On the other hand, the conduct of Scott’s immediate dependants had been

highly creditable. Deeply attached, in consequence of his long-enduring

kindness, all were anxious to remain, if possible, about his person.

His butler, Dalgleish, said he would take any or no wages, but go he

would not. His coachman, Peter Matheson, went to work with his horses

at the plough, glad to the core that he was allowed to remain at

Abbotsford on such terms.

The spring of 1828 gave the world _The Fair Maid of Perth_, his last

popular novel. He then indulged in a little relaxation, by spending

a few weeks in London, in the enjoyment of Mr and Mrs Lockhart’s

society, as well as that of many attached friends. We have at this

time a valuable addition to that testimony to his temper which the

second last paragraph affords. He had some years before engaged his

credit for £1200 in favour of his friend Daniel Terry the actor, who

was then undertaking the management of the Adelphi Theatre. Being now

informed of the ruin of Mr Terry’s affairs, he wrote him a letter, in

which the following passage occurs: ‘For my part, I feel as little

title, as God knows I have the wish, to make any reflections on the

matter, beyond the most sincere regret on your own account. The sum

for which I stand noted in the schedule is of no consequence in the

now more favourable condition of my affairs.... I told your solicitor

that I desired he would consider me as a friend of yours, desirous to

take, as a creditor, the measures which seemed best to forward your

interest.’ These are precious things to put into a biography; but they

do not exhaust the list. Even while drudging so hard for the means

of diminishing his own encumbrances, he is found pretty frequently

composing and giving away a paper for the benefit of some unfortunate

man of letters, little regarding, perhaps, the strict merits of the

object of his bounty. One of the most remarkable of these benefactions

consisted in his allowing the publication of two religious discourses

for the benefit of a young man endeared to him by misfortune as well

as merit. This publication yielded £250, a sum which few other literary

men would allow to pass from their own pockets in such a manner.

A great part of his time was now taken up with the new writing

connected with the popular edition of his works; yet before the end of

1828 he had advanced a good way with a new novel, the ground of which

he laid in Switzerland, notwithstanding his being acquainted with the

scenery of that country only by description and engravings. His mind

was now in a more cheerful mood regarding his affairs than it had been

since the dreadful January 1826; and if he had been free of various

ailments, inclusive of rheumatism, caught from a damp bed in France, he

might have enjoyed his life in the country almost as heartily as ever.

Suffer as he might, perseverance at his desk was a fixed principle

with him. Of this we have a striking trait in his finishing _Anne of

Geierstein_ before breakfast one morning, and commencing, as soon as

the meal was over, a new work, a _History of Scotland_, for Lardner’s

_Cabinet Cyclopædia_.

The prospectus of what he called his _opus magnum_--namely, the

re-issue of the Waverley Novels--came out in February 1829, and was so

exceedingly well received that an edition of 10,000 seemed the least he

could throw off, a number which in those days appeared immense. When

the book was published, it was quickly found that this edition would be

quite insufficient to supply the public demand. In short, the sale of

the early volumes was not under 35,000. This was of course magnificent

success, and afforded the prognostic of a much quicker and more easy

settlement of the debts than had been anticipated. The volumes were

sold at five shillings. It was easy to see that, when a certain section

of the public had been supplied at that rate, a still cheaper edition

might be issued with benefit to all concerned. Thus it might be hoped

that Sir Walter would in time rest a free man, with little help from

his own immediate exertions. His heart rebounded at the prospect; and

he even glanced at the possibility of adding to his son’s estate before

he died. The public, too, had their visions on the subject, and, under

the idea that his embarrassments were, comparatively speaking, at an

end, the old stream of tourists and friend-visitors began once more to

pour into Abbotsford. The only drawback was in the infirm and failing

health.

CONCLUDING YEARS--DECEASE.

In February 1830, Scott experienced the first decidedly bad symptom, in

an attack of an apoplectic nature, which caused him to fall speechless

and insensible on the floor. This, it seems, was a hereditary affection

in his family, and it therefore gave him the greater apprehension,

though his physicians were of opinion that the attack proceeded from

the stomach. On still went the pen of the ready-writer, now engaged

on a volume of _Demonology_ for Murray’s _Family Library_. To obtain

even more time for literary task-work, he now resigned his clerkship

on a retiring allowance of £800 a year, and went to fix himself at

Abbotsford as a permanent residence. It was an injudicious step, as it

deprived him of the society of most of his old friends, and threw him

more and more upon that task-work which had already been prosecuted

only too zealously. His friends, Cadell and Ballantyne, were now

sensible that he had carried his zeal for the discharge of his debts

too far, and would have fain restricted him to lighter duty; but it

was difficult to deal with a mind acting under such powerful impulses.

Greatly against their wishes, he commenced a new novel, styled _Count

Robert of Paris_, which, when it appeared, shewed very clearly how

glory had departed from him. He also embroiled his mind in the politics

of the crisis then passing, and wrote a long pamphlet against the

reforming measures of the day, which afterwards he was induced to

suppress. The exaggerated view which he took of the reform cause is a

painful chapter in his history, not merely as shewing him unusually ill

informed and weak of judgment on passing events, but because it gave a

needless addition to anxieties of a real kind which were now pressing

severely on the springs of life. Amidst the vexations arising to him

from public affairs, one ray of pleasure visited him when his creditors

(December 1830) presented him with his library, furniture, plate, and

articles of virtù, considered as equivalent to £10,000, thus enabling

him to make a provision for the younger branches of his family. These

gentlemen were led to this act of generosity by their sense of his

unparalleled exertions in their behalf. Their claims against Scott

had now been reduced to £54,000, and as he had insured £22,000 upon

his life in their favour, and the Waverley Novels were continuing to

produce large returns, all doubt of the ultimate discharge of the

claims had ceased. About this time, the honour of being made a member

of the Privy Council was offered to him, but peremptorily declined, as

unsuitable to his circumstances.

In November of the past year, Scott had had another slight stroke

of apoplexy. He lived in the most sparing manner, yet this did not

prevent a distinct paralytic affection befalling him in April 1831.

From this he recovered, by the care of a good surgeon, in a few days,

and was then placed, by way of caution, upon extremely low diet, which,

however, he did not always adhere to. He was now extremely infirm

in walking, and, from heedlessness, often tumbled over articles of

furniture or other impediments. The desire to be writing continued,

nevertheless, in full vigour as a ruling passion. Here, however, he

was destined to receive a shock more terrible to him than bodily

illness, when his friends, Cadell and Ballantyne, felt it right to tell

him that his tale of _Count Robert of Paris_ was, in their opinion,

an entire failure. ‘The blow is a stunning one, I suppose’--thus he

speaks in his diary--‘for I scarcely feel it.... I am at sea in the

dark, and the vessel leaky, I think, into the bargain. I have suffered

terribly, that is the truth, rather in body than in mind, and I often

wish I could lie down and sleep without waking. But I will fight it

out if I can.’ His friends and medical attendants strongly advised

him to intermit these severe exertions, which evidently were only

a gentle form of self-murder; but they preached to deaf ears. They

were equally unsuccessful in their endeavours to keep him back from a

county election in which he felt interested. He went--took part in the

proceedings--and came to a collision with the populace, which could

not but leave distressing effects on one who, on all other points,

delighted to stand in kindly relations towards the humbler classes.

In the very depth of this dark crisis he began a tale, called _Castle

Dangerous_, in which the failing powers of his mind became even

more painfully conspicuous. He was now fully sensible that, in all

probability, he had but a short time to live; but it only made him the

more eager to work for the acquittance of his great obligations. So

much was this the case, that, being at a country-house in Lanarkshire

on a short visit, the intelligence of a friend having fallen down

suddenly in a fit, from which it was not expected he would recover,

caused him instantly to break up his engagement, and go home; answering

to all remonstrances on the subject: ‘The night cometh when no man may

work.’

He was now advised to spend the ensuing winter in Italy; and the

government having handsomely placed a ship at his disposal, he sailed

for Naples in October, attended by his eldest son and younger daughter.

He was most unwilling to leave home, but a long-entertained wish to see

some of the continental countries besides France served to reconcile

him to the change. The voyage was a pleasant one: he enjoyed the

objects to be seen at Malta, so full of middle-age associations, and

thought of fictions he could found upon them. On the 17th December,

he reached Naples, where everything was done by the king and the best

society of the place, including many English, to render his residence

happy. His chief companion here was Sir William Gell, an invalid

English gentleman, who wrote upon the antiquities of Italy, and with

whom Scott at once became extremely intimate. He beheld most of the

classical antiquities with indifference--saying only at Pompeii: ‘The

city of the dead!’--but was keenly interested in any object or document

which took his mind into the middle ages. Here he actually wrote a new

tale (entitled _The Siege of Malta_), and commenced a second, neither

of which was deemed by his friends as fit to see the light. For some

time he entertained cheerful views about his health; he was also under

an impression that his debts were all discharged: it is needless to say

that in both particulars he was deceived. Thus about four months rolled

on. He then became anxious to return home, and, as he would not obey

rule either as to writing or his diet, it was thought best to gratify

him, in the hope that a more effectual control might there be exercised.

Attended by his younger son, who had been placed at Naples as an

attaché to the embassy there, and by his younger daughter as before,

Scott left Naples for Tweedside on the 16th of April. He paused a few

weeks at Rome, chiefly to gratify his daughter with the sights, of

which, however, he himself also partook, beholding, as before, the

medieval antiquities with the greater share of interest. The houses

occupied by the dethroned Stuarts, and their tombs in St Peter’s,

were objects of peculiar interest in his eyes. Here, as at Naples, he

was treated by persons of the highest rank, native and foreign, with

the greatest respect. Leaving Rome on the 11th of May, he proceeded

by Venice, through the Tyrol, to Frankfort, with a haste which must

have been unfavourable to him, but which nothing could control. It

was soon after necessary for him to have blood let by his servant

Nicolson, who had been instructed for that purpose. On the 13th of

June he reached London, totally exhausted. It was now evident that

this illustrious man was drawing near to the end of a greater journey.

He was kept three weeks in London, during which his friends saw in

him but occasional gleams of sense. He never knew distinctly where

he was: he knew, however, that he was not at Abbotsford, and there he

yearned to be. To gratify him, he was taken to Scotland by sea, and

from Edinburgh, as soon as possible, to his own house. As he approached

it, he began faintly to recognise familiar objects, and by and by it

was found difficult to keep him in the carriage, so greatly was he

excited. At length, alighting at the porch, and seeing his steward

and friend, he exclaimed: ‘Ha, Willie Laidlaw! O man, how often have

I thought of you!’ His dogs came about his knees, and he sobbed over

them until stupor fell again upon him. He remained in the sad state to

which he was now reduced for two months. Sometimes the mind cleared a

little, and on one occasion he caused himself to be placed at his desk

to write, where, however, the fingers failed to grasp the pen, and he

sunk back weeping in his chair. More generally he was in a state of

slumber. When sensible, he caused the Bible and church services to

be read to him. At length, on the 21st of September 1832, the scene

was gently closed. Sir Walter died in the sixty-second year of his

age--years undoubtedly being cut off from the sum of his existence by

that terrible exhaustion consequent on his later literary task-work.

The funeral of this illustrious Scotsman was appointed to take place

on Wednesday the 26th; and, preparatory to that melancholy ceremony,

about three hundred gentlemen were invited by Major Sir Walter Scott,

the eldest son of the deceased. Among the persons thus called upon

were many individuals whose acquaintance of Sir Walter Scott was

simply of a local character. On an occasion like this, when the most

honoured head in the country was to be laid in the grave, it might

have been expected that many individuals would have come of their own

accord, especially from the neighbouring capital, to form part in a

procession, which, however melancholy, was altogether of a historical

character. Considering what the deceased had done for literature--what,

more specially, he had done to popularise Scotland, its scenery,

traditions, and character--we might not unnaturally have looked for

some very marked demonstration of respect, gratitude, and affection.

But great events sometimes make less impression at the time than they

do many years after: and such was the apathy towards this extraordinary

solemnity, that only ten or twelve persons, including the writer of

this and his brother William, had come from Edinburgh. It is also a

very remarkable circumstance, that, as in ordinary funerals, not nearly

the whole of those who had been invited found it convenient to attend.

After a refection in the style usually observed on such occasions, the

funeral train set forward to Dryburgh, where the family of the deceased

possess a small piece of sepulchral ground, amidst the ruins of the

abbey. The spot originally belonged to the Halyburtons of Merton,

an ancient and respectable baronial family, of which Sir Walter’s

paternal grandmother was a member. It is composed simply of the area

comprehended by four pillars, in one of the aisles of the ruined

building. On a side-wall is the following inscription: ‘Sub hoc tumulo

jacet JOANNES HALIBURTONUS, Barro de Mertoun, vir religione et virtute

clarus, qui obiit 17 die Augusti, 1640;’ below which there is a coat

of arms. On the back wall, the latter history of the spot is expressed

on a small tablet, as follows: ‘Hunc locum sepulturæ D. Seneschallus,

Buchaniæ comes, GUALTERO, HOMÆ, et ROBERTO SCOTT, nepotibus

Haliburtoni, concessit, 1791.’--That is to say, the Earl of Buchan

(lately proprietor of the ruins and adjacent ground) granted this place

of sepulture, in 1791, to Walter, Thomas, and Robert Scott, descendants

of the Laird of Halyburton. The persons indicated were the father and

uncles of Sir Walter Scott; but though all are dead, no other member

of the family lies there, besides his uncle Robert and his deceased

lady. From the limited dimensions of the place, the body of the author

of _Waverley_ was placed in a direction north and south, instead of

the usual fashion; and thus, in death at least, he has resembled the

Cameronians, of whose character he was supposed to have given such an

unfavourable picture in one of his tales.

The funeral procession consisted of about sixty vehicles of different

kinds, and a few horsemen. It was melancholy at the very first to see

the deceased carried out of a house which bore so many marks of his

taste, and of which every point, and almost every article of furniture,

was so identified with himself. But it was doubly touching to see him

carried insensible and inurned through the beautiful scenery, which he

has in different ways rendered, from its most majestic to its minutest

features, a matter of interest unto all time. There lay the gray and

august ruin of Melrose Abbey, whose broken arches he has rebuilt in

fancy, and whose deserted aisles he has repeopled with all their former

tenants--as lovely in its decay as ever; while he who had given it all

its charm was passing by, unconscious of its existence, and never more

to behold it. At every successive turn of the way appeared some object

which he had either loved because it was the subject of former song,

or rendered delightful by his own--from the Eildon Hills, renowned in

the legendary history of Michael Scott--to

‘Drygrange, with the milk-white yowes,

’Twixt Tweed and Leader standing;’

to Cowdenknows, where once spear and helm

‘Glanced gaily through the broom;’

and so on to the heights above Gladswood, where Smailholm Castle

appeared in sight--the scene of his childhood being thus brought, after

all the transactions of a mighty and glorious life, into the same

prospect with his grave.

During the time of the funeral, all business was suspended at the

burgh of Selkirk and the villages of Darnick and Melrose; and in the

former of these hamlets several of the signs of the traders were

covered with black cloth, while a flag of crape was mounted on the

old tower of Darnick, which rears itself in the midst of the inferior

buildings. At every side avenue and opening, stood a group of villagers

at gaze--few of them bearing the external signs of mourning, but all

apparently impressed with a proper sense of the occasion. The village

matrons and children, clustered in windows or in lanes, displayed a

mingled feeling of sorrow for the loss, and curiosity and wonder for

the show. The husbandmen suspended their labour, and leaned pensively

over the enclosures. Old infirm people sat out of doors, where some of

them, perhaps, were little accustomed to sit, surveying the passing

cavalcade. And though the feelings of the gazers had, perhaps, as much

reference to the local judge--‘the _Shirra_’--as to the poet of the

world and of time, the whole had a striking effect. Those forming the

procession, so far as they could abstract themselves from the feeling

of the occasion, were also impressed with the extraordinary appearance

which it bore, as it dragged its enormous length through the long

reaches of the road--the hearse sometimes appearing on a far height,

while the rear vehicles were stealing their way through a profound

valley or chasm. The sky was appropriately hung, during the whole time

of the ceremony, with a thick mass of cloud, which canopied the vale

from one end to the other like a pall.

Towards nightfall the procession arrived within the umbrageous

precincts of Dryburgh; and the coffin, being taken from the hearse,

was borne along in slow and solemn wise through the shady walks,

the mourners following to the amount of about three hundred. Before

leaving Abbotsford, homage had been done to the religious customs of

the country by the pronunciation of a prayer by Dr Baird; the funeral

service of the Episcopal Church (to which the deceased belonged)

was now read in the usual manner by the Rev. John Williams, Rector

of the Edinburgh Academy, and Vicar of Lampeter, whose distinction

in literature and in scholarship eminently entitled him to this

honour. The scene was at this time worthy of the occasion. In a

small green space, surrounded by the broken but picturesque ruins of

a Gothic abbey, and overshadowed by wild foliage, just tinged with

the melancholy hues of autumn, with mouldering statuary, and broken

monuments meeting the eye wherever it attempted to pierce, stood the

uncovered group of mourners, amongst whom could be detected but one

feeling--a consciousness that the greatest man their country ever

produced was here receiving from them the last attentions that man

can pay to his brother man--which, however, in this case, reflected

honour, not from the living to the dead, but (and to such a degree!)

from the dead to the living. In this scene, where the efforts of man

seemed struck with desolation, and those of nature crowned with beauty

and triumph, the voice of prayer sounded with peculiar effect; for it

is rare that the words of Holy Writ are pronounced in such a scene;

and it must be confessed that they can seldom be pronounced over such

a ‘departed brother.’ The grave was worthy of a poet--was worthy of

Scott.--And so there he lies, amidst his own loved scenes, awaiting

throughout the duration of time the visits of yearly thousands, after

which the awakening of eternity, when alone can he be reduced to a

level with other men.

PERSONAL APPEARANCE.

Life of Sir Walter Scott, with Abbotsford Notanda · 第 6 / 13 段