The first Baldwin-Lafontaine Ministry resigned office in November, 1843,

in consequence of the arbitrary conduct of Sir Charles Metcalfe. All

the circumstances connected with this resignation are narrated at

sufficient length elsewhere in these pages. Mr. Lafontaine remained in

Opposition until March, 1848, when he and his colleagues again came into

power. During the interval he had steadily held his ground in the

estimation of the Reform element in the French Canadian population, of

whom he was the acknowledged leader. The history of the second

Baldwin-Lafontaine Administration[10] in which Mr. Lafontaine held the

portfolio of Attorney-General East, has been given in previous sketches,

and there is no need for repeating the details here. It was Mr.

Lafontaine who, in February, 1849, introduced the famous Rebellion

Losses Bill, which gave rise to so much heated debate in the House, and

to such disgraceful proceedings outside. Mr. Lafontaine, as the actual

introducer of the Bill, came in for his full share of the odium

attaching to that measure. His house in Montreal was attacked by the

mob, and although the flames were extinguished in time to save the

building, the furniture and library shared the fate of those in the

Houses of Parliament, with the fate of which readers of the sketch of

Lord Elgin are already familiar. After much wilful destruction of

valuable property the rioters waxed bolder, and proceeded to maltreat

loyal subjects in the streets in the most shameful manner. Mr.

Lafontaine himself narrowly escaped personal maltreatment. A second

attack was made upon his house. The military, or some occupants of the

house, finding it necessary to use extreme measures, fired upon the mob,

wounding several, and killing one man, whose name was Mason. For a few

minutes after this time it seemed not improbable that Mr. Lafontaine

would be torn in pieces. Yells rent the air, and it was loudly

proclaimed that a Frenchman had shed the blood of an Anglo-Saxon. The

hour of danger passed, however, and Mr. Lafontaine escaped without

personal injury. The unanimous verdict of a coroner's jury acquitted him

of all blame for the death of the misguided man who had fallen a victim

to his zeal for riot. The verdict had a quieting effect upon the public

mind. Meanwhile the Governor-General had tendered his resignation, but

as his conduct was approved of both by the Local Administration and by

the Home Authorities, he, at their urgent request, consented to remain

in office. In consequence of this disgraceful riot, however, it was not

considered desirable to continue the seat of Government at Montreal. The

Legislature thenceforth sat alternately at Toronto and Quebec, until

1866, when Ottawa became the permanent capital of the Dominion.

Notwithstanding all the excitement, and the opposition to which he was

subjected, Mr. Lafontaine generally contrived to carry through any

measure which he had very much at heart. There were certain popular

measures, however, which he never had at heart, and to which, although

the leader of a professedly Liberal Administration, he could never be

induced to lend his countenance. After Responsible Government had become

an accomplished fact, there was no measure so imperatively demanded by

Upper Canadian Reformers as the secularization of the Clergy Reserves.

In the Lower Province the measure most desired by the people was the

abolition of the Seignorial Tenure. To neither of these projects would

Mr. Lafontaine consent. He had an immense respect for vested rights, and

does not seem to have fully recognized the fact that so-called vested

rights are sometimes neither more nor less than vested wrongs. Yet,

notwithstanding his hostility to these measures, he continued to hold

the reins of power, for he was regarded as an embodiment, in his own

person, of the unity of the French-Canadian race. He was, however, like

his colleague, Robert Baldwin, too moderate in his views for the times

in which his later political life was cast. The progress of Reform was

too rapid for him, and he finally made way for more advanced and more

energetic men. His retirement from office and from political life took

place towards the close of 1851. After his retirement he devoted himself

to professional pursuits, and continued to do so until the death of Sir

James Stuart, Chief Justice of the Lower Province, in the summer of

1853, left that position vacant. On the 13th of August Mr. Lafontaine

was appointed to the office, and on the 28th of August, 1854, he was

created a Baronet. In 1861, having been a widower for some years, he

married a second time, his choice being Jane, daughter of Mr. Charles

Morrison, of Berthier, and widow of Mr. Thomas Kinton, of Montreal. He

continued to occupy the position of Chief Justice until his death, which

took place on the morning of the 26th of February, 1864. During his

tenure of that office he also presided at the sittings of the Seignorial

Tenure Court. He attained high rank as a jurist, and his decisions,

which were always delivered with a weighty impressiveness of manner, are

regarded with very great respect by his successors, and by the legal

profession generally.

Mr. Robert Christie, the historian of Lower Canada, contrasts the

political character of Mr. Lafontaine with that of his early colleague,

Mr. Papineau. Mr. Christie knew both the personages well, and was quite

capable of discriminating between them. "Mr. Lafontaine," he says, "it

is pretty generally admitted, has, by consulting only the practicable

and expedient, acted wisely and well, amidst the difficulties that beset

his position as Prime Minister, and upon the whole, though there are

derogating circumstances in the course of it, his administration has

been eminently successful. It was, in fact, from the impetuous and blind

pursuit of the impracticable and inexpedient, that Mr. Papineau lost

himself, shipwrecking his own and his party's hopes, and, with his

example and failure before him, it is to Mr. Lafontaine's credit that he

has had the wisdom to profit by them."

Sir Louis had no issue by his first wife. By his second wife he had one

son, to whom he was very much attached, and upon whom he looked as the

transmitter of his name, and of the title which he had so honourably

won. The little fellow, however, died in childhood, and the title became

extinct. Lady Lafontaine still resides in Montreal.

JOHN CHRISTIAN SCHULTZ, M.D.

Dr. Schultz has had some adventurous passages in his life, and has

played a by no means insignificant part in the history of the Prairie

Province. He was born at Amherstburgh, in the county of Essex, Upper

Canada, on the 1st of January, 1840. He is a son of the late Mr. William

Schultz, a native of Denmark, who was for many years engaged in business

as a merchant at Amherstburgh. His mother was Eliza, daughter of Mr.

Willam Riley, of Bandon, Ireland.

After receiving his primary education at the public schools of

Amherstburgh, he entered Oberlin College, Ohio. This institution was

then held in high consideration by many persons in this country, and

some of our prominent men have been educated there. Mr. Schultz remained

there long enough to pass through the Arts course. Having chosen the

medical profession as his future calling, he studied medicine at Queen's

College, Kingston, and afterwards at the Medical Department of Victoria

College, in Toronto. He had conceived the design of emigrating to

Mexico, with a view to practising his profession there, but after

graduating as M.D., in the spring of 1860, he relinquished that design,

and found his way, by the rude and toilsome route then in vogue, to the

Red River Settlement. The community there at that time consisted of

about eight thousand persons, separated from the city of St. Paul,

Minnesota, by a distance of 550 miles of country, a great part of which

was owned by the Ojibway and Sioux Indians. There was of course no

railway in that part of the world in those days, and anyone undertaking

to travel from St. Paul to Fort Garry entered upon a journey which was

not only toilsome but perilous. The barbarians all along the route were

fierce and intractable, not much given to discriminating between

subjects of Great Britain and those of the United States. Between the

latter and the Indians there was much ill-feeling, and murders and

assassinations of white travellers were matters of frequent occurrence.

After enduring many hardships, Dr. Schultz reached Fort Garry, and there

commenced the practice of his profession. He soon afterwards entered

upon the traffic in furs, a pursuit which was very profitable in those

days, but which was still held as a monopoly by the Hudson's Bay

Company. The great Company doubtless well knew that it would not much

longer be permitted to enjoy its monopoly, but it was not disposed to

encourage rivalry, and looked upon Dr. Schultz's interference with no

friendly eye. There are of course two sides to this question. The

Company's agents were sometimes overbearing and tyrannical in resisting

the encroachments of free-traders. On the other hand, it was scarcely to

be expected that they would encourage or quietly submit to interference

with what they regarded as the Company's exclusive rights. In spite of

all opposition, however, Dr. Schultz continued to carry on his

operations with great profit to himself for some years. His negotiations

with the Indians and half-breeds rendered it necessary that he should

traverse a wide extent of country, and he thus gained an accurate

knowledge of the topography of the North-West, as well as an intimate

acquaintance with Indian manners, traditions, and customs.

In the spring of 1862 Dr. Schultz was unfortunate enough to be away from

home when the terrible Sioux massacre occurred in Minnesota, completely

cutting off connection between its frontier settlements and Fort Garry,

and spreading devastation and terror throughout the whole of the

North-West. The Doctor, after waiting some time at St. Paul, where he

had been transacting business, attempted the passage through the Indian

country by the "Crow Wing" trail, as it was called. After many days and

nights of cautious travelling, and one capture by the Indians, from

which he owed his release to his ability to convince the savages that he

was English and not American, he arrived safely at Pembina, whence he

made his way to Fort Garry. In 1864 he became the owner and editor of

the _Nor'-Wester_, the pioneer newspaper of the North-West, and laboured

hard through its columns to make the great agricultural value of the

country known. His policy was, of course, diametrically opposed to that

of the Hudson's Bay Company, and as time passed by, the hostility

between that Company and himself became very bitter and implacable. He

subsequently disposed of the _Nor'-Wester_ to Dr. Walter Robert Bown, by

whom the paper was conducted at the time of the outbreak to be presently

referred to.

In 1868 Dr. Schultz married Miss Agnes Campbell Farquharson, formerly of

Georgetown, British Guiana. He soon afterwards built the house which was

destined to become historical for the defence against Riel and his

insurrectionary force. In the autumn of 1868 he greatly extended the fur

business in which he was engaged, sending expeditions for that purpose

to the far north and west. The following autumn brought with it the

first mutterings of the Red River Rebellion, and it was seen that Dr.

Schultz was a marked man. Warning letters from Riel and other insurgents

were sent to him. Some of the Hudson's Bay Company's officials openly

accused him of having been the means of bringing about connection with

Canada, and in the gathering of the storm there seemed to be an ominous

future for him whom many of the Canadians then in the country looked

upon as their leader, and trusted to for their defence. He was

unfortunate, too, in the situation of his residence and trading post,

which were the nearest buildings to Fort Garry, and within easy range of

the field guns which Riel afterwards planted to force the giving up of

the Canadian Government provisions. Upon the actual breaking out of the

insurrection, Dr. Schultz suffered severely, both in person and in

purse. His pecuniary losses were recompensed to him by the Government,

but the bodily privations to which he was subjected were the means of

inflicting a shock upon his constitution, the effects of which are still

to some extent perceptible. After the seizure of Fort Garry by the

insurgents, the loyal Canadians of the settlement were placed under

surveillance. About fifty of these assembled for mutual safety at Dr.

Schultz's house, about eight hundred yards from the Fort. Here they were

besieged by several hundred of Riel's followers for three days. The

siege does not seem to have been incessant or very active, but there

were more than two hundred armed French half-breeds who kept continually

on the watch, and the inmates were prevented from egress. It is said

that two mounted six-pounders were drawn by the insurgents outside the

walls of Fort Garry, with their muzzles pointed in the direction of the

beleaguered house. The little force inside the building was too small to

enable the besieged to make a permanent resistance, and at last they

were compelled to surrender. They were then marched by the rebels to

Fort Garry and imprisoned there. Dr. Schultz himself, who was the

especial object of Riel's hatred, was placed in solitary confinement,

under a strong guard. His wife, who had insisted on remaining by his

side, was at first permitted to share his imprisonment, but after a few

days she was forcibly separated from him, and it seemed not unlikely

that this separation had been effected by Riel with a view to wreaking

his vengeance on the Doctor by taking his life. Riel himself alleged

that there was no intention of harming any of the prisoners, but that he

considered it desirable to separate Mr. and Mrs. Schultz, lest the

husband should be enabled to escape through the instrumentality of his

wife, who of course was not a prisoner, and who was permitted ingress

and egress at all reasonable hours. Dr. Schultz, however, placed little

reliance on the word of the arch-insurgent. Knowing the sentiments with

which he was regarded by Riel, he felt that his life was liable to be

sacrificed at any moment, and he determined to make an attempt to

escape. This purpose, after being confined for nearly three weeks, he

successfully accomplished. Mrs. Schultz contrived to secretly convey to

him a pen-knife and a small gimlet. With these inadequate means he made

an opening through his cell, large enough to enable him to pass through

into the inner quadrangle of the Fort. On the night of Sunday, the 23rd

of December, 1869, he cut into strips the buffalo-robe which served for

his bed, fastened an end to a projection in his cell, passed through the

opening he had made in the wall, and prepared to descend to _terra

firma_. While he was making the descent one of the strips of buffalo

skin snapped, and he was precipitated violently to the ground. The fall

rendered him temporarily lame, and caused him great suffering, but even

in this disabled condition he managed to scramble over the outer wall

near one of the bastions, and found himself at liberty. He stole away in

the dead silence of night, and after a toilsome march of some hours in a

blinding snow-storm, took refuge in the house of a friendly settler in

the parish of Kildonan. There, in the course of the next few weeks, he

and other Canadians organized a force about six hundred strong, with a

view to releasing their friends who were still imprisoned at Fort Garry.

Everything being in readiness for action, a message, demanding the

release of the prisoners, was despatched to Riel. The demand was

vigorously backed up by the influence of Mr. A. G. B. Bannatyne, a

prominent citizen of Red River, and Miss McVicar, a young lady from

Canada who was on a visit to the settlement. These two called upon Riel

at Fort Garry, and begged him to avert the bloodshed which would

certainly result if he persisted in detaining the prisoners. Riel, under

the combined influence of his interlocutors and the demand which had

been made upon him by the Canadian forces, displayed the better part of

valour, and promptly released the captives. He was determined, however,

to recapture Dr. Schultz, and sent out several expeditions to discover

his whereabouts. He declared that he would have Dr. Schultz's body, dead

or alive, if it was to be found in the Red River Settlement.

Disappointed at the non-success of his emissaries, Riel started out

himself at the head of an expedition, to scour the settlement, and to

recapture the object of his enmity. The expedition reached the Stone

Fort, or Lower Fort Garry, about midway between the capital of the

settlement and the entrance of Red River into Lake Winnipeg. They

entered the enclosure, and searched every nook and corner of the Fort.

Ill would it have fared with Dr. Schultz had he been discovered there;

but he was far away, and was every hour increasing the distance between

Riel and himself. A large meeting of loyalist settlers had been held, at

which Dr. Schultz was requested to proceed to Canada, and to lay the

real state of affairs before the people there. Such a mission involved

grave perils and hardships, for all the roads leading to Minnesota were

closely guarded by the insurgents, and certain death would have

overtaken the Doctor had he again fallen into their hands. He

determined, however, to make the attempt by way of Lake Superior. On the

21st of February, accompanied only by an English half-breed named Joseph

Monkman, he started on his perilous expedition. News of his having done

so came in due course to the ears of Riel, who sent out scouts in every

direction to intercept him. The Doctor and his companion eluded their

vigilance, and with snow-shoes on their feet struck across the frozen

south-easterly end of Lake Winnipeg to the mouth of the Winnipeg River.

They made their way past the rushing cascades of that stream to the Lake

of the Woods; thence across to Rainy Lake, and thence across the

northern part of the State of Minnesota to the head of Lake Superior.

Numerous camps of Indians were encountered on this adventurous march,

and from time to time guides were obtained from the latter. "Over weary

miles of snow-covered lakes; over the watershed between Rainy Lake and

the lakes of the Laurentian chain; over the height of land between Rainy

Lake and Lake Superior; through pine forests and juniper swamps, these

travellers made their way, turning aside only where wind-fallen timber

made their course impossible. Often saved from starvation by the

woodcraft of Monkman; their course guided by the compass, or by views

taken from the top of some stately Norway pine, they found themselves,

after twenty-four weary days of travel, in sight of the blue, unfrozen

waters of Lake Superior. They had struck the lake not far from its head,

and in a few hours presented themselves to the astonished gaze of the

people of the then embryo village of Duluth, gaunt with hunger, worn

with fatigue, their clothes in tatters, their eyes blinded with the

glare of the glittering sun of March." They then learned for the first

time of the terrible event which had occurred at Fort Garry since their

departure--the murder of the unfortunate Thomas Scott. From Duluth they

made their way to Toronto, whither news of their adventures had preceded

them. On the 6th of April an indignation meeting was held in Toronto, at

which a stirring address was delivered by Dr. Schultz, wherein the whole

nature of the Red River difficulty was reviewed. Resolutions expressive

of indignation at Scott's murder, and calling aloud for active

Government interference, were passed. Similar meetings were held, and

similar resolutions passed in Montreal, and in various other cities and

towns in both the Upper and Lower Provinces. The expedition under

Colonel (now Sir Garnet) Wolseley was soon afterwards set on foot, but

the account of it has no special bearing upon Dr. Schultz's life, and

need not be given here. The Doctor soon afterwards returned to Manitoba,

where he has ever since resided, and where he exercises a potent

influence over public affairs.

For nearly ten years past Dr. Schultz has been engaged in active

political life. At the first general election after Manitoba became part

of the Dominion, he was elected to represent the county of Lisgar (which

comprises most of the old Lord Selkirk Settlement) in the House of

Commons. The following year he was appointed a member of the Executive

Council of the North-West Territories, which sat in Winnipeg under the

Presidency of the Lieutenant-Governor of the Province. In this capacity

he was able to utilize his knowledge of the Indians and their wants much

to their advantage, in the passage of a Prohibitive Liquor Law for the

whole of the North-West, and in other measures for the amelioration of

their condition. He was reëlected to represent Lisgar at the general

election of 1872, and again at that of 1874, and again by acclamation at

the last general election. He is a member of the Dominion Board of

Health for Manitoba, a Director of the Manitoba Southwestern

Colonization Railway, one of the Board of Examiners of the Manitoba

Medical Board, a Director of the Winnipeg and Hudson's Bay Railway, and

of the Great Northwestern Telegraph Company. He is moreover one of the

largest land owners in the Province. He is enthusiastic in his views as

to the future of Manitoba, and of the North-West generally, and takes an

active interest in promoting the welfare and prosperity of that part of

the Dominion. Of late years his health has been somewhat less robust

than formerly. This result is partly due to a native energy which

frequently impels him to overtax his physical strength, and partly,

doubtless, to the sufferings and privations above referred to. The

North-West, however, has upon the whole been propitious to the Doctor.

His speculations have made him a thoroughly independent man, so far as

worldly wealth is concerned, and he can well afford to take repose for

the remainder of his life. He is a member of the Liberal-Conservative

Party, and a staunch supporter of the Government now in power at

Ottawa.

THE HON. GEORGE WILLIAM BURTON.

Judge Burton was born at the town of Sandwich, the most ancient of the

Cinque Ports, in the county of Kent, England, on the 21st of July, 1818.

He was the second son of the late Admiral George Guy Burton, R.N., of

Chatham. He received his education at the Rochester and Chatham

Proprietary School, under the late Rev. Robert Whiston, LL.D., a Fellow

of Trinity College, Cambridge, who subsequently occupied the position of

Head-Master of the Grammar School at Rochester, and who was the author

of several works remarkable for sound scholarship and independence of

thought. Mr. Burton has always held his tutor in honoured remembrance,

and to this day is accustomed to speak of him with the respect due to

his great learning and attainments.

In 1836, the year before the breaking out of Mackenzie's rebellion, Mr.

Burton, then a youth of eighteen, came over to Upper Canada and repaired

to Ingersoll, in the county of Oxford, where he began the study of the

law in the office of his paternal uncle, the late Mr. Edmund Burton, who

then carried on a legal business there. The gentleman last named had

formerly held an office in connection with the Admiralty, and had been

stationed at the mouth of the Grand River during the War of 1812, '13,

and '14. After the close of the war he devoted himself to the law, and

spent the rest of his life in Upper Canada. His presence in this country

was doubtless to some extent the cause of his nephew's emigration from

England. The latter spent the regular term of five years in his uncle's

office in Ingersoll. Upon the expiration of his articles, he was called

to the Bar, in Easter Term, 1842, and settled down to the practice of

his profession in Hamilton, where he was not long in acquiring a large

and lucrative business. He identified himself with the Reform Party in

politics, and took an active part in various local elections. He was

frequently importuned to enter Parliament, but he preferred to confine

his best energies to his professional duties, and, as the years passed

by, his business assumed such dimensions that he had full occupation for

his time. He formed various partnerships, but was always the guiding

spirit of the firm, and became known from one end of the Province to the

other as a sound and learned lawyer. His connexion with Mr. Charles A.

Sadleir lasted for many years, and the firm of "Burton & Sadleir" was

one of the best known in the western part of the Province. On the 9th of

June, 1850, Mr. Burton married Miss Elizabeth Perkins, daughter of the

late Dr. F. Perkins, of Kingston, in the Island of Jamaica, and niece

and adopted daughter of the late Colonel Charles Cranston Dixon, of the

90th Regiment.

The life of an industrious lawyer, though interesting to himself and his

clients, is uneventful, and there is not much to be said about Mr.

Burton's professional career, except that it was a remarkably successful

one. He had many wealthy merchants and corporations for his clients, and

was regarded as an adept in the law relating to railway companies. He

was for many years Solicitor for the City of Hamilton; also for the

Canada Life Assurance Company, of which he is at present a Director,

having been elected to that position soon after his elevation to the

Judicial Bench. In 1856 he was nominated a Bencher of the Law Society of

Upper Canada, and when that body became elective by the profession at

large, under the Ontario Act of 1871, he was elected to the position. In

1863 he was invested with a silk gown.

The Canadian Portrait Gallery - Volume 3 (of 4) · 第 15 / 35 段