V. THE CHURCH OF THE SERVILE STATE

I confess I cannot see why mere blasphemy by itself should be an excuse

for tyranny and treason; or how the mere isolated fact of a man not

believing in God should be a reason for my believing in Him.

But the rather spinsterish flutter among some of the old Freethinkers

has put one tiny ripple of truth in it; and that affects the idea which

I wish to emphasise even to monotony in these pages. I mean the idea

that the new community which the capitalists are now constructing will

be a very complete and absolute community; and one which will tolerate

nothing really independent of itself. Now, it is true that any positive

creed, true or false, would tend to be independent of itself. It might

be Roman Catholicism or Mahomedanism or Materialism; but, if strongly

held, it would be a thorn in the side of the Servile State. The Moslem

thinks all men immortal: the Materialist thinks all men mortal. But the

Moslem does not think the rich Sinbad will live forever; but the poor

Sinbad will die on his deathbed. The Materialist does not think that Mr.

Haeckel will go to heaven, while all the peasants will go to pot, like

their chickens. In every serious doctrine of the destiny of men, there

is some trace of the doctrine of the equality of men. But the capitalist

really depends on some religion of inequality. The capitalist must

somehow distinguish himself from human kind; he must be obviously above

it--or he would be obviously below it. Take even the least attractive

and popular side of the larger religions to-day; take the mere vetoes

imposed by Islam on Atheism or Catholicism. The Moslem veto upon

intoxicants cuts across all classes. But it is absolutely necessary for

the capitalist (who presides at a Licensing Committee, and also at a

large dinner), it is absolutely necessary for him, to make a distinction

between gin and champagne. The Atheist veto upon all miracles cuts

across all classes. But it is absolutely necessary for the capitalist to

make a distinction between his wife (who is an aristocrat and consults

crystal gazers and star gazers in the West End), and vulgar miracles

claimed by gipsies or travelling showmen. The Catholic veto upon usury,

as defined in dogmatic councils, cuts across all classes. But it is

absolutely necessary to the capitalist to distinguish more delicately

between two kinds of usury; the kind he finds useful and the kind he

does not find useful. The religion of the Servile State must have no

dogmas or definitions. It cannot afford to have any definitions. For

definitions are very dreadful things: they do the two things that most

men, especially comfortable men, cannot endure. They fight; and they

fight fair.

Every religion, apart from open devil worship, must appeal to a virtue

or the pretence of a virtue. But a virtue, generally speaking, does some

good to everybody. It is therefore necessary to distinguish among

the people it was meant to benefit those whom it does benefit. Modern

broad-mindedness benefits the rich; and benefits nobody else. It was

meant to benefit the rich; and meant to benefit nobody else. And if you

think this unwarranted, I will put before you one plain question. There

are some pleasures of the poor that may also mean profits for the rich:

there are other pleasures of the poor which cannot mean profits for the

rich? Watch this one contrast, and you will watch the whole creation of

a careful slavery.

In the last resort the two things called Beer and Soap end only in a

froth. They are both below the high notice of a real religion. But

there is just this difference: that the soap makes the factory more

satisfactory, while the beer only makes the workman more satisfied. Wait

and see if the Soap does not increase and the Beer decrease. Wait and

see whether the religion of the Servile State is not in every case what

I say: the encouragement of small virtues supporting capitalism, the

discouragement of the huge virtues that defy it. Many great religions,

Pagan and Christian, have insisted on wine. Only one, I think, has

insisted on Soap. You will find it in the New Testament attributed to

the Pharisees.

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 18 / 71 题