C = 1/(1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3 + &c.) = 1/[Sigma](1/C) (15).

These rules provide means for calculating the resultant capacity when

any number of condensers are joined up in any way.

If one condenser is charged, and then joined in parallel with another

uncharged condenser, the charge is divided between them in the ratio

of their capacities. For if C1 and C2 are the capacities and Q1 and Q2

are the charges after contact, then Q1/C1 and Q2/C2 are the potential

differences of the coatings and must be equal. Hence Q1/C1 = Q2/C2 or

Q1/Q2 = C1/C2. It is worth noting that if we have a charged sphere we

can perfectly discharge it by introducing it into the interior of

another hollow insulated conductor and making contact. The small

sphere then becomes part of the interior of the other and loses all

charge.

_Measurement of Capacity._--Numerous methods have been devised for the

measurement of the electrical capacity of conductors in those cases in

which it cannot be determined by calculation. Such a measurement may

be an _absolute_ determination or a _relative_ one. The dimensions of

a capacity in electrostatic measure is a length (see UNITS, PHYSICAL).

Thus the capacity of a sphere in electrostatic units (E.S.U.) is the

same as the number denoting its radius in centimetres. The unit of

electrostatic capacity is therefore that of a sphere of 1 cm.

radius.[9] This unit is too small for practical purposes, and hence a

unit of capacity 900,000 greater, called a microfarad, is generally

employed. Thus for instance the capacity in free space of a sphere 2

metres in diameter would be 100/900,000 = 1/9000 of a microfarad. The

electrical capacity of the whole earth considered as a sphere is about

800 microfarads. An absolute measurement of capacity means, therefore,

a determination in E.S. units made directly without reference to any

other condenser. On the other hand there are numerous methods by which

the capacities of condensers may be compared and a relative

measurement made in terms of some standard.

Relative determinations.

One well-known comparison method is that of C.V. de Sauty. The two

condensers to be compared are connected in the branches of a

Wheatstone's Bridge (q.v.) and the other two arms completed with

variable resistance boxes. These arms are then altered until on

raising or depressing the battery key there is no sudden deflection

either way of the galvanometer. If R1 and R2 are the arms' resistances

and C1 and C2 the condenser capacities, then when the bridge is

balanced we have R1 : R2 = C1 : C2.

Another comparison method much used in submarine cable work is the

method of mixtures, originally due to Lord Kelvin and usually called

Thomson and Gott's method. It depends on the principle that if two

condensers of capacity C1 and C2 are respectively charged to

potentials V1 and V2, and then joined in parallel with terminals of

opposite charge together, the resulting potential difference of the

two condensers will be V, such that

(C1V1 - C2V2)

V = ------------- (16);

(C + C)

and hence if V is zero we have C1 : C2 = V2 : V1.

The method is carried out by charging the two condensers to be

compared at the two sections of a high resistance joining the ends of

a battery which is divided into two parts by a movable contact.[10]

This contact is shifted until such a point is found by trial that the

two condensers charged at the different sections and then joined as

above described and tested on a galvanometer show no charge. Various

special keys have been invented for performing the electrical

operations expeditiously.

A simple method for condenser comparison is to charge the two

condensers to the same voltage by a battery and then discharge them

successively through a ballistic galvanometer (q.v.) and observe the

respective "throws" or deflections of the coil or needle. These are

proportional to the capacities. For the various precautions necessary

in conducting the above tests special treatises on electrical testing

must be consulted.

Absolute determinations.

In the absolute determination of capacity we have to measure the ratio

of the charge of a condenser to its plate potential difference. One of

the best methods for doing this is to charge the condenser by the

known voltage of a battery, and then discharge it through a

galvanometer and repeat this process rapidly and successively. If a

condenser of capacity C is charged to potential V, and discharged n

times per second through a galvanometer, this series of intermittent

discharges is equivalent to a current nCV. Hence if the galvanometer

is calibrated by a potentiometer (q.v.) we can determine the value of

this current in amperes, and knowing the value of n and V thus

determine C. Various forms of commutator have been devised for

effecting this charge and discharge rapidly by J.J. Thomson, R.T.

Glazebrook, J.A. Fleming and W.C. Clinton and others.[11] One form

consists of a tuning-fork electrically maintained in vibration of

known period, which closes an electric contact at every vibration and

sets another electromagnet in operation, which reverses a switch and

moves over one terminal of the condenser from a battery to a

galvanometer contact. In another form, a revolving contact is used

driven by an electric motor, which consists of an insulating disk

having on its surface slips of metal and three wire brushes a, b, c

(see fig. 2) pressing against them. The metal slips are so placed

that, as the disk revolves, the middle brush, connected to one

terminal of the condenser C, is alternately put in conductive

connexion with first one and then the other outside brush, which are

joined respectively to the battery B and galvanometer G terminals.

From the speed of this motor the number of commutations per second can

be determined. The above method is especially useful for the

determinations of very small capacities of the order of 100

electrostatic units or so and upwards.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.]

_Dielectric constant._--Since all electric charge consists in a state of

strain or polarization of the dielectric, it is evident that the

physical state and chemical composition of the insulator must be of

great importance in determining electrical phenomena. Cavendish and

subsequently Faraday discovered this fact, and the latter gave the name

"specific inductive capacity," or "dielectric constant," to that quality

of an insulator which determines the charge taken by a conductor

embedded in it when charged to a given potential. The simplest method of

determining it numerically is, therefore, that adopted by Faraday.[12]

He constructed two equal condensers, each consisting of a metal ball

enclosed in a hollow metal sphere, and he provided also certain

hemispherical shells of shellac, sulphur, glass, resin, &c., which he

could so place in one condenser between the ball and enclosing sphere

that it formed a condenser with solid dielectric. He then determined the

ratio of the capacities of the two condensers, one with air and the

other with the solid dielectric. This gave the dielectric constant K of

the material. Taking the dielectric constant of air as unity he obtained

the following values, for shellac K = 2.0, glass K = 1.76, and sulphur K

= 2.24.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Electrostatics" to "Engis" Volume 9, Slice 3 · 第 10 / 35 题