MATERIALISM, the doctrine which resolves the thinking principle in man,

or the immaterial and immortal soul with which God was pleased to endue

Adam at his creation, into mere matter, or into a faculty resulting from

its organization. Much has been written of late years against this

doctrine, and the different modifications which it has assumed; but in

substance nothing new has been said on either side; and the able and

condensed argument of Wollaston in his Religion of Nature Delineated,”

if well considered, will furnish every one with a most clear and

satisfactory refutation of this antiscriptural and irrational

error:--The soul cannot be mere matter: for if it is, then either all

matter must think; or the difference must arise from the different

modification, magnitude, figure, or motion of some parcels of matter in

respect of others; or a faculty of thinking must be superadded to some

systems of it, which is not superadded to others. But in the first

place, that position, which makes all matter to be cogitative, is

contrary to all the apprehensions and knowledge we have of the nature of

it; nor can it be true, unless our senses and faculties be contrived

only to deceive us. We perceive not the least symptom of cogitation or

sense in our tables, chairs, &c. Why doth the scene of thinking lie in

our heads, and all the ministers of sensation make their reports to

something there, if all matter be apprehensive and cogitative? For in

that case there would be as much thought and understanding in our heels,

and every where else, as in our heads. If all matter be cogitative, then

it must be so _quatenus_ [so far forth as] matter, and thinking must be

of the essence and definition of it; whereas by matter no more is meant

than a substance extended and impenetrable to other matter. And since,

for this reason, it cannot be necessary for matter to think, (because it

may be matter without this property,) it cannot think as matter only; if

it did, we should not only continue to think always, till the matter of

which we consist is annihilated, and so the asserter of this doctrine

would stumble upon immortality unawares; but we must also have thought

always in time past, ever since that matter was in being; nor could

there be any the least intermission of actual thinking; which does not

appear to be our case. If thinking, self-consciousness, &c, were

essential to matter, every part of it must have them; and then no system

could have them. For a system of material parts would be a system of

things conscious, every one by itself of its own existence and

individuality, and, consequently, thinking by itself; but there could be

no one act of self-consciousness or thought common to the whole.

Juxtaposition, in this case, could signify nothing; the distinction and

individuation of the several particles would be as much retained in

their vicinity, as if they were separated by miles.

In the next place, the faculties of thinking, &c, cannot arise from the

size, figure, texture, or motion of it; because bodies by the alteration

of these only become greater or less, round or square, &c, rare or

dense, translated from one place to another with this or that new

direction or velocity, or the like; all which ideas are quite different

from that of thinking; there can be no relation between them. These

modifications and affections of matter are so far from being principles

or causes of thinking and acting, that they are themselves but effects,

proceeding from the action of some other matter or thing upon it, and

are proofs of its passivity, deadness and utter incapacity of becoming

cogitative: this is evident to sense. They who place the essence of the

soul in a certain motion given to some matter, (if any such men there

really be,) should consider, among many other things, that to move the

body spontaneously, is one of the faculties of the soul; and that this,

which is the same with the power of beginning motion, cannot come from

motion already begun, and impressed _ab extra_. Let the materialist

examine well, whether he does not feel something within himself that

acts from an internal principle; whether he does not experience some

liberty, some power of governing himself, and choosing; whether he does

not enjoy a kind of invisible empire in which he commands his own

thoughts, sends them to this or that place, employs them about this or

that business, forms such and such designs and schemes; and whether

there is any thing like this in bare matter, however fashioned or

proportioned; which, if nothing should protrude or communicate motion to

it, would for ever remain fixed to the place where it happens to be, an

eternal monument of its own being dead. Can such an active being as the

soul is, the subject of so many powers, be itself nothing but an

accident? When I begin to move myself, I do it for some reason, and with

respect to some end, the means to effect which I have, if there be

occasion for it, concerted within myself; and this does not at all look

like motion merely material, or in which matter is only concerned, which

is all mechanical. Who can imagine matter to be moved by arguments, or

ever placed syllogisms and demonstrations among levers and pullies? We

not only move ourselves upon reasons which we find in ourselves, but

upon reasons imparted by words or writings from others, or perhaps

merely at their desire or bare suggestion: in which case, again, nobody

surely can imagine that the words spoken or written, the sound in the

air, or the strokes on the paper, can, by any natural or mechanical

efficience, cause the reader or hearer to move in any determinate

manner, or at all. The reason, request, or friendly admonition, which is

the true motive, can make no impression upon matter. It must be some

other kind of being that apprehends the force and sense of them. Do not

we see in conversation, how a pleasant thing said makes people break out

into laughter, a rude thing into passion, and so on? These affections

cannot be the physical effects of the words spoken; because then they

would have the same effect, whether they were understood or not. And

this is farther demonstrable from hence, that though the words do really

contain nothing which is either pleasant or rude, or perhaps words are

thought to be spoken which are not spoken; yet if they are apprehended

to do that, or the sound to be otherwise than it was, the effect will be

the same. It is therefore the sense of the words, which is an immaterial

thing, that by passing through the understanding, and causing that which

is the subject of the intellectual faculties to influence the body,

produces these motions in the spirits, blood, and muscles.

They who can fancy that matter may come to live, think, and act

spontaneously, by being reduced to a certain magnitude, or having its

parts placed after a certain manner, or being invested with such a

figure, or excited by such a particular motion; they, I say, would do

well to discover to us that degree of fineness, that alteration in the

situation of its parts, &c, at which matter may begin to find itself

alive and cogitative; and which is the critical minute, that introduces

these important properties. If they cannot do this, nor have their eye

upon any particular crisis, it is a sign that they have no good reason

for what they say. For if they have no reason to charge this change upon

any particular degree or difference, one more than another, they have no

reason to charge it upon any degree or difference at all; and then they

have no reason by which they can prove that such a change is made at

all. Beside all which, since magnitude, figure, and motion are but

accidents of matter, not matter, and only the substance is truly matter;

and since the substance of any one part of matter does not differ from

that of another, if any matter can be by nature cogitative, all must be

so: but this we have seen cannot be. So then, in conclusion, if there is

any such thing as matter that thinks, &c, this must be a particular

privilege granted to it; that is, a faculty of thinking must be

superadded to certain parts or parcels of it; which, by the way, must

infer the existence of some being able to confer this faculty; who, when

the ineptness of matter has been well considered, cannot appear to be

less than omnipotent, or God. But the truth is, matter seems not to be

capable of such improvement, of being made to think. For since it is not

the essence of matter, it cannot be made to be so without making matter

another kind of substance from what it is. Nor can it be made to arise

from any of the modifications or accidents of matter; and in respect of

what else can any matter be made to differ from other matter.

The accidents of matter are so far from being made by any power to

produce cogitation, that some even of them show it incapable of having a

faculty of thinking superadded. The very divisibility of it does this.

For that which is made to think must either be one part, or more parts

joined together. But we know no such thing as a part of matter purely

one, or indivisible. It may, indeed, have pleased the Author of nature,

that there should be atoms, whose parts are actually indiscerptible, and

which may be the principles of other bodies; but still they consist of

parts, though firmly adhering together. And if the seat of cogitation be

in more parts than one, whether they lie close together, or are loose,

or in a state of fluidity, it is the same thing, how can it be avoided,

but that either there must be so many several minds, or thinking

substances, as there are parts, and then the consequence which has been

mentioned would return upon us again; or else that there must be

something else superadded for them to centre in, to unite their acts,

and make their thoughts to be one? And then what can this be but some

other substance, which is purely one?

Matter by itself can never entertain abstracted and general ideas, such

as many in our minds are. For could it reflect upon what passes within

itself, it could possibly find there nothing but material and particular

impressions; abstractions and metaphysical ideas could not be printed

upon it. How could one abstract from matter who is himself nothing but

matter?

If the soul were mere matter, external visible objects could only be

perceived within us according to the impressions they make upon matter,

and not otherwise. For instance: the image of a cube in my mind, or my

idea of a cube, must be always under some particular prospect, and

conform to the rules of perspective; nor could I otherwise represent it

to myself; whereas now I can form an idea of it as it is in itself, and

almost view all its _hedræ_ at once, as it were encompassing it with my

mind. I can within myself correct the external appearances and

impressions of objects, and advance, upon the reports and hints received

by my senses, to form ideas of things that are not extant in matter. By

seeing a material circle I may learn to form the idea of a circle, or

figure generated by the revolution of a ray about its centre; but then,

recollecting what I know of matter upon other occasions, I can conclude

there is no exact material circle. So that I have an idea, which perhaps

was raised from the hints I received from without, but is not truly to

be found there. If I see a tower at a great distance, which, according

to the impressions made upon my material organs, seems little and round,

I do not therefore conclude it to be either; there is something within

that reasons upon the circumstances of the appearance, and as it were

commands my sense, and corrects the impression; and this must be

something superior to matter, since a material soul is no otherwise

impressible itself but as material organs are: instances of this kind

are endless. If we know any thing of matter, we know that by itself it

is a lifeless thing, inert and passive only; and acts necessarily, or

rather is acted, according to the laws of motion and gravitation. This

passiveness seems to be essential to it. And if we know any thing of

ourselves, we know that we are conscious of our own existence and acts,

that is, that we live; that we have a degree of freedom; that we can

move ourselves spontaneously; and, in short, that we can, in many

instances, take off the effect of gravitation, and impress new motions

upon our spirits, or give them new directions, only by a thought.

Therefore, to make mere matter do all this is to change the nature of

it; to change death into life, incapacity of thinking into cogitativity,

necessity into liberty. And to say that God may superadd a faculty of

thinking, moving itself, &c, to matter, if by this be meant, that he may

make matter to be the _suppositum_ of these faculties, that substance in

which they inhere, is the same in effect as to say, that God may

superadd a faculty of thinking to incogitativity, of acting freely to

necessity, and so on. What sense is there in this? And yet so it must

be, while matter continues to be matter.

That faculty of thinking, so much talked of by some as superadded to

certain systems of matter, fitly disposed, by virtue of God’s

omnipotence, though it be so called, must in reality amount to the same

thing as another substance with the faculty of thinking. For a faculty

of thinking alone will not make up the idea of a human soul, which is

endued with many faculties; apprehending, reflecting, comparing,

judging, making deductions and reasoning, willing, putting the body in

motion, continuing the animal functions by its presence, and giving

life; and therefore, whatever it is that is superadded, it must be

something which is endued with all those other faculties. And whether

that can be a faculty of thinking, and so these other faculties be only

faculties of a faculty, or whether they must not all be rather the

faculties of some substance, which, being by their own concession,

superadded to matter, must be different from it, we leave the

unprejudiced to determine. If men would but seriously look into

themselves, the soul would not appear to them as a faculty of the body,

or a kind of appurtenance to it, but rather as some substance, properly

placed in it, not only to use it as an instrument, and act by it, but

also to govern it, or the parts of it, as the tongue, hands, feet, &c,

according to its own reason. For I think it is plain enough, that the

mind, though it acts under great limitations, doth, however, in many

instances govern the body arbitrarily; and it is monstrous to suppose

this governor to be nothing but some fit disposition or accident,

superadded, of that matter which is governed. A ship, it is true, would

not be fit for navigation, if it was not built and provided in a proper

manner; but then, when it has its proper form, and is become a system of

materials fitly disposed, it is not this disposition that governs it: it

is the man, that other substance, who sits at the helm, and they who

manage the sails and tackle, that do this. So our vessels without a

proper organization and conformity of parts would not be capable of

being acted as they are; but still it is not the shape, or modification,

or any other accident, that can govern them. The capacity of being

governed or used can never be the governor, applying and using that

capacity. No, there must be at the helm something distinct, that

commands the body, and without which the vessel would run adrift or

rather sink.

For the foregoing reasons it is plain, that matter cannot think, cannot

be made to think. But if a faculty of thinking can be superadded to a

system of matter, without uniting an immaterial substance to it; yet a

human body is not such a system, being plainly void of thought, and

organized in such a manner as to transmit the impressions of sensible

objects up to the brain, where the percipient, and that which reflects

upon them, certainly resides; and therefore that which there apprehends,

thinks, and wills, must be that system of matter to which a faculty of

thinking is superadded. All the premises then well considered, judge

whether, instead of saying that this inhabitant of our heads (the soul)

is a system of matter to which a faculty of thinking is superadded, it

might not be more reasonable to say, it is a thinking substance

intimately united to some fine material vehicle, which has its residence

in the brain. Though I understand not perfectly the manner how a

cogitative and spiritual substance can be thus closely united to such a

material vehicle, yet I can understand this union as well as how it can

be united to the body in general, perhaps as how the particles of the

body itself cohere together, and much better than how a thinking faculty

can be superadded to matter; and beside, several phenomena may more

easily be solved by this hypothesis; which, in short, is this, that the

human soul is a cogitative substance united to a material vehicle; that

these act in conjunction, that which affects the one affecting the

other; that the soul is detained in the body till the habitation is

spoiled, and their mutual tendency interrupted, by some hurt or disease,

or by the decays and ruins of old age, or the like.

But many a man, says Mr. Rennell, has maintained, that the brain has the

power of thought, from the conclusions which his own experience, and,

perhaps, his extended knowledge of the human frame, have enabled him to

draw. He has observed the action of the brain, has watched the progress

of its diseases, and has seen the close connection which exists between

many of its afflictions, and the power of thought. But in this, as in

most other cases, partial knowledge leads him to a more mistaken view of

the matter than total ignorance. Satisfied with the correctness of his

observations, he hastily proceeds to form his opinion, forgetting that

it is not on the truth only, but on the whole truth, that he should rest

his decision. By an accidental blow, the scull is beaten in, the brain

is pressed upon, and the patient lies without sense or feeling. No

sooner is the pressure removed than the power of thought immediately

returns. It is known, again, that the phenomena of fainting arise from a

temporary deficiency of blood in the brain; the vessels collapse, and

the loss of sense immediately ensues. Restore the circulation, and the

sense is as instantly recovered. On the contrary, when the circulation

in the brain is too rapid, and inflammation of the organ succeeds, we

find that delirium, frenzy, and other disorders of the mind arise in

proportion to the inflammatory action, by which they are apparently

produced. It is observed, also, that when the stomach is disordered by

an excess of wine, or of ardent spirits, the brain is also affected

through the strong sympathies of the nervous system, the intellect is

disordered, and the man has no longer a rational command over himself or

his actions. From these, and other circumstances of a similar nature, it

is concluded, that thought is a quality or function of the brain, that

it is inseparable from the organ in which it resides, and as Mr.

Lawrence, after the French physiologists, represents it, that medullary

matter thinks.”

Now it must certainly be inferred from all these circumstances, that

there is a close connection between the power of thinking and the brain;

but it by no means follows, that they are, therefore, one and the same.

Allowing, however, for a moment, the justice of the inference, from the

premises which have been stated, we must remember, that we have not as

yet taken in all the circumstances of the case. We have watched the body

rather than the mind, and that only in a diseased state; and from this

partial and imperfect view of the subject, our conclusions have been

deduced. Let us take a healthy man in a sound sleep. He lies without

sense or feeling, yet no part of his frame is diseased, nor is a single

power of his life of vegetation suspended. All within his body is as

active as ever. The blood circulates as regularly, and, almost as

rapidly, in the sleeping as in the waking subject. Digestion, secretion,

nutrition, and all the functions of the life of vegetation proceed, and

yet the understanding is absent. Sleep, therefore, is an affection of

the mind, rather than of the body; and the refreshment which the latter

receives from it, is from the suspension of its active and agitating

principle. Now if thought was identified with the brain, when the former

was suspended, the latter would undergo a proportionate change. Memory,

imagination, perception, and all the stupendous powers of the human

intellect are absent; and yet the brain is precisely the same, the same

in every particle of matter, the same in every animal function. Of not a

single organ is the action suspended. When, again, the man awakens, and

his senses return, no change is produced by the recovery; the brain, the

organs of sense, and all the material parts of his frame remain

precisely in the same condition. Dreaming may perhaps be adduced as an

exception to this statement. But it is first to be remarked, that this

affection is by no means general. There are thousands who never dream at

all, and thousands who dream only occasionally. Dreaming therefore, even

though it were to be allowed as an exception, could not be admitted to

invalidate the rule. And if there be a circumstance, which to any

philosophic mind will clearly intimate the independency of thought upon

matter, it is the phenomenon of dreaming. Perception, that faculty of

the soul which unites it with the external world, is then suspended, and

the avenues of sense are closed. All communication with outward objects

being thus removed, the soul is transported, as it were, into a world of

its own creation. There appears to be an activity in the motions, and a

perfection in the faculties, of the mind, when disengaged from the body,

and disencumbered of its material organs. The slumber of its external

perception seems to be but the awakening of every other power. The

memory is far more keen, the fancy far more vivid, in the dreaming than

in the waking man. Ideas rise in rapid succession, and are varied in

endless combination; so that the judgment, which, next to the

perception, depends most upon external objects, is unable to follow the

imagination in all its wild and unwearied flights. A better notion of

the separate and independent existence of the soul cannot be formed,

than that which we derive from our observations on the phenomena of

dreaming. Again: when the mind is anxiously engaged in any train of

thought, whether in company or alone, it frequently neglects the

impressions made upon the external organs. When a man is deeply immersed

in meditation, or eagerly engaged in a discussion, he often neither

hears a third person when he speaks, nor observes what he does, nor even

when gently touched does he feel the pressure. Yet there is no defect

either in the ear, the eye, or the nervous system; the brain is not

disordered, for if his mind were not so fully occupied, he would

perceive every one of those impressions which he now neglects. In this

case, therefore, as in sleep, the independence of mind upon the external

organ is clearly shown.

A Biblical and Theological Dictionary explanatory of the history, manners, and customs of the Jews, and neighbouring nations · 第 159 / 253 段