2. To understand the nature of this “election,” as applied sometimes to

particular bodies of Christians, as when St. Peter says, “The church

which is at Babylon, _elected together_ with you,” and sometimes to the

whole body of believers every where; and also the reason of the frequent

use of the term _election_, and of the occurrence of allusions to the

fact; it is to be remembered, that a great religious revolution, so to

speak, had occurred in the age of the Apostles; with the full import of

which we cannot, without calling in the aid of a little reflection, be

adequately impressed. This change was no other than the abrogation of

the _church state_ of the Jews, which had continued for so many ages.

They had been the only visibly acknowledged people of God in all the

nations of the earth; for whatever pious people might have existed in

other nations, they were not, in the sight of men, and collectively,

acknowledged as “the people of Jehovah.” They had no written

revelations, no appointed ministry, no forms of authorized initiation

into his church and covenant, no appointed holy days, or sanctioned

ritual. All these were peculiar to the Jews, who were, therefore, an

elected and peculiar people. This distinguished honour they were about

to lose. They might have retained it as Christians, had they been

willing to admit the believing Gentiles of all nations to share it with

them; but the great reason of their peculiarity and election, _as a

nation_, was terminated by the coming of the Messiah, who was to be “a

light to lighten the Gentiles,” as well as “the glory of his people

Israel.” Their pride and consequent unbelief resented this, which will

explain their enmity to the believing part of the Gentiles, who, when

that which St. Paul calls “the fellowship of the mystery” was fully

explained, chiefly by the glorious ministry of that Apostle himself,

were called into that church relation and visible acknowledgment as the

people of God, which the Jews had formerly enjoyed, and that with even a

higher degree of glory, in proportion to the superior spirituality of

the new dispensation. It was this doctrine which excited that strong

irritation in the minds of the unbelieving Jews, and in some partially

Christianized ones, to which so many references are made in the New

Testament. They were “provoked,” were made “jealous;” and were often

roused to the madness of persecuting opposition by it. There was then a

_new election_ of a _new people_ of God, to be composed of Jews, not by

virtue of their _natural descent_, but through their faith in Christ,

and of Gentiles of all nations, also believing, and put as believers, on

an equal ground with the believing Jews: and there was also a

_rejection_, a reprobation, but not an absolute one; for _the election_

was offered to the Jews first, in every place, by offering them the

Gospel. Some embraced it, and submitted to be the elect people of God,

on the new ground of faith, instead of the old one of natural descent;

and therefore the Apostle, Rom. xi, 7, calls the believing part of the

Jews, “the _election_,” in opposition to those who opposed this

“election of grace,” and still clung to their former and now repealed

election as Jews and the descendants of Abraham: “But the election hath

obtained it, and the rest were blinded.” The offer had been made to the

whole nation; all might have joined the one body of believing Jews and

believing Gentiles; but the major part of them refused: they would not

“come into the supper;” they made “light of it;” light of an election

founded on faith, and which placed the relation of “the people of God”

upon spiritual attainments, and offered to them only spiritual

blessings. They were, therefore, deprived of election and church

relationship of every kind: their temple was burned; their political

state abolished; their genealogies confounded; their worship annihilated

and all visible acknowledgment of them; by God as a church withdrawn,

and transferred to a church henceforward to be composed chiefly of

Gentiles: and thus, says St. Paul, “were fulfilled the words of Moses, I

will provoke you to jealousy by them that are _no people_, and by a

foolish,” ignorant and idolatrous, “people I will anger you.” It is

easy, therefore, to see what is the import of the “calling” and

“election” of the Christian church, as spoken of in the New Testament.

It was not the calling and the electing of one nation in particular to

succeed the Jews; but it was the calling and the electing of believers

in all nations, wherever the Gospel should be preached, to be in reality

what the Jews typically, and therefore in an inferior degree, had

been,--the visible church of God, “his people,” under Christ “the Head;”

with an authenticated revelation; with an appointed ministry, never to

be lost; with authorized worship; with holy days and festivals; with

instituted forms of initiation; and with special protection and favour.

3. The _third_ kind of election is personal election; or the election of

individuals to be the children of God, and the heirs of eternal life.

This is not a choosing to particular offices and service, which is the

first kind of election we have mentioned; nor is it that collective

election to religious privileges and a visible church state, of which we

have spoken. For although “the elect” have an individual interest in

such an election as parts of the collective body, thus placed in

possession of the ordinances of Christianity; yet many others have the

same advantages, who still remain under the guilt and condemnation of

sin and practical unbelief. The individuals properly called “the elect,”

are they who have been made partakers of the grace and saving efficacy

of the Gospel. “Many,” says our Lord, “are _called_, but few _chosen_.”

What true personal election is, we shall find explained in two clear

passages of Scripture. It is explained by our Lord, where he says to his

disciples, “I have chosen you out of the world:” and by St. Peter, when

he addresses his First Epistle to the “elect according to the

foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit,

unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus.” To be elected,

therefore, is to be separated from “the world,” and to be sanctified by

the Spirit, and by the blood of Christ. It follows, then, not only that

election is an act of God done in _time_, but also that it is subsequent

to the administration of the means of salvation. The “calling” goes

before the “election;” the publication of the doctrine of “the Spirit,”

and the atonement, called by Peter “the sprinkling of the blood of

Christ,” before that “sanctification” through which they become “the

elect” of God. In a word, “the elect” are the body of true believers;

and personal election into the family of God is through personal faith.

All who truly believe are elected; and all to whom the Gospel is sent

have, through the grace that accompanies it, the power to believe placed

within their reach; and all such might, therefore, attain to the grace

of personal election.

ELEMENTS, ϛοιχεῖα, the elements or first principles of any art, whence

the subsequent parts proceed. The elements or first principles of the

Christian doctrine, Heb, v, 12. St. Paul calls the ceremonial ordinances

of the Mosaic law, “worldly elements,” Gal. iv, 3; Col. ii, 8, 20; “weak

and beggarly elements,” Gal. iv, 9. Elements, as containing the

rudiments of the knowledge of Christ, to which knowledge the law, as a

pedagogue, Gal. iii, 24, was intended, by means of those ordinances, to

bring the Jews; worldly, as consisting in outward worldly institutions,

Heb. ix, 1; weak and beggarly, when considered in themselves, and set up

in opposition to the great realities to which they were designed to

lead. But, in Col. ii, 8, the elements or rudiments of the world are so

closely connected with philosophy and vain deceit, or an empty and

deceitful philosophy, that they must be understood there to include the

dogmas of Pagan philosophy; to which, no doubt, many of the Colossians

were in their unconverted state attached, and of which the Judaizing

teachers, who also were probably themselves infected with them, took

advantage to withdraw the Colossian converts from the purity of the

Gospel, and from Christ their living head. And from the general tenor of

this chapter, and particularly from verses 18–23, it appears, that these

philosophical dogmas, against which the Apostle cautioned his converts,

were partly Platonic, and partly Pythagorean; the former teaching the

worship of angels, or demons, as mediators between God and man; the

latter enjoining such abstinence from particular kinds of meats and

drinks, and such severe mortifications of the body, as God had not

commanded.

ELI, a high priest of the Hebrews, of the race of Ithamar, who succeeded

Abdon, and governed the Hebrews, both as priest and judge, during forty

years. How Eli came to the high priesthood, and how this dignity was

transferred from Eleazar’s family to that of Ithamar, who was Aaron’s

youngest son, we know not. This much, however, is certain, that it was

not done without an express declaration of God’s will, 1 Sam. ii, 27,

&c. In the reign of Solomon, the predictions in relation to Eli’s family

were fulfilled; for the high priesthood was taken from Abiathar, a

descendant of Eli, and given to Zadok, who was of the race of Eleazar, 1

Kings ii, 26. Eli appears to have been a pious, but indolent man,

blinded by paternal affection, who suffered his sons to gain the

ascendancy over him; and for want either of personal courage, or zeal

for the glory of God sufficient to restrain their licentious conduct, he

permitted them to go on to their own and his ruin. Thus he carried his

indulgence to cruelty; while a more dignified and austere conduct on his

part might have rendered them wise and virtuous, and thereby have

preserved himself and family. A striking lesson for parents! God

admonished him by Samuel, then a child; and Eli received those awful

admonitions with a mind fully resigned to the divine will. “It is the

Lord,” said he, “let him do what seemeth him good.” God deferred the

execution of his vengeance many years. At length, however, Hophni and

Phineas, the sons of Eli, were slain by the Philistines, the ark of the

Lord was taken, and Eli himself, hearing this melancholy news, fell

backward from his chair and broke his neck, in the ninety-eighth year of

his age, 1 Sam. iv, 12, 18.

ELIEZER, a native of Damascus, and the steward of Abraham’s house. It

seems that Abraham, before the birth of Isaac, intended to make him his

heir:--“One born in my house,” a domestic slave, “is mine heir,” Gen.

xv, 1–3. He was afterward sent into Mesopotamia, to procure a wife for

Isaac, Gen. xxiv, 2, 3, &c; which business he accomplished with fidelity

and expedition. “It is still the custom in India,” says Forbes,

“especially among the Mohammedans, that in default of children, and

sometimes where there are lineal descendants, the master of a family

adopts a slave, frequently a Haffshee Abyssinian, of the darkest hue,

for his heir. He educates him agreeably to his wishes, and marries him

to one of his daughters. As the reward of superior merit, or to suit the

caprice of an arbitrary despot, this honour is also conferred on a slave

recently purchased, or already grown up in the family; and to him he

bequeaths his wealth, in preference to his nephews, or any collateral

branches. This is a custom of great antiquity in the east, and prevalent

among the most refined and civilized nations. In the earliest period of

the patriarchal history, we find Abraham complaining for want of

children; and declaring that either Eliezer of Damascus, or probably one

born from him in his house, was his heir, to the exclusion of Lot, his

favourite nephew, and all the other collateral branches of his family.”

ELIHU, one of Job’s friends, a descendant of Nahor, Job xxxii, 2. See

JOB.

ELIJAH. Elijah or Elias, a prophet, was a native of Tishbe beyond Jordan

in Gilead. Some think that he was a priest descended from Aaron, and say

that one Sabaca was his father; but this has no authority. He was raised

up by God, to be set like a wall of brass, in opposition to idolatry,

and particularly to the worship of Baal, which Jezebel and Ahab

supported in Israel. The Scripture introduces Elijah saying to Ahab, 1

Kings xvii, 1, 2, A. M. 3092, “As the Lord God of Israel liveth, before

whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, but according

to my word.” It is remarkable, that the number of years is not here

specified; but in the New Testament we are informed that it was three

years and six months. By the prohibition of dew as well as rain, the

whole vegetable kingdom was deprived of that moisture, without which

neither the more hardy, nor more delicate kinds of plants could shoot

into herbage, or bring that herbage to maturity. The Lord commanded

Elijah to conceal himself beyond Jordan, near the brook Cherith. He

obeyed, and God sent ravens to him morning and evening, which brought

him flesh and bread. Scheuzer observes, that he cannot think that the

_orebim_ of the Hebrew, rendered “ravens,” means, as some have thought,

the inhabitants of a town called _Oreb_, nor a troop of Arabs called

_orbhim_; and contends that the bird called the raven, or one of the

same genus is intended. Suppose that Elijah was concealed from Ahab in

some rocky or mountainous spot, where travellers never came; and that

here a number of voracious birds had built their nests upon the trees

which grew around it, or upon a projecting rock, &c. These flying every

day to procure food for their young, the prophet availed himself of a

part of what they brought; and while they, obeying the dictates of

nature, designed only to provide for their offspring, Divine providence

directed them to provide at the same time for the wants of Elijah. What,

therefore, he collected, whether from their nests, from what they

dropped, or under a supernatural influence, brought to him, or

occasionally from all these means, was enough for his daily support.

“And the _orebim_ furnished him bread or flesh in the morning, and bread

or flesh in the evening.” But as there were probably several of them,

some might furnish bread and others flesh, as it happened; so that a

little from each formed his solitary but satisfactory meal. To such

straits was the exiled prophet driven! perhaps these _orebim_ were not

strictly ravens, but rooks. The word rendered _raven_, includes the

whole genus, among which are some less impure than the raven, as the

rook. Rooks living in numerous societies are supposed by some to be the

kind of birds employed on this occasion rather than ravens, which fly

only in pairs. But upon all these explanations we may observe, that when

an event is evidently miraculous, it is quite superfluous, and often

absurd, to invent hypotheses to make it appear more easy. After a time

the brook dried up, and God sent Elijah to Zarephath, a city of the

Sidonians. At the city gate he met with a widow woman gathering sticks,

from whom he desired a little water, adding, “Bring me, I pray thee,

also a morsel of bread.” She answered, “As the Lord liveth, I have no

bread, but only a handful of meal, and a little oil in a cruse; and I am

gathering some sticks, that I may dress it for me and my son, that we

may eat it, and die.” Elijah said, “Make first a little cake, and bring

it me, and afterward make for thee and thy son: for thus saith the Lord,

the barrel of meal shall not waste, neither shall the cruse of oil fail,

until the day the Lord sendeth rain upon the earth.” His prediction was

fully accomplished, and he dwelt at the house of this widow. Some time

after, the son of this woman fell sick, and died. The mother,

overwhelmed with grief, intreated the assistance and interposition of

Elijah, who taking the child in his arms laid him on his own bed, and

cried to the Lord for the restoration of the child’s life. The Lord

heard the prophet’s petition, and restored the child.

2. After three years of drought the Lord commanded Elijah to show

himself to Ahab. The famine being great in Samaria, Ahab sent the people

throughout the country, to inquire after places where they might find

forage for the cattle. Obadiah, an officer of the king’s household,

being thus employed, Elijah presented himself, and directed him to tell

Ahab, “Behold, Elijah is here!” Ahab came to meet the prophet, and

reproached him as the cause of the famine. Elijah retorted the charge

upon the king, and his iniquities, and challenged Ahab to gather the

people together, and the prophets of Baal, that it might be determined

by a sign from heaven, the falling of fire upon the sacrifice, who was

the true God. In this the prophet obeyed the impulse of the Spirit of

God; and Ahab, either under an influence of which he was not conscious,

or blindly confident in the cause of idolatry, followed Elijah’s

direction, and convened the people of Israel, and four hundred prophets

of Baal. The prophets of Baal prepared their altar, sacrificed their

bullock, placed it on the altar, and called upon their gods. They leaped

upon the altar, and cut themselves after their manner, crying with all

their might. Elijah ridiculed them, and said, “Cry aloud, for he is god;

either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or

peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.” When midday was past,

Elijah repaired the altar of the Lord; and with twelve stones, in

allusion to the twelve tribes of Israel, he built a new altar. He then

laid his bullock upon the wood, poured a great quantity of water three

times upon the sacrifice and the wood, so that the water filled the

trench which was dug round the altar. After this he prayed, and, in

answer to his prayer, the Lord sent fire from heaven, and consumed the

wood, the burnt sacrifice, the stones, and dust of the place, and even

dried up the water in the trench. Upon this, all the people fell on

their faces, and exclaimed, “The Lord, he is the God.” Elijah then,

having excited the people to slay the false prophets of Baal, said to

Ahab, “Go home, eat and drink, for I hear the sound of abundance of

rain;” which long-expected blessing descended from heaven according to

his prediction, and gave additional proof to the truth of his mission

from the only living and true God.

3. Jezebel, the wife of Ahab, threatened Elijah for having slain her

prophets. He therefore fled to Beersheba, in the south of Judah, and

thence into Arabia Petrea. In the evening, being exhausted with fatigue,

he laid himself down under a juniper tree, and prayed God to take him

out of the world. An angel touched him, and he arose, and saw a cake

baked on the coals, and a cruse of water; and he ate and drank, and

slept again. The angel again awakened him, and said, “Rise and eat, for

the journey is too great for thee;” and he ate and drank, and went in

the strength of that meat forty days and forty nights, unto Horeb, the

mount of God. Here he had visions of the glory and majesty of God, and

conversed with him; and was commanded to return to the wilderness of

Damascus, to anoint Hazael king over Syria, and Jehu king over Israel,

and to appoint Elisha his successor in the prophetic office. Some years

after, Ahab having seized Naboth’s vineyard, the Lord commanded Elijah

to reprove Ahab for the crime he had committed. Elijah met him going to

Naboth’s vineyard to take possession of it, and said, “In the place

where dogs licked the blood of Naboth, shall they lick thy blood, even

thine. And the dogs shall eat Jezebel by the wall of Jezreel.” Both of

which predictions were fulfilled in the presence of the people. Ahaziah,

king of Israel, being hurt by a fall from the platform of his house,

sent to consult Baalzebub, the god of Ekron, whether he should recover.

Elijah met the messengers, and said to them, “Is it because there is no

God in Israel that ye go to inquire of Baalzebub, the god of Ekron? Now,

therefore, saith the Lord, Thou shalt surely die.” The messengers of

Ahaziah returned, and informed the king, that a stranger had told them

he should certainly die; and Ahaziah knew that this was the Prophet

Elijah. The king, therefore, sent a captain with his company of fifty

men, to apprehend him; and when the officer was come to Elijah, who was

sitting upon a hill, he said, “Thou man of God, the king commands thee

to come down.” Elijah answered, “If I be a man of God, let fire come

down from heaven, and consume thee and thy fifty.” The prophet’s words

were followed with the effect predicted. The king sent another captain,

who was also consumed; but a third captain going to Elijah intreated him

to save him and his people’s lives, and Elijah accompanied him to the

king. By these fearful miracles he was accredited to this successor of

Ahab as a prophet of the true God, and the destruction of these

companies of armed men was a demonstration of God’s anger against the

people at large. Elijah could not in this case act from any other

impulse than that of the Spirit of God.

4. Elijah, understanding by revelation that God would soon translate him

out of this world, was desirous of concealing this fact from Elisha, his

inseparable companion. He therefore said to Elisha, “Tarry thou here,

for the Lord hath sent me to Bethel.” But Elisha answered, “I will not

leave thee.” At Bethel, Elijah said, “Tarry thou here, the Lord hath

sent me to Jericho;” but Elisha replied, he would not forsake him. At

Jericho Elijah desired him to stay; but Elisha would not leave him. They

went therefore together to Jordan, and fifty of the sons of the prophets

followed them at a distance. When they were come to the Jordan, Elijah

took his mantle, and with it struck the waters, which divided, and they

went over on dry ground. Elijah then said to Elisha, “Ask what I shall

do for thee before I be taken away from thee.” “I pray thee,” said

Elisha, “let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me;” that is, obtain

the gift of prophecy from God for me, in the same measure that thou

possessest it. Double may signify like; or the gift of prophecy, and of

miracles, in a degree double to what thou dost possess, or to what I now

possess. Elijah answered, “Thou hast asked me a very hard thing; yet, if

thou see me when I am taken from thee, it shall be so unto thee; but if

not, it shall not be so.” As they journeyed, a fiery chariot, with

horses of fire, suddenly separated them, and Elijah was carried in a

whirlwind to heaven; while Elisha exclaimed, “My father, my father, the

chariots of Israel and the horsemen thereof!”

5. Elijah was one of the most eminent of that illustrious and singular

race of men, the Jewish prophets. Every part of his character is marked

by a moral grandeur, which is heightened by the obscurity thrown around

his connections, and his private history. He often wears the air of a

supernatural messenger suddenly issuing from another world, to declare

the commands of heaven, and to awe the proudest mortals by the menace of

fearful judgments. His boldness in reproof; his lofty zeal for the

honour of God; his superiority to softness, ease, and suffering, are the

characters of a man filled with the Holy Spirit; and he was admitted to

great intimacy with God, and enabled to work miracles of a very

extraordinary and unequivocal character. These were called for by the

stupid idolatry of the age, and were in some instances equally

calculated to demonstrate the being and power of Jehovah, and to punish

those who had forsaken him for idols. The author of Ecclesiasticus has

an encomium to his memory, and justly describes him as a prophet “who

stood up as fire, and whose word burned as a lamp.” In the sternness and

power of his reproofs he was a striking type of John the Baptist, and

the latter is therefore prophesied of, under his name. Malachi, iv, 5,

6, has this passage: “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet, before

the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.” Our Saviour also

declares that Elijah had already come in spirit, in the person of John

the Baptist. At the transfiguration of our Saviour, Elijah and Moses

both appeared and conversed with him respecting his future passion,

Matt. xvii, 3, 4; Mark ix, 4; Luke ix, 30. Many of the Jews in our

Lord’s time believed him to be Elijah, or that the soul of Elijah had

passed into his body, Matt. xvi, 14; Mark vi, 15; Luke ix, 8. In

conclusion, we may observe, that to assure the world of the future

existence of good men in a state of glory and felicity, and that in

bodies changed from mortality to immortality, each of the three grand

dispensations of religion had its instance of translation into heaven;

the patriarchal in the person of ENOCH, the Jewish in the person of

ELIJAH, and the Christian in the person of CHRIST.

A Biblical and Theological Dictionary explanatory of the history, manners, and customs of the Jews, and neighbouring nations · 第 86 / 253 段