CHAPTER XXVI.

I think if a person were ever excusable for losing track of the days

of the week, the circumstances excused me. Indeed, if I had been told

that the method of reckoning time had been wholly changed and the days

were now counted in lots of five, ten, or fifteen instead of seven, I

should have been in no way surprised after what I had already heard

and seen of the twentieth century. The first time that any inquiry as

to the days of the week occurred to me was the morning following the

conversation related in the last chapter. At the breakfast table Dr.

Leete asked me if I would care to hear a sermon.

"Is it Sunday, then?" I exclaimed.

"Yes," he replied. "It was on Friday, you see, when we made the lucky

discovery of the buried chamber to which we owe your society this

morning. It was on Saturday morning, soon after midnight, that you

first awoke, and Sunday afternoon when you awoke the second time with

faculties fully regained."

"So you still have Sundays and sermons," I said. "We had prophets who

foretold that long before this time the world would have dispensed

with both. I am very curious to know how the ecclesiastical systems

fit in with the rest of your social arrangements. I suppose you have a

sort of national church with official clergymen."

Dr. Leete laughed, and Mrs. Leete and Edith seemed greatly amused.

"Why, Mr. West," Edith said, "what odd people you must think us. You

were quite done with national religious establishments in the

nineteenth century, and did you fancy we had gone back to them?"

"But how can voluntary churches and an unofficial clerical profession

be reconciled with national ownership of all buildings, and the

industrial service required of all men?" I answered.

"The religious practices of the people have naturally changed

considerably in a century," replied Dr. Leete; "but supposing them to

have remained unchanged, our social system would accommodate them

perfectly. The nation supplies any person or number of persons with

buildings on guarantee of the rent, and they remain tenants while they

pay it. As for the clergymen, if a number of persons wish the services

of an individual for any particular end of their own, apart from the

general service of the nation, they can always secure it, with that

individual's own consent, of course, just as we secure the service of

our editors, by contributing from their credit-cards an indemnity to

the nation for the loss of his services in general industry. This

indemnity paid the nation for the individual answers to the salary in

your day paid to the individual himself; and the various applications

of this principle leave private initiative full play in all details to

which national control is not applicable. Now, as to hearing a sermon

to-day, if you wish to do so, you can either go to a church to hear it

or stay at home."

"How am I to hear it if I stay at home?"

"Simply by accompanying us to the music room at the proper hour and

selecting an easy chair. There are some who still prefer to hear

sermons in church, but most of our preaching, like our musical

performances, is not in public, but delivered in acoustically prepared

chambers, connected by wire with subscribers' houses. If you prefer to

go to a church I shall be glad to accompany you, but I really don't

believe you are likely to hear anywhere a better discourse than you

will at home. I see by the paper that Mr. Barton is to preach this

morning, and he preaches only by telephone, and to audiences often

reaching 150,000."

"The novelty of the experience of hearing a sermon under such

circumstances would incline me to be one of Mr. Barton's hearers, if

for no other reason," I said.

An hour or two later, as I sat reading in the library, Edith came for

me, and I followed her to the music room, where Dr. and Mrs. Leete

were waiting. We had not more than seated ourselves comfortably when

the tinkle of a bell was heard, and a few moments after the voice of a

man, at the pitch of ordinary conversation, addressed us, with an

effect of proceeding from an invisible person in the room. This was

what the voice said:--

MR. BARTON'S SERMON.

"We have had among us, during the past week, a critic from the

nineteenth century, a living representative of the epoch of our

great-grandparents. It would be strange if a fact so extraordinary had

not somewhat strongly affected our imaginations. Perhaps most of us

have been stimulated to some effort to realize the society of a

century ago, and figure to ourselves what it must have been like to

live then. In inviting you now to consider certain reflections upon

this subject which have occurred to me, I presume that I shall rather

follow than divert the course of your own thoughts."

Edith whispered something to her father at this point, to which he

nodded assent and turned to me.

"Mr. West," he said, "Edith suggests that you may find it slightly

embarrassing to listen to a discourse on the lines Mr. Barton is

laying down, and if so, you need not be cheated out of a sermon. She

will connect us with Mr. Sweetser's speaking room if you say so, and I

can still promise you a very good discourse."

"No, no," I said. "Believe me, I would much rather hear what Mr.

Barton has to say."

"As you please," replied my host.

When her father spoke to me Edith had touched a screw, and the voice

of Mr. Barton had ceased abruptly. Now at another touch the room was

once more filled with the earnest sympathetic tones which had already

impressed me most favorably.

* * * * *

"I venture to assume that one effect has been common with us as a

result of this effort at retrospection, and that it has been to leave

us more than ever amazed at the stupendous change which one brief

century has made in the material and moral conditions of humanity.

"Still, as regards the contrast between the poverty of the nation and

the world in the nineteenth century and their wealth now, it is not

greater, possibly, than had been before seen in human history, perhaps

not greater, for example, than that between the poverty of this

country during the earliest colonial period of the seventeenth century

and the relatively great wealth it had attained at the close of the

nineteenth, or between the England of William the Conqueror and that

of Victoria. Although the aggregate riches of a nation did not then,

as now, afford any accurate criterion of the masses of its people, yet

instances like these afford partial parallels for the merely material

side of the contrast between the nineteenth and the twentieth

centuries. It is when we contemplate the moral aspect of that contrast

that we find ourselves in the presence of a phenomenon for which

history offers no precedent, however far back we may cast our eye. One

might almost be excused who should exclaim, 'Here, surely, is

something like a miracle!' Nevertheless, when we give over idle

wonder, and begin to examine the seeming prodigy critically, we find

it no prodigy at all, much less a miracle. It is not necessary to

suppose a moral new birth of humanity, or a wholesale destruction of

the wicked and survival of the good, to account for the fact before

us. It finds its simple and obvious explanation in the reaction of a

changed environment upon human nature. It means merely that a form of

society which was founded on the pseudo self-interest of selfishness,

and appealed solely to the anti-social and brutal side of human

nature, has been replaced by institutions based on the true

self-interest of a rational unselfishness, and appealing to the social

and generous instincts of men.

"My friends, if you would see men again the beasts of prey they seemed

in the nineteenth century, all you have to do is to restore the old

social and industrial system, which taught them to view their natural

prey in their fellow-men, and find their gain in the loss of others.

No doubt it seems to you that no necessity, however dire, would have

tempted you to subsist on what superior skill or strength enabled you

to wrest from others equally needy. But suppose it were not merely

your own life that you were responsible for. I know well that there

must have been many a man among our ancestors who, if it had been

merely a question of his own life, would sooner have given it up than

nourished it by bread snatched from others. But this he was not

permitted to do. He had dear lives dependent on him. Men loved women

in those days, as now. God knows how they dared be fathers, but they

had babies as sweet, no doubt, to them as ours to us, whom they must

feed, clothe, educate. The gentlest creatures are fierce when they

have young to provide for, and in that wolfish society the struggle

for bread borrowed a peculiar desperation from the tenderest

sentiments. For the sake of those dependent on him, a man might not

choose, but must plunge into the foul fight,--cheat, overreach,

supplant, defraud, buy below worth and sell above, break down the

business by which his neighbor fed his young ones, tempt men to buy

what they ought not and to sell what they should not, grind his

laborers, sweat his debtors, cozen his creditors. Though a man sought

it carefully with tears, it was hard to find a way in which he could

earn a living and provide for his family except by pressing in before

some weaker rival and taking the food from his mouth. Even the

ministers of religion were not exempt from this cruel necessity. While

they warned their flocks against the love of money, regard for their

families compelled them to keep an outlook for the pecuniary prizes of

their calling. Poor fellows, theirs was indeed a trying business,

preaching to men a generosity and unselfishness which they and

everybody knew would, in the existing state of the world, reduce to

poverty those who should practice them, laying down laws of conduct

which the law of self-preservation compelled men to break. Looking on

the inhuman spectacle of society, these worthy men bitterly bemoaned

the depravity of human nature; as if angelic nature would not have

been debauched in such a devil's school! Ah, my friends, believe me,

it is not now in this happy age that humanity is proving the divinity

within it. It was rather in those evil days when not even the fight

for life with one another, the struggle for mere existence, in which

mercy was folly, could wholly banish generosity and kindness from the

earth.

"It is not hard to understand the desperation with which men and

women, who under other conditions would have been full of gentleness

and ruth, fought and tore each other in the scramble for gold, when we

realize what it meant to miss it, what poverty was in that day. For

the body it was hunger and thirst, torment by heat and frost, in

sickness neglect, in health unremitting toil; for the moral nature it

meant oppression, contempt, and the patient endurance of indignity,

brutish associations from infancy, the loss of all the innocence of

childhood, the grace of womanhood, the dignity of manhood; for the

mind it meant the death of ignorance, the torpor of all those

faculties which distinguish us from brutes, the reduction of life to a

round of bodily functions.

"Ah, my friends, if such a fate as this were offered you and your

children as the only alternative of success in the accumulation of

wealth, how long do you fancy would you be in sinking to the moral

level of your ancestors?

"Some two or three centuries ago an act of barbarity was committed in

India, which, though the number of lives destroyed was but a few

score, was attended by such peculiar horrors that its memory is likely

to be perpetual. A number of English prisoners were shut up in a room

containing not enough air to supply one-tenth their number. The

unfortunates were gallant men, devoted comrades in service, but, as

the agonies of suffocation began to take hold on them, they forgot all

else, and became involved in a hideous struggle, each one for himself,

and against all others, to force a way to one of the small apertures

of the prison at which alone it was possible to get a breath of air.

It was a struggle in which men became beasts, and the recital of its

horrors by the few survivors so shocked our forefathers that for a

century later we find it a stock reference in their literature as a

typical illustration of the extreme possibilities of human misery, as

shocking in its moral as its physical aspect. They could scarcely have

anticipated that to us the Black Hole of Calcutta, with its press of

maddened men tearing and trampling one another in the struggle to win

a place at the breathing holes, would seem a striking type of the

society of their age. It lacked something of being a complete type,

however, for in the Calcutta Black Hole there were no tender women, no

little children and old men and women, no cripples. They were at least

all men, strong to bear, who suffered.

"When we reflect that the ancient order of which I have been speaking

was prevalent up to the end of the nineteenth century, while to us the

new order which succeeded it already seems antique, even our parents

having known no other, we cannot fail to be astounded at the

suddenness with which a transition so profound beyond all previous

experience of the race must have been effected. Some observation of

the state of men's minds during the last quarter of the nineteenth

century will, however, in great measure, dissipate this astonishment.

Though general intelligence in the modern sense could not be said to

exist in any community at that time, yet, as compared with previous

generations, the one then on the stage was intelligent. The inevitable

consequence of even this comparative degree of intelligence had been a

perception of the evils of society, such as had never before been

general. It is quite true that these evils had been even worse, much

worse, in previous ages. It was the increased intelligence of the

masses which made the difference, as the dawn reveals the squalor of

surroundings which in the darkness may have seemed tolerable. The

keynote of the literature of the period was one of compassion for the

poor and unfortunate, and indignant outcry against the failure of the

social machinery to ameliorate the miseries of men. It is plain from

these outbursts that the moral hideousness of the spectacle about them

was, at least by flashes, fully realized by the best of the men of

that time, and that the lives of some of the more sensitive and

generous hearted of them were rendered wellnigh unendurable by the

intensity of their sympathies.

"Although the idea of the vital unity of the family of mankind, the

reality of human brotherhood, was very far from being apprehended by

them as the moral axiom it seems to us, yet it is a mistake to suppose

that there was no feeling at all corresponding to it. I could read you

passages of great beauty from some of their writers which show that

the conception was clearly attained by a few, and no doubt vaguely by

many more. Moreover, it must not be forgotten that the nineteenth

century was in name Christian, and the fact that the entire commercial

and industrial frame of society was the embodiment of the

anti-Christian spirit must have had some weight, though I admit it was

strangely little, with the nominal followers of Jesus Christ.

"When we inquire why it did not have more, why, in general, long after

a vast majority of men had agreed as to the crying abuses of the

existing social arrangement, they still tolerated it, or contented

themselves with talking of petty reforms in it, we come upon an

extraordinary fact. It was the sincere belief of even the best of men

at that epoch that the only stable elements in human nature, on which

a social system could be safely founded, were its worst propensities.

They had been taught and believed that greed and self-seeking were all

that held mankind together, and that all human associations would fall

to pieces if anything were done to blunt the edge of these motives or

curb their operation. In a word, they believed--even those who longed

to believe otherwise--the exact reverse of what seems to us

self-evident; they believed, that is, that the anti-social qualities

of men, and not their social qualities, were what furnished the

cohesive force of society. It seemed reasonable to them that men lived

together solely for the purpose of overreaching and oppressing one

another, and of being overreached and oppressed, and that while a

society that gave full scope to these propensities could stand, there

would be little chance for one based on the idea of coöperation for

the benefit of all. It seems absurd to expect any one to believe that

convictions like these were ever seriously entertained by men; but

that they were not only entertained by our great-grandfathers, but

were responsible for the long delay in doing away with the ancient

order, after a conviction of its intolerable abuses had become

general, is as well established as any fact in history can be. Just

here you will find the explanation of the profound pessimism of the

literature of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the note of

melancholy in its poetry, and the cynicism of its humor.

"Feeling that the condition of the race was unendurable, they had no

clear hope of anything better. They believed that the evolution of

humanity had resulted in leading it into a _cul de sac_, and that

there was no way of getting forward. The frame of men's minds at this

time is strikingly illustrated by treatises which have come down to

us, and may even now be consulted in our libraries by the curious, in

which laborious arguments are pursued to prove that despite the evil

plight of men, life was still, by some slight preponderance of

considerations, probably better worth living than leaving. Despising

themselves, they despised their Creator. There was a general decay of

religious belief. Pale and watery gleams, from skies thickly veiled by

doubt and dread, alone lighted up the chaos of earth. That men should

doubt Him whose breath is in their nostrils, or dread the hands that

moulded them, seems to us indeed a pitiable insanity; but we must

remember that children who are brave by day have sometimes foolish

fears at night. The dawn has come since then. It is very easy to

believe in the fatherhood of God in the twentieth century.

"Briefly, as must needs be in a discourse of this character, I have

adverted to some of the causes which had prepared men's minds for the

change from the old to the new order, as well as some causes of the

conservatism of despair which for a while held it back after the time

was ripe. To wonder at the rapidity with which the change was

completed after its possibility was first entertained is to forget the

intoxicating effect of hope upon minds long accustomed to despair. The

sunburst, after so long and dark a night, must needs have had a

dazzling effect. From the moment men allowed themselves to believe

that humanity after all had not been meant for a dwarf, that its squat

stature was not the measure of its possible growth, but that it stood

upon the verge of an avatar of limitless development, the reaction

must needs have been overwhelming. It is evident that nothing was able

to stand against the enthusiasm which the new faith inspired.

"Here, at last, men must have felt, was a cause compared with which

the grandest of historic causes had been trivial. It was doubtless

because it could have commanded millions of martyrs, that none were

needed. The change of a dynasty in a petty kingdom of the old world

often cost more lives than did the revolution which set the feet of

the human race at last in the right way.

"Doubtless it ill beseems one to whom the boon of life in our

resplendent age has been vouchsafed to wish his destiny other, and yet

I have often thought that I would fain exchange my share in this

serene and golden day for a place in that stormy epoch of transition,

when heroes burst the barred gate of the future and revealed to the

kindling gaze of a hopeless race, in place of the blank wall that had

closed its path, a vista of progress whose end, for very excess of

light, still dazzles us. Ah, my friends! who will say that to have

lived then, when the weakest influence was a lever to whose touch the

centuries trembled, was not worth a share even in this era of

fruition?

"You know the story of that last, greatest, and most bloodless of

revolutions. In the time of one generation men laid aside the social

traditions and practices of barbarians, and assumed a social order

worthy of rational and human beings. Ceasing to be predatory in their

habits, they became co-workers, and found in fraternity, at once, the

science of wealth and happiness. 'What shall I eat and drink, and

wherewithal shall I be clothed?' stated as a problem beginning and

ending in self, had been an anxious and an endless one. But when once

it was conceived, not from the individual, but the fraternal

standpoint, 'What shall we eat and drink, and wherewithal shall we be

clothed?'--its difficulties vanished.

"Poverty with servitude had been the result, for the mass of humanity,

of attempting to solve the problem of maintenance from the individual

standpoint, but no sooner had the nation become the sole capitalist

and employer than not alone did plenty replace poverty, but the last

vestige of the serfdom of man to man disappeared from earth. Human

slavery, so often vainly scotched, at last was killed. The means of

subsistence no longer doled out by men to women, by employer to

employed, by rich to poor, was distributed from a common stock as

among children at the father's table. It was impossible for a man any

longer to use his fellow-men as tools for his own profit. His esteem

was the only sort of gain he could thenceforth make out of him. There

was no more either arrogance or servility in the relations of human

beings to one another. For the first time since the creation every man

stood up straight before God. The fear of want and the lust of gain

became extinct motives when abundance was assured to all and

immoderate possessions made impossible of attainment. There were no

more beggars nor almoners. Equity left charity without an occupation.

The ten commandments became wellnigh obsolete in a world where there

was no temptation to theft, no occasion to lie either for fear or

favor, no room for envy where all were equal, and little provocation

to violence where men were disarmed of power to injure one another.

Humanity's ancient dream of liberty, equality, fraternity, mocked by

so many ages, at last was realized.

"As in the old society the generous, the just, the tender-hearted had

been placed at a disadvantage by the possession of those qualities, so

in the new society the cold-hearted, the greedy, and self-seeking

found themselves out of joint with the world. Now that the conditions

of life for the first time ceased to operate as a forcing process to

develop the brutal qualities of human nature, and the premium which

had heretofore encouraged selfishness was not only removed, but placed

upon unselfishness, it was for the first time possible to see what

unperverted human nature really was like. The depraved tendencies,

which had previously overgrown and obscured the better to so large an

extent, now withered like cellar fungi in the open air, and the nobler

qualities showed a sudden luxuriance which turned cynics into

panegyrists and for the first time in human history tempted mankind to

fall in love with itself. Soon was fully revealed, what the divines

and philosophers of the old world never would have believed, that

human nature in its essential qualities is good, not bad, that men by

their natural intention and structure are generous, not selfish,

pitiful, not cruel, sympathetic, not arrogant, godlike in aspirations,

instinct with divinest impulses of tenderness and self-sacrifice,

images of God indeed, not the travesties upon Him they had seemed. The

constant pressure, through numberless generations, of conditions of

life which might have perverted angels, had not been able to

essentially alter the natural nobility of the stock, and these

conditions once removed, like a bent tree, it had sprung back to its

normal uprightness.

"To put the whole matter in the nutshell of a parable, let me compare

humanity in the olden time to a rosebush planted in a swamp, watered

with black bog-water, breathing miasmatic fogs by day, and chilled

with poison dews at night. Innumerable generations of gardeners had

done their best to make it bloom, but beyond an occasional half-opened

bud with a worm at the heart, their efforts had been unsuccessful.

Many, indeed, claimed that the bush was no rosebush at all, but a

noxious shrub, fit only to be uprooted and burned. The gardeners, for

the most part, however, held that the bush belonged to the rose

family, but had some ineradicable taint about it, which prevented the

buds from coming out, and accounted for its generally sickly

condition. There were a few, indeed, who maintained that the stock was

good enough, that the trouble was in the bog, and that under more

favorable conditions the plant might be expected to do better. But

these persons were not regular gardeners, and being condemned by the

latter as mere theorists and day dreamers, were for the most part, so

regarded by the people. Moreover, urged some eminent moral

philosophers, even conceding for the sake of the argument that the

bush might possibly do better elsewhere, it was a more valuable

discipline for the buds to try to bloom in a bog than it would be

under more favorable conditions. The buds that succeeded in opening

might indeed be very rare, and the flowers pale and scentless, but

they represented far more moral effort than if they had bloomed

spontaneously in a garden.

"The regular gardeners and the moral philosophers had their way. The

bush remained rooted in the bog, and the old course of treatment went

on. Continually new varieties of forcing mixtures were applied to the

roots, and more recipes than could be numbered, each declared by its

advocates the best and only suitable preparation, were used to kill

the vermin and remove the mildew. This went on a very long time.

Occasionally some one claimed to observe a slight improvement in the

appearance of the bush, but there were quite as many who declared that

it did not look so well as it used to. On the whole there could not be

said to be any marked change. Finally, during a period of general

despondency as to the prospects of the bush where it was, the idea of

transplanting it was again mooted, and this time found favor. 'Let us

try it,' was the general voice. 'Perhaps it may thrive better

elsewhere, and here it is certainly doubtful if it be worth

cultivating longer.' So it came about that the rosebush of humanity

was transplanted, and set in sweet, warm, dry earth, where the sun

bathed it, the stars wooed it, and the south wind caressed it. Then it

appeared that it was indeed a rosebush. The vermin and the mildew

disappeared, and the bush was covered with most beautiful red roses,

whose fragrance filled the world.

"It is a pledge of the destiny appointed for us that the Creator has

set in our hearts an infinite standard of achievement, judged by which

our past attainments seem always insignificant, and the goal never

nearer. Had our forefathers conceived a state of society in which men

should live together like brethren dwelling in unity, without strifes

or envying, violence or overreaching, and where, at the price of a

degree of labor not greater than health demands, in their chosen

occupations, they should be wholly freed from care for the morrow and

left with no more concern for their livelihood than trees which are

watered by unfailing streams,--had they conceived such a condition, I

say, it would have seemed to them nothing less than paradise. They

would have confounded it with their idea of heaven, nor dreamed that

there could possibly lie further beyond anything to be desired or

striven for.

"But how is it with us who stand on this height which they gazed up

to? Already we have wellnigh forgotten, except when it is especially

called to our minds by some occasion like the present, that it was

not always with men as it is now. It is a strain on our imaginations

to conceive the social arrangements of our immediate ancestors. We

find them grotesque. The solution of the problem of physical

maintenance so as to banish care and crime, so far from seeming to us

an ultimate attainment, appears but as a preliminary to anything like

real human progress. We have but relieved ourselves of an impertinent

and needless harassment which hindered our ancestors from undertaking

the real ends of existence. We are merely stripped for the race; no

more. We are like a child which has just learned to stand upright and

to walk. It is a great event, from the child's point of view, when he

first walks. Perhaps he fancies that there can be little beyond that

achievement, but a year later he has forgotten that he could not

always walk. His horizon did but widen when he rose, and enlarge as he

moved. A great event indeed, in one sense, was his first step, but

only as a beginning, not as the end. His true career was but then

first entered on. The enfranchisement of humanity in the last century,

from mental and physical absorption in working and scheming for the

mere bodily necessities, may be regarded as a species of second birth

of the race, without which its first birth to an existence that was

but a burden would forever have remained unjustified, but whereby it

is now abundantly vindicated. Since then, humanity has entered on a

new phase of spiritual development, an evolution of higher faculties,

the very existence of which in human nature our ancestors scarcely

suspected. In place of the dreary hopelessness of the nineteenth

century, its profound pessimism as to the future of humanity, the

animating idea of the present age is an enthusiastic conception of the

opportunities of our earthly existence, and the unbounded

possibilities of human nature. The betterment of mankind from

generation to generation, physically, mentally, morally, is recognized

as the one great object supremely worthy of effort and of sacrifice.

We believe the race for the first time to have entered on the

realization of God's ideal of it, and each generation must now be a

step upward.

"Do you ask what we look for when unnumbered generations shall have

passed away? I answer, the way stretches far before us, but the end is

lost in light. For twofold is the return of man to God 'who is our

home,' the return of the individual by the way of death, and the

return of the race by the fulfilment of the evolution, when the divine

secret hidden in the germ shall be perfectly unfolded. With a tear for

the dark past, turn we then to the dazzling future, and, veiling our

eyes, press forward. The long and weary winter of the race is ended.

Its summer has begun. Humanity has burst the chrysalis. The heavens

are before it."

Looking Backward: 2000-1887 · 第 26 / 28 章