Can the minister of the day now presume to expect a continuance of

support in this ruinous infatuation? Can Parliament be so dead to its

dignity and its duty as to be thus deluded into the loss of the one and

the violation of the other? To give an unlimited credit and support for

the steady perseverance in measures not proposed for our parliamentary

advice, but dictated and forced upon us--in measures, I say, my Lords,

which have reduced this late flourishing empire to ruin and contempt!

"But yesterday, and England might have stood against the world: now none

so poor to do her reverence." I use the words of a poet; but, though it

be poetry, it is no fiction. It is a shameful truth, that not only the

power and strength of this country are wasting away and expiring, but

her well-earned glories, her true honor, and substantial dignity are

sacrificed.

France, my Lords, has insulted you; she has encouraged and sustained

America; and, whether America be wrong or right, the dignity of

this country ought to spurn at the officious insult of French

interference. The ministers and ambassadors of those who are called

rebels and enemies are in Paris; in Paris they transact the

reciprocal interests of America and France. Can there be a more

mortifying insult? Can even our ministers sustain a more humiliating

disgrace? Do they dare to resent it? Do they presume even to hint a

vindication of their honor, and the dignity of the State, by

requiring the dismission of the plenipotentiaries of America? Such

is the degradation to which they have reduced the glories of

England! The people whom they affect to call contemptible rebels,

but whose growing power has at last obtained the name of enemies;

the people with whom they have engaged this country in war, and

against whom they now command our implicit support in every measure

of desperate hostility--this people, despised as rebels, or

acknowledged as enemies, are abetted against you, supplied with

every military store, their interests consulted, and their

ambassadors entertained, by your inveterate enemy! and our ministers

dare not interpose with dignity or effect. Is this the honor of a

great kingdom? Is this the indignant spirit of England, who "but

yesterday" gave law to the house of Bourbon? My Lords, the dignity

of nations demands a decisive conduct in a situation like this....

My Lords, this ruinous and ignominious situation, where we can

not act with success, nor suffer with honor, calls upon us to

remonstrate in the strongest and loudest language of truth, to

rescue the ear of majesty from the delusions which surround it. The

desperate state of our arms abroad is in part known. No man thinks

more highly of them than I do. I love and honor the English troops.

I know their virtues and their valor. I know they can achieve

anything except impossibilities; and I know that the conquest of

English America _is an impossibility_. You cannot, I venture to say

it, _you cannot_ conquer America. Your armies in the last war

effected everything that could be effected; and what was it? It cost

a numerous army, under the command of a most able general [Lord

Amherst], now a noble Lord in this House, a long and laborious

campaign, to expel five thousand Frenchmen from French America. My

Lords, _you cannot conquer America_. What is your present situation

there? We do not know the worst; but we know that in three campaigns

we have done nothing and suffered much. Besides the sufferings,

perhaps _total loss_ of the Northern force, the best appointed army

that ever took the field, commanded by Sir William Howe, has retired

from the American lines. _He was obliged_ to relinquish his attempt,

and with great delay and danger to adopt a new and distant plan of

operations. We shall soon know, and in any event have reason to

lament, what may have happened since. As to conquest, therefore, my

Lords, I repeat, it is impossible. You may swell every expense and

every effort still more extravagantly; pile and accumulate every

assistance you can buy or borrow; traffic and barter with every

little pitiful German prince that sells and sends his subjects to

the shambles of a foreign prince; your efforts are forever vain and

impotent--doubly so from this mercenary aid on which you rely; for

it irritates, to an incurable resentment, the minds of your enemies,

to overrun them with the mercenary sons of rapine and plunder,

devoting them and their possessions to the rapacity of hireling

cruelty! If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a

foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my

arms--never--never--never.

But, my Lords, who is the man, that, in addition to these disgraces

and mischiefs of our army, has dared to authorize and associate to

our arms the tomahawk and scalping-knife of the savage? to call into

civilized alliance the wild and inhuman savage of the woods; to

delegate to the merciless Indian the defence of disputed rights, and

to wage the horrors of his barbarous war against our brethren? My

Lords, these enormities cry aloud for redress and punishment. Unless

thoroughly done away, it will be a stain on the national character.

It is a violation of the Constitution. I believe it is against law.

It is not the least of our national misfortunes that the strength

and character of our army are thus impaired. Infected with the

mercenary spirit of robbery and rapine, familiarized to the horrid

scenes of savage cruelty, it can no longer boast of the noble and

generous principles which dignify a soldier, no longer sympathize

with the dignity of the royal banner, nor feel the pride, pomp, and

circumstance of glorious war, "that make ambition virtue!" What

makes ambition virtue?--the sense of honor. But is the sense of

honor consistent with a spirit of plunder, or the practice of

murder? Can it flow from mercenary motives, or can it prompt to

cruel deeds?

The independent views of America have been stated and asserted as the

foundation of this address. My Lords, no man wishes for the due

dependence of America on this country more than I do. To preserve it,

and not confirm that state of independence into which your measures

hitherto have driven them, is the object which we ought to unite in

attaining. The Americans, contending for their rights against arbitrary

exactions, I love and admire. It is the struggle of free and virtuous

patriots. But, contending for independency and total disconnection from

England, as an Englishman, I cannot wish them success; for in a due

constitutional dependency, including the ancient supremacy of this

country in regulating their commerce and navigation, consists the mutual

happiness and prosperity both of England and America. She derived

assistance and protection from us; and we reaped from her the most

important advantages. She was, indeed, the fountain of our wealth, the

nerve of our strength, the nursery and basis of our naval power. It is

our duty, therefore, my Lords, if we wish to save our country, most

seriously to endeavor the recovery of these most beneficial subjects;

and in this perilous crisis, perhaps the present moment may be the only

one in which we can hope for success. For in their negotiations with

France, they have, or think they have, reason to complain; though it be

notorious that they have received from that power important supplies and

assistance of various kinds, yet it is certain they expected it in a

more decisive and immediate degree. America is in ill humor with France;

on some points they have not entirely answered her expectations. Let us

wisely take advantage of every possible moment of reconciliation.

Besides, the natural disposition of America herself still leans toward

England; to the old habits of connection and mutual interest that united

both countries. This _was_ the established sentiment of all the

continent; and still, my Lords, in the great and principal part, the

sound part of America, this wise and affectionate disposition prevails.

And there is a very considerable part of America yet sound--the middle

and the southern provinces. Some parts may be factious and blind to

their true interests; but if we express a wise and benevolent

disposition to communicate with them those immutable rights of nature

and those constitutional liberties to which they are equally entitled

with ourselves, by a conduct so just and humane we shall confirm the

favorable and conciliate the adverse. I say, my Lords, the rights and

liberties to which they are equally entitled with ourselves, _but no

more_. I would participate to them every enjoyment and freedom which the

colonizing subjects of a free state can possess, or wish to possess; and

I do not see why they should not enjoy every fundamental right in their

property, and every original substantial liberty, which Devonshire, or

Surrey, or the county I live in, or any other county in England, can

claim; reserving always, as the sacred right of the mother country, the

due constitutional dependency of the colonies. The inherent supremacy of

the state in regulating and protecting the navigation and commerce of

all her subjects, is necessary for the mutual benefit and preservation

of every part, to constitute and preserve the prosperous arrangement of

the whole empire.

The sound parts of America, of which I have spoken, must be sensible of

these great truths and of their real interests. America is not in that

state of desperate and contemptible rebellion which this country has

been deluded to believe. It is not a wild and lawless banditti, who,

having nothing to lose, might hope to snatch something from public

convulsions. Many of their leaders and great men have a great stake in

this great contest. The gentleman who conducts their armies, I am told,

has an estate of four or five thousand pounds a year; and when I

consider these things, I cannot but lament the inconsiderate violence of

our penal acts, our declaration of treason and rebellion, with all the

fatal effects of attainder and confiscation.

As to the disposition of foreign powers which is asserted [in the King's

speech] to be pacific and friendly, let us judge, my Lords, rather by

their actions and the nature of things than by interested assertions.

The uniform assistance supplied to America by France suggests a

different conclusion. The most important interests of France in

aggrandizing and enriching herself with what she most wants, supplies of

every naval store from America, must inspire her with different

sentiments. The extraordinary preparations of the House of Bourbon, by

land and by sea, from Dunkirk to the Straits, equally ready and willing

to overwhelm these defenceless islands, should rouse us to a sense of

their real disposition and our own danger. Not five thousand troops in

England! hardly three thousand in Ireland! What can we oppose to the

combined force of our enemies? Scarcely twenty ships of the line so

fully or sufficiently manned, that any admiral's reputation would permit

him to take the command of. The river of Lisbon in the possession of our

enemies! The seas swept by American privateers! Our Channel trade torn

to pieces by them! In this complicated crisis of danger, weakness at

home, and calamity abroad, terrified and insulted by the neighboring

powers, unable to act in America, or acting only to be destroyed, where

is the man with the forehead to promise or hope for success in such a

situation, or from perseverance in the measures that have driven us to

it? Who has the forehead to do so? Where is that man? I should be glad

to see his face.

You cannot _conciliate_ America by your present measures. You cannot

_subdue_ her by your present or by any measures. What, then, can you do?

You cannot conquer; you cannot gain; but you can _address_; you can lull

the fears and anxieties of the moment into an ignorance of the danger

that should produce them. But, my Lords, the time demands the language

of truth. We must not now apply the flattering unction of servile

compliance or blind complaisance. In a just and necessary war, to

maintain the rights or honor of my country, I would strip the shirt from

my back to support it. But in such a war as this, unjust in its

principle, impracticable in its means, and ruinous in its consequences,

I would not contribute a single effort nor a single shilling. I do not

call for vengeance on the heads of those who have been guilty; I only

recommend to them to make their retreat. Let them walk off; and let them

make haste, or they may be assured that speedy and condign punishment

will overtake them.

My Lords, I have submitted to you, with the freedom and truth which I

think my duty, my sentiments on your present awful situation. I have

laid before you the ruin of your power, the disgrace of your reputation,

the pollution of your discipline, the contamination of your morals, the

complication of calamities, foreign and domestic, that overwhelm your

sinking country. Your dearest interests, your own liberties, the

Constitution itself totters to the foundation. All this disgraceful

danger, this multitude of misery, is the monstrous offspring of this

unnatural war. We have been deceived and deluded too long. Let us now

stop short. This is the crisis--the only crisis of time and situation,

to give us a possibility of escape from the fatal effects of our

delusions. But if, in an obstinate and infatuated perseverance in folly,

we slavishly echo the peremptory words this day presented to us, nothing

can save this devoted country from complete and final ruin. We madly

rush into multiplied miseries, and "confusion worse confounded."

Is it possible, can it be believed, that ministers are yet blind to this

impending destruction? I did hope, that instead of this false and empty

vanity, this overweening pride, engendering high conceits and

presumptuous imaginations, ministers would have humbled themselves in

their errors, would have confessed and retracted them, and by an active,

though a late, repentance, have endeavored to redeem them. But, my

Lords, since they had neither sagacity to foresee, nor justice nor

humanity to shun these oppressive calamities--since not even severe

experience can make them feel, nor the imminent ruin of their country

awaken them from their stupefaction, the guardian care of Parliament

must interpose. I shall, therefore, my Lords, propose to you an

amendment of the address to his Majesty, to be inserted immediately

after the two first paragraphs of congratulation on the birth of a

princess, to recommend an immediate cessation of hostilities, and the

commencement of a treaty to restore peace and liberty to America,

strength and happiness to England, security and permanent prosperity to

both countries. This, my Lords, is yet in our power; and let not the

wisdom and justice of your Lordships neglect the happy, and, perhaps,

the only opportunity. By the establishment of irrevocable law, founded

on mutual rights, and ascertained by treaty, these glorious enjoyments

may be firmly perpetuated. And let me repeat to your Lordships, that the

strong bias of America, at least of the wise and sounder parts of it,

naturally inclines to this happy and constitutional reconnection with

you. Notwithstanding the temporary intrigues with France, we may still

be assured of their ancient and confirmed partiality to us. America and

France _cannot_ be congenial.

My Lords, to encourage and confirm that innate inclination to this

country, founded on every principle of affection, as well as

consideration of interest; to restore that favorable disposition into a

permanent and powerful reunion with this country; to revive the mutual

strength of the empire; again to awe the House of Bourbon, instead of

meanly truckling, as our present calamities compel us, to every insult

of French caprice and Spanish punctilio; to re-establish our commerce;

to reassert our rights and our honor; to confirm our interests, and

renew our glories forever--a consummation most devoutly to be

endeavored! and which, I trust, may yet arise from reconciliation with

America--I have the honor of submitting to you the following amendment,

which I move to be inserted after the two first paragraphs of the

address:

"And that this House does most humbly advise and supplicate his

Majesty to be pleased to cause the most speedy and effectual

measures to be taken for restoring peace in America; and that no

time may be lost in proposing an immediate opening of a treaty

for the final settlement of the tranquillity of these invaluable

provinces, by a removal of the unhappy causes of this ruinous

civil war, and by a just and adequate security against the

return of the like calamities in times to come. And this House

desire to offer the most dutiful assurances to his Majesty, that

they will, in due time, cheerfully co-operate with the

magnanimity and tender goodness of his Majesty for the

preservation of his people, by such explicit and most solemn

declarations, and provisions of fundamental and irrevocable

laws, as may be judged necessary for the ascertaining and fixing

forever the respective rights of Great Britain and her

colonies."

XXII. FROM "THE VICAR OF WAKEFIELD."

THE FAMILY USE ART, WHICH IS OPPOSED WITH STILL GREATER.

OLIVER GOLDSMITH.--1728-1774.

Whatever might have been Sophia's sensations, the rest of the family was

easily consoled for Mr. Burchell's absence by the company of our

landlord, whose visits now became more frequent and longer. Though he

had been disappointed in procuring my daughters the amusements of the

town, as he designed, he took every opportunity of supplying them with

those little recreations which our retirement would admit of. He usually

came in the morning, and while my son and I followed our occupations

abroad, he sat with the family at home, and amused them by describing

the town, with every part of which he was particularly acquainted. He

could repeat all the observations that were retailed in the atmosphere

of the play-houses, and had all the good things of the high wits by rote

long before they made their way into the jest-books. The intervals

between conversation were employed in teaching my daughters piquet, or

sometimes in setting my two little ones to box to make them _sharp_, as

he called it; but the hopes of having him for a son-in-law, in some

measure blinded us to all his imperfections. It must be owned that my

wife laid a thousand schemes to entrap him; or, to speak it more

tenderly, used every art to magnify the merit of her daughter. If the

cakes at tea ate short and crisp, they were made by Olivia: if the

gooseberry wine was well knit, the gooseberries were of her gathering:

it was her fingers that gave the pickles their peculiar green; and in

the composition of a pudding, it was her judgment that mixed the

ingredients. Then the poor woman would sometimes tell the 'squire, that

she thought him and Olivia extremely of a size, and would bid both stand

up to see which was tallest. These instances of cunning, which she

thought impenetrable, yet which everybody saw through, were very

pleasing to our benefactor, who gave every day some new proofs of his

passion, which, though they had not risen to proposals of marriage, yet

we thought fell but little short of it; and his slowness was attributed

sometimes to native bashfulness, and sometimes to his fear of offending

his uncle. An occurrence, however, which happened soon after, put it

beyond a doubt that he designed to become one of our family; my wife

even regarded it as an absolute promise.

My wife and daughters happening to return a visit to neighbor

Flamborough's, found that family had lately got their pictures drawn by

a limner, who travelled the country, and took likenesses for fifteen

shillings a head. As this family and ours had long a sort of rivalry in

point of taste, our spirit took the alarm at this stolen march upon us,

and notwithstanding all I could say, and I said much, it was resolved

that we should have our pictures done too. Having, therefore, engaged

the limner, for what could I do? our next deliberation was to shew the

superiority of our taste in the attitudes. As for our neighbor's family,

there were seven of them, and they were drawn with seven oranges, a

thing quite out of taste, no variety in life, no composition in the

world. We desired to have something in a brighter style, and after many

debates, at length came to an unanimous resolution of being drawn

together in one large historical family piece. This would be cheaper,

since one frame would serve for all, and it would be infinitely more

genteel; for all families of any taste were now drawn in the same

manner. As we did not immediately recollect an historical subject to hit

us, we were contented each with being drawn as independent historical

figures. My wife desired to be represented as Venus, and the painter was

desired not to be too frugal of his diamonds in her stomacher and hair.

Her two little ones were to be as Cupids by her side, while I, with my

gown and band, was to present her with my books on the Whistonian

controversy. Olivia would be drawn as an Amazon, sitting upon a bank of

flowers, dressed in a green Joseph richly laced with gold, and a whip in

her hand. Sophia was to be a shepherdess, with as many sheep as the

painter could put in for nothing; and Moses was to be dressed out with

an hat and white feather. Our taste so much pleased the 'squire, that he

insisted on being put in as one of the family, in the character of

Alexander the Great, at Olivia's feet. This was considered by us all as

an indication of his desire to be introduced into the family, nor could

we refuse his request. The painter was therefore set to work, and as he

wrought with assiduity and expedition, in less than four days the whole

was completed. The piece was large, and it must be owned he did not

spare his colors; for which my wife gave him great encomiums. We were

all perfectly satisfied with his performance; but an unfortunate

circumstance had not occurred till the picture was finished, which now

struck us with dismay. It was so very large that we had no place in the

house to fix it. How we all came to disregard so material a point is

inconceivable; but certain it is, we had been all greatly remiss. The

picture, therefore, instead of gratifying our vanity, as we hoped,

leaned, in a most mortifying manner, against the kitchen wall, where the

canvas was stretched and painted, much too large to be got through any

of the doors, and the jest of all our neighbors. One compared it to

Robinson Crusoe's long-boat, too large to be removed; another thought it

more resembled a reel in a bottle; some wondered how it could be got

out, but still more were amazed how it ever got in.

But though it excited the ridicule of some, it effectually raised more

malicious suggestions in many. The 'squire's portrait being found united

with ours, was an honor too great to escape envy. Scandalous whispers

began to circulate at our expense, and our tranquillity was continually

disturbed by persons who came as friends to tell us what was said of us

by enemies. These reports we always resented with becoming spirit; but

scandal ever improves by opposition.

We once again therefore entered into a consultation upon obviating the

malice of our enemies, and at last came to a resolution which had too

much cunning to give me entire satisfaction. It was this: as our

principal object was to discover the honor of Mr. Thornhill's addresses,

my wife undertook to sound him by pretending to ask his advice in the

choice of an husband for her eldest daughter. If this was not found

sufficient to induce him to a declaration, it was then resolved to

terrify him with a rival. To this last step, however, I would by no

means give my consent, till Olivia gave me the most solemn assurances

that she would marry the person provided to rival him upon this

occasion, if he did not prevent it, by taking her himself. Such was the

scheme laid, which, though I did not strenuously oppose, I did not

entirely approve.

The Ontario Readers: The High School Reader, 1886 · 第 9 / 29 段