CHAPTER FOUR

Upon page 287, _Popular Astronomy_, Newcomb says that it is beyond all

“moral probability” that unknown worlds should exist in such numbers as

have been reported, and should be seen crossing the solar disc only by

amateur observers and not by skilled astronomers.

Most of our instances are reports by some of the best-known astronomers.

Newcomb says that for fifty years, prior to his time of writing (edition

of 1878) the sun had been studied by such men as Schwabe, Carrington,

Secchi, and Spörer, and that they had never seen unknown bodies cross

the sun—

Aug. 30, 1863—an unknown body that was seen by Spörer to cross the sun

(Webb, _Celestial Objects_, p. 45).

Sept. 1, 1859—two star-like objects that were seen by Carrington to

cross the sun (_Monthly Notices_, 20-13, 15, 88).

Things that crossed the sun, July 31, 1826, and May 26, 1828—see

_Comptes Rendus_, 83-623, and Webb’s _Celestial Objects_, p. 40. From

Sept. 6, to Nov. 1, 1831, an unknown luminous object was seen every

cloudless night, at Geneva, by Dr. Wartmann and his assistants (_Comptes

Rendus_, 2-307). It was reported from nowhere else. What all the other

astronomers were doing, Sept.-Oct., 1831, is one of the mysteries that

we shall not solve. An unknown, luminous object that was seen, from May

11 to May 14, 1835, by Cacciatore, the Sicilian astronomer (_Amer. Jour.

Sci._, 31-158). Two unknowns that according to Pastorff, crossed the

sun, Nov. 1, 1836, and Feb. 16, 1837 (_An. Sci. Disc._, 1860-410)—De

Vico’s unknown, July 12, 1837 (_Observatory_, 2-424)—observation by De

Cuppis, Oct. 2, 1839 (_C. R._, 83-314)—by Scott and Wray, last of June,

1847; by Schmidt, Oct. 11, 1847 (_C. R._, 83-623)—two dark bodies that

were seen, Feb. 5, 1849, by Brown, of Deal (_Rec. Sci._, 1-138)—object

watched by Sidebotham, half an hour, March 12, 1849, crossing the sun

(_C. R._, 83-622)—Schmidt’s unknown, Oct. 14, 1849 (_Observatory_,

3-137)—and an object that was watched, four nights in October, 1850, by

James Ferguson, of the Washington Observatory. Mr. Hind believed this

object to be a Trans-Neptunian planet, and calculated for it a period of

1,600 years. Mr. Hind was a great astronomer, and he miscalculated

magnificently: this floating island of space was not seen again

(_Smithson. Miscell. Cols._, 20-20).

About May 30, 1853—a black point that was seen against the sun, by

Jaennicke (_Cosmos_, 20-64).

A procession—in the _Rept. B. A._, 1855-94, R. P. Greg says that, upon

May 22, 1854, a friend of his saw, near Mercury, an object equal in size

to the planet itself, and behind it an elongated object, and behind that

something else, smaller and round.

June 11, 1855—a dark body of such size that it was seen, without

telescopes, by Ritter and Schmidt, crossing the sun (_Observatory_,

3-137). Sept. 12, 1857—Ohrt’s unknown world; seemed to be about the size

of Mercury (_C. R._, 83-623)—Aug. 1, 1858—unknown world reported by

Wilson, of Manchester (_Astro. Reg._, 9-287).

I am not listing all the unknowns of a period; perhaps the object

reported by John H. Tice, of St. Louis, Mo., Sept. 15, 1859, should not

be included; Mr. Tice was said not to be trustworthy—but who has any way

of knowing? However, I am listing enough of these observations to make

me feel like a translated European of some centuries ago, relatively to

a wider existence—lands that may be the San Salvadors, Greenlands,

Madagascars, Cubas, Australias of extra-geography, all of them said to

have crossed the sun, whereas the sun may have moved behind some of

them—

Jan. 29, 1860—unknown object, of planetary size, reported from London,

by Russell and three other observers (_Nature_, 15-505). Summer of

1860—see _Sci. Amer._, 35-340, for an account, by Richard Covington, of

an object, that without a telescope, he saw crossing the sun. An unknown

world, reported by Loomis, of Manchester, March 20, 1862 (_Monthly

Notices_, 22-232)—a newspaper account of an object that was seen

crossing the sun, Feb. 12, 1864, by Samuel Beswick, of New York (_Astro.

Reg._, 2-161)—unknown that was seen, March 18, 1865, at Constantinople

(_L’Ann. Sci._, 1865-16)—unknown “cometic objects” that were seen, Nov.

4, 9, and 18, 1865 (_Monthly Notices_, 26-242).

Most of these unknowns were seen in the daytime. Several reflections

arise. How could there be stationary regions over Irkutsk, Comrie, and

Birmingham, and never obscure the stars—or never be seen to obscure the

stars? A heresy that seems too radical for me is that they may be beyond

the nearby stars. A more reasonable idea is that if nightwatchmen and

policemen and other persons who do stay awake nights, should be given

telescopes, something might be found out. Something else that one thinks

of is that, if so many unknowns have been seen crossing the sun, or

crossed by the sun, others not so revealed must exist in great numbers,

and that instead of being virtually blank, space must be archipelagoic.

New lands · 第 41 / 70 题