We have learnt that sunshine is endowed with distinctly lethal action

as regards particular bacteria, that it can modify the subtle

properties of toxic solutions, and we are asked to believe that it may

exercise an important influence on the animal system in determining

the power of the latter to deal with the agents of disease; but, as we

have seen, the mechanism of it all is shrouded in mystery, and we are

at a loss to divine how it works. Might not some fresh light be thrown

upon this problem if we could ascertain the effect of sunshine on some

of these natural fluids of the body, which recent brilliant research

has shown to be endowed with such wonderful protective or immunising

properties? So far as I am aware, the action of sunshine on these

anti-toxins or protective fluids has not yet been investigated. Can

sunshine interfere with the therapeutic effect of diphtheria-serum,

for example? If simple insolation can so profoundly modify the

character of toxic fluids, it is not unreasonable to anticipate some

action on these anti-toxins, and their study in this connection would

appear to offer an important step in the direction of unravelling the

mystery attending the action of light on life.

BACTERIOLOGY AND WATER

Whilst the Hamburg cholera disaster of 1892 will certainly rank in the

annals of epidemiology as one of the great catastrophes of recent

times, it will also be memorable as one of the most instructive which

has ever taken place.

It is perhaps not unnatural that this should be the case, for since

the last European epidemic of importance our study of the principles

of sanitation has received a new impetus, and this impetus must be in

great part ascribed to the science of bacteriology, which has sprung

into existence within the past two decades. We have now no longer to

confront mysterious and unknown morbific material, but have been

brought face to face with some of the most dreaded foes of the human

race. We are no longer groping, as it were, in the dark, but have a

definite object, in the shape of well-recognised micro-organisms

associated with specific zymotic diseases, for our common crusade.

But it is the light which has been thrown for the first time upon

numerous intricate problems connected with the sanitary aspects of

public water-supplies which constitutes not the least important of the

many services rendered by bacteriology to the public. Perhaps one of

the most striking of these may be considered the insight which it has

afforded into the value of various processes of water-purification,

furnishing us with the most subtle and searching tests, surpassing in

delicacy those of the most refined chemical methods.

Thus for years the processes of sand-filtration, as practised at

waterworks in dealing with river and other surface waters, were

regarded by chemical experts as of but little or no value, because, on

chemical analysis, but little or no difference was found to exist

between the filtered and unfiltered samples respectively. Water

engineers started this method of water treatment in London as far back

as the year 1839, with no other object than the distribution of a

water bright and clear on delivery, but, unknown to themselves, they

were carrying out a system of water-purification the nature and extent

of which has been left to the infant science of bacteriology to

unravel and reveal.

It was in the year 1885 that Dr. Koch's new bacteriological

water-tests were introduced, and systematically applied for the first

time to the London water-supply by Professor Percy Frankland, and the

entirely unexpected result obtained, that whereas the River Thames

water at Hampton contained as many as 1,644 micro-organisms in about

twenty drops, this water, after passing through the sand-filters,

possessed as few as thirteen in the same number of drops. The

remarkable purification effected in the treatment of the water was

thus very clearly shown, and an entirely new aspect was given to the

processes of sand-filtration.

The importance of these results was quickly appreciated by the

official water-examiner, the late Sir Francis Bolton, and at the

request of the Local Government Board regular monthly bacteriological

examinations of the London water-supply were conducted.

It is amusing to recall that, at the time when these results were

first published, the public, instead of being reassured by these

facts, were greatly alarmed, and it is a matter of history that the

mere demonstration of the presence of micro-organisms in

drinking-water caused a fall in the price of several of the water

companies' stocks!

These investigations, which have since been confirmed by others both

in this country and on the Continent, have clearly shown, then, that

sand-filtration, when carefully carried out, offers a most remarkable

and obstinate barrier to the passage of microbes, and there was every

justification in presuming that if disease organisms should at any

time be present in the raw untreated water, they would also undergo a

similar fate, as there was no reasonable ground for supposing that

they would behave any differently from the ordinary harmless water

bacteria.

But this was a hypothesis only, and, however satisfactory experiments

in this direction made in the laboratory might prove, there was always

the uncertainty attaching to a fact which had not passed through the

ordeal of practical experience.

The answer to this searching and all-important question has been

furnished in the most conclusive manner by the history of the cholera

epidemic in Hamburg and Altona respectively in the year 1892.

These two cities are both dependent upon the River Elbe for their

water-supply, but whereas in the case of Hamburg the intake is

situated _above_ the city, the supply for Altona is abstracted below

Hamburg _after it has received the sewage of a population of close

upon 800,000 persons_. The Hamburg water was, therefore, to start

with, relatively pure when compared with that destined for the use of

Altona. But what was the fate of these two towns as regards cholera?

Situated side by side, absolutely contiguous, in fact, with nothing in

their surroundings or in the nature of their population to especially

distinguish them, in the one cholera swept away thousands, whilst in

the other the scourge was scarcely felt; in Hamburg the deaths from

cholera amounted to 1,250 per 100,000, and in Altona to but 221 per

100,000 of the population. So clearly defined, moreover, was the path

pursued by the cholera, that although it pushed from the Hamburg side

right up to the boundary line between the two cities, it there

stopped, this being so striking that in one street, which for some

distance marks the division between these cities, _the Hamburg side

was stricken down with cholera, whilst that belonging to Altona

remained free_. The remarkable fact was brought to light that in those

houses supplied with the Hamburg water cholera was rampant, whilst in

those on the Altona side and furnished with the Altona water not one

case occurred.

We have seen that the Hamburg water, to start with, was comparatively

pure when compared with the foul liquid abstracted from the Elbe by

Altona, but whereas in the one case the water was submitted to

exhaustive and careful filtration through sand before delivery, in

Hamburg the Elbe water was distributed in its raw condition as drawn

from the river.

But further testimony was afforded later to the truth of these

results, for during the winter, whilst the cases of cholera had almost

completely died out in Hamburg, suddenly a most unexpected and

unaccountable recrudescence of the epidemic occurred, and this time in

Altona. This outbreak could not be traced to any direct infection from

Hamburg, but must have arisen in Altona itself. In all about

forty-seven cases were recorded between December 23rd, 1892, and

February 12th, 1893. A searching inquiry was instituted, and it was

ascertained that the number of bacteria found in the filtered water,

usually about fifty, had during these months risen to as many as 1,000

and more in about twenty drops of water, clearly indicating that the

filtration of the water was not being efficiently carried out. That

this was actually the case was proved by the fact that one of the

sand-filters which had been cleaned during the frost had become frozen

over, and was not able to retain the bacteria. That the outbreak did

not become more serious Koch ascribes to the fact that this, to all

intents and purposes raw untreated water, was largely diluted with

efficiently filtered water before delivery. Dr. Koch, who personally

superintended this inquiry in Altona, traced another local outbreak of

cholera in the city to the use of a well-water obviously open to

pollution, which was used by about 270 persons. In one of the houses

employing this water, and in the immediate vicinity of the well, a boy

died of cholera on January 23rd, and during the week following a

number of cases occurred amongst persons using this source. On

discovering the cholera bacilli in this polluted water, its

contamination was placed beyond doubt, and five days after the well

was closed all cases ceased in the locality.

There cannot be any longer a doubt as to the value of sand-filtration

as a means of water-purification, but the responsibility which we have

seen attaches to this treatment of water cannot be exaggerated, for

whilst when efficiently pursued it forms a most important barrier to

the dissemination of disease germs, the slightest imperfection in its

manipulation is a constant menace during any epidemic.

It is, as a rule, during the winter months that the largest number of

bacteria are present in the filtered water, and it is therefore of

especial importance that during this season, when the raw river water

is generally richest in bacterial life, and when, therefore, the

filters are most taxed and the consequences of frost are most to be

apprehended, that those entrusted with this responsible task should be

unremitting in their endeavours to obtain a good filtrate.

That waters submitted to exhaustive natural filtration, such as those

derived from deep wells sunk into the chalk, and usually almost

entirely devoid of bacterial life, may at times become the carriers of

disease has been proved by the disastrous outbreak of typhoid fever

which occurred some years ago at Worthing.

This town has long been supplied with water of the very finest quality

for dietetic purposes, and nothing could have been more unexpected

than this most fatal epidemic. It must, however, be borne in mind that

such deep-well waters are not necessarily immaculate, for in the event

of any fault in the water-bearing strata occurring, the filtration

becomes inefficient, and the water may then, as in the case of

Worthing, be the bearer and disseminator of zymotic disease.

The bacteriological methods for the examination of water, although

when first introduced but a few years ago were lightly looked upon,

and by many opposed, have now become of paramount importance in all

questions of water-purification. The immense mass of evidence of a

purely bacteriological character which was taken, and indeed required

by the Royal Commissioners of 1893 on the London water-supply,

indicates clearly enough the change which has taken place in the

public estimation of the value of these methods; and it is highly

significant that in their report the Commissioners lay stress upon the

importance of extensive storage and efficient filtration, two factors

the meaning and worth of which rest almost entirely on the results of

bacteriological research.

Cholera is not, however, the only water-carried disease which has

borne eloquent testimony to the services rendered by the efficient

purification of public water-supplies. The experience of the State of

Massachusetts in America, in regard to typhoid fever and

drinking-water, is also exceedingly instructive.

Massachusetts has, by creating a Board of Health, and affording the

same every facility for the prosecution of hygienic investigations of

the greatest importance, laid the whole scientific world under a deep

obligation. The reports issued have a very wide circulation, and

embrace a variety of subjects, but second to none in interest and

importance is the account of the experimental work carried out by the

officials of the Board on the purification of water and sewage. These

experiments have become classical, and have been conducted with a zeal

and thoroughness which deserve the highest praise. It is in looking at

the results achieved by the city of Lawrence in regard to its

water-supply that some conception can be obtained of the immense

importance to the community of the scientific experiments conducted in

the State Laboratory. No expense has been spared, and for years past

elaborate and costly experiments on a large scale have been carried

out to determine the most efficient manner in which water may be

rendered fit and safe for drinking.

Now the death-rate in a community from typhoid fever may be taken as

an index of the general sanitary conditions prevailing in such a

community, the character of the public water-supply, not without

justification, being regarded as a prime factor in its determination.

One of the most significant points in the sanitary history of the

State of Massachusetts is the almost uniform decline in the mortality

from typhoid fever in proportion as measures have been taken to

introduce better water-supplies and to improve those which already

exist. Thus in the twenty years, from 1856 to 1876, the death-rate

from this disease was 8·6 per 10,000 of population, whilst in the

period from 1876 to 1895 it had fallen to 4·1 per 10,000, the

improvement in respect of typhoid-mortality being coincident with the

improvement made during the last twenty years in providing public

water-supplies. In the words of one of the State reports, "The

death-rate from typhoid fever has generally fallen as the per cent. of

the population supplied with public water has risen, for the reason

that the majority of the deaths from this disease have occurred among

communities and portions of communities _not supplied with public

water_."

That this improvement is being maintained is seen from the fact that

in the four-year period 1896-99 the deaths from typhoid fever in

Massachusetts were further reduced to 2·6 per 10,000.

It is, however, in the city of Lawrence that the most striking insight

is obtained as to the manner in which typhoid fever may be controlled

by conditions surrounding the water-supply to the community. Thus,

whereas the death-rate from typhoid fever reached a mean of 11·2 per

10,000 in 1886-90, it fell to 7·7 in 1891-95 and to 2·5 in 1896-99. It

was in the autumn of the year 1893 that the raw river-water supplied

to the city from the Merrimac River was first begun to be filtered,

and since that time the sand-filters have been subjected to systematic

and most elaborate bacterial supervision, and improvements have been

constantly introduced so as to secure the most efficient purification

possible of the water before distribution, and the results are

reflected in the marked diminution in typhoid fever which has followed

these strenuous efforts to obtain the best water-supply available.

The splendid example set by the State of Massachusetts, in promoting

the welfare of the people by the encouragement of original researches

in practical hygiene, has stimulated other American States to create

Boards of Health and enact laws for the protection of their rivers and

streams. In view of all that has been done to promote sanitary science

in the United States, it is surprising to learn that Lake Michigan,

which receives the untreated sewage of municipalities and small towns

aggregating over two million people, still furnishes Chicago with its

drinking water, and undergoes no preliminary purification before

distribution. The city of Chicago, by constructing the Chicago

Drainage and Ship Canal, opened in January, 1900, has diverted its own

sewage from Lake Michigan, but this great sewer has only been made

possible because of its advantages as a commercial waterway; and it

has been stated, on high authority, that every project for the

drainage of Chicago into the Illinois which has not recognised the

waterway features has been predestined to failure. Dr. Egan, of the

Illinois State Board of Health, however, points out that "with the

present increase in population the Great Lakes, if they continue to be

used as common sewers, will soon become totally unfit for use as

drinking water, ... and one of two alternatives must be

followed--either every source of water-supply must be filtered, or the

sewage of the towns must be efficiently purified before it is allowed

to flow into the lakes."

Doubtless this seeming inertia of the citizens of Chicago in the

matter of filtering their water is attributable to the fact that

already the authorities have expended eighty-five million dollars in

their waterworks and sewerage systems, which represents an investment

of something over fifty dollars per head of population, and that plans

in connection with the great canal which has been described as "the

greatest feat of sanitary engineering in the world," and to which

reference has already been made, will, when carried out, involve an

expenditure of thirty or forty million dollars more. In the face of

such burdens even so prosperous a community as Chicago does not care

to contemplate further capital charges, at any rate until the

unsatisfactory conditions shadowed by Dr. Egan become more pressing in

regard to the source of their water-supply.

The systematic investigations carried out in the great Institutes of

Health on the Continent and elsewhere should surely make the sporadic

work, as by comparison it must be designated, produced in this country

an eloquent argument for the creation of a British Imperial Board of

Health adequately endowed by the State, manned by the ablest

investigators, and forming a centre for the prosecution of researches

which in other countries, as in our own, have contributed so greatly

to the health and welfare of mankind.

Why should England for ever have to knock at the door of foreign

institutes for information and guidance in matters in which once she

was the leader and enlightened example to every civilised country?

The question of how far polluted water-supplies, besides possessing

the potentiality for spreading cholera and typhoid, may disseminate

consumption, has been approached in a very instructive manner by Dr.

Musehold, of the German Imperial Board of Health.

Some ten years ago the discovery of the tubercle bacillus in water for

the first time was announced by a Spanish investigator, Fernandez. The

water containing the bacillus tuberculosis was derived from an open

ditch, and hence had been doubtless exposed to contamination of divers

kinds.

In the course of the elaborate experiments on London sewage and its

treatment, carried out by Professor Frank Clowes, Chief Chemist to the

London County Council, an instance was recently met with in which a

guinea-pig, inoculated with a portion of coke-deposit derived from a

bacterial sewage bed, died from typical tuberculosis, and sections of

its organs showed the presence of numerous tubercle bacilli. Dr.

Musehold has now submitted the whole question of the vitality of

virulent tubercle bacilli present in the expectorations of consumptive

persons in sewage, in river water, and on cultivated land

respectively, to an exhaustive examination, and the novelty as well as

importance of these researches merit their being carefully considered.

In the first instance tuberculous sputum was introduced into river

water in its natural condition, and as this water was abstracted from

the River Spree, in Berlin, it was exposed at any rate to a certain

degree of surface contamination. In this water, kept in ordinary

daylight, the tubercle bacilli remained alive and in a virulent

condition for over five months; in ordinary sewage for six and a half

months. Some of the sewage-infected samples were left in the open air

and exposed to ordinary meteorological conditions, but even the ordeal

of getting frozen up in their surroundings did not in the slightest

shorten the lease of virulence possessed by the tubercle bacilli. Some

of this tubercle-infected sewage was poured over garden soil in which

radishes were growing, and after the bacilli had spent eighty-eight

days in these surroundings, during which time they had experienced

frost, snow, rain, and sunshine, they still retained their virulence.

Of special interest are the investigations Dr. Musehold made to

ascertain if tubercle bacilli could be detected on the fields attached

to a hospital for consumption and irrigated with the sewage from the

same. Not only were tubercle bacilli found, but they were also, as was

to be expected from the laboratory experiments cited above, discovered

in a highly virulent condition.

That disease germs may be distributed with the vegetables grown on

municipal sewage farms is not a mere whim or fancy of the faddist, but

is a very real danger, and must be regarded as a menace to the health

of all who consume such articles as lettuces, radishes, celery, and

other vegetables which are not first cooked before being placed on the

table.

This forcibly suggests the desirability of all expectorations from

consumptive patients being thoroughly disinfected, or, in other words,

deprived of their virulence before being admitted to sewage.

The importance of such precautions being taken is borne out by the

examinations of the clear effluent derived from the treatment of the

sewage of a consumptive hospital which revealed the presence of

virulent tubercle bacilli, whilst they were also discovered in the

bottom of a ditch conducting the effluent away.

Such facts as these deserve the earnest attention of all public

authorities, and it is to be hoped that the overwhelming evidence

which is now available regarding the distribution and Spartan

character of the tubercle bacillus will lead to serious efforts being

made to bestow upon it that measure of consideration which in the case

of recognised zymotic diseases leads to the enactment of rules and

regulations for the restriction at least of the fateful activities of

these malignant foes of mankind.

Before leaving the subject of bacteria in relation to water, it will

be interesting to glance at what is known regarding the attitude taken

up by these minute forms of life towards that large and

ever-increasing class of waters vaguely grouped together under the

synonym of mineral waters. The fortunes made in manufacturing

artificially aërated waters and the mine of wealth contained in a new

mineral spring are sufficient evidence of the popularity enjoyed by

this description of beverage. The beer and spirit statistics of the

country and their contributions to the national revenue do not,

however, permit us to indulge in the belief that this large

consumption of harmless drinks is due to their displacing the use of

intoxicants--the increasing sale of non-alcoholic beverages cannot in

fact be taken as an index of the growing sobriety of a nation; far

more must the greater demand be attributed to the improvements in

manufacture which have cheapened production and placed what was

formerly an article of luxury almost prohibitive in price, and hence

reserved for the few, within comparatively easy reach of the many.

Perhaps also an increased sale may be assisted by a prevailing

impression that by substituting carbonated for ordinary potable water,

the risk of contracting zymotic disease is, if not altogether removed,

at any rate very materially diminished.

It will be therefore instructive to see how far this assumption is

justified by actual facts.

The first fact to be recognised is that the number of bacteria present

may and does fluctuate between such wide limits as is represented by

as few as three, and as many as 100,000 being found in about twenty

drops of artificially aërated waters. Seltzer water, manufactured from

well water, was found by Sohnke to contain numbers varying from 200 to

6,000, whilst when only distilled water was used, _i.e._ water

previously deprived of all bacterial life, only from ten to thirty

microbes were present. But an important and far too little recognised

factor in the manufacture of aërated waters is the contamination which

so frequently takes place subsequent to the initial purification of

the water by sterilisation. In some instances this contamination is

due to the storing of water before use in reservoirs, where an

excellent opportunity is offered for microbial multiplication.

Bacteria in Daily Life · 第 5 / 11 段