PRUE

Through the long history of human relations, which is the history of the

life of our race, there sounds at intervals the clamour of a single voice

which has not the tone of oratory, but asks, answers, interrupts itself,

interrupts--what else? Whatever else it interrupts is silence; there are

pauses, but no answers. There is the jest without the laugh, and again

the laugh without the jest. And this is because the letters written by

Madame de Sevigne were all saved, and not many written to her; because

Swift burnt the letters that were the dearest things in life to him,

while "MD" both made a treasury of his; and because Prue kept all the

letters which Steele wrote to her from their marriage-day onwards, and

Steele kept none of hers.

In Swift's case the silence is full of echoes; that is to say, his

letters repeat the phrases of Stella's and Dingley's, to play with them,

flout them, and toss them back against the two silenced voices. He never

lets the word of these two women fall to the ground; and when they have

but blundered with it, and aimed it wide, and sent it weakly, he will

catch it, and play you twenty delicate and expert juggling pranks with it

as he sends it back into their innocent faces. So we have something of

MD's letters in the "journal," and this in the only form in which we

desire them, to tell the truth; for when Swift gravely saves us some

specimens of Stella's wit, after her death, as she spoke them, and not as

he mimicked them, they make a sorry show.

In many correspondences, where one voice remains and the other is gone,

the retort is enough for two. It is as when, the other day, the half of

a pretty quarrel between nurse and child came down from an upper floor to

the ears of a mother who decided that she need not interfere. The voice

of the undaunted child it was that was audible alone, and it replied,

"I'm not; _you_ are"; and anon, "I'll tell _yours_." Nothing was really

missing there.

But Steele's letters to Prue, his wife, are no such simple matter. The

turn we shall give them depends upon the unheard tone whereto they reply.

And there is room for conjecture. It has pleased the more modern of the

many spirits of banter to supply Prue's eternal silence with the voice of

a scold. It is painful to me to complain of Thackeray; but see what a

figure he makes of Prue in "Esmond." It is, says the nineteenth-century

humourist, in defence against the pursuit of a jealous, exacting,

neglected, or evaded wife that poor Dick Steele sends those little notes

of excuse: "Dearest Being on earth, pardon me if you do not see me till

eleven o'clock, having met a schoolfellow from India"; "My dear, dear

wife, I write to let you know I do not come home to dinner, being obliged

to attend some business abroad, of which I shall give you an account

(when I see you in the evening), as becomes your dutiful and obedient

husband"; "Dear Prue, I cannot come home to dinner. I languish for your

welfare"; "I stay here in order to get Tonson to discount a bill for me,

and shall dine with him to that end"; and so forth. Once only does

Steele really afford the recent humourist the suggestion that is

apparently always so welcome. It is when he writes that he is invited to

supper to Mr. Boyle's, and adds: "Dear Prue, do not send after me, for I

shall be ridiculous." But even this is to be read not ungracefully by a

well-graced reader. Prue was young and unused to the world. Her

husband, by the way, had been already married; and his greater age makes

his constant deference all the more charming.

But with this one exception, Steele's little notes, kept by his wife

while she lived, and treasured after her death by her daughter and his,

are no record of the watchings and dodgings of a London farce. It is

worth while to remember that Steele's dinner, which it was so often

difficult to eat at home, was a thing of midday, and therefore of mid-

business. But that is a detail. What is desirable is that a reasonable

degree of sweetness should be attributed to Prue; for it is no more than

just. To her Steele wrote in a dedication: "How often has your

tenderness removed pain from my aching head, how often anguish from my

afflicted heart. If there are such beings as guardian angels, they are

thus employed. I cannot believe one of them to be more good in

inclination, or more charming in form, than my wife."

True, this was for the public; but not so were these daily notes; and

these carry to her his assurance that she is "the beautifullest object in

the world. I know no happiness in this life in any degree comparable to

the pleasure I have in your person and society." "But indeed, though you

have every perfection, you have an extravagant fault, which almost

frustrates the good in you to me; and that is, that you do not love to

dress, to appear, to shine out, even at my request, and to make me proud

of you, or rather to indulge the pride I have that you are mine." The

correction of the phrase is finely considerate.

Prue cannot have been a dull wife, for this last compliment is a reply,

full of polite alacrity, to a letter from her asking for a little

flattery. How assiduously, and with what a civilized absence of

uncouthness, of shame-facedness, and of slang of the mind, with what

simplicity, alertness, and finish, does he step out at her invitation,

and perform! She wanted a compliment, though they had been long married

then, and he immediately turned it. This was no dowdy Prue.

Her request, by the way, which he repeats in obeying it, is one of the

few instances of the other side of the correspondence--one of the few

direct echoes of that one of the two voices which is silent.

The ceremony of the letters and the deferent method of address and

signature are never dropped in this most intimate of letter-writing. It

is not a little depressing to think that in this very form and state is

supposed, by the modern reader, to lurk the stealthiness of the husband

of farce, the "rogue." One does not like the word. Is it not clownish

to apply it with intention to the husband of Prue? He did not pay, he

was always in difficulties, he hid from bailiffs, he did many other

things that tarnish honour, more or less, and things for which he had to

beg Prue's special pardon; but yet he is not a fit subject for the

unhandsome incredulity which is proud to be always at hand with an ironic

commentary on such letters as his.

I have no wish to bowdlerize Sir Richard Steele, his ways and words. He

wrote to Prue at night when the burgundy had been too much for him, and

in the morning after. He announces that he is coming to her "within a

pint of wine." One of his gayest letters--a love-letter before the

marriage, addressed to "dear lovely Mrs. Scurlock"--confesses candidly

that he had been pledging her too well: "I have been in very good

company, where your health, under the character of the woman I loved

best, has been often drunk; so that I may say that I am dead drunk for

your sake, which is more than _I die for you_."

Steele obviously drank burgundy wildly, as did his "good company"; as did

also the admirable Addison, who was so solitary in character and so

serene in temperament. But no one has, for this fault, the right to put

a railing accusation into the mouth of Prue. Every woman has a right to

her own silence, whether her silence be hers of set purpose or by

accident. And every creature has a right to security from the banterings

peculiar to the humourists of a succeeding age. To every century its own

ironies, to every century its own vulgarities. In Steele's time they had

theirs. They might have rallied Prue more coarsely, but it would have

been with a different rallying. Writers of the nineteenth century went

about to rob her of her grace.

She kept some four hundred of these little letters of her lord's. It was

a loyal keeping. But what does Thackeray call it? His word is

"thrifty." He says: "There are four hundred letters of Dick Steele's to

his wife, which that thrifty woman preserved accurately."

"Thrifty" is a hard word to apply to her whom Steele styled, in the year

before her death, his "charming little insolent." She was ill in Wales,

and he, at home, wept upon her pillow, and "took it to be a sin to go to

sleep." Thrifty they may call her, and accurate if they will; but she

lies in Westminster Abbey, and Steele called her "your Prueship."

Essays(#1434) · 第 49 / 58 题