CHAPTER VII

LOVE

Without doubt, the greatest source of happiness, as known to human

beings, is love. Scott voiced the sentiment of all rational and normal

persons when he said:

"Love rules the court, the camp, the grove,

And men below and saints above,

For love is Heaven, and Heaven is love."

It is owing to the fact that we cannot enjoy anything to the fullest

extent alone, since our nature is so constituted that we must have

company in our pleasures, that friends are indispensable. Cicero

realized this over two thousand years ago when he said that, "The

fruit of talent, and worth, and every excellence, is gathered most

fully when it is bestowed upon every one most nearly connected with

us." Appreciating this, nature has given us the love and friendship

of parents in our childhood; of the companions of our youth as we

grow older; of our life-partner at a later period, and last, the love

of our children and grandchildren, so that, by an interest in their

lives, we may become ourselves rejuvenated. In this, as in everything

else of a physical or mental character, we start at the bottom, and,

by a crescendo movement, reach the acme of the condition which with

age diminishes, but in this instance the quality does not deteriorate.

Our likelihood of forming acquaintances and friends in later years

is very much less than in youth, and, certainly, with our habits

and idiosyncrasies established, as they are after middle age, the

possibility of forming intimate friendships is very much decreased.

In childhood and youth, we are more imaginative and less practical,

and, consequently, our inclinations in the line of friendships will be

more natural and less influenced by considerations alien to friendship

itself. Nothing can be more true than the axiom of Cicero, "Friendship

does not follow upon advantage, but advantage upon friendship." Clearly

demonstrated as this is, but few people seem to realize it. For the

fundamental truth at the bottom of this matter is, as he further

states, "the basis of that steadfastness and constancy which we seek in

friendship is sincerity. For nothing is enduring which is insincere."

Of all virtues, sincerity is the greatest, yet, broadly speaking, how

extremely rare! There is almost no trouble and pains which people will

not take to make the world think that they are something other than

they really are, when but a fraction of the cost might make them what

they are trying to seem to be. The reciprocal relation of friendship

demands sincerity, just in proportion as it becomes intimate, and this

applies to all friendships, of whatsoever character.

The love of children is perhaps the greatest of all affections in

the aggregate, because experience has not taught them to doubt and

impugn the motives of others, since everything to them is just what it

superficially appears to be. Our most violent heartaches come through

dissimulation toward others, and nothing tends to make so callous and

blunt our finer sensibilities as this. But just in proportion as we

are sincere, must we be careful as to who arouses an interest of more

than passing moment within us, as after affection is once started and

nurtured into luxuriance, it is not within our power to control it.

While love, when reciprocated, can afford an ecstasy and happiness,

otherwise unknown, it can, also, when not returned by the object of

our affection, become the most potent cause of superlative pain and

anguish. The expression of this truth by the greatest of all English

poets, would, in itself, make his name forever immortal had he never

written another line, and constitutes not only the soundest philosophy,

but the most sublime of all sentiments evolved from the human mind:

"Love is not love

That alters when it alteration finds,

Or bends with the remover to remove.

Oh no! It is an ever-fixed mark

That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;

It is the star to every wandering bark

Whose worth's unknown, altho' his height is taken.

Love's not Time's fool; though rosy lips and cheeks

Within his bending sickle's compass come.

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,

But bears it out e'en to the edge of doom."

If all the race thoroughly understood the truth of these words, how

much more happiness there would be in the world! It is our trifling

with our affections, or the reckless manner in which we bestow them

upon others, which causes us our deepest sorrows. In childhood, with

ordinarily kind parents, we have such experiences as afford us pleasant

memories throughout life, simply because we lived in accordance with

nature's law, which she makes easy for us at this age to follow, when

we have no experience or reason by which we may be guided; but as we

grow older, we form those habits of dissimulation which lead us into

all sorts of trouble; simply because we can do certain things without

our friends and acquaintances becoming cognizant of our actions, we

are foolish enough to think that no harm can be done. If we would use

our intelligence at all, we would see at once, that while it may be

possible to deceive others in the matter of our thoughts and actions,

we cannot delude ourselves. We would also realize that our actions and

our thoughts are efficient causes in the making of our own characters.

We would further see that in order to get any real enjoyment out of a

friendship, of even the most Platonic kind, we must be able to play our

part sincerely; in other words, we must be all that we attempt to make

our friends think we are. The old proverb which tells us that we should

go courting in our old clothes, is true in the largest sense in which

we can apply it.

When we consider how much we are dependent upon our after-affections

and their outcome for our happiness, we see that Coleridge resorted to

no hyperbole when he wrote:

"All thoughts, all passions, all delights,

Whatever stirs this mortal frame,

Are but the ministers of Love

And feed his sacred flame."

Nor did he overestimate the bearing which each and every act of our

life has upon our ability to either love or to be loved, since it is

only when we are capable of returning affection as pure and unsullied

as is given us, that we achieve the acme of delight. It is on account

of the necessity of the possession of these qualities which we have

found to constitute the only possible basis for really lasting love,

that we are so much interested in those of great affection. Emerson

truly said that "all mankind loves a lover," and equally valid is his

observation that "Love is not for levity, but for the total worth of

man." It is the affection of any human being which constitutes his

life and his friendships, both as living and when coming into his

companionship, and when dead, as forming the memories upon which the

imagination will fondly dwell, and that bring into his life whatever

real satisfaction he may have. As a means of æsthetic development,

nothing is of higher value than the affections, and, as a stimulant

for action along this line, they are without an equal. We have only to

remember the story of Damon and Pythias, to see that the ancients fully

realized the power of affection; or to read what Plato puts into the

mouth of Phoedrus, when he has him say, "Love will make men dare to

die for their beloved, and women as well as men."

What we have noted, heretofore, refers to all affections. Now we come

to the culmination of all affairs of friendship,--that relationship

which is known as marriage. Upon the immensity of the importance of

this ceremony have almost all of the religious ideas of man been built,

and in many cases, if not in all, to the utter profanation of the thing

itself.

In the old tribal civilization which prevailed, the idea of marriage

was ill-defined, and it was only as the desire for the ownership of

children grew that moral ideas in this relation became at all definite.

The fact that men wished to leave to their children property and

chattels, which they might not have the opportunity of disposing of

satisfactorily before their death, brought about a desire for marriage

upon the monogamous and monandrous basis; and the fact that man was

the owner of the property, and that the wife, until recently, had

no inherent right therein, made the matter of the ownership of the

children of primal importance, so that the wishes of the father in

regard to the inheritance might be fulfilled. It was on account of the

supremacy of man in his own home that the family became the unit upon

which the State is built, just as the male individual was the unit upon

which the family was built, and citizenship was primarily evolved and

applicable only to the male portion of the population, inasmuch as they

were necessary to the State both as tax-payers and as warriors. This

idea of the ownership of children enforced upon woman the moral code

under which she lives in Occidental countries to-day; and, at the same

time, and for the reasons above stated, kept man immune from it.

The significance attached to the sexual desire in this relationship

is and has been greatly overestimated, to the greatest disadvantage

of mankind at large. The most distinguishing feature about connubial

affection as compared with Platonic friendship, is that in matrimony

there is the added unification of the parties thereto, owing to the

community of interest between them. Their individualities are merged

into one another; their development must be along similar or parallel

lines. Richter has given us a good account of what a man should select

in the character of his wife "to whom he may be able to give readings

concerning the more essential principles of psychology and astronomy

without her bringing up the subject of his stockings in the middle of

his loftiest and fullest flights of enthusiasm; yet he will be well

content should one possessed of moderate excellencies fall to his

lot--one who shall be capable of accompanying him, side by side, in

his flights so far as they extend--whose eyes and heart may be able to

take in the blooming earth and the shining heavens, in great, grand

masses at a time, and not in mere infinitesimal particles; one for whom

this universe may be something higher than a nursery or ball-room, and

one who, with feelings delicate and tender, both pious and wide, will

be continually making her husband better and holier." Since the time

of Jean Paul Richter, woman has been allowed educational advantages

more nearly equal to those of her brothers than heretofore; and, as a

consequence, in many instances and quite often, do we find the lady not

only the better but the larger half of the home, intellectually.

As Geoffrey Mortimer has well shown, love among cultured people is

largely dependent upon the imagination. In savages and in the human

race, primarily, when at this period of their existence, it took the

form of hedonism, or even the more gross sex-worship, and it was not

until mankind was removed far from the brute that his imagination

developed, and his mind was capable of abstract thought, that his

æsthetic nature began to develop. As his intellect became more

profound, and his mental range wider, his power of abstract thinking

was accordingly augmented, until to-day, with the average human

being, love is only, in a restricted sense, dependent upon physical

gratification. Herbert Spencer has given a very sure test of love,

based upon its dependence upon the imaginative faculty. According to

him, when we are absent from the one we love, the mental picture

which we form of her, and the attributes which we at that time give

her, are all found in her when in her actual presence. Then, we are

really in love with the person whose faults we cannot see. The truth

of the old adage, "Absence makes the heart grow fonder," still further

shows the part which the imagination plays in love. There is no human

being who has been so fortunate as to marry the first object upon

which his affections settled, providing, of course, that his previous

life has been spent so that he can enter into this relationship

equitably, who did not find that if his love was reciprocated, life

possessed a transcendent charm which words cannot express. Such an

affection is necessarily based upon a most profound respect, and can

only continue when this deferential regard exists. While feeling a

security in its sense of ownership of the one loved, yet it asks and

demands nothing, and can only bud, blossom, and ripen into its fullness

in the atmosphere of kindness and absolute liberty. While sensual

gratification, in the earlier stages, has been the means of nature

in perpetuating the species, it is also the most powerful factor in

the evolution of that community of interest which is the very soul of

this attachment. The infinite number of little incidents which are

never to be forgotten by any real lover, are all of a purely physical

nature, but, in the aggregate, they form the nucleus of that "amazement

of love and friendship and intimacy" which is like the melodious

harmony of the sweetest sounds, which lead us into an ecstasy in every

way supersensual. It is in the realization of such delight that Gay

remarks, "Not to know love, is not to live."

We can best understand the real potency of sensual gratification in

love, if we consider that those moments which are the subject of

our most pleasant memories, are not those in which our desires were

gratified, but those in which we ourselves practiced the most ascetic

self-denial. Well has Schlegel expressed this sentiment when he says,

in his essay upon the Limits of the Beautiful:--"Those who yield

their souls captive to the brief intoxication of (sensual) love, if

no higher and holier feeling mingle with and consecrate their dreams

of bliss, will shrink tremblingly from the pangs which attend their

awakening." But nature has here so arranged her course, that after

marriage, our children's, or, in their absence, our lovers' affairs,

become a part and parcel of our lives, and thus, what began as selfish

interest, from the pleasure which we obtain from the presence of our

loved one, is transmuted into altruism of the highest type. To those

who love, there is nothing of the spirit of boasting in the words of

"Valentine," when he says:

"She is mine own,

And I as rich in having such a jewel

As twenty seas, if all their sands were pearls,

The water nectar, and the rocks pure gold";

but rather of a pious appreciation of the being who has brought him

such great happiness. There is something unaccountable about this

passion called love, and anyone who has experienced it does not wonder

at the words of Madame de Stael, "Love is the emblem of eternity; it

confounds all notions of time, effaces all memory of a beginning, all

fear of an end."

In speaking of the happiness which is to be attained by means of love,

we should not fail to note the fact that in order to secure the most

enjoyment from it, we must be able to satisfy the conditions for which

such a close and reciprocal relationship calls. It is here that the

philosophy of living, based upon self-interest, is by far the safest

guide of conduct known, since once the fact that we must be able to

give to the ones whom we love all that we ask of them is instilled in

our minds, we will have a most powerful stimulant to virtuous living.

And in this matter, there is no chance for misunderstanding. If we

would get all the happiness out of love, we must go into it according

to the old injunction given to clients who were both about to try their

case before a court in equity: "You must enter with clean hands." It is

strange, that even in the affairs of a Platonic friendship, a citizen

of morally rotten Rome at the time of the decadence of the consulate,

should realize that "Nothing is more amiable than virtue; nothing

which more strongly allures us to love it," and yet, two thousand years

later, so few people are practicing this truth, and many, who, in their

ignorance, will utterly deny it. This has largely come about from the

fact that, in times past, man has been able to mold the opinions of

his sisters, and, consequently, virtue was not demanded from him. But

if we will teach our children that it is essential to their happiness

that they should be virtuous, so that they may enter into an _affair

d'amour_ with equity, and obtain from it the happiness which it only

can bring, we would sweep from their paths, with one stroke, the

temptations of licentiousness which are to-day proving to be the ruin

of the majority of the young men of this country. We should teach our

boys that they must be able to give to their wives a mind and body as

unpolluted by debauchery as they expect and insist upon receiving,

and that unless they are able to do this, the pleasures of love, as

it affects the marriage relationship, are forever beyond their power

to experience. We should teach our girls that they should demand,

from the man who asks for their hand, as clean and as spotless a past

as they are able to give him, and that, unless they insist upon this,

matrimony will not turn out to be the "grand, sweet song" which they

have been told about, but will be more like an "armed truce." Connubial

love is of such a nature that it will not find happiness in the

contemplation of the possibility of a rival, and of all of the exacting

passions with which humanity has to deal, undoubtedly this of love

is the strongest. The old saying that "familiarity breeds contempt,"

is based upon this fact--that unless we are able to maintain, in the

one we love, the esteem for us, which under a smaller knowledge of

our individuality, we have excited, the sentiment of attraction soon

turns to one of repulsion even more potent than its opposite, and even

as great a source of misery as is the repulsion of hatred; not even

being secondary when compared with jealousy, which "mocks the meat it

feeds upon." What possibility of happiness is there in marriage where

there is constantly running through the mind a comparison of the

partner which you have, and a possibility of what you have given up?

How much happiness is possible when you are always comparing yourself

with some rival, and wondering what your lover sees in him which you

do not possess? It is the strongest argument in favor of monogamy and

monandry, that only under this condition can the marriage relationship

be equitably fulfilled, even more potent than the necessity of parental

guidance in directing the development of the growing mind.

Man is, by nature, socially inclined, and it is only in the society

of his fellow-men that he really matures intellectually and morally.

Under the influence of love, in the most intimate association with a

limited number of others, preferably of his own kin, who will reprove

his faults gently and reasonably laud his courage and achievements--he

finds the perfect element for inspiration and development. Holmes has

expressed this sentiment beautifully in his lines:

"Soft as the breath of a maiden's 'yes';

Not the light gossamer stirs with less;

But never a cable holds so fast

Through all the battles of wave and blast."

The enthusiasm which comes from the struggle of maintaining a home for

your loved ones, where privacy and comfort may be found; a retreat from

the cares and trifling annoyances of the work-a-day world, makes the

place of abode a shrine where all of our interests are centered. Most

truly has Longfellow said:

"Each man's chimney is his golden milestone;

Is the central point from which he measures

Every distance, through the gateways of the world around him."

Without having experienced a real and genuine affection, no man can

realize the highest possibility. Edwin Markham has most truly said that

the love adventure is the episode of every human life, and, without

it, no existence is complete. There is no other earthly possession

with which it can be compared; consequently, we cannot be too careful

in seeing that our lives conform to the necessary demands of the

nature of this passion. The effect of love upon human ethics cannot be

doubted. The finest faculty which we have is that by means of which we

are able to judge right from wrong, and is what we call conscience.

With this truth in mind, we have only to remember a portion of an

incomplete sonnet of Shakespeare's, saying, "Conscience is born of

love."

In this observation, as in many of his others, the bard of Avon has

reached the heart of the matter at once. Without love, we would have,

and could have, no conscience, as we are only considerate of others

when we have much at stake ourselves, and wish this consideration for

reciprocal reasons. Had we no affection, we would have but little

incentive to moral discrimination. In this sense, as well as for its

happy memories,

"It is better to have loved and lost

Than never to have loved at all."

In considering the advantages of real love, it is also important that

the disadvantages of its counterfeits should be made clear. In the

first place, many of the noted teachers during the last decade have

called attention to the frightful reduction in our marriage and birth

rates; and this, notwithstanding the fact that we feel that we are

progressing upward in the scale of civilization. Now, while many of our

political economists believe that the increased cost of living has been

largely responsible for this, it seems that we should not, however,

attach too great importance to the claim. There has been a growing of

the moral sense among women of the Western nations, and particularly in

America, during the last few years, which has tremendously influenced

the foundations of our civilization. The Women's Christian Temperance

movement, under the guiding hand of Miss Willard, not only advocated

the prohibition of the sale of alcoholic stimulants, but also became

a tremendous power in the social purity crusade, which began to sweep

over this country some twenty-five years ago. The agitation, which

resulted from this reform movement, developed facts which were

previously unknown to the general public, and in every way caused

people to begin to think about subjects which had previously never

been brought to their attention in a specific way. When the statistics

were published that, in this country of eighty million people, we were

having one divorce for every twelve marriages, and that every year

showed a decrease in the marriage and birth rate, thinking people of

all classes began to seek to find the cause for such facts.

It would seem that one of the primal causes for the decrease in the

marriage rate is the ease with which vice has been allowed to become

organized in this country into a regular system, which is conducted

upon a basis of cold-blooded business calculation. The fact that we

have between six hundred thousand and three-quarters of a million

of prostitutes in America, and that this class of people is being

recruited at the rate of over fifteen thousand per annum from foreign

countries and about seventy-five thousand per annum from our own

country, is certainly highly significant. Furthermore, the fact that

probably three-quarters of the women in America who marry are forced

to undergo major operations within the first five years of their

married life, on account of the moral delinquency of their husbands,

has certainly not given any impetus to marriage in our own country. We

have also to remember that over one-third of all the blindness in this

country is traceable to a like cause, and that this occurs in innocent

children, who usually are less than a week old when their sight is

lost, as the result of venereal infection. Furthermore, in many of the

homes which we all have an opportunity to observe, there is not that

happiness existing which would lead thinking people to rush ruthlessly

into matrimony, and the necessity for making divorce easy and the

marriage relationship hard to enter into was never as imperative as it

is to-day. The majority of the children being born, and in whose hands

the entire welfare of this state in the future will rest, are usually

those of parents who are either unfitted or unable, physically,

intellectually, and morally, to give them such character and education

as will make them good citizens; in other words, vice and crime are

breeding faster by far than moral restraint and virtue. Whenever we

are able to have our young men understand that self-control on their

part is a matter of first importance in the requirements of good

citizenship, and a prime requisite if individual happiness is desired,

then and only then will we begin to find marriage becoming more popular

and divorce less to be desired by those who have entered into this

relationship.

Human Life · 第 7 / 8 章