II. Letters and the New Laureates

In these articles I only take two or three examples of the first and

fundamental fact of our time. I mean the fact that the capitalists of

our community are becoming quite openly the kings of it. In my last (and

first) article, I took the case of Art and advertisement. I pointed out

that Art must be growing worse--merely because advertisement is growing

better. In those days Millais condescended to Pears’ soap. In these days

I really think it would be Pears who condescended to Millais. But here

I turn to an art I know more about, that of journalism. Only in my ease

the art verges on artlessness.

The great difficulty with the English lies in the absence of something

one may call democratic imagination. We find it easy to realise an

individual, but very hard to realise that the great masses consist of

individuals. Our system has been aristocratic: in the special sense of

there being only a few actors on the stage. And the back scene is kept

quite dark, though it is really a throng of faces. Home Rule tended to

be not so much the Irish as the Grand Old Man. The Boer War tended not

to be so much South Africa as simply “Joe.” And it is the amusing but

distressing fact that every class of political leadership, as it comes

to the front in its turn, catches the rays of this isolating lime-light;

and becomes a small aristocracy. Certainly no one has the aristocratic

complaint so badly as the Labour Party. At the recent Congress, the real

difference between Larkin and the English Labour leaders was not so much

in anything right or wrong in what he said, as in something elemental

and even mystical in the way he suggested a mob. But it must be plain,

even to those who agree with the more official policy, that for Mr.

Havelock Wilson the principal question was Mr. Havelock Wilson; and that

Mr. Sexton was mainly considering the dignity and fine feelings of Mr.

Sexton. You may say they were as sensitive as aristocrats, or as sulky

as babies; the point is that the feeling was personal. But Larkin, like

Danton, not only talks like ten thousand men talking, but he also has

some of the carelessness of the colossus of Arcis; “Que mon nom soit

fletri, que la France soit libre.”

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 11 / 71 题