3. That this system of the cabbalistic philosophy, which we may consider

as the acroamatic, esoteric, or concealed doctrine of the Jews, by way

of contradistinction from the exoretic or popular doctrine, was not of

Hebrew origin, we may conclude with a very great degree of probability,

from the total dissimilarity of its abstruse and mysterious doctrines to

the simple principles of religion taught in the Mosaic law; and that it

was borrowed from the Egyptian schools will sufficiently appear from a

comparison of its tenets with those of the oriental and Alexandrian

philosophy. Many writers have, indeed, imagined that they have found in

the cabbalistic dogmas a near resemblance of the doctrines of

Christianity; and they have thought that the fundamental principles of

this mystical system were derived from divine revelation. This opinion,

however, may be traced up to a prejudice which originated with the Jews,

and passed from them to the Christian fathers, by which they were led to

ascribe all Pagan wisdom to a Hebrew origin: a notion which very

probably took its rise in Egypt, when Pagan tenets first crept in among

the Jews. Philo, Josephus, and other learned Jews, in order to flatter

their own vanity, and that of their countrymen, industriously propagated

this opinion; and the more learned fathers of the Christian church, who

entertained a high opinion of the Platonic philosophy, hastily adopted

it, from an imagination that if they could trace back the most valuable

doctrines of Paganism to a Hebrew origin, this could not fail to

recommend the Jewish and Christian religions to the attention of the

Gentile philosophers. Many learned moderns, relying implicitly upon

these authorities, have maintained the same opinion; and have thence

been inclined to credit the report of the divine original of the Jewish

cabbala. But the opinion is unfounded; and the cabbalistic system is

essentially inconsistent with the pure doctrine of divine revelation.

The true state of the case seems to be, that during the prophetic ages,

the traditions of the Jews consisted in a simple explanation of those

divine truths which the prophets delivered, or their law exhibited,

under the veil of emblems. After this period, when the sects of the

Essenes and Therapeutæ were formed in Egypt, foreign tenets and

institutions were borrowed from the Egyptians and Greeks; and, in the

form of allegorical interpretations of the law, were admitted into what

might then be called the Jewish mysteries, or secret doctrines. These

innovations chiefly consisted in certain dogmas concerning God and

divine things, at this time received in the Egyptian schools;

particularly at Alexandria, where the Platonic and Pythagorean doctrines

on these subjects had been blended with the oriental philosophy. The

Jewish mysteries, thus enlarged by the accession of Pagan dogmas, were

conveyed from Egypt to Palestine, at the time when the Pharisees, who

had been driven into Egypt under Hyrcanus, returned with many other Jews

into their own country. From this time the cabbalistic mysteries

continued to be taught in the Jewish schools; but at length they were

adulterated by a mixture of Peripatetic doctrines, and other tenets.

These mysteries were not, probably, reduced to any systematic forms in

writing, till after the dispersion of the Jews; when in consequence of

their national calamities, they became apprehensive that those sacred

treasures would be corrupted or lost. In preceding periods, the

cabbalistic doctrines underwent various corruptions, particularly from

the prevalence of the Aristotelian philosophy. The similarity, or rather

the coincidence, of the cabbalistic, Alexandrian, and oriental

philosophy, will be sufficiently evinced by briefly stating the common

tenets in which these different systems agreed. They are as

follow:--“All things are derived by emanation from one principle; and

this principle is God. From him a substantial power immediately

proceeds, which is the image of God, and the source of all subsequent

emanations. This second principle sends forth, by the energy of

emanation, other natures, which are more or less perfect, according to

their different degrees of distance, in the scale of emanation, from the

first source of existence, and which constitute different worlds or

orders of being, all united to the eternal power from which they

proceed. Matter is nothing more than the most remote effect of the

emanative energy of the Deity. The material world receives its form from

the immediate agency of powers far beneath the first source of being.

Evil is the necessary effect of the imperfection of matter. Human souls

are distant emanations from Deity; and, after they are liberated from

their material vehicles, will return, through various stages of

purification, to the fountain whence they first proceeded.” From this

brief view it appears, that the cabbalistic system, which is the

offspring of the other two, is a fanatical kind of philosophy,

originating in defect of judgment and eccentricity of imagination, and

tending to produce a wild and pernicious enthusiasm.

4. Among the explications of the law which are furnished by the cabbala,

and which, in reality, are little else but the several interpretations

and decisions of the rabbins on the laws of Moses, some are mystical;

consisting of odd abstruse significations given to a word, or even to

the letters whereof it is composed: whence, by different combinations,

they draw meanings from Scripture very different from those it seems

naturally to import. The art of interpreting Scripture after this manner

is called more particularly _cabbala_; and it is in this last sense the

word is more ordinarily used among us. This cabbala, called also

artificial cabbala, to distinguish it from the first kind, or simple

tradition, is divided into three sorts. The first, called _gematria_,

consists in taking letters as figures, or arithmetical numbers, and

explaining each word by the arithmetical value of the letters whereof it

is composed; which is done various ways: the second is called

_notaricon_, and consists either in taking each letter of a word for an

entire diction, or in making one entire diction out of the initial

letters of many: the third kind, called _themurah_, that is, _changing_,

consists in changing and transposing the letters of a word; which is

done various ways. The generality of the Jews prefer the cabbala to the

literal Scripture; comparing the former to the sparkling lustre of a

precious stone, and the latter to the fainter glimmering of a candle.

The cabbala only differs from masorah, as the latter denotes the science

of reading the Scripture; the former, of interpreting it. Both are

supposed to have been handed down from generation to generation by oral

tradition only, till at length the readings were fixed by the vowels and

accents, as the interpretations were by the gemara.

5. Cabbala is also applied to the use, or rather abuse, which

visionaries and enthusiasts make of Scripture, for discovering futurity

by the study and consideration of the combination of certain words,

letters, and numbers, in the sacred writings. All the words, terms,

magic figures, numbers, letters, charms, &c, used in the Jewish magic,

as also in the hermetical science, are comprised under this species of

cabbala; which professes to teach the art of curing diseases, and

performing other wonders, by means of certain arrangements of sacred

letters and words. But it is only the Christians that call it by this

name, on account of the resemblance this art bears to the explications

of the Jewish cabbala: for the Jews never used the word _cabbala_ in any

such sense; but ever with the utmost respect and veneration. It is not,

however, the magic of the Jews alone which we call cabbala; but the word

is also used for any kind of magic.

CABUL, the name which Hiram, king of Tyre, gave to the twenty cities in

the land of Galilee, of which Solomon made him a present, in

acknowledgment for the great services in building the temple, 1 Kings

ix, 31. These cities not being agreeable to Hiram, on viewing them, he

called them the land of Cabul, which in the Hebrew tongue denotes

_displeasing_; others take it to signify _binding_ or _adhesive_, from

the clayey nature of the soil.

CÆSAR, a title borne by all the Roman emperors till the destruction of

the empire. It took its rise from the surname of the first emperor,

Caius Julius Cæsar; and this title, by a decree of the senate, all the

succeeding emperors were to bear. In Scripture, the reigning emperor is

generally mentioned by the name of Cæsar, without expressing any other

distinction: so in Matt. xxii, 21, “Render unto Cæsar,” &c, Tiberias is

meant; and in Acts xxv, 10, “I appeal unto Cæsar,” Nero is intended.

CÆSAREA, a city and port of Palestine, built by Herod the Great, and

thus called in honour of Augustus Cæsar. It was on the site of the tower

of Strato. This city, which was six hundred furlongs from Jerusalem, is

often mentioned in the New Testament. Here it was that Herod Agrippa was

smitten of the Lord for not giving God the glory, when the people were

so extravagant in his praise. Cornelius the centurion, who was baptized

by St. Peter, resided here, Acts x, 1, &c; and also Philip the deacon,

with his four maiden daughters. At Cæsarea the Prophet Agabus foretold

that Paul would be bound and persecuted at Jerusalem. Lastly, the

Apostle himself continued two years a prisoner at Cæsarea, till he was

conducted to Rome. When Judea was reduced to the state of a Roman

province, Cæsarea became the stated residence of the proconsul, which

accounts for the circumstance of Paul being carried thither from

Jerusalem, to defend himself.

Dr. E. D. Clarke’s remarks upon this once celebrated city will be read

with interest: “On the 15th of July, 1801, we embarked, after sunset,

for Acre, to avail ourselves of the land wind, which blows during the

night, at this season of the year. By day break, the next morning, we

were off the coast of Cæsarea; and so near with the land that we could

very distinctly perceive the appearance of its numerous and extensive

ruins. The remains of this city, although still considerable, have long

been resorted to as a quarry, whenever building materials are required

at Acre. Djezzar Pacha brought from hence the columns of rare and

beautiful marble, as well as the other ornaments of his palace, bath,

fountain, and mosque at Acre. The place at present is inhabited only by

jackals and beasts of prey. As we were becalmed during the night, we

heard the cries of these animals until day break. Pococke mentions the

curious fact of the former existence of crocodiles in the river of

Cæsarea. Perhaps there has not been in the history of the world an

example of any city, that in so short a space of time rose to such an

extraordinary height of splendour as did this of Cæsarea; or that

exhibits a more awful contrast to its former magnificence, by the

present desolate appearance of its ruins. Not a single inhabitant

remains. Its theatres, once resounding with the shouts of multitudes,

echo no other sound than the nightly cries of animals roaming for their

prey. Of its gorgeous palaces and temples, enriched with the choicest

works of art, and decorated with the most precious marbles, scarcely a

trace can be discerned. Within the space of ten years after laying the

foundation, from an obscure fortress, it became the most celebrated and

flourishing city of all Syria. It was named Cæsarea by Herod, in honour

of Augustus, and dedicated by him to that emperor, in the twenty-eighth

year of his reign. Upon this occasion, that the ceremony might be

rendered illustrious, by a degree of profusion unknown in any former

instance, Herod assembled the most skilful musicians, wrestlers, and

gladiators from all parts of the world. This solemnity was to be renewed

every fifth year. But, as we viewed the ruins of this memorable city,

every other circumstance respecting its history was absorbed in the

consideration that we were actually beholding the very spot where the

scholar of Tarsus, after two years’ imprisonment, made that eloquent

appeal, in the audience of the king of Judea, which must ever be

remembered with piety and delight. In the history of the actions of the

holy Apostles, whether we regard the internal evidence of the narrative,

or the interest excited by a story so wonderfully appalling to our

passions and affections, there is nothing that we call to mind with

fuller emotions of sublimity and satisfaction. ‘In the demonstration of

the Spirit and of power,’ the mighty advocate for the Christian faith

had before ‘reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to

come,’ till the Roman governor, Felix, trembled as he spoke. Not all the

oratory of Tertullus; not the clamour of his numerous adversaries; not

even the countenance of the most profligate of tyrants availed against

the firmness and intrepidity of the oracle of God. The judge had

trembled before his prisoner; and now a second occasion offered, in

which, for the admiration and the triumph of the Christian world, one of

the bitterest persecutors of the name of Christ, and a Jew, appeals, in

the public tribunal of a large and populous city, to all its chiefs and

its rulers, its governor and its king, for the truth of his conversion

founded on the highest evidence.”

CÆSAREA PHILIPPI was first called Laish or Leshem, Judg. xviii, 7. After

it was subdued by the Danites, Judg. v, 29, it received the name of Dan;

and is by Heathen writers called Paneas. Philip, the youngest son of

Herod the Great, made it the capital of his tetrarchy, enlarged and

embellished it, and gave it the name of Cæsarea Philippi. It was

situated at the foot of Mount Hermon, near the head of the Jordan; and

was about fifty miles from Damascus, and thirty from Tyre. Our Saviour

visited and taught in this place, and healed one who was possessed of an

evil spirit: here also he gave the memorable rebuke to Peter, Mark viii.

CAIAPHAS, high priest of the Jews, succeeded Simon, son of Camith; and

after possessing this dignity nine years, from A. M. 4029 to 4038, he

was succeeded by Jonathan, son of Ananas, or Annas. Caiaphas was high

priest, A. M. 4037, which was the year of Jesus Christ’s death. He

married a daughter of Annas, who also is called high priest in the

Gospel, because he had long enjoyed that dignity. When the priests

deliberated on the seizure and death of Jesus Christ, Caiaphas declared,

that there was no room for debate on that matter, “because it was

expedient that one man should die for the people, that the whole nation

should not perish,” John xi, 49, 50. This sentiment was a prophecy,

which God suffered to proceed from the mouth of the high priest on this

occasion, importing, that the death of Jesus would be for the salvation

of the world. When Judas had betrayed Jesus, he was first taken before

Annas, who sent him to his son-in-law, Caiaphas, who possibly lived in

the same house, John xviii, 24. The priests and doctors of the law there

assembled to judge our Saviour, and to condemn him. The depositions of

certain false witnesses being insufficient to justify a sentence of

death against him, and Jesus continuing silent, Caiaphas, as high

priest, said to him, “I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us

whether thou art the Christ, the Son of God!” To this adjuration, so

solemnly made by the superior judge, Jesus answered, “Thou hast said;

nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man

sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.”

On hearing these words, Caiaphas rent his clothes, saying, “What farther

need have we of witnesses? Behold, now you have heard his blasphemy.

What think ye?” They answered, “He is worthy of death.” And as the power

of life and death was not at this time in their hands, but was reserved

by the Romans, they conducted him to Pilate, that he might confirm their

sentence, and order his execution.

Two years after this, Vitellus, governor of Syria, coming to Jerusalem

at the passover, was received very magnificently by the people. As an

acknowledgment for this honour, he restored the custody of the high

priest’s ornaments to the priests, he remitted certain duties raised on

the fruits of the earth, and deposed the high priest Caiaphas. From this

it appears that Caiaphas had fallen under popular odium, for his

deposition was to gratify the people.

CAIN, the eldest son of Adam and Eve. He was the first man who had been

a child, and the first man born of woman. For his history, as connected

with that of Abel, see _Abel_. The curse pronounced upon Cain, on

account of his fratricide, is thus expressed: “And the Lord said unto

Cain, Where is thy brother Abel? And he said, I know not: am I my

brother’s keeper? And God said, What hast thou done? The voice of thy

brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground. And now art thou cursed

from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s

blood from thy hand. When thou tillest it, it shall not henceforth yield

unto thee its strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the

earth. And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can

bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from _the face of the

earth_,” meaning, probably, from his own native district, and from the

presence of his kindred, “and from _thy face_ shall I be hid;” by which

he probably intended the divine glory, or Shekinah, whose appearance

sanctified the place of primitive worship, and was the pledge of

acceptance and protection. The mark set upon Cain “lest any one finding

him should kill him,” has been variously interpreted. Some have supposed

it a change in the colour of his skin, others a certain horror of

countenance. The LXX. understood the passage to mean, that the Lord gave

him a sign, to assure him that his life should be preserved. Whatever it

was, its object was not to aggravate, but to mitigate, his punishment,

which may intimate that Cain had manifested repentance. Cain, being thus

banished from the presence of the Lord, retired into the land of Nod,

lying east from the province of Eden. While he dwelt in this country,

which is generally understood to be Susiana, or Chusistan, he had a son,

whom he named Enoch, in memory of whom he built a city of the same name.

This is all we learn from Scripture concerning Cain.

CAKE. See BREAD.

CALAH, a city of Assyria, built by Ashur, Gen. x, 12. From it the

adjacent country, on the north-east of the Tigris, and south of the

Gordian mountains of Armenia, was called Callachene, or Callacine.

CALAMUS, קנה. Exod. xxx, 23; Cantic. iv, 14; Isa. xliii, 24; Jer. vi,

20; Ezek. xxvii, 19. An aromatic reed, growing in moist places in Egypt,

in Judea near lake Genezareth, and in several parts of Syria. It grows

to about two feet in height; bearing from the root a knotted stalk,

quite round, containing in its cavity a soft white pith. The whole is of

an agreeable aromatic smell; and the plant is said to scent the air with

a fragrance even while growing. When cut down, dried, and powdered, it

makes an ingredient in the richest perfumes. It was used for this

purpose by the Jews.

CALAMUS SCRIPTORIUS, a reed answering the purpose of a pen to write

with. The ancients used styles, to write on tablets covered with wax;

but reeds, to write on parchment or papyrus. The Psalmist says, “My

tongue is the pen of a ready writer,” xlv, 1. The Hebrew signifies

rather a style. The third book of Maccabees states, that the writers

employed in making a list of the Jews in Egypt, produced their reeds

quite worn out. Baruch wrote his prophecies _with ink_, Jer. xxxvi, 4;

and, consequently, used reeds; for it does not appear that quills were

then used to write with. In third John 13, the Apostle says, he did not

design to write with pen (reed) and ink. The Arabians, Persians, Turks,

Greeks, and Armenians, to this day, write with reeds or rushes.

CALEB, the son of Jephunneh, of the tribe of Judah, was one of those who

accompanied Joshua, when he was deputed by Moses to view the land of

Canaan, which the Lord had promised them for an inheritance, Num. xiii.

The deputies sent on this occasion were twelve in number, selected one

out of each of the tribes, and they performed their commission with

great promptitude and skill; they traversed the country in every

direction, bringing with them, on their return, some of its finest

fruits for the inspection of their brethren. Some of them, however,

after making the report of the beauty and goodness of the country, which

they described to be a land flowing with milk and honey, added, that the

inhabitants of it were remarkable for their strength, while its cities

were large and enclosed with walls. These later particulars having

excited a spirit of murmuring among the Israelites, Caleb endeavoured to

animate their courage by dwelling upon the fertility of the country, and

exhorting them to go boldly and take possession of it. Others, however,

dissuaded the people from making the attempt, assuring them that they

would never make themselves masters of it. We have seen giants there,

said they, in comparison of whom we were as grasshoppers; on which the

people declared against the project, and intimated their wish to return

again into Egypt. Moses and Aaron no sooner heard this than they fell

upon their faces before the whole congregation, and Joshua and Caleb

rent their clothes, imploring them to take courage and march boldly on;

since, if God were with them, they might easily make a conquest of the

whole land. So exasperated, however, were the multitude, that they were

proceeding to stone Caleb and Joshua, when the glory of the Lord

appeared upon the tabernacle, and threatened their extermination. Moses,

having fervently interceded for them, the Lord graciously heard his

prayer; but though he was pleased not to destroy them immediately, he

protested with an oath, that none of those who had murmured against him

should see the land of Canaan, but that they should all die in the

wilderness. “As for my servant Caleb,” it was added, “who hath

faithfully followed me, him will I bring into the land, and he shall

possess it, he and his children after him,” Num. xiv, 1–24. Joshua also

obtained a similar exception, verses 30, 38. When Joshua had entered the

promised land, and conquered a considerable part of it, Caleb, with the

people of his tribe, came to meet him at Gilgal, and finding that he was

about to divide the land among the twelve tribes, Caleb petitioned to

have the country which was inhabited by the giants allotted to him, on

which Joshua blessed him and granted his request. Assisted by a portion

of his tribe, he marched against Hebron, and slew the children of Anak:

thence he proceeded to Debir, and finding the place almost impregnable,

he offered his daughter Achsah in marriage to the hero that should take

it. This was done by his nephew Othniel, who in consequence obtained

Achsah with a considerable portion also of territory. We are not

informed of the particular time or manner of the death of Caleb; but by

his three sons, Iru, Elah, and Naam, he had a numerous posterity, who

maintained an honourable rank among their brethren. See Num. xiii, xiv,

Josh. xiv, 6–15; xv, 13–19; Judges i, 9–15; 1 Chron. iv, 15–20. עגל

A Biblical and Theological Dictionary explanatory of the history, manners, and customs of the Jews, and neighbouring nations · 第 48 / 253 段