He took a deep interest in those borderland questions which sometimes seem

so near an answer and yet never are answered. At the hour of death what

are the sights which rush upon the vision? Of these he would sometimes

speak; he told me how William Allingham, when dying, said to his wife, "I

see things beyond your imagination to conceive." Some vision seemed to

come to such at death. One lady in the Isle of Wight exclaimed, as though

she saw "Cherubim and Seraphim." But these incidents did not disturb the

steady thought and trust which found its strength far deeper down than in

any surface phenomena. He never shirked the hard and dismaying facts of

life. Once he made me take to my room Winwoode Reade's _Martyrdom of Man_.

There never was such a passionate philippic against Nature as this book

contained. The universe was one vast scene of murder; the deep aspirations

and noble visions of men were the follies of flies buzzing for a brief

moment in the presence of inexorable destruction. Life was bottled

sunshine; death the silent-footed butler who withdrew the cork. The book,

with its fierce invective, had a strange rhapsodical charm. It put with

irate and verbose extravagance the fact that sometimes

Nature, red in tooth and claw,

With ravin shrieked against his creed;

but it failed to see any but one side of the question. The writer saw

clearly enough what Tennyson saw, but Tennyson saw much more. He could not

make his judgment blind against faith any more than he would make it blind

against facts. He saw more clearly because he saw more largely. He

distrusted narrow views from whatever side they were advanced. The same

spirit which led him to see the danger of the dogmatic temper in so-called

orthodox circles led him to distrust it when it came from other quarters.

There was a wholesome balance about his mind. Nothing is farther from the

truth than to suppose that men of great genius lack mental balance. Among

the lesser lights there may be a brilliant but unbalanced energy, but

among the greater men it is not so; there is a large and wholesome sanity

among these. There is sufficient breadth of grasp to avoid extremes in

Dante, Milton, and Shakespeare; it was the same with Tennyson. We may be

right, for instance, in classing Tennyson among those

Whose faith has centre everywhere

Nor cares to fix itself to form;

but we should be wholly wrong if we supposed that he did not realize the

value of form. He knew that faith did not lie in the form, but he knew

also the protective value of form to faith; the shell was not the kernel,

but the kernel ripened all the better in the shelter of the shell. He

realized how sacred was the flesh and blood to which truth divine might be

linked, and he uttered the wise caution:

Hold thou the good: defend it well

For fear divine philosophy

Should push beyond her mark and be

Procuress to the lords of Hell.

In his view, as it seemed to me, there were two attitudes of mind towards

dogmatic forms--the one impatient of form because form was never adequate

to express the whole truth, the other impatient of form[74] because

impatient of the truth itself. These two attitudes of mind were poles

asunder; they must never be confused together.

I may be allowed to illustrate this discriminating spirit by one or two

reminiscences. I once asked him whether they were right who interpreted

the three ladies who accompanied King Arthur on his last voyage as Faith,

Hope, and Charity. He replied with a touch of (shall I call it?)

intellectual impatience: "They do and they do not. They are those graces,

but they are much more than those. I hate to be tied down to say, 'This

means that,' because the thought in the image is much more than the

definition suggested or any specific interpretation advanced." The truth

was wider than the form, yet the form was a shelter for the truth. It

meant this, but not this only; truth must be able to transcend any form in

which it may be presented.

Hence he could see piety under varying forms: for example, he described

those who were "pious variers from the Church." This phrase, it may here

be related, had a remarkable influence on one man's life, as the following

letter, written by a clergyman who had formerly been a Nonconformist, will

show. The writer died some few years ago; two of his sons are now good and

promising clergymen of the Church of England:

OXFORD VILLAS, GUISELEY, LEEDS,

_January 16, 1901_.

MY LORD BISHOP--In reference to your volume on the Poets, may I

intrude upon your attention one moment to say that it was Tennyson's

phrase in reference to dissenters:

Pious variers from the Church,

in his "Sea Dreams" that first kindled me to earnest thought (some

twenty years since) as to my own position in relationship to the

Church of the land. The force that moved me lay in the word "pious."

Were dissenters more pious than Church people? I regret to say I

thought them much less so; and as this conviction deepened I was

compelled to make the change for which I am every day more

thankful.--I am, my Lord Bishop, your Lordship's devoted servant,

W. HAYWARD ELLIOTT.

I have already spoken of his recognition of the apparent dualism in

Nature. His outlook on the universe could not ignore the dark and

dismaying facts of existence, and his faith, which rose above the shriek

of Nature, was not based upon arguments derived from any survey of

external, physical Nature. When he confined his outlook to this, he could

see power and mechanism, but he could not from these derive faith. His

vision must go beyond the mere physical universe; he must see life and see

it whole; he must include that which is highest in Nature, even man, and

only then could he find the resting-place of faith. He thus summed up the

matter once when we had been walking up and down the "Ball-room" at

Farringford: "It is hard," he said, "it is hard to believe in God; but it

is harder not to believe. I believe in God, not from what I see in Nature,

but from what I find in man." I took him to mean that the witness of

Nature was only complete when it included all that was in Nature, and that

the effort to draw conclusions from Nature when man, the highest-known

factor in Nature, was excluded, could only lead to mistake. I do not think

he meant, however, that external Nature gave no hints of a superintending

wisdom or even love, for his own writings show, I think, that such hints

had been whispered to him by flower and star; I think he meant that faith

did not find her platform finally secure beneath her feet till she had

taken count of man. In short, he seemed to me to be near to the position

of Thomas Erskine of Linlathen, who said that truth as soon as learned was

felt to be held on a much deeper and more unshakable ground than any

authority which appealed to mere intellect, namely, on its own discerned

truthfulness. The response to all that is highest in Nature is found in

the heart of man, and man cannot deny this highest, because it is latent

in himself already. But I must continue Tennyson's own words: "It is hard

to believe in God, but it is harder not to believe in Him. I don't

believe in His goodness from what I see in Nature. In Nature I see the

mechanician; I believe in His goodness from what I find in my own breast."

I said, "Then you believe that Man is the highest witness of God?"

"Certainly," he replied. I said, "Is not that what Christ said and was? He

was in man the highest witness of God to Man," and I quoted the recorded

words, "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father." He assented, but said

that there were, of course, difficulties in the idea of a Trinity--the

Three. "But mind," he said, "Son of God is quite right--that He was."[75]

He said that, of course, we must have doctrine, and then he added, "After

all, the greatest thing is Faith." Having said this, he paused, and then

recited with earnest emphasis the lines which sang of faith in the reality

of the Unseen and Spiritual, of a faith, therefore, which can wait the

great disclosure:

Doubt no longer, that the Highest is the wisest and the best,

Let not all that saddens Nature blight thy hope, or break thy rest,

Quail not at the fiery mountain, at the shipwreck, or the rolling

Thunder, or the rending earthquake, or the famine, or the pest.

Neither mourn if human creeds be lower than the heart's desire;

Thro' the gates that bar the distance comes a gleam of what is higher.

Wait till death has flung them open, when the man will make the Maker

Dark no more with human hatred in the glare of deathless fire.

He was alive to the movements of modern thought. He saw in evolution, if

not a fully proved law, yet a magnificent working hypothesis; he could not

regard it as a theory hostile to ultimate faith; but far beyond the

natural wish to reconcile faith and thought, which he shared with all

right-thinking men, was the conviction of the changeless personal

relationship between God and man. He might find difficulties about faith

and about certain dogmas of faith, such as the Trinity. No doubt, however,

the Poet's conception brought the divine into all human life; it showed

God in touch with us at all epochs of our existence--in our origin, in our

history, in our final self-realization, for He is

Our Father and our Brother and our God.[76]

Religion largely lies in the consciousness of our true relation to Him who

made us; and the yearning for the realization of this consciousness found

constant expression in Tennyson's works and conversation.[77] Perhaps its

clearest expression is to be found in his instructions to his son:

"Remember, I want 'Crossing the Bar' to be always at the end of all my

works."

I hope to see my Pilot face to face

When I have crossed the Bar.

TENNYSON AND SIR JOHN SIMEON, AND TENNYSON'S LAST YEARS

By LOUISA E. WARD[78]

From the misty dawn of early childhood rises the first image of one who

was to fill so large a place in my life and that of those dear to me. As

I, not yet four years old, lay in my father's arms and he said to me the

"Morte d'Arthur," there blended with the picture of the wild winter mere

and the mighty King carried, dying, to its shore, a vision of the man who,

my father told me, lived somewhere amongst us and who could write words

which seemed to me more beautiful than anything I had ever heard.

It was several years before I again came upon the "Morte d'Arthur," when I

was a girl of ten or eleven, and I remember how eagerly I seized upon it,

and how the fairy glamour of my infancy came back to me as I read it.

It was in the autumn of 1852 that Lord and Lady (then Mr. and Mrs.)

Tennyson came to Farringford. They had been looking for a house, and they

found themselves one summer evening on the terrace walk, with the rosy

sunset lighting up the long line of coast to St. Catherine's Point, and

the gold-blue sea with its faint surf line mingling with the rosiness: and

they said, "We will go no further, this must be our home." An ideal

home it was, ideal in its loveliness, its repose, in its wild but

beautiful gardens, and more than all ideal in its calm serenity, the

hospitable simplicity, the high thought and utter nobleness of aim and

life which that pair brought with them, and which through the long years

of change, of sickness, and of sorrow, of which every home must be the

scene, made the atmosphere of Farringford impossible to be forgotten by

those who had the happiness of breathing it.

[Illustration: THE CORNER OF THE STUDY AT FARRINGFORD WHERE TENNYSON

WROTE, WITH HIS DEERHOUND "LUFRA" AND THE TERRIER "WINKS" IN THE

FOREGROUND. From a drawing by W. Biscombe Gardner.]

Hallam was at that time a baby, and very soon after their arrival at

Farringford beautiful Lionel came to gladden the hearts of his parents. It

was on the day of Lionel's christening that my father paid his first visit

to Farringford, and found the family party just returning from church. My

father had already been introduced to Tennyson at Lady Ashburton's house

in London, on which occasion he had walked away with Carlyle and had

expressed to him his pleasure at meeting so great a man as Tennyson.

"Great man," said Carlyle, "yes, he is nearly a great man, but not quite;

he stands on a dunghill with yelping dogs about him, and if he were quite

a great man, he would call down fire from Heaven, and burn them

up"--"but," he went on, speaking of his poetry, "he has the grip on it."

My father had entertained the greatest admiration for Tennyson's poetry

since the day when, both being undergraduates at Christchurch, his friend

Charles Wynne brought him the first published volume, saying to him,

"There is something new for you who love poetry." And his delight may be

imagined in now having the Poet for a neighbour. The intimacy between

Farringford and Swainston grew apace. My mother and Lady Tennyson, though

poor health and numerous occupations interfered with their frequent

meetings, conceived a very real affection for each other, which was only

cut short by my mother's early death, which left Lady Tennyson with a deep

feeling and pity for her children.

During the early years of Farringford, it was one of my father's great and

frequent pleasures to ride or drive over in the summer afternoons; he, in

turn with her husband, would draw Lady Tennyson in her garden chair, and

with the two boys skipping on before them, they would go long expeditions

through the lanes, and even up the downs; then back through the soft

evening air to dinner, and the long evening of talk and reading which

knitted that "fair companionship" and made of it "such a friendship as had

mastered time," and which we may well believe has re-formed itself still

more perfectly now that both those beloved souls have "crossed the bar."

The Tennysons sometimes came over to Swainston for a few days, and I

remember his being there on the wonderful July night in 1858 when the tail

of the great comet passed over Arcturus. His admiration and excitement

knew no bounds; he could not sit at the dinner-table, but rushed out

perpetually to look at the glorious sight, repeating: "It is a besom of

destruction sweeping the sky."

Little Lionel was that same night taken from his bed to the window, and,

opening his sleepy eyes on the unaccustomed splendour, he said, "Am I in

Heaven?"

The writing and publication of "Maud" in 1855 was largely due to my

father.

Looking through some papers one day at Farringford with his friend, he

came upon the exquisite lyric "O that 'twere possible," and said, "Why do

you keep these beautiful lines unpublished?" Tennyson told him that the

poem had appeared years before in the _Tribute_, an ephemeral publication,

but that it was really intended to belong to a dramatic poem which he had

never been able to carry out. My father gave him no peace till he had

persuaded him to set about the poem, and not very long after, he put

"Maud" into his hand.

It was about this time, but I do not remember what year, that Tennyson

gave my father the manuscript of "In Memoriam."[79] He had often asked him

to give him a manuscript poem, and he had put him off, but one day at

Swainston he asked my father to reach him a particular book from a shelf

in the library, and as he did so, down fell the MS. which Tennyson had put

there as a surprise. Never was gift more valued and appreciated by its

recipient. I have always felt grateful to him for the continual pleasure

which it gave my father during the whole of his life.

Tennyson's visits were eagerly looked forward to by us children. He would

talk to us a good deal, and was fond of puzzling and mystifying us in a

way that was very fascinating. He would take the younger ones on his knee,

and give them sips of his port after dinner, and I remember my father

saying to one of my sisters: "Never forget that the greatest of poets has

kissed you and made you drink from his glass."

As I got older I was sometimes allowed to drive over to Farringford with

my father, and, need I say, I looked forward to these as the red-letter

days of my life. Not only were the talk and intellectual atmosphere

intoxicating to me, but I became passionately attached to Lady Tennyson.

Praise of her would be unseemly; but I may quote what my father was fond

of saying of her, that she was "a piece of the finest china, the mould of

which had been broken as soon as she was made." It was not, however, till

after my mother's death in 1860 that my real grown-up intimacy with them

began, and that Farringford became the almost second home which for some

years it was to me. During my father's absences in London or elsewhere, I

was free to go and stay there as often and for as long as I liked, and was

almost on the footing of a daughter of the house. I used to go for long

walks, sometimes alone with Tennyson, sometimes in the company of other

guests, of whom Mr. Jowett was one of the most frequent. I wish I had

written down the talks with which he made the hours pass like minutes

during our walks. Forgetful of the youth and ignorance of his companion,

he would rise to the highest themes, thread his way through the deepest

speculations, till I caught the infection of his mind, and the questions

of matter and spirit, of space and the infinite, of time and of eternity,

and such kindred subjects, became to me the burning questions, the supreme

interests of life! But however absorbed he might be in earnest talk, his

eye and ear were always alive to the natural objects around him: I have

known him stop short in a sentence to listen to a blackbird's song, to

watch the sunlight glint on a butterfly's wing, or to examine a field

flower at his feet. The lines on "The Flower" were the result of an

investigation of the "love-in-idleness" growing on a wall in the

Farringford garden. He made them nearly on the spot, and said them to me

next day. Trees and plants had a special attraction for him, and he longed

to see the vegetation of the Tropics. Years ago he scolded my husband more

than half in earnest for not having told him in time that he was going to

winter in Madeira, that he might have gone with him.

But to return to my girlish days at Farringford! The afternoon walks were

followed by the long talks in the firelight by the side of Lady Tennyson's

sofa, talks less eager, less thrilling than those I have recalled; but so

helpful, so tender, full of the wisdom of one who had learnt to look upon

life and all it embraces from one standpoint only, and that the very

highest! Then dinner with the two boys (their long fair hair hanging over

their shoulders and their picturesque dresses as they are seen in Mr.

Watts's picture in the drawing-room at Aldworth) waiting as little pages

on the guests at table, followed by the delightful dessert, for which,

according to the old College fashion, we adjourned to the drawing-room.

The meal was seasoned with merry genial talk, unexpected guests arriving,

and always finding the same warm welcome, for none came who were not tried

and trusted friends. After dessert Tennyson went up to his study[80] (the

little room at the top of the house, from the leads outside which such sky

pageants have been seen, shooting stars, eclipses, and Northern Lights)

with any men friends who were in the house. They smoked there for an hour

or two, and then came down to tea, unless, as sometimes happened, we all

joined them upstairs; and then there was more talk or reading aloud of

published or, still better, unpublished poems. He would sometimes read

from other poets; Shakespeare, Milton, Pope, and some lyrics of Campbell

being what he often chose; and he taught me to know and appreciate Crabbe,

whom he placed very high in the rank of English poets.

One day Tennyson came behind me as I sat at breakfast, and dropped on my

plate the MS. of the "Higher Pantheism" which he had composed, or at any

rate perfected, during the night. Another day he took me into the garden

to see a smoking yew, and said the lines on it which he had just made and

afterwards interpolated in "In Memoriam." My father was with him when they

came upon a bed of forget-me-not in the garden and he exclaimed "the

heavens upbreaking through the earth," the lines which he afterwards

applied to the bluebells in the description of the spring ride of

Guinevere and Lancelot to Arthur's court. Once he pleased and touched me

inexpressibly: he was talking of the different way in which friends speak

before your face and behind your back, and he said, "Now I should not mind

being behind the curtain while L. S. was talking of me, and there are very

few of whom I could say that."

Years went on, and changes came; my father's re-election to Parliament in

1865 made our seasons in London longer and more regular than they had

been, and though there was still constant and delightful intercourse with

Farringford during the autumn and winter, there was necessarily less

during the Session. Some glorious days there were, however, when at Easter

or at Whitsuntide my father went down to Swainston, and I sometimes

accompanied him. We always went over to Farringford either to spend a

night or two, or to drive back through the spring night with its scented

breath and its mad revelry of cuckoos and nightingales vying with each

other as to which could outshout the other, and my father, fresh from

communion with his friend, would open himself out as he rarely did at any

other time or place.

It was about this time that Tennyson and his wife, worried beyond bearing

by the rudeness and vulgarity of the tourists, who considered that they

could best show admiration for the Poet by entirely refusing to respect

his privacy, determined to find another house for themselves during the

summer months, and turned their thoughts to Blackdown and its

neighbourhood. One summer they rented a farm on Blackdown called, I think,

Greyshott, and on a fine morning, April 23, 1868, we stood, a party of

some fifteen friends, to see the foundation-stone laid of Aldworth, the

new home which, to more recent, though not to the older friends, has

become almost as much associated with its owner as Farringford, and

received the sorrowful consecration of having been the scene of his

passing away.

About this time Tennyson took to coming oftener to London. On one occasion

he took me with him to the British Museum, and we did not get beyond the

Elgin Marbles, such was their fascination for him. Another day he came to

our house at luncheon time; most of the family happened to be out, and he

proposed that we should go to the Zoological Gardens. London was at its

fullest, and I feared, though I did not say it, that he would not escape

recognition, which was of all things what he most hated. However, all went

well for some time until we went into the Aquarium, and he became greatly

absorbed in the sea monsters, when I heard a whisper in the crowd, "That's

Tennyson," and knew that in another minute he would be surrounded; so I

suddenly discovered that the heat of the Aquarium was unbearable and

carried him off unwillingly to a quieter part of the gardens--he never

found out my ruse.

My mind lingers willingly on the last years of the sixties. As I look back

the two-and-twenty years seem, as did another "two and thirty years," a

"mist that rolls away." Of the circle of dear friends who were so much to

one another some still remain to gladden us with their presence, but how

many have gone where "beyond these voices there is peace"--Mr. George

Venables, Mr. John Ball, Mr. Browning, Sir F. Pollock, Mr. Brookfield, Mr.

Henry Cowper, Mr. Laurence Oliphant. The circle was complete as the Table

of Arthur before the fatal quest had made its gaps; here death was the

quest, and each one who sought, alas, has found it!

The first to pass away was my father, and as his best friend walked in the

garden at Swainston on the day, May 31, 1870, on which he came to see him

laid to rest, he made those verses,[81] than which few lovelier tributes

were ever paid from friend to friend, and which will keep the name of the

"Prince of Courtesy" green even in the long years to come.

Tennyson and his friends · 第 20 / 36 段