"There can never," he says, "be a second Shakespeare, that is to say,

given a man of equal Genius he cannot in this complex and analytical

age of Literature embody himself in the metrical and dramatic form if

his purpose is to 'hold up the mirror to Nature, and to give the Time

its form and pressure.' The form of prose fiction is a vastly greater

one, indeed it may be termed all-comprehensive, and admits of the

introduction of lyric or epic verse, in all varieties, as well as the

profoundest analysis of character and motive, and is susceptible of

the highest range of eloquence and unrhythmical poetry, and whatever

it may lose in metrical melody (which, however, is not greatly

regarded in dramatic dialogue) it gains immeasurably in its other

elements. All things considered, I am of opinion that if a man were

endowed with such faculties as Shakespeare's, they would be more

freely and effectively exercised in prose fiction with its wider

capabilities than when 'cribbed, cabined, and confined' in the

trammels of verse."

It may be that the very remoteness of his life was in part the cause of

this lasting freshness and freedom of his mind. He lived so far from the

world as to be almost entirely removed from any bias of self-interest--the

most fruitful source of prejudice. Ambition played no part in his life.

"Once," he wrote in 1888, "I used to have some ambition--that is when

I was a boy at school--I verily believe that at that early age I

exhausted the demoniacal passion which chains you to fixed purposes

like a Prometheus and preys upon you like a Vulture. Though many great

works have been accomplished under the spur of this (so-called) noble

passion, think how much chaotic rubbish has been projected into Space

and Time which ought to have been imprisoned to Eternity--how many

heart-burnings, jealousies, and disappointments--how often the love of

the Beautiful and True is entirely subordinated to that of mere

distinction to be won at any cost. How seldom do we hear writers of

the same school speak well of one another. Especially poisonous are

poets, I think, wherever they apprehend a rival--Honey-suckers like

the Bee, they know how to use their stings even while sipping the

flowers. The unambitious man is at any rate free to use his eyes, to

walk up to and contemplate in the pure clear air and solitude of his

mountain-top the face and form of Nature, and like Turner a-fishing,

see wonderful effects never to be come at by the hosts of those who

get on (or off) by copying one another. I daresay you will disapprove

all this and attribute it to indolent epicurism.

"Latterly since the supernatural and the Future Life, and its

conditions 'such as eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, nor hath it

entered into the heart of man to conceive,' have occupied and absorbed

my whole soul to the exclusion of almost every subject which the

Gorillas of this world most delight in, whether scientific, political,

or literary--I have been led to see what men in general consider a

proper use of their stewardship, _i.e._ ruin of body and soul by

inordinate superhuman struggles for supremacy--Samson-like heavings to

upset the neighbour, or supplant him--carbonic acid-breathing

creepings along the dark floors of stifling caverns such as may enable

them to scrape together a preponderance of a certain mineral, etc.

etc.--as the most lamentable examples of Phrenitis--arising simply

from the ineradicable instinct--of Immortality it is true, but

misplaced Immortality--Immortality in this life."

The death of his wife in 1880 was a severe blow to him.

"In answer to your kind letters of sympathy," he wrote to Mr. and Mrs.

Brotherton, "I can say but little. Sorrow such as mine when it falls

upon the aged is virtual paralysis, mental and bodily. I know not what

I may do for the brief period remaining to me in this world. At

present my daughter-in-law attends to household matters, and I still

have the presence of children and grandchildren to remind me that I am

not left entirely desolate. But my chief consolation is that the

beloved of my youth and the friend of my age is already risen, and has

cast off the burthen of her mortal cares and pains, and my only hope

that, God willing, I may follow quickly."

A great but less tremendous shock to him was the death in 1887 of his

sister Emily, once the betrothed of Arthur Hallam. On this occasion he

sent the following lines to his friend:

Farewell, dear sister, thou and I

Will meet no more beneath the sky:

But in the high world where thou art

Mind speaks to Mind, and Heart to Heart,

Not in faint wavering tones, but heard

As twin sweet notes that sound accord.

Thy dwelling in the Angel sphere

Looks forth on a sublimer whole,

Where all that thou dost see and hear

Is in true concord with thy soul--

A great harp of unnumbered strings

Answering to one voice that sings:

Where thousand blisses spring and fade

Swiftly, as in diviner dream,

And inward motions are portrayed

In outward shows that move with them:

After the midnight and dark river

No more to be o'erpast for ever.

Behold the lover of thy youth,

That spirit strong as Love and Truth,

Many a long year gone before,

Awaits thee on the sunny shore:

In that high world of endless wonder

Nor Space, nor Time can hold asunder

Twin souls--as Space and Time have done--

Whom kindest instincts orb in One.

It was inevitable that the later years of one so aged and so solitary

should be more and more filled with the chronicle and anticipation of

death. But he never sank into lethargy, as the following letter, written

in his eighty-first year, shows:

My own sorrow is indeed continually revived by memories continually

reawakened, not only by the comparatively recent occurrence of my own

temporarily final separation from my best friend--but also by that

bird's-eye--so to speak--retrospect, which carries the imagination

over lovely landscapes of the days of youth--out of the golden morning

light of which emerge, in that unaccountable manner which is quite

involuntary, even the most trivial circumstances--moments of no

moment--yet somehow clothed in a more glittering light than the vast

tracts drowned in the general splendour of the dawn, some tiny

pinnacle that reflects the sun, some far off rillet that gushes out

from the wayside.

Even when in his eighty-fourth year his sight began to fail him and the

loss drove him still more back into his inner life, the old eagerness of

mind remained, though finding a melancholy occupation in noting the

changes to which age was daily subjecting his mental and physical

constitution. The note of hope is, however, ineradicable:

An old man of my great age is already dead--old age being the only

Death--and the faculties which I once possessed receive no impulse, as

of old, for activity--no joyous inspiration. The intellect is cold and

frozen like the mountain streams in Winter, a moonless midnight; and

were it not for the increasing illumination of the immortal spirit

which already beholds the dawn of a greater Day beyond the mountains,

I should indeed be desolate, lost! For I am 84 years of age next

June--and in looking back through my long life--it often seems to me

like a dream--many movements, intellectual and physical, seem to me

like impossibilities. When I see my little grandson Charlie skipping

and hear him shouting and singing, and the light-limbed and

light-hearted girls darting like living lightning down the staircase

(which if I were to attempt to imitate I should undoubtedly break my

neck), I say to myself, is it possible that I can ever have been like

them? Alas! for old age. What can be more mournful than a retrospect

of the days of childhood? But a truce to solemn thoughts--the Spring

is come again, the leaves are unfolding, the birds are singing, the

sun is shining, and surely, next to the human countenance, this is the

most lovely emblem, the most beautiful representative material of

inner spiritualities and the resurrection, and ought to have been so

regarded since the dawn of Christianity; for as sure as Winter

blossoms into Summer, the Winter of old age will spring into the

Eternal Life. Fear not, hope all things! What a contrast to these

consoling aspirations is presented in the touching fragment of the old

Greek poet Moschus which no doubt expresses the scepticism of the

ancient world--I give a free translation:

Aye, aye the garden mallows, mint and thyme

When they have wither'd in the winter clime,

After a little space do reappear,

And live again and see another year:

But we, the brave, the noble, and the wise,

When once for all pale Death hath closed our eyes,

Sink into dread oblivion dark and deep,

The everlasting, never-waking sleep.

With the approach of death he seemed to himself to undergo a kind of

physical regeneration.

"Apropos to spiritual matters," he writes in 1890, "I have had

recently for several consecutive days some very strange experiences.

One morning I awoke and seemed to have lost my natural memory. Objects

daily presented to me for years seemed no longer familiar as of

old--but as when a man after years of travel returning to his home and

the chamber he formerly occupied takes some time and labour of thought

to bring back to his recollection the whereabouts of objects once (as

it were) instinctively known to him--I had the same difficulty in

recovering my relations to my own surroundings. And this for days was

supplemented by a strange sense of having been far away and conversant

with wonderful things--movements and tumults--which only immeasurable

distance deadened to my perception like great music borne away by the

wind. Ever and anon there flashed up within me what I can only

describe symbolically as Iridescences of feeling as when the prismatic

colours of a rainbow succeed one another, or the coloured lights in

Pyrotechnics cause objects in midnight darkness to assume their own

hues. But all this, wonderful though it may seem, is not the only

change that has come upon me--I am happy to say that simultaneously

with these phenomena a revolution in my spiritual economy of far

greater moment has, I believe, taken place. I have always prayed for

that regeneration, or second birth ('Thou must be born again,' said

the Lord to Nicodemus), to be shielded from selfhood--and as the

divine answer to such prayers continually repeated, I can declare,

without any self-delusion, that the answer has actually been a

sensible change in the nature of my affections. Never have I felt

towards those around me, such tender inclinations, such earnest desire

to do them all possible good regardless of self-interest, such a

spirit of forgiveness of any wrongs; and my earnest prayerful

thankfulness for such inestimable benefits has been invariably

acknowledged by that Voice from the Lord Himself by which He has

repeatedly ratified to my spiritual ear His promise of blessing and

the continuation thereof--and that 'Thou hast nothing to fear, for I

am with thee night and day, body and soul!' Think of this! But for

God's sake do not attribute these statements of mine, which are

comprehended in a period of many years, to self-delusion or

self-righteousness. God knows, from whom nothing is hid, that I have

never approached Him except in the spirit of profound humility and

self-condemnation, and the answer has always been, 'Thou hast nothing

to fear. I am with thee.'"

As age settled upon him the violence of many of his views abated. His

faith in Spiritualism and Swedenborgianism lost their hold on him and gave

way to a more philosophic condition of mind. His activity, however,

continued unabated. In 1890, after a silence of thirty-six years, he

published his _Isles of Greece_, and the success of the volume encouraged

him to give to the world two others, _Daphne and other Poems_ in 1891, and

_Poems of the Day and Year_ (in which were included some of the verses

contained in the volume of 1854) in 1898. In 1896 he left Jersey to join

his eldest son, Captain Julius Tennyson, in whose house in Kensington he

died on February 26, 1898.

It would be difficult to imagine two persons more strongly contrasted in

life and character than Frederick and Charles. Charles (who was always

Alfred's favourite brother) had nothing of the powerful, erratic,

tempestuous mind of his elder brother. One does not think of him, as

FitzGerald did of Frederick, as a being born for the warmth and glow of

the South, yet in appearance he was (like Alfred) far more Southern than

the eldest brother. So Spanish were his swarthy complexion, brown eyes,

and curly, dark hair, that Thackeray, meeting him in middle age, called

him a "Velasquez _tout craché_." Like Alfred, too, he had a magnificent

deep bass voice; and even in dress the two brothers seem to have

maintained their affinity, for Charles used to wear a soft felt hat and

flowing black cloak much like those which the Millais portrait has

identified with his brother, and these garments, with the addition of

white cuffs, which he wore turned back over his coat sleeves, intensified

the strangely foreign effect of his appearance. But the kinship of the

two brothers extended beyond purely physical resemblance. They remained

inseparable companions till Charles was ordained, and there was hardly a

taste possessed by either which the other did not share. They read,

played, and rambled together; both were extremely fond of dancing (one of

Charles's last Sonnets was "On a County Ball") and were much sought after

as partners at the balls of their countryside. The _Poems by Two

Brothers_, which were almost entirely the work of Alfred and Charles,

while displaying the differing qualities of each, were a joint production,

the fruit of common reading and common enthusiasm. Both the brothers were

regarded by their contemporaries at Cambridge as destined to achieve

poetical greatness. Both possessed the unwearying patience of the

craftsman, the same devotion to science and the same power of close and

loving observation. Charles, however, lacked the fire and energy of

temperament which made Frederick's character remarkable and was to a great

extent shared by Alfred. With all Alfred's sensitiveness and shrinking

from society, he had little of that sympathetic and passionate interest in

the hopes and achievements of their age which drove the younger brother

ever more and more into public life.

[Illustration: CHARLES TENNYSON-TURNER.]

Nothing quieter and less eventful than Charles Tennyson's life can well be

imagined. He was ordained in 1835 (three years after taking his degree)

and immediately obtained a Curacy at Tealby. In the same year he became

Vicar of Grasby, a small village in the Lincolnshire wolds between Caistor

and Brigg.

In the following year he married Louisa Sellwood, whose sister was to

become Alfred's wife, and from that time until just before his death on

April 25, 1879, his life, save for an occasional holiday and too frequent

lapses from health, knew little variation. Like all the Tennysons, Charles

was of a nervous temperament, and this condition often induced acute

suffering. So severe indeed was his struggle with this disorder and the

still more perilous condition which resulted from it that at one time,

soon after his marriage, he was compelled to leave his parish for some

months in search of strength. Throughout these trying interludes the

devotion of his wife, a woman of great humour and power of mind and

character, was of the utmost service to him. Indeed, his debt to her was

great at all times of his life. She would often act almost as a curate to

him in the straggling parish, tirelessly visiting and nursing the sick (a

duty which they both unflinchingly observed even in the epidemics of

small-pox which were then frequent), keeping all his accounts, both

personal and parochial, and even sometimes writing his sermons. The

devotion of the pair was remarkable, retaining a certain youthful ardour

to the end, and when Charles died his wife was carried to the grave within

a month.

As early as 1830, Charles had published a small volume of sonnets, which

(as is well known) earned the hearty commendation of Coleridge and Leigh

Hunt. As in the case of Frederick, however, there followed a prolonged

silence, the next volume not making its appearance till 1864; others

followed in 1868 and 1873, and all were collected and republished, with a

sage, benevolent, and affectionate Introduction by his friend James

Spedding, in 1880. The reason for this long silence was a slightly

different one from that which was responsible for Frederick's

intermission. In both cases, no doubt, the feeling that it would be

impertinent for another person of the name of Tennyson to put his work

before the public had some influence. In Charles's case, however, there

were further considerations. The violent shock which his health sustained

by that prolonged early illness and his subsequent troubles to some extent

numbed his powers. "The edge of thought was blunted by the stress of the

hard world," and the same cause probably increased his natural modesty

till it became almost morbid. He was perpetually haunted by the fear that

his poetry was not original, and the only word of satisfaction which

Spedding ever heard him use of any of his sonnets was with regard to one

which owed its origin to a period of deep affliction, of which the poet

said that he thought it was good because he _knew_ it to be true. Whatever

the cause, however, during these thirty-four years Charles Turner

published nothing and, indeed, hardly even wrote anything. Spedding, in

his Introduction, has collected a few fragments which were gathered from

the poet's notebooks, and show that his mind still occasionally noted a

stray simile or description, doubtless intended to be subsequently worked

up into a poem. A few of these are in his happiest manner. One may quote

the following picture of goldfish in a glass bowl:

As though King Midas did the surface touch,

Constraining the clear water to their change

With shooting motions and quick trails of light.

Now a rich girth and then a narrow gleam,

And now a shaft and now a sheet of gold.

and the lines on the opening of the tomb of Charlemagne:

They rove the marble where the ancient King,

Like one forspent with sacred study sate,

Robed like a King, but as a scholar pale.

His mind, too, was always working in the same direction on his rambles

about the countryside, and he would sometimes, when walking with Agnes

Weld, "the little, ambling, stile-clearing niece," who was often his

guest, hit on some phrase which took his fancy and was imparted to his

companion, who remembers his description of the slanting light-bars on a

cloudy day as "the oars of the golden Galley of the sun," and many another

phrase as happy as any of the homely and perfect touches in his published

works.

But though these years were barren of actual output, they were of value in

many ways, and not the least as a period of incubation, for many a phrase

or idea first formed in them was subsequently perfected and published. The

intermission, too, left him freer to study and to labour among his

parishioners. At the beginning and end of his life, poetry occupied a

great deal of his time, for each of his sonnets, in spite of their

apparent facility, was the result of much toil. He would work at the same

lines morning after morning, and read the results aloud to his wife, or

niece, or other companion after dinner, the same poem going through a

great succession of forms. A letter to Miss Weld, in answer to some

suggestion of a subject connected with the then recent excavations at

Mycenae, shows his method of work and something of the manifold interests

of his secluded life:

"I never can undertake to work to order," he writes, "though the order

comes from the dearest of customers. If I get a good hold of that

poor, noble, nodding head I will put him on board of a respectable

sonnet and try to save his memory from drowning.... Mycenae is a very

exciting subject, but I have Kelsey Moor Chapel to write on--a

commission from Mrs. Townsend ... and a poor dead dog haunts me" (see

Sonnet 97--Collected Edition).

During these barren years Charles Turner's devotion to his parochial work

was intense. Grasby was a somewhat barbarous village when he obtained the

living. Belief in witchcraft was still rife, and one of the popular charms

against its influence was to cut a sheep in half, put the body on a

scarlet cloth, and walk between the pieces. Such religion as there was

among the poor was of a rather harsh spirit, as may be seen from an

anecdote preserved by Miss Weld of an old cottager, who, hearing Mrs.

Turner mention the name of Hobbes, exclaimed to his wife: "Why, loovey,

that's the graate Hobbes that's in hell!" The climate, too, was as harsh

as the character of the people, for the village stands high and bleak.

Friends remember Louisa Turner going about her ministrations in clogs, and

during one particularly sharp winter she writes: "I am in a castle now of

double cotton wool petticoat and thick baize drawers and waistcoat." The

Turners soon found it necessary to leave the house at Caistor, three miles

off, where Sam Turner, Charles's uncle, the preceding vicar, had lived,

for the distance made any real intimacy with the people impossible.

Charles had inherited a small property from his uncle (the event was the

occasion of his change of name), and this made it possible for him to

build a new vicarage and to further enrich the village with new schools

and a new church. He also took the very practical step of buying the

village inn and putting it in charge of a reliable servant, a scheme

which, for a time at least, had excellent effects on the temperance of the

inhabitants.

There were no children of the marriage, but the pair adopted the children

of the whole village, opening their house and grounds to them for

Christmas trees and summer festivities. Children and animals were always

devoted to Charles Turner, as he to them. He was, as the villagers said,

"Strangen gone upon birds and things." He never shot after that tragedy of

the swallow which he never forgot (see Sonnet 200), and birds of every

kind flocked to him daily as he fed them on his lawn. Flowers and trees,

too, he loved almost as keenly as he did children. He quarrelled seriously

with one of his curates whom he found exorcising the flowers, which were

to be used for church decoration, by means of the service contained in the

Directorium Anglicanum, maintaining stoutly that if any spirits dwelt in

flowers they must be angels and not devils. His garden was a jungle of

old-fashioned flowers, golden-rod, sweet-william, convolvulus, and rose of

Sharon; figs and apricots ripened on his walls, and the house was covered

with roses, honeysuckle, white clematis, and blue ceanothus. The grounds,

too, boasted some fine timber, which Charles never would allow to be

pruned or cut, even permitting the willow-props to outgrow and destroy the

rose trees (Sonnet 270), and once, when it was proposed to fell some large

trees within sight of his house, he threatened to throw up his living and

leave Grasby.

In this peaceful world Charles found plenty to occupy his time. He saw

little of society except when Alfred or Frederick, or one of his old

college friends, came to visit him, and the resources of the neighbourhood

were strained to the utmost to afford them entertainment. He found,

however, a congenial companion in Mr. Townsend, a neighbouring clergyman

of wide culture much interested in science. And the care of his parish

occupied the greater part of his time. Theology, too, was a favourite

study with him. He began life as an Evangelical, but in later years tended

(partly under the influence of his wife, who would often, on the vigil of

a saint, spend half the night on her knees) more and more towards the High

Church.

Tennyson and his friends · 第 4 / 36 段