CHAPTER X

ANOTHER SEASON AND A LITTLE MORE SUCCESS

One of the pleasant affairs that came my way that year was Sir Morton

Peto's banquet in October. Sir Morton was a distinguished Englishman who

represented big railway interests in Great Britain and who was then

negotiating some new and important railroading schemes on this side of

the water. There were two hundred and fifty guests; practically

everybody present, except my mother and myself, standing for some large

financial power of the United States. I felt much complimented at being

invited, for it was at a period when very great developments were in the

making. America was literally teeming with new projects and plans and

embryonic interests.

The banquet was given at Delmonico's, then at Fifth Avenue and

Fourteenth Street, and the rooms were gorgeous in their drapings of

American and English flags. The war was about drawing to its close and

patriotism was at white heat. The influential Americans were in the mood

to wave their banners and to exchange amenities with foreign potentates.

Sir Morton was a noted capitalist and his banquet was a sort of "hands

across the sea" festival. He used, I recall, to stop at the Clarendon,

now torn down and its site occupied by a commercial "sky scraper," but

then the smart hostelry of the town.

I sang that night after dinner. My services had not been engaged

professionally, so, when Sir Morton wanted to reward me lavishly, I of

course did not care to have him do so. We were still so new to _prime

donne_ in New York that we had no social code or precedent to refer to

with regard to them; and I preferred, personally, to keep the episode on

a purely friendly and social basis. I was an invited guest only who had

tried to do her part for the entertainment of the others. I was

honoured, too. It was an experience to which anyone could look back with

pride and pleasure.

But, being English, Sir Morton Peto had a solution and, within a day or

two, sent me an exquisite pearl and diamond bracelet. It is odd how much

more delicately and graciously than Americans all foreigners--of

whatever nationality indeed--can relieve a situation of awkwardness and

do the really considerate and appreciative thing which makes such a

situation all right. I later found the same tactful qualities in the

Duke of Newcastle who, with his family, were among the closest friends I

had in England. Indeed, I was always much impressed with the good taste

of English men and women in this connection.

An instance of the American fashion befell me during the winter of

'63-'64 on the occasion of a big reception that was given by the father

of Brander Matthews. I was invited to go and asked to sing, my host

saying that if I would not accept a stipulated price he would be only

too glad to make me a handsome present of some kind. The occasion turned

out to be very unfortunate and unpleasant altogether, both at the time

and with regard to the feeling that grew out of it. I happened to wear a

dress that was nearly new, a handsome and expensive gown, and this was

completely ruined by a servant upsetting melted ice cream over it. My

host and hostess were all concern, saying that, as they were about to go

to Paris, they would buy me a new one. I immediately felt that if they

did this, they would consider the dress as an equivalent for my singing

and that I should never hear anything more of the handsome present. Of

course I said nothing of this, however, to anyone. Well--they went to

Paris. Days and weeks passed. I heard nothing from them about either

dress or present. I went to Europe. They called on me in Paris. In the

course of time we all came home to America; and the night after my

return I received a long letter and a set of Castilian gold jewelry,

altogether inadequate as an equivalent. There was nothing to do but to

accept it, which I did, and then proceeded to give away the ornaments as

I saw fit. The whole affair was uncomfortable and a discredit to my

entertainers. Not only had I lost a rich dress through the carelessness

of one of their servants, but I received a very tardy and inadequate

recompense for my singing. I had refused payment in money because it was

the custom to do so. But I was a professional singer, and I had been

asked to the reception as a professional entertainer. This, however, I

must add, is the most flagrant case that has ever come under my personal

notice of an American host or hostess failing to "make good" at the

expense of a professional.

Well--from time to time after Sir Morton's banquet, I sang in concert.

On one occasion I replaced Euphrosyne Parepa--she had not then married

Carl Rosa--at one of the Bateman concerts. The Meyerbeer craze was then

at its height. Good, sound music it was too, if a little brazen and

noisy. _L'Etoile du Nord_ (I don't understand why we always speak of it

as _L'Etoile du Nord_ when we never once sang it in French) had been

sung in America by my old idol, Mme. de la Grange, nearly ten years

before I essayed Catarina. My _premiere_ in the part was given in

Philadelphia; but almost immediately we came back to New York for the

spring opera season and I sang _The Star_ as principal attraction. Later

on I sang it in Boston.

It was always good fun playing in Boston, for the Harvard boys adored

"suping" and we had our extra men almost without the asking. They were

such nice, clean, enthusiastic chaps! The reason why I remember them so

clearly is that I never can forget how surprised I was when, in the boat

at the end of the first act of _The Star of the North_, I chanced to

look down and caught sight of Peter Barlow (now Judge Barlow) grinning

up at me from a point almost underneath me on the stage, and how I

nearly fell out of the boat!

We had difficulty in finding a satisfactory Prascovia. Prascovia is an

important soprano part, and had to be well taken. At last Albites

suggested a pupil of his. This was Minnie Hauck. Prascovia was sung at

our first performance by Mlle. Bososio who was not equal to the part.

Minnie Hauck came into the theatre and sang a song of Meyerbeer's, and

we knew that we had found our Prascovia. Her voice was very light but

pleasing and well-trained, for Albites was a good teacher. She

undoubtedly would add value to our cast. So she made her _debut_ as

Prascovia, although she afterwards became better known to the public as

one of the most famous of the early Carmens. Indeed, many people

believed that she created that _role_ in America although, as a matter

of fact, I sang Carmen several months before she did. As Prascovia she

and I had a duet together, very long and elaborate, which we introduced

after the tent scene and which made an immense hit. We always received

many flowers after it--I, particularly, to be quite candid. By this time

I was called The Flower Prima Donna because of the quantities of

wonderful blossoms that were sent to me night after night. When singing

_The Star of the North_ there was one bouquet that I was sure of getting

regularly from a young man who always sent the same kind of flowers. I

never needed a card on them or on the box to know from whom they came.

Miss Hauck used to help me pick up my bouquets. The only trouble was

that every one she picked up she kept! As a rule I did not object, and,

anyway, I might have had difficulty in proving that she had appropriated

my flowers after she had taken the cards off: but one night she included

in her general haul my own special, unmistakable bouquet! I recognised

it, saw her take it, but, as there was no card, had the greatest

difficulty in getting it away from her. I did, though, in the end.

Minnie Hauck was very pushing and took advantage of everything to

forward and help herself. She never had the least apprehension about the

outcome of anything in which she was engaged and, in this, she was

extremely fortunate, for most persons cursed with the artistic

temperament are too sensitive to feel confident. She was clever, too.

This is another exception, for very few big singers are clever. I think

it is Mme. Maeterlinck who has made use of the expression "too clever to

sing well." I am convinced that there is quite a truth in it as well as

a sarcasm. Wonderful voices usually are given to people who are,

intrinsically, more or less nonentities. One cannot have everything in

this world, and people with brains are not obliged to sing! But Minnie

Hauck was a singer and she was also clever. If I remember rightly, she

married some scientific foreign baron and lived afterwards in Lucerne.

Once I heard of a soldier who was asked to describe Waterloo and who

replied that his whole impression of the battle consisted of a mental

picture of the kind of button that was on the coat of the man in front

of him. It is so curiously true that one's view of important events is

often a very small one,--especially when it comes to a matter of mere

memory. Accordingly, I find my amethysts are almost my most vivid

recollection in connection with _L'Etoile du Nord_. I wanted a set of

really handsome stage jewelry for Catarina. In fact, I had been looking

for such a set for some time. There are many _roles_, Violetta for

instance, for which rich jewels are needed. My friends were on the

lookout for me, also, and it was while I was preparing for _The Star of

the North_ that a man I knew came hurrying in with a wonderful tale of a

set of imitation amethysts that he had discovered, and that were, he

thought, precisely what I was looking for.

"The man who has them," he told me, "bought them at a bankrupt sale for

ninety-six dollars and they are a regular white elephant to him. Of

course, they are suitable only for the stage; and he has been hunting

for months for some actress who would buy them. You'd better take a look

at them, anyhow."

I had the set sent to me and, promptly, went wild over it. The stones,

that ranged from the size of a bean to that of a large walnut, appeared

to be as perfect as genuine amethysts, and the setting--genuine soft,

old, worked gold--was really exquisite. There were seventy stones in

the whole set, which included a necklace, a bracelet, a large brooch,

ear-rings and a most gorgeous tiara. The colour of the gems was very

deep and lovely, bordering on a claret tone rather than violet. The

crown was apparently symbolic or suggestive of some great house. It was

made of roses, shamrocks, and thistles, and every piece in the set was

engraved with a small hare's head. I wish I knew heraldry and could tell

to whom the lovely ornaments had first belonged. Of course I bought

them, paying one hundred and fifty dollars for the set, which the man

was glad enough to get. I wore it in _The Star_ and in other operas, and

one day I took it down to Tiffany's to have it cleaned and repaired.

The man there, who knew me, examined it with interest.

"It will cost you one hundred and seventy dollars," he informed me.

"What!" I gasped. "That is more than the whole set is worth!"

He looked at me as if he thought I must be a little crazy.

"Miss Kellogg," he said, "if you think that, I don't believe you know

what you've really got. What do you think this jewelry is really worth?"

"I don't know," I admitted. "What do you think it is worth?"

"Roughly speaking," he replied, "I should say about six thousand

dollars. The workmanship is of great value, and every one of the stones

is genuine."

Through all these years, therefore, I have been fearful that some Rip

Van Winkle claimant might rise up and take my beloved amethysts away

from me!

My general impressions of this period of my life include those of the

two great pianists, Thalberg and Gottschalk. They were both wonderful,

although I always admired Gottschalk more than the former. Thalberg had

the greater technique; Gottschalk the greater charm. Sympathetically,

the latter musician was better equipped than the former. The very

simplest thing that Gottschalk played became full of fascination.

Thalberg was marvellously perfect as to his method; but it was

Gottschalk who could "play the birds off the trees and the heart out of

your breast," as the Irish say. Thalberg's work was, if I may put it so,

mental; Gottschalk's was temperamental.

Gottschalk was one of the first big pianists to come to New York

touring. He was from New Orleans, having been born there in the French

Quarter, and spoke only French, like so many persons from that city up

to thirty years ago. But he had been educated abroad and always ranked

as a foreign artist. He must have been a Jew, from his name. Certainly,

he looked like one. He had peculiarly drooping eyelids and was

considered to be very attractive. He wrote enchanting Spanish-sounding

songs; and gave the banjo quite a little dignity by writing a piece

imitating it, much to my delight, because of my fondness for that

instrument. He was in no way a classical pianist. Thalberg was. Indeed,

they were altogether different types. Thalberg was nothing like so

interesting either as a personality or as a musician, although he was

much more scholarly than his predecessor. I say predecessor, because

Thalberg followed Gottschalk in the touring proposition. Gottschalk

began his work before I began mine, and I first sang with him in my

second season. He and I figured in the same concerts not only in those

early days but also much later.

[Illustration: =Gottschalk=

Photograph by Case & Getchell]

Gottschalk was a gay deceiver and women were crazy about him. Needless

to say, my mother never let me have anything to do with him except

professionally. He was pursued by adoring females wherever he went and

inundated with letters from girls who had lost their hearts to his

exquisite music and magnetic personality. I shall always remember

Gottschalk and Brignoli comparing their latest love letters from matinee

girls. Some poor, silly maiden had written to Gottschalk asking for a

meeting at any place he would appoint. Said Gottschalk:

"It would be rather fun to make a date with her at some absurd,

impossible place,--say a ferry-boat, for instance."

"Nonsense," said Brignoli, "a ferry-boat is not romantic enough. She

wouldn't think of coming to a ferry-boat to meet her ideal!"

"She would come anywhere," declared Gottschalk, not at all

vaingloriously, but as one stating a simple truth. "I'll make her come;

and you shall come too and see her do it!"

"Will you bet?" asked Brignoli.

"I certainly will," replied Gottschalk.

They promptly put up quite a large sum of money and Gottschalk won. That

dear, miserable goose of a girl did go to the ferry-boat to meet the

illustrious pianist of her adoration, and Brignoli was there to see. If

only girls knew as much as I do about the way in which their stage

heroes take their innocent adulation, and the wicked light-heartedness

with which they make fun of it! But they do not; and the only way to

teach them, I suppose, is to let them learn by themselves, poor little

idiots.

As I look back I feel a continual sense of outrage that I mixed so

little with the people and affairs that were all about me; interesting

people and important affairs. My dear mother adored me. It is strange

that we can never even be adored in the particular fashion in which we

would prefer to be adored! My mother's way was to guard me eternally;

she would have called it protecting me. But, really, it was a good deal

like shutting me up in a glass case, and it was a great pity. My mother

was an extraordinarily fine woman, upright as the day and of an unusual

mentality. Uncompromising she was, not unnaturally, according to her

heritage of race and creed and generation. Yet I sometimes question if

she were as uncompromising as she used to seem to me, for was not the

life she led with me, as well as her acceptance of it in the beginning,

one long compromise between her nature and the actualities? At any rate,

where she seemed to draw the line was in keeping me as much as possible

aloof from my inevitable associates. I led a deadly dull and virtuous

life, of necessity. To be sure, I might have been just as virtuous or

even more so had I been left to my own devices and judgments; but I

contend that such a life is not up to much when it is compulsory.

Personal responsibility is necessary to development. Perhaps I reaped

certain benefits from my mother's close chaperonage. Certainly, if there

were benefits about it, I reaped them. But I very much question its

ultimate advantage to me, and I confess freely that one of the things I

most regret is the innocent, normal coquetry which is the birthright of

every happy girl and which I entirely missed. It is all very well to be

carefully guarded and to be made the archetype of American virtue on the

stage, but there is a great deal of entirely innocuous amusement that I

might have had and did not have, which I should have been better off

for having. My mother could hardly let me hold a friendly conversation

with a man--much less a flirtation.

[Illustration: =Jane Elizabeth Crosby=

Mother of Clara Louise Kellogg

From a tintype]

Memoirs of an American Prima Donna · 第 10 / 33 章