CHAPTER XIV.

THE COMMISSION OF CARDINAL POLE.

There were glad hearts at Rome when the news came that the English

commons had risen for the Church. The Pope would lose no time in

despatching his blessings and his help to his faithful children. His

advances had been scorned--his hopes had been blighted--his offers of

renewed cordiality had been flung back to him in an insulting act of

parliament; the high powers, it seemed, had interfered at last to avenge

his quarrel and theirs. Rumour painted the insurgents as in full

triumph; but their cause was the cause of the world, and should not be

left in their single hands. If France and the Empire were entangled in

private quarrels, Scotland was free to act, and to make victory sure.

[Sidenote: A cap and sword are consecrated at St Peter's, as a present

for James of Scotland.]

On Christmas eve, at St. Peter's, at the marvellous mass, when as the

clock marked midnight, the church, till then enveloped in darkness,

shone out with the brilliance of a thousand tapers, a sword and cap were

laid upon the altar: the sword to smite the enemies of the faith, the

cap, embroidered with the figure of a dove, to guard the wearer's life

in his sacred enterprise. The enchanted offerings were a present of the

Holy Father to James the Fifth; they were to be delivered in Scotland

with the same ceremonials with which they had been consecrated;[208]

and at Rome prayers were sent up that the prince would use them in

defence of Holy Church against those enemies for whom justice and

judgment were now prepared; that, in estimating the value of the gifts,

he would remember their mystic virtue and spiritual potency.[209]

The Scotch were, indeed, ill-selected as allies to the northern English,

their hereditary enemies;[210] but religion had reconciled more

inveterate antagonisms, and to the sanguine Paul, and his more sanguine

English adviser, minor difficulties seemed as nothing, and vanished in

the greatness of their cause.

[Sidenote: Reginald Pole is made a cardinal,]

Reginald Pole was now a cardinal. When hopes of peace with England had

finally clouded, he was invited to Rome. It was soon after announced

that he was to be raised to high dignity in the Roman Church; and

although he was warned that the acceptance of such a position would

sanction the worst interpretation of his past proceedings, he contented

himself with replying with his usual protestations of good meaning, and

on the 20th of December he received a cardinal's hat.[211]

[Sidenote: And receives a legate's commission.]

His promotion, like the consecration of the cap and sword, was a

consequence of the reports from England. He had been selected a

representative of the Holy See on the outbreak of the rebellion which he

had foretold, and he was armed with a rank adequate to his mission, and

with discretionary instructions either to proceed to England or to the

nearest point to it, in France or Flanders, to which he could venture.

[Sidenote: He is to go into Flanders.]

The condition in which he might find his own country was uncertain. If

the first rumours were correct, the king might be in the power of the

insurgents, or, at least, be inclined to capitulate. It was possible

that the struggle was still in progress--that the friends of the Church

might require assistance and direction. It was necessary, therefore, to

be provided for either contingency. To the Pope, with whom he had no

disguise, and under whose direction he, of course, was acting, he spoke

freely of his mission as intended to support the insurrection, that the

people of England might have a leader near at hand of the old royal

blood, with authority from the Pope to encourage them, yet beyond the

reach of the tyrant's hand.[212] With the English government he

manœuvred delicately and dexterously. At the end of December he wrote a

respectful letter to Henry, making no allusion to any intended

commission, but, in his capacity merely of an English subject, going

over the points at issue between his country and the Papacy, and giving

his reasons for believing the right to be with the See of Rome; but

stating at the same time his desire "to satisfy his Majesty, or else to

be himself satisfied," and offering "to repair into Flanders, there to

discuss and reason with such as his Highness would appoint to entreat

that matter with him."[213]

The proposal seemed so reasonable to Henry, that, if Pole, he said, was

coming to Flanders really with no concealed intention, he would consent

willingly; and persons were selected who should go over and dispute with

him.[214] The mask was carefully sustained. In his general

correspondence with his friends, although he did not disguise his

commission from the Holy See, or suggest as a possibility that he might

himself be convinced in the intended discussion, yet he spoke

beforehand of his expedition merely as a peaceful one; and since he

intended to commence with argument, he perhaps conceived himself to be

keeping within the letter of the truth.

[Sidenote: His legatine credentials to England,]

As his legatine credentials, five pastoral epistles were prepared by

Paul.

The first was an address to his well-beloved children in England, whose

apostacy he knew to have been forced upon them, and who now were giving

noble proof of their fidelity in taking arms for the truth. He lauded

them for their piety; he exhorted them to receive, obey, and assist his

excellent representative in the high work on which he was sent.

[Sidenote: To Scotland,]

The second was to James of Scotland--a companion to another and more

explicit letter which accompanied the cap and sword--commending Pole to

his care, and again dwelling on the exploits which lay before him to

execute in England.

[Sidenote: To France and Flanders,]

The third and fourth were to Francis and the Regent of the Netherlands.

The French and Imperial ambassadors had both been consulted on Pole's

intended expedition, and both had signified their approval of it. Paul

now implored the King of France to consider the interests which were

compromised by the unhappy war in Europe, and to remember his duty as a

Christian prince. He urged both Francis and the Regent Mary to receive

Pole as they would receive himself, as engaged upon the deepest

interests of Holy Church.

[Sidenote: To the Bishop of Liège.]

A last letter was to the Prince Bishop of Liège, claiming his general

assistance, and begging him, should it be necessary, to supply the

legate with money.

With these missives, and with purposes of a very plain character,

Reginald Pole left Rome in February. France was his first object. The

events in England of the few last weeks had prepared a different

reception for him from that which he expected.

[Sidenote: The king privately gains the confidence of the northern

gentlemen.]

[Sidenote: Conditions are attached to the pardon.]

The king had not lost a moment in correcting the misconceptions which

the Duke of Norfolk had permitted at Doncaster. The insurgents supposed

that they had done good service to the commonwealth; the king regarded

them as pardoned traitors who must reward his forgiveness by loyal

obedience for the future. A chasm lay between the two estimates of the

same subject, which would not readily be filled. The majority of the

gentlemen had returned from their visit to London, converts to Henry's

policy--or at any rate determined to support it. The clergy, and such of

the people as were under their influence, remained a sullen minority.

The intentions of the government were made purposely obvious. Large

garrisons, with ammunition and cannon, were thrown into Newcastle,

Scarborough, and Hull. Royal officers penetrated the country where the

power of the knights and nobles was adequate to protect them, compelling

suspected persons to sue out their pardons by taking the oath of

allegiance in a form constructed for the occasion.[215] The most

conspicuous insurgents were obliged to commit themselves to acquiescence

in all the measures against which they had risen. They had believed

themselves victorious: they were enduring the consequences of defeat.

[Sidenote: Exasperation of the clergy.]

[Sidenote: January. Fresh commotions begin.]

Loud outcries arose on all sides. The people exclaimed that they were

betrayed by the gentlemen. The pardon was a delusion; "the king," they

said, "had given them the fawcet and had kept the spigot."[216] The

clergy were described as writhing with fury;[217] they had achieved

their magnificent explosion; the smoke which had darkened the sky was

clearing off, and the rock was not splintered. The opportunity was not,

could not be gone; after all, it was only here and there that the

treachery of the gentlemen would be fatal; the king had still but a

comparatively inconsiderable force scattered in a few towns; the country

generally was in a state of anarchy; the subsidy could not be collected;

the monks remained in the abbeys in which they had been reinstated. The

agitation began again, at particular points, to gather head.

[Sidenote: Character of Sir Francis Bigod.]

Sir Francis Bigod, of Mogreve Castle, in Blakemore, was one of those

persons who, in great questions, stand aloof from parties, holding some

notion of their own, which they consider to be the true solution of the

difficulty, and which they will attempt when others have failed; he was

a spendthrift; his letters to Cromwell[218] describe him as crippled

with debt; he was a pedant; and had written a book on the supremacy, on

an original principle;[219] in the first rising, he said, he was "held

in great suspect and jealousy because of his learning."

Mortified, perhaps, that his talents had not been appreciated, he now

conceived that he had an occasion for the display of his powers. If the

king had selected a leader for the insurgents who would give a

death-blow to their cause, he could not have made a better choice.

[Sidenote: The Duke of Norfolk coming again into Yorkshire.]

The council of the north was about to undertake its functions. The Duke

of Norfolk was to be the first president, and was to enter upon his

duties at the end of January.

[Sidenote: Jan. 12. Bigod raises the people.]

Bigod, consulting only a few monks, a certain John Hallam a retainer of

Sir Robert Constable, and one or two other insignificant persons,

imagined that before his arrival the vantage-ground of Doncaster might

be recovered. Had Lord Darcy, or any capable person, been aware of his

intentions, he would have been promptly checked; but he kept his secret,

except among his own private confederates, till the 12th of January,

when he sent out a sudden circular, through Durham and Richmondshire,

inviting a muster at Settington. Discontent is an incautious passion.

The clergy gave their help, and a considerable number of people

collected, though knowing nothing of the object for which they had been

called together.[220] Presently Sir Francis Bigod rode up, and mounting

a hillock, addressed the crowd.

"He had invited them thither, he said, to warn them that, unless they

looked to themselves, they would be all destroyed. Cleveland had risen,

and other parts of the bishopric had risen, and all brave men must

follow the example. The Duke of Norfolk was coming down with twenty

thousand men. The gentlemen were traitors. The people were deceived by a

pretended pardon, which was not a pardon, but a proclamation. None were

to have the benefit of it, unless they took the king for supreme head of

the Church; and that was against the Gospel. If, therefore, he said, you

will take my part, I will take yours. You who will follow me, hold up

your hands."[221]

They did not know Bigod; but in their humour they would have followed

any one who had offered to lead them. Every hand went up. "Who will not

go," they cried, "strike off his head!"--"Now is the time to rise, or

else never. Forward! forward! forward! forward now! on pain of death.

Forward now, or else never; and we shall have captains just and true;

and no gentlemen shall stay us."... The spent force of the great rising

could still issue in noise, if in nothing else.

[Sidenote: George Lumley attempts Scarborough, and fails.]

[Sidenote: Hallam fails at Hull, and is taken prisoner.]

Among the crowd was the eldest son of Lord Lumley, taken there, if his

own word was true, by little else than curiosity. Bigod saw him; and he

was pitched upon to head a party to Scarborough, and seize the castle.

He went unwillingly, with followers little better than a rabble. The

townspeople were languid; the castle had been newly entrenched; the

black mouths of cannon gaped between the parapets. The insurgents stood

gazing for a few hours on their hopeless enterprise, and at the end

Lumley stole away out of the town, and left his men to shift as they

could. Hull and Beverley were to be attempted on the same day by Hallam

and Bigod. In both cases they hoped to succeed by a surprise. At Hull it

happened to be the market day. Hallam went thither in a farmer's dress,

with twenty men, the party going in two and two to avoid causing

suspicion. He calculated on the assistance of the crowd who would be

collected by the market; but he soon discovered that he was mistaken,

and that unless he could escape before his disguise was betrayed, he

would be taken prisoner. He had gained the open country with two or

three of his followers, when, on looking round, he saw the gates

closing. "Fie!" some one cried, "will you go and leave your men behind

you?" He turned his horse, intending a rescue. At that moment his bridle

was seized; and though he drew his sword, and with his servants made a

few minutes' defence, he was overpowered and carried to the town

gaol.[222]

[Sidenote: Bigod takes Beverley, but is denounced by Aske and Lord

Darcy, and is also taken prisoner.]

Bigod's fortune was scarcely better. He succeeded in getting possession

of Beverley; but the late leaders, whose names still possessed the most

authority, Aske, Darcy, and Sir Robert Constable, lost not an instant in

disclaiming and condemning his proceedings. His men fell away from him;

he was obliged to fly, and he, too, soon after found himself a prisoner.

[Sidenote: Difficult position of Aske, Sir R. Constable, and Lord

Darcy.]

Nothing could have been more fortunate for the government, nothing more

vexatious to all intelligent friends of the insurrection, than this

preposterous outbreak. If the king desired to escape from the conditions

of Doncaster, a fresh commotion furnished him with a fair excuse.

Constable sent out orders,[223] imperiously commanding every one to

remain quiet. The Duke of Norfolk, he said, was coming only with his

private retinue to listen to the complaints of the people. The king was

to follow at Whitsuntide, to hold a parliament in the midst of them.

Their present folly was compromising their cause, and would undo their

victory. To the king both he and Aske made the most of their exertions

to preserve order, and received for them his thanks and

acknowledgments.[224] Yet their position was full of danger; and to move

either against the rising or in favour of it might equally injure them;

they ruined Bigod; but the country people and the clergy, who were half

inclined to suspect them before, saw in their circulars only fresh

evidence of treachery;[225] their huge party, so lately with the

organization of an army, was gaping and splitting everywhere, and they

knew not on which side to turn. Bigod's scattered followers appealed to

Aske and Darcy for protection, and Aske at least ventured to engage his

word for their pardons. Hallam, who was as popular as he was rash and

headstrong, had been taken in arms, and was in the hands of the king's

soldiers at Hull. They must either rescue him and commit themselves to

fresh treason, or forfeit the influence which they retained. They

consulted anxiously. It was still open to them to draw their swords--to

fling themselves on the country, and fight out the cause which they saw

too clearly was fading away. But they had lost the tide--and they had

lost heart, except for half measures, the snare and ruin of

revolutionists.

[Sidenote: February. The Duke of Norfolk arrives with an army.]

Aske ventured in person to Hull, and interceded, with indirect menaces,

to prevent Hallam's execution; a step which compromised himself, and

could not benefit the prisoner.[226] The general consequences which he

had foreseen all followed as a matter of course. "Bigod," he said

bitterly, "had gone about to destroy the effect of the petition."[227]

The Duke of Norfolk came at the end of the month; but, under fair

pretext of the continued disorders, he brought with him an army, and an

army this time composed of men who would do his bidding and ask few

questions.[228]

[Sidenote: February 3.]

[Sidenote: Commotions in Westmoreland and Northumberland.]

On the 3d of February he was at Pomfret. He was instructed to respect

literally the terms of the pardon, but to punish promptly all offences

committed since the issue of it. By the gentlemen he was eagerly

welcomed, "being," he wrote, "in the greatest fear of the people that

ever I saw men."[229] The East Riding was tolerably quiet; but to the

north all was in confusion. The Earl of Westmoreland was in London. The

countess was labouring to keep order, "playing the part rather of a

knight than of a lady," but with imperfect success. The Countess of

Northumberland had also exerted herself nobly. But "there was never so

much need of help," wrote Sir Thomas Tempest to Norfolk, "as now;

Northumberland is wholly out of rule, and without order to be taken in

Tyndal and Redesdale, all mischief shall go at large. The barony of

Langley and Hexhamshire, taking example by them, be almost as evil as

they be."[230] Similar information came in from Richmond and the Dales,

and Westmoreland was in worse condition than either. In place of the

disciplined army which had been at Doncaster, an armed mob was spread

over the country, pillaging and burning. Happily the latter form of evil

was the more easy to deal with. "The gentlemen be in such terror,"

Norfolk said, "that they be afraid to move for their defence." "It shall

not be long," he added, "ere I will look on these commons;" nor were

they slow in giving him an opportunity.

[Sidenote: Feb. 12. The rebels attack Carlisle, but without success.]

[Sidenote: They again rally, and Norfolk goes to look for them.]

About the 12th of February a rabble from Kendal, Richmond, Hexham,

Appleby, and Penrith, collected under one of the Musgraves, about eight

thousand in number, and attacked Carlisle. They assaulted the walls, but

were beaten back in confusion, and chased for many miles by Sir Thomas

Clifford. Clifford's troops, hastily levied, contained a sprinkling of

the professional thieves of the Border. The tendencies of these men

getting the better of them, they began to pillage; and the rebels

rallying, and probably reinforced, attacked them, and gained some

advantage. Norfolk hurried to the scene, taking care to bring the

southern levies with him;[231] and he trusted that he had at last found

an opportunity of dealing a blow which would finally restore order, and

recover Henry's confidence in him, which had been somewhat shaken. "I

doubt not," he wrote to Cromwell, "so to use my company as it shall

appear I have seen some wars. This pageant well played, it is likely all

this realm shall be in better quiet during our lives. Doubt not, my

lord, that I will adventure anything. I know too well what danger it

should be to the whole realm if we were overthrown. Now shall appear

whether for favour of these countrymen I forbare to fight with them at

Doncaster, as ye know the King's Highness showed me it was thought by

some I did. Those that so said shall now be proved false liars."[232]

[Sidenote: A battle is imminent, but the rebels disperse.]

[Sidenote: Martial law proclaimed in Westmoreland and the North Riding

of Yorkshire.]

[Sidenote: The king requires the monks andcanons who have been faulty to

be tied up.]

The result of a battle in Norfolk's humour would have been serious to

the rebels.[233] They felt it, and their courage failed them; they broke

up in panic and dispersed. On inquiry, the last explosion, like the

rest, was traced to the monks; those of Sawley, Hexham, Lanercost,

Newminster, and St. Agatha, being the most guilty. The duke had the

power in his hands, and was determined, once for all, to close these

scenes. The impunity of the first insurrection had borne its natural

fruits, and wholesome severity could alone restore quiet. Martial law

was proclaimed in Durham, Westmoreland, Cumberland, and the northern

angle of Yorkshire; arrests were made on all sides, and a courier was

despatched to inform the king of the final flight of the insurgents, and

of the steps which had been taken. Henry answered promptly, sending down

his thanks to Sir Thomas Clifford and Sir Christopher Dacre, who had

defended Carlisle, with his full approbation of Norfolk's conduct. "The

further you wade," he said, "in the investigation of the behaviour of

those persons that call themselves religious, the more you shall detest

the great number of them. Our pleasure is, that before you shall close

up our banner again you shall cause such dreadful execution to be done

upon a good number of the inhabitants of every town, village, and hamlet

that have offended, as they may be a fearful spectacle to all others

hereafter that would practise any like matter, remembering that it

should be much better that these traitors should perish in their unkind

and traitorous follies, than that so slender punishment should be done

upon them as the dread thereof should not be a warning to others.

Finally, forasmuch as all these troubles have ensued by the solicitation

and traitorous conspiracies of the monks and canons of those parts, we

desire you at such places as they have conspired or kept their houses

with force since the appointment at Doncaster, you shall, without pity

or circumstance, cause all the monks and canons that be in any wise

faulty, to be tied up without further delay or ceremony."[234]

[Sidenote: March. Seventy-four persons are executed.]

The command was obeyed. Before the ordinary course of law was restored,

seventy-four persons, laity and clergy, were hanged in various towns in

Westmoreland and Cumberland.[235] The severity was not excessive, but it

was sufficient to produce the desired result. The rebellion was

finished. The flame was trampled out, and a touch of human pathos hangs

over the close. I find among the records a brief entry that "the bodies

were cut down and buried by certain women."[236] Hallam and several of

his followers were executed at Hull. Bigod, Lumley, and six others were

sent to London, to await their trial with the Lincolnshire prisoners who

were still in the Tower.

[Sidenote: Reginald Pole arrives in France.]

[Sidenote: Francis refuses to receive him.]

The turn of events promised ill for Reginald Pole, and the nature of his

mission was by this time known in England. The fame had spread of the

consecrated sword; and James had given fresh umbrage and caused

additional suspicion by having married in the midst of the late events

the Princess Magdalen of France, without consulting his uncle. The

disturbances had been checked opportunely; but great as the danger was

known to have been, a further peril had been on the rise to increase its

volume. Pole had professed a desire for a reconciliation. The

reconciliation, as Pole understood the word, was to be accomplished by

the success of the rebellion which he was hastening to assist by all

methods, natural and supernatural; and his affected surprise could

scarcely have been genuine when he found himself proclaimed a traitor.

Henry, by his success in England, had meantime recovered the judicious

respect of foreign sovereigns. The French ambassador had promised the

Pope a favourable reception for his legate at Paris. The legate, on his

arrival at Lyons, met his first disappointment in the reports which

reached him from his friends at home: approaching the French capital, he

received a second and a worse, in an intimation from Francis that he

would not be admitted to his presence; that unless he desired to find

himself in the custody of his own government he must leave the kingdom

immediately. In the treaties between France and England, a mutual

promise to give no protection to political offenders was a prominent

article. Henry had required Francis to observe his obligations, and they

could only be evaded by Pole's instant disappearance.

[Sidenote: He retreats to Cambray,]

[Sidenote: And is escorted by the regent to Liège.]

[Sidenote: Arrest of Aske, Lord Darcy, and Sir Robert Constable.]

[Sidenote: Treason of Sir John and Lady Bulmer.]

In the cruel blight of his hopes the legate had only to comply. He

hastened to Cambray, and sending a courier with the Pope's letter to the

Regent of the Netherlands, he avenged himself by childish complaints,

which he poured out to Cromwell.[237] The King of France had been

insulted--the sacred privileges of an ambassador had been violated by

the monstrous demand for his surrender. He pretended to be ignorant

that treaties are made to be observed--and that foreign courts can

confer no sacred privilege on the subjects of other countries, as

towards their own governments. He reached Cambray in the beginning of

April, but he found in the Netherlands a scarcely more cordial reception

than in France. He remained in that town under honourable but uneasy

restraint till the end of May, when he was obliged to inform the

Pope[238] that the regent was in so great awe and fear of "that

adversary," the King of England, that she no more dared to receive him

than Francis; that he lived in daily fear of being taken prisoner and

sent to London, and the utmost favour on which she could venture was to

send him under an escort to Liège. To Liège, therefore, he was obliged

to retire, and there for the present the bishop's hospitality allowed

him to remain. If his journey had been attended with no other

consequences but his own mortification it would scarcely have required

to be noticed. Unhappily it was followed by, and probably it occasioned,

the destruction of more than one brave man for whom we could have

desired a better fate. While at Liège, and even from his entry into

France, it is evident, from his letters to the Pope,[239] that he

maintained an active correspondence with England. Whether intercepted

despatches found their way into the hands of Cromwell, or whether his

presence in the neighbourhood invited suspicion, and suspicion led to

discovery, is uncertain; we find only that simultaneously with Pole's

arrival at Cambray, Robert Aske, Lord Darcy, and Sir Robert Constable

were arrested and taken to the Tower. On mid-Lent Sunday Aske had sent

out his letters to "the captains" of various districts, and meetings had

been held in consequence.[240] I am unable to ascertain either the

objects or the results of these meetings; but "to summon the king's

lieges" for any object after the restoration of quiet was an act of the

highest imprudence. In Easter week there was an obscure insurrection in

Cleveland. Sir John and Lady Bulmer (or Margaret Cheyne, as she is

termed in her indictment) had been invited to London. Lady Bulmer was

proved to have said that she would as soon be torn in pieces as go to

London unless the Duke of Norfolk's and Sir Ralph Ellerkar's heads were

off, and then she might go where she would at the head of the commons.

Her chaplain confessed to a plot between the lady, her husband, and

other persons, to seize and carry off Norfolk to Wilton Castle;[241] but

in the evidence which I have discovered there is nothing to implicate

either Aske or his two friends in this project.

[Sidenote: The rule of judgment in the government necessarily harsh.]

That after the part which the latter had played they should have been

jealously watched, that actions of doubtful bearing should be construed

to their disfavour, was no more than they had a right to expect. Narrow

interpretations of conduct, if severe, are inevitable with men who in

perilous times thrust themselves into revolutionary prominence. To

estimate their treatment fairly, we must ascertain, if possible, from

the fragments of surviving informations against them, whether they

really showed symptoms of fresh treasonable intent, or whether they were

the victims of the irritation created by Pole's mission, and were less

punished for their guilt than because they were dangerous and powerful.

The government insisted that they had clear proof of treason;[242] yet

the word "treason" as certainly bore a more general meaning in

Cromwell's estimate than in the estimate of those who continued to

regard the first pilgrimage as good service to the state. To the

government it was a crime to be expiated by active resistance of all

similar attempts, by absolute renunciation of its articles; and if, in

contrast to the great body of the northern gentlemen, a few possessed of

wide influence continued to maintain that they had done well, if they

continued to encourage the people to expect that their petitions would

be granted, if they discouraged a renewal of the commotions avowedly

because they would injure the cause, it is certain that by a government

surrounded by conspiracy, and emerging with difficulty out of an arduous

position, yet determined to persevere in the policy which had created

the danger, such men would be regarded with grave suspicion, even if

compromised by no further overt acts of disloyalty.

[Sidenote: To what extent were Aske, Darcy, and Constable compromised?]

[Sidenote: The offences which were proved against them.]

But it can scarcely be said that they were wholly uncompromised. Through

the months of February and March a series of evidence shows Aske, Darcy,

Sir Robert Constable, a gentleman named Levening, and several others,

holding aloof as an isolated group, in close and continued intercourse,

yet after Bigod's capture taking no part in the pacification of the

country. These men repeatedly, in public and private, assured the people

that the Doncaster articles must be conceded. They were in possession of

information respecting the risings in Westmoreland and Cleveland, and

yet gave no information to the government. In an intercepted letter to

Lord Darcy, Aske spoke of himself as having accomplished a great

enterprise,--"as having played his part, and all England should perceive

it."[243] It was proved that Darcy, when commanded in January to furnish

Pomfret with stores, had repeated his former neglect,--that he and Aske

were still in secret possession of cannon belonging to the government,

which they had appropriated in the rebellion, and had not

restored,--that Aske had interfered with the authorities at Hull to

prevent the punishment of traitors taken in arms,[244]--that Constable,

in a letter to Bigod, told him that he had chosen a wrong time of the

year, that he ought to have waited till the spring,[245]--that Lord

Darcy had been heard to say that it was better to rule than be

ruled,--"and that where before they had had but two sovereign crowns

they would now have four."[246]

The lightest of these charges were symptoms of an animus[247] which the

crown prosecutors would regard as treasonable. The secretion of the

artillery and Aske's conduct at Hull would ensure a condemnation where

the judges were so anxious to condemn.

[Sidenote: Trials of the Lincolnshire prisoners.]

[Sidenote: A hundred had been surrendered; nineteen were executed.]

The materials for the prosecution were complete. It remained to proceed

with the trials. But I must first mention the fate of the prisoners from

Lincolnshire, who had been already disposed of. In their case there was

not the complication of a pardon. They had been given up hot-handed by

their confederates, as the principal instigators of the rebellion. More

than a hundred seem to have been sent originally to the Tower. Upwards

of half of these were liberated after a short imprisonment. On the 6th

of March Sir William Parr, with a special commission, sat at Lincoln, to

try the Abbot of Kirkstead, with thirty of the remainder. The Lincoln

jury regarded the prisoners favourably; Thomas Moigne, one or the

latter, spoke in his defence for three hours so skilfully, according to

Sir William Parr's report, that "but for the diligence of the king's

serjeant," he and all the rest would have been acquitted. Ultimately the

crown secured their verdict: the abbot, Moigne, and another were hanged

on the following day at Lincoln, and four others a day or two later at

Louth and Horncastle.[248] The commission petitioned for the pardon of

the rest. After a delay of a few weeks the king consented, and they were

dismissed.[249]

[Sidenote: Trial of Lord Hussey.]

Twelve more, the Abbot of Barlings, one of his monks, and others who had

been concerned in the murder of the chancellor, were then brought to the

bar in the Guildhall. They had no claim to mercy; and they found none.

They were hung on gibbets, at various towns, in their own county, as

signs and warnings. Lord Hussey was tried by the peers. He was guilty

obviously of having fled from a post which he was bound to defend. He

had obstructed good subjects, who would have done their duty, had he

allowed them; and he had held communication with the rebels. His

indictment[250] charges him with acts of more direct complicity, the

evidence of which I have not discovered. But wherever a comparison has

been possible, I have found the articles of accusation in so strict

accordance with the depositions of witnesses, that the absent link may

be presumed to have existed. The construction may be violent; the fact

is always true. He, too, was found guilty, and executed.[251]

With Lord Hussey the Lincolnshire list was closed. Out of fifty or sixty

thousand persons who had been in armed rebellion, the government was

satisfied with the punishment of twenty. The mercy was perhaps in part

dictated by prudence.

[Sidenote: May. The second trials.]

[Sidenote: The government find a difficulty in obtaining the verdicts.

One of the prisoners is acquitted. A list of the grand jury is sent to

London.]

The turn of the northern men came next. There were three sections of

them:--Sir Francis Bigod, George Lumley, and those who had risen in

January in the East Riding; Sir Thomas Percy, the Abbot of Fountains,

the Abbot of Jervaulx, Sir John and Lady Bulmer, Sir Ralph Bulmer, and

Sir Stephen Hamarton, who had been concerned in the separate commotions

since suppressed by the Duke of Norfolk; and, finally, Aske, Constable,

and Lord Darcy, with their adherents. In this instance the proceedings

were less simple than in the former, and in some respects unusual. The

inferior offenders were first tried at York. The indictments were sent

in to the grand jury; and in the important case of Levening, the special

confederate of Aske and Darcy, whose guilt was identical with theirs, no

bill was found. The king, in high displeasure, required Norfolk to take

some severe notice of this obstruction of justice. Norfolk remonstrated;

and was requested, in sharper language, to send up a list of the

jurors,[252] and unravel, if possible, the cause of the acquittal. The

names were forwarded. The panel was composed of fifty gentlemen,

relatives, most of them, of one or other of the accused persons, and

many among whom had formed part of the insurgent council at

Pomfret.[253] Levening's escape was explained; and yet it could not be

remedied. The crown was forced to continue its prosecutions, apparently

with the same difficulty, and under the same uncertainty of the issue.

When the trials of the higher offenders were opened in London, true

bills had first to be found against them in their own counties; and the

foremen of the two grand juries (for the fifty were divided into two

bodies of twenty-five each) were Sir James Strangways and Sir

Christopher Danby, noted, both of them, on the list which was forwarded

to the crown, as relatives of Lord Darcy, Sir Francis Bigod, and Sir

John Bulmer.[254]

[Sidenote: May 9. True bills found against Darcy and fifteen others.]

On the 9th of May, however, either through intimidation or the force of

evidence, the sixteen prisoners who were in the Tower, Lord Darcy,

Robert Aske, Sir Robert Constable, and thirteen more, were delivered

over for their trials. In the six preceding weeks they had been

cross-examined again and again. Of the many strange scenes which must

have taken place on these occasions, one picture, but a striking one, is

all which I have found. It occurred at the house of the lord

chancellor, in the presence of the Privy Council and a crowded

audience. Darcy was the subject of examination. Careless of life, and

with the prophetic insight of dying men, he turned, when pressed with

questions, to the lord privy seal:--

[Sidenote: Lord Darcy prophesies the death of Cromwell.]

"Cromwell," he said, "it is thou that art the very special and chief

causer of all this rebellion and mischief, and art likewise causer of

the apprehension of us that be ----,[255] and dost daily earnestly

travel to bring us to our ends, and to strike off our heads. I trust

that ere thou die, though thou wouldest procure all the noblemen's heads

within the realm to be stricken off, yet shall there one head remain

that shall strike off thy head."[256]

[Sidenote: Aske's servant dies for sorrow.]

Of Aske, too, we catch glimpses which show that he was something more

than a remarkable insurgent leader: a short entry tells us that, six or

seven days after his arrest, "his servant, Robert Wall (let his name be

remembered), did cast himself upon his bed and cried, 'Oh, my master!

Oh, my master! they will draw him, and hang him and quarter him;' and

therewith he did die for sorrow."[257] Aske had lost a friend when

friends were needed. In a letter which he wrote to Cromwell, he said

that he had been sent up in haste without clothes or money, that no one

of his relations would help him, and that unless the king would be his

good and gracious lord, he knew not how he would live.[258] His

confessions during his imprisonment were free and ample. He asked for

his life, yet with a dignity which would stoop to no falsehood, and

pretend to no repentance beyond a general regret that he should have

offended the king. Then, as throughout, he showed himself a brave,

simple, noble-minded man.

[Sidenote: May 16. Trials and sentences in Westminster Hall.]

But it was in vain; and fate was hungry for its victims. The bills being

found, Darcy was arraigned before twenty-two peers, and was condemned,

Cromwell undertaking to intercede for his life.[259] The intercession,

if made, was not effectual. The fifteen commoners, on the same day, were

tried before a special commission in Westminster Hall. Percy, Hamarton,

Sir John and Lady Bulmer pleaded guilty. The prosecution against Sir

Ralph Bulmer was dropped: a verdict was given without difficulty against

Aske, Constable, Bigod, Lumley, and seven more. Sixteen knights, nobles,

and gentlemen, who a few months before were dictating terms to the Duke

of Norfolk, and threatening to turn the tide of the Reformation, were

condemned criminals waiting for death.

The executions were delayed from a doubt whether London or York should

be the scene of the closing tragedy. There remain some fragments written

by Darcy and Aske in the interval after their sentence. Darcy must have

been nearly eighty years old; but neither the matter nor the broad,

large, powerful handwriting of the following words show signs of

agitation:--

"After judgment given, the petition of Thomas Lord Darcy to the King's

Grace, by my Lord Privy Seal.

[Sidenote: Lord Darcy's last petition.]

"First to have confession; and at a mass to receive my Maker, that I may

depart like a Christian man out of this vale of misery.

"Second, that incontinent after my death my whole body may be buried

with my late wife, the Lady Neville, in the Freers at Greenwich.

"Third, that the straitness of my judgment may be mitigated after the

king's mercy and pleasure.

"Fourth, that my debts may be paid according to a schedule

enclosed."[260]

[Sidenote: Last petition of Aske.]

Aske, in a few lines addressed also to Cromwell, spoke of his debts, and

begged that some provision might be made for his family. "They," he

said, "never offended the King's Grace, nor were with me in council in

no act during all this time, but fled into woods and houses. Good my

Lord, extend your pity herein. And I most humbly ask the King's

Highness, and all his council and lords, lowly forgiveness for any mine

offences or words attempted or said against his Grace or any of them any

time of my life; and that his Grace would save my life, if it be his

pleasure, to be his bedesman--or else--to let me be full dead or that I

be dismembered, that I may piously give my spirit to God without more

pain; and that I desire for the honour of God and for charity."[261]

[Sidenote: Provision made for the families of the sufferers.]

[Sidenote: Properties not forfeited.]

The requests relating to the manner of the executions, it is

satisfactory to find, were granted; and not only in the case of the two

petitioners, but so far as I can learn in that of all the other

sufferers. Wherever the scaffold becomes visible, the rope and the axe

are the sole discernible implements of death. With respect to the other

petition, I find among loose memoranda of Cromwell an entry "for a book

to be made of the wives and poor children of such as have suffered, to

the intent his Grace may extend his mercy to them for their livings as

to his Highness shall be thought convenient, and for payment of their

debts."[262] The "mercy" seems to have been liberal. The forfeited

properties, on the whole, were allowed to descend without diminution, in

their natural order.[263]

[Sidenote: June 20. Eight gentlemen executed at Tyburn.]

[Sidenote: Lady Bulmer is burnt, and the world is little disturbed.]

[Sidenote: The king relinquishes his intention of holding a parliament

in Yorkshire.]

After some discussion it was settled that Darcy should suffer on Tower

Hill; and he was executed on the 20th of June. Sir Thomas Percy, Bigod,

the Abbots of Fountains and Jervaulx, Hamarton, Sir John Bulmer, young

Lumley, and Nicholas Tempest were hanged at Tyburn; four who had been

tried with them and condemned were pardoned. Lady Bulmer died the

dreadful death awarded by the English law to female treason.[264] "On

the Friday in Whitsun week," wrote a town correspondent of Sir Henry

Saville, "the wife of Sir John Bulmer was drawn without Newgate to

Smithfield and there burned:" and the world went its light way, thinking

no more of Lady Bulmer than if she had been a mere Protestant heretic:

the same letter urged Saville to hasten to London for the pleasures of

the season, suggesting that he might obtain some share in the

confiscated estates, of which the king would be soon disposing.[265]

Aske and Sir Robert Constable were to be sent down to Yorkshire. The

king had been compelled, by the succession of fresh disorders the

punishments which had followed, to relinquish his intention of holding a

summer parliament there. The renewed disturbances had released him from

his promise, and the discussion which would inevitably have been opened,

would have been alike irritating and useless. He had thought

subsequently of going to York on progress, and of making his presence

the occasion of an amnesty; the condition of the Continent, however, the

large armies, French and Imperial, which were in the field in the

neighbourhood of Calais, the possibility or the alarm that the Pope

might succeed in reconciling and directing them upon England, and still

more the pregnancy of the queen and the danger of some anxiety which

might cause the loss of the child, combined to make so distant a journey

undesirable. These at least were the reasons which he alleged to the

world. His chief ground, however, as he stated in private, was the

increasing infirmity of his own health and the inhibition of his

physician.[266] He resolved, therefore, that Norfolk, and not himself,

should "knit up the tragedy," by conducting the last executions on the

scene of the rebellion, and after they were over, by proclaiming a final

and general pardon.

[Sidenote: July. Aske and Constable are sent down to Yorkshire.]

[Sidenote: Constable is executed at Hull.]

At the beginning of July the two remaining prisoners were placed in the

custody of Sir Thomas Wentworth. They were paraded in formal state

through the eastern counties, and at each town a few words of warning

were addressed on the occasion to the people. Wentworth brought them

thus to Lincoln, where they were delivered over to the Duke of Norfolk.

Constable suffered first. He was taken to Hull,[267] and there hanged in

chains.[268] Before his death he said that, although he had declared on

his examination that he had revealed everything of importance which he

knew, yet he had concealed some matter connected with Lord Darcy for

fear of doing him an injury. "He was in doubt whether he had offended

God in receiving the sacrament in such manner, concealing the truth upon

a good purpose."[269] This secret, whatever it was, he carried with him

from the world. His own offences he admitted freely, protesting,

however, that he had added nothing to them since the pardon.

A fuller account remains of the end of Aske. He, too, like Constable,

had some mystery on his conscience which he would not reveal. In a

conversation with his confessor he alluded to Darcy's connexion with the

Spanish ambassador; he spoke of the intention of sending for help to

Flanders, and acknowledged his treason, while he shrunk from the name of

traitor. He complained that Cromwell had several times promised him his

life if he would make a full confession, and once he said he had a token

of pardon from the king; but his bearing was quiet and brave, and if he

believed himself hardly dealt with, he said so only in private to a

single person.

[Sidenote: Aske is drawn upon a hurdle through the streets of York,]

[Sidenote: And is hanged.]

York was chosen as his place of execution. He was drawn through the

streets upon a hurdle, to be hanged afterwards from the top of a tower.

On his way he told the people that he had grievously offended God, the

king, and the world. God he had offended in breaking his commandments

many ways; the King's Majesty he had greatly offended in breaking his

laws, to which every subject was bound; and the world he had offended,

"for so much as he was the occasion that many a one had lost their

lives, lands, and goods." At the scaffold he begged the people to pray

for him, "and divers times asking the King's Highness' forgiveness, the

lord chancellor, the Lord of Norfolk, the lord privy seal, the Lord of

Sussex, and all the world, after certain orisons he commended his soul

to God."[270]

So we take leave of Robert Aske, closing his brief greatness with a

felon's death--an unhappy ending! Yet, as we look back now, at a

distance of three centuries, when the noble and the base, the conquerors

and the conquered, have been all long dead together, when nothing

remains of any of them but the work, worthy or unworthy, which they

achieved, and the few years which weak false hearts could purchase by

denying their faith and truckling to the time,[271] appear in the

retrospect in their proper insignificance, a man who risked and lost his

life for a cause which he believed a just one, though he was mistaken in

so believing it, is not among those whose fate deserves the most

compassion, or whose career is least to be envied.

The insurrection had sunk down into rest; but it had not been wholly in

vain. So far as it was just it had prevailed; and happy were they whose

work was sifted for them, who were permitted to accomplish so much only

of their intentions as had been wisely formed. If the reins of England

had been seized by Aske and Darcy, their signal beacons of insurrection

would have become blazing martyr-piles, shining dreadfully through all

after-ages; and their names would have come down to posterity swathed in

such epithets as cling, and will cling, for ever to the Gardiners and

the Alvas.

[Sidenote: The noble Catholics, and the ignoble. Reginald Pole at

Liège.]

[Sidenote: He will weave the broken web for a third effort.]

[Sidenote: He believes that Henry desires to kill him.]

[Sidenote: And is recalled by the Pope.]

While the noble Catholics were braving danger in England, Reginald Pole

sate at safe distance on his Liège watch-tower, scenting the air for the

expected battle-field; and at length, hungry and disappointed, turning

sullenly away and preparing for flight. He had clung to hope till the

last moment with desperate tenacity. He had laboured to inspire his

friends in Italy with his own confidence. "The leaders of the faithful,"

he wrote to the Pope, "had been duped and murdered; but the hate of the

people for the government had deepened in intensity. They were subdued

for the instant by terror; but their strength was unimpaired. They were

furious at the king's treachery."[272] "Twice," he wrote to Contarini,

"the children of Israel went up against Benjamin, and twice they were

put to confusion, God having encouraged them to fight, and God

permitting their defeat. The third time they prevailed. In like manner

had the children of the Church been twice conquered, once God so willing

it in Ireland, and now again in England. A third time they would take up

their cause, and then they would triumph gloriously."[273] He knew what

he meant. Already he was digging fresh graves for other victims; secret

messengers were passing between Liège and his mother, and his mother's

family, and Lord Montague and Lord Exeter were already contemplating

that third effort of which he spoke.[274] "I do but desire to wait in

this place," he said, "so long as the farmer waits for his crops. I have

sown my seed. It will grow in its allotted time."[275] Contarini advised

his return to Italy; and the Pope believed also that the opportunity was

passed. Pole himself, alternately buoyed up with hope and plunged in

despondency, seemed at times almost delirious. He spread a wild rumour

that the king had sent emissaries to murder him.[276] The Pope believed

him, and became more anxious for the safety of so valuable a life.

Letters passed and repassed. He could not resign himself to relinquish

his enterprise. On the 21st of August he wrote that "the English

government had made itself so detested, and the King of Scotland was so

willing to assist, that with the most trifling impulse a revolution

would be certain." Events, however, so far, had not borne out his

expectations. He had promised liberally, but there had been no

fulfilment; and supposing at length that the chances of success were too

slight to justify the risk of his longer stay, Paul put an end to his

anxieties by sending him a formal recall.

[Sidenote: He has one only consolation.]

The disappointment was hard to bear. One only comfort remained to him.

Henry had been evidently anxious that his book should not be made known

to the world. He might revise, intensify, and then publish it, and taste

the pleasure of a safe revenge.

[Sidenote: Michael Throgmorton is employed by Cromwell to betray Pole,

and betrays his employers.]

But I have now to mention a minor drama of treachery winding into the

interstices of the larger. When Pole first awoke serious suspicion by

being raised to the Cardinalate, Michael, younger brother of Sir George

Throgmorton, volunteered to Cromwell to go to Rome, make his way into

Pole's service, and become a spy upon his actions. His offer was

accepted. He went, and became Pole's secretary; but, instead of

betraying his master, he betrayed his employers; and to him the "Liber

de Unitate Ecclesiæ" was in all probability indebted for the fresh

instalment of scandals which were poured into it before

publication,[277] and which have furnished material for the Catholic

biographers of Henry the Eighth. Throgmorton's ingenious duplicity

enabled him to blind the English government through the spring and

summer. He supplied them with reports in a high degree laudatory of the

cardinal, affirming entire confidence in the innocency of the legatine

mission; and if they were not misled as to Pole's purposes, they

believed in the fidelity of the spy. It was not till the day before

leaving Liège that he threw off disguise, and wrote to Cromwell in

language which was at last transparent.

[Sidenote: Pole will return to Rome, and will publish his book,]

[Sidenote: Unless the king will submit to the Pope.]

The excellent intentions of the legate, he said, having been frustrated

by events, and his pure and upright objects having been wickedly

misconstrued, he was about to return to Rome. The Pope, whose gracious

disposition towards England remained unabated, had issued indulgences

through all Christendom for a general supplication that the King's Grace

and the country might return to the Church. These would be naturally

followed by a rehearsal of the king's actions, and accompanied by

censures. It was likely, in addition, that, on Pole's return to Rome,

his Holiness would request his consent that his book should be set in

print, "as it will be hard for him to deny, for the great confidence

they have therein." "Hereof," Throgmorton concluded, "I have thought it

necessary to advertise you, considering the short departure of the

legate, upon whose return, as you see, hangs both the divulgating of the

censures, the putting forth of his book, and the sending also of new

ambassadors to all Christian princes. I suppose you have a great desire

for a true knowledge of his mind and acts in this legacy. It makes many

men marvel to see the King's Grace so bent to his ruin, rather than to

take some way to reconcile him. Your lordship may best think what is

best to be done."[278]

Cromwell's answer to this communication, though long, will not be

thought too long by those who desire to comprehend the passions of the

time, and with the time the mind of its ruling spirit.

[Sidenote: Cromwell replies. He had thought that the king's goodness

might have softened Pole,]

[Sidenote: Or at least have commanded the fidelity of Throgmorton.]

"I thought," was the abrupt commencement,[279] "that the singular

goodness of the King's Highness shewed unto you, and the great and

singular clemency shewed unto that detestable traitor your master, in

promising him not only forgiveness, but also forgetting of his most

shameful ingratitude, unnaturalness, conspiracy against his honour, of

whom he hath received no more, but even as much, and all that he

hath--I thought, I say, that either this princely goodness might have

brought that desperate rebel from his so sturdy malice, blindness, and

pervicacy, or else have encouraged you to be his Highness's true and

faithful subject. But I now remember myself too late. I might better

have judged that so dishonest a master could have but even such servants

as you are. No, no! loyalty and treason seldom dwell together. There can

no faithful servant so long abide the sight of so heinous a traitor to

his prince. You could not all this season have been a spy for the king,

but at some time your countenance should have declared your heart to be

loyal. No! You and your master have both well declared how little fear

of God resteth in you, which, led by vain promise of promotion, thus

against his laws work treason towards your natural prince and country,

to serve an enemy of God, an enemy of all honesty, an enemy of right

religion, a defender of iniquity, a merchant and occupier of all

deceits.

[Sidenote: But he will not be again deceived.]

[Sidenote: Pole need not trouble himself to explain why he is considered

a traitor.]

[Sidenote: Let him publish his book, and the world will be in no

uncertainty.]

"You have bleared mine eyes once. Your credit shall never more serve you

so far to deceive me the second time. Your part was to do as the king

your sovereign lord had commanded you. Your praise was to be sought in

obeying his Highness's pleasure, and not in serving your foolish

fantasy. But now, to stick unto a rebel, to follow a traitor, to serve a

friend of his which mortally hateth your sovereign lord, what folly is

it to excuse such mad lewdness? Your good master, who has lately entered

into the religion which has been the ruin of all religion, cannot, ye

say, but be the king's high friend. He will, as ye write, declare unto

the world why the king taketh him for a traitor. In this thing he

needeth to travel never a deal. All princes almost know how well he hath

deserved this name; yea the King's Highness is much beholden unto some

of them from whom his Grace hath learned the godly enterprizes that this

silly cardinal went about. Now, if those that have made him thus mad can

also persuade him to print his detestable book, where one lie leapeth in

every line on another's neck, he shall be then as much bound to them for

their good counsel as his family to him for his wise dealing. He will, I

trow, have as little joy thereof as his friends and kinsfolk are like to

take profit of it. Pity it is that the folly of one brainsick Pole, or,

to say better, of one witless fool, should be the ruin of so great a

family. Let him follow ambition as fast as he can, these that little

have offended (saving that he is of their kin), were it not for the

great mercy and benignity of the prince, should and might feel what it

is to have such a traitor to their kinsman. Let his goodly book, the

fruit of his whole study, come abroad, is there any man but he may well

accuse our prince of too much clemency, and must marvel that no way is

found to take away the author of such traitory? Surely when answers

shall be made to his malice, there shall be very few but they will think

as I do, that he hath as he deserveth, if he be brought to a most

shameful death. Let him not think but though he can lie largely, there

be some with us that can say truth of him. His praise shall be grief

when men shall see the King's Highness's benefits towards him, and shall

look upon his good heart, his grateful mind, his desire to serve the

king's honour.

[Sidenote: The king can, perhaps, reach him, though tied to the Pope's

girdle.]

"Let his lewd work go forth. After that let princes judge whether the

king can take the author of so famous a libel to be his true subject.

Let the king's high benefits, and, which is far more to be esteemed,

his singular benevolence shewed unto him of a child, come and make

their plea. Can he or you think any ground safe for him to stand in?

Hath he not just cause to fear lest every honest man should offer

himself to revenge this so enormous unkindness? Shall he not think every

honest man to be his foe? Shall not his detestable acts, written in his

conscience, evermore bring him to continual sorrow? And ye know that,

whensoever the king will, his Highness may bring it easily to pass that

he shall think himself scarce sure of his life, although he went tied at

his master's girdle. There may be found ways enough in Italy to rid a

traitorous subject. Surely let him not think but, when justice can take

no place by process of law at home, sometimes she may be enforced to

take new means abroad.

[Sidenote: The Pope will pray for the king, having found other means

less]

[Sidenote: successful than he hoped, which perhaps the world will smile

at.]

"Amongst all your pretty news these are very pleasant, that the Bishop

of Rome intendeth to make a lamentation to the world and to desire every

man to pray that his old gains may return home again. Men will think

that he has cause, or at least good time, to lament, not that the King

of England hath pulled his realm out of thraldom, but that a great part

of the world is like to do the same. Many a man weepeth for less. We

blame him not if he lament. Howbeit, doubt ye not he shall find some

with us that shall bid him be a better man, though they bid him not be

of better cheer. If your good master take upon him to make this

lamentation, as indeed I think there is no man that hath better cause to

wail than he hath, assure ye him he shall lack no consolation. The Pope

will desire the world to pray for the king! The hypocrisy cometh even as

it should do, and standeth in place meet for it. The world knoweth

right well what other wiles he has practised these three years. They

shall laugh to see his Holiness come to prayer because he cannot bring

to pass that he most desireth. He that the last day went about to set

all princes on his Grace's top, writing letters for the bringing of this

to pass, shall he not now be thought holy that thus suddenly casteth

away his weapon and falleth to his beads? If sinners be heard at any

time, it is when they pray for good things. He shall not pray so fast

that we may return to errors, to the defence of tyranny, ungodliness,

untruth, as we shall pray that his Grace long may continue our most

virtuous prince, and that hypocrites never after these days shall reign

over us.

[Sidenote: Cromwell's last wishes for Throgmorton and his master.]

"Michael, if you were either natural towards your country or your

family, you would not thus shame all your kin. I pray they bide but the

shame of it. This I am sure of, though they bye and bye suffer no loss

of goods, yet the least suspicion shall be enough to undo the greatest

of them. I can no more, but desire that your master and you may

acknowledge your detestable faults and be good witnesses of the king's

high mercy. Ye may turn. If ye do so I doubt not but the king will shew

the world that he desireth nothing more than the saving of his subjects.

If ye continue in your malice and perverse blindness, doubt not but your

end shall be as of all traitors. I have done what I may to save you. I

must, I think, do what I can to see you condignly punished. God send you

both to fare as ye deserve--either shortly to come to your allegiance,

or else to a shameful death."

The scene and the subject change. I must now take my reader below the

surface of outward events to the undercurrent of the war of opinions,

where the forces were generated which gave to the time its life and

meaning. Without some insight into this region, history is but a dumb

show of phantoms; yet, when we gaze into it with our best efforts, we

catch but uncertain images and fleeting pictures. In palace and cottage,

in village church and metropolitan cathedral, at the board of the Privy

Council or in the roadside alehouse, the same questions were discussed,

the same passions were agitated. A mysterious change was in process in

the minds of men. They knew not what it was--they could not control its

speed or guide its direction. The articles and the settlement of 1536

were already buried under the froth of the insurrection. New

standing-ground was to be sought for, only in its turn to slip away as

it seemed to be gained; and the teachers and the taught, the governors

and the governed, each separate human being, left to his own direction,

was whirled along the rapids which formed the passage into a new era. A

few scenes out of this strange time have been preserved for us in the

records. They may pass one by one before us like the pictures in a magic

slide.

[Sidenote: The friars mendicant, who will live as their fathers lived.]

The first figure that appears is a "friar mendicant, living by the alms

of the king's subjects, forming himself to the fashions of the people."

He is "going about from house to house, and when he comes to aged and

simple people he will say to them, 'Father or sister, what a world this

is! It was not so in your father's days. It is a perilous world. They

will have no pilgrimages. They will not we should pray to saints, or

fast, or do any good deeds. Oh Lord, have mercy on us! I will live as my

forefathers have done. And I am sure your fathers and friends were

good, and ye have followed them hitherto. Continue as ye have done, and

believe as they believed.'"[280]

[Sidenote: The Protestant's opinion of the faith of his fathers.]

The friar disappears. A neighbour of the new opinions, who has seen him

come and go, takes his place, and then begins an argument. One says "my

father's faith shall be my faith." And the other, hot and foolish,

answers, "Thy father was a liar and is in hell, and so is my father in

hell also. My father never knew Scripture, and now it is come

forth."[281]

[Sidenote: Church windows containing the history of Becket.]

[Sidenote: August 14. Scenes in the parish church at Woodstock.]

The slide again moves. We are in a village church, and there is a window

gorgeously painted, representing the various events in the life and

death of Thomas à Becket. The king sits on his throne, and speaks

fiercely to his four knights. The knights mount their horses and gallop

to Canterbury. The archbishop is at vespers in the quire. The knights

stride in and smite him dead. Then follows the retribution. In the great

central compartment of the window the haughty prince is kneeling naked

before the shrine of the martyr, and the monks stand round him and beat

him with their rods. All over England in such images of luminous beauty

the memory of the great victory[282] of the clergy had been

perpetuated.[283] And now the particular church is Woodstock, the court

is at the park, and day after day, notwithstanding the dangerous

neighbourhood, in the church aisles groups of people assemble to gaze

upon the window, and priests and pardoners expatiate with an obvious

application on the glories of the martyr, the Church's victory, and the

humiliation of the king. Eager ears listen; eager tongues draw

comparisons. A groom from the court is lounging among the crowd, and

interrupts the speakers somewhat disdainfully; he says that he sees no

more reason why Becket was a saint than Robin Hood. No word is mentioned

of the profanity to Henry; but a priest carries the story to Gardiner

and Sir William Paulet. The groom is told that he might as well reason

of the king's title as of St. Thomas's; forthwith he is hurried off

under charge of heresy to the Tower; and, appealing to Cromwell, there

follows a storm at the council table.[284]

[Sidenote: The Lady Chapel at Worcester.]

We are next at Worcester, at the Lady Chapel, on the eve of the

Assumption. There is a famous image of the Virgin there, and to check

the superstition of the people the gorgeous dress has been taken off by

Cromwell's order. A citizen of Worcester approaches the figure: "Ah,

Lady," he cries, "art thou stripped now? I have seen the day that as

clean men had been stripped at a pair of gallows as were they that

stripped them." Then he kisses the image, and turns to the people and

says, "Ye that be disposed to offer, the figure is no worse than it was

before," "having a remorse unto her."[285]

The common treads close upon the serious. On a summer evening a group of

villagers are sitting at the door of an alehouse on Windermere; a

certain master Alexander, a wandering ballad-singer, is "making merry

with them." A neighbour Isaac Dickson saunters up and joins the party.

[Sidenote: "The minstrel of Winandermere."]

"Then the said Isaac commanded the said minstrel to sing a song he had

sung at one Fairbank's house in Crossthwaite, in the county of

Westmoreland, in the time of the rebellion, which song was called

'Crummock,'[286] which was not convenient, which the said minstrel

utterly denied. The said Isaac commanded the said minstrel again in a

violent manner to sing the song called 'Cromwell,' and the said minstrel

said he would sing none such; and then the said Isaac pulled the

minstrel by the arm, and smote him about the head with the pummel of a

dagger, and the same song the minstrel would not sing to die for. The

third time the said Isaac commanded the minstrel to sing the same song,

and the minstrel said it would turn them both to anger, and would not.

And then did Isaac call for a cup of ale, and bade the minstrel sing

again, which he always denied; then Isaac took the minstrel by the beard

and dashed the cup of ale in his face; also, he drew his dagger and hurt

master Willan, being the host of the said house, sore and grievously in

the thigh, in rescuing of the said minstrel."[287]

Again, we find accounts of the reception which the English Bible met

with in country parishes.

[Sidenote: The unthrifty curate of Wincanton.]

A circle of Protestants at Wincanton, in Somersetshire, wrote to

Cromwell complaining of the curate, who would not teach them or preach

to them, but "gave his time and attention to dicing, carding, bowling,

and the cross waster." In their desire for spiritual food they applied

to the rector of the next parish, who had come occasionally and given

them a sermon, and had taught them to read the New Testament; when

suddenly, on Good Friday, "the unthrifty curate entered the pulpit,

where he had set no foot for years," and "admonished his parishioners to

give no credence to the newfangled fellows which read the new books."

"They be like knaves and Pharisees," he said; "they be like a dog that

gnaweth a marry-bone, and never cometh to the pith, therefore avoid

their company; and if any man will preach the New Testament, if I may

hear him, I am ready to fight with him incontinent;" and "indeed," the

petitioners said, "he applyeth in such wise his school of fence so sore

continually, that he feareth all his parishioners."[288]

[Sidenote: The parish clerk at Hastings lectures on the translation of

the Bible.]

So the parish clerk at Hastings made a speech to the congregation on the

faults of the translation. "It taught heresy," he said: "it taught that

a priest might have a wife by God's law. He trusted to see the day that

the book called the Bible, and all its maintainers and upholders, should

be brent."[289]

Here, again, is a complaint from the parishioners of Langham in Essex,

against their village potentate, a person named Vigourous, who with the

priest oppressed and ill-used them.

[Sidenote: School maidens reading the English primer at Langham.]

"Upon Ascension day last past did two maidens sit in their pew or school

in the church, as all honest and virtuous persons use to do in matins

time, saying their matins together upon an English primer. Vigourous

this seeing was sore angry, in so much that therefore, and for nothing

else, he did bid the maidens to avoid out of the church, (calling them)

errant whores, with such other odious and spiteful words. And further,

upon a time within this year, one of Vigourous's servants did quarrel

and brawl with other children many, whom he called heretics; and as

children be light and wanton, they called the said servant again

Pharisee. Upon this complained Robert Smyth of our town to Vigourous,

saying that it was against reason that the great fellow his servant

should quarrel and fight with children. Whereupon Vigourous said to his

servant, 'See that thou do cut off their ears, oh errant whoreson, if

they so call thee hereafter; and if thou lack a knife, I shall give thee

one to do it. And if thou wilt not thus do, thou shalt no longer serve

me.'"[290]

[Sidenote: The Protestants and the mystery plays.]

[Sidenote: The Protestants call a "spade a spade."]

On the other hand, the Protestants gave themselves no pains to make

their heterodoxy decent, or to spare the feelings of their antagonists.

To call "a spade a spade," and a rogue a rogue, were Protestant axioms.

Their favourite weapons were mystery plays, which they acted up and down

the country in barns, in taverns, in chambers, on occasion, before the

vicar-general himself;[291] and the language of these, as well as the

language of their own daily life, seemed constructed as if to pour scorn

on the old belief. Men engaged in a mortal strife usually speak plainly.

Blunt words strike home; and the euphuism which, in more ingenious ages,

discovers that men mean the same thing when they say opposite things was

as yet unknown or unappreciated. We have heard something of the popular

impieties, as they were called in the complaints of convocation. I add a

few more expressions taken at random from the depositions. One man said

"he would as soon see an oyster-shell above the priest's head at the

sacring time as the wafer. If a knave priest could make God, then would

he hire one such God-maker for a year, and give him twenty pounds to

make fishes and fowls."[292] Another said that "if he had the cross that

Christ died on, it should be the first block he would rive to the fire

for any virtue that was in it." Another, "that a shipload of friars'

girdles, nor a dungcart full of friars' cowls and boots, would not help

to justification."

On both sides the same obstinate English nature was stirred into

energetic hate.

[Sidenote: The Abbott of Stratford excommunicates his monks for

revealing convent scandals.]

[Sidenote: The Abbot of Woburn repents of his apostasy,]

[Sidenote: Takes up his cross and dies.]

Or, once more to turn to the surviving abbeys, here, too, each house was

"divided against itself, and could not stand." The monks of Stratford

complained to Sir Thomas Cholmondley that their abbot had excommunicated

them for breach of oath in revealing convent secrets to the royal

visitors. Their allegiance, the brave abbot had said, was to the

superior of their order abroad, not to the secular sovereign in England.

He cared nothing for acts of parliament or king's commissions. The king

could but kill him, and death was a small matter compared to

perjury.[293] Death, therefore, he resolutely risked, and in some

manner, we know not how, he escaped. Another abbot with the same courage

was less fortunate. In the spring and summer of 1537 Woburn Abbey was in

high confusion. The brethren were trimming to the times, anxious merely

for secular habits, wives, and freedom. In the midst of them, Robert

Hobbes the abbot, who in the past year had accepted the oath of

supremacy in a moment of weakness, was lying worn down with sorrow,

unable to govern his convent, or to endure the burden of his

conscience. On Passion Sunday in that spring, dying as it seemed of a

broken heart, he called the fraternity to his side, and exhorted them to

charity, and prayed them to be obedient to their vows. Hard eyes and

mocking lips were all the answer of the monks of Woburn. "Then, being in

a great agony, the abbot rose up in his bed, and cried out, and said, 'I

would to God it would please Him to take me out of this wretched world,

and I would I had died with the good men that have suffered death for

holding with the Pope. My conscience--my conscience doth grudge me for

it.'" Abbot Hobbes should have his wish. Strength was left him to take

up his cross once more where he had cast it down. Spiteful tongues

carried his words to the council, and the law, remorseless as destiny,

flung its meshes over him on the instant. He was swept up to London and

interrogated in the usual form--"Was he the king's subject or the

Pope's?" He stood to his faith like a man, and the scaffold swallowed

him.[294]

[Sidenote: The king believes in unity.]

So went the world in England, rushing forward, rocking and reeling in

its course. What hand could guide it! Alone, perhaps, of living men, the

king still believed that unity was possible--that these headstrong

spirits were as horses broken loose, which could be caught again and

harnessed for the road. For a thousand years there had been one faith in

Western Christendom. From the Isles of Arran to the Danube thirty

generations had followed each other to the grave who had held all to the

same convictions, who had prayed all in the same words. What was this

that had gone out among men that they were so changed? Why, when he had

but sought to cleanse the dirt from off the temple, and restore its

original beauty, should the temple itself crumble into ruins?

[Sidenote: Questions on the nature and number of the sacraments.]

[Sidenote: The real presence almost the only doctrine on which there is

general agreement.]

The sacraments, the Divine mysteries, had existed in the Church for

fifteen centuries. For all those ages they had been supposed to be the

rivulets which watered the earth with the graces of the Spirit. After so

long experience it should have been at least possible to tell what they

were, or how many they were; but the question was suddenly asked, and

none could answer it. The bishops were applied to. Interrogatories were

sent round among them for opinions, and some said there were three

sacraments, some seven, some a hundred. The Archbishop of York insisted

on the apostolical succession; the Archbishop of Canterbury believed

that priests and bishops might be nominated by the crown, and he that

was so appointed needed no consecration, for his appointment was

sufficient.[295] Transubstantiation remained almost the only doctrine

beyond the articles of the three creeds on which a powerful majority was

agreed.[296]

[Sidenote: Fresh rule of faith made necessary.]

[Sidenote: "The Institution of a Christian Man."]

[Sidenote: Doctrine of sacramental grace.]

Something, however, must be done. Another statement must be made of the

doctrine of the Church of England--if the Church of England were to

pretend to possess a doctrine--more complete than the last. The slander

must be put to silence which confounded independence with heresy; the

clergy must be provided with some guide to their teaching which it

should be penal to neglect. Under orders, therefore, from the crown, the

bishops agreed at last upon a body of practical divinity, which was

published under the title of "The Bishop's Book," or "the Institution of

a Christian Man." It consisted of four commentaries, on the creed, the

sacraments, the ten commandments, and the Lord's prayer, and in point of

language was beyond question the most beautiful composition which had as

yet appeared in English prose. The doctrine was moderate, yet more

Catholic, and, in the matter of the sacraments, less ambiguous than the

articles of 1536. The mystic number seven was restored, and the nature

of sacramental grace explained in the old manner. Yet there was a

manifest attempt, rather, perhaps, in tendency than in positive

statement, to unite the two ideas of symbolic and instrumental efficacy,

to indicate that the grace conveyed through the mechanical form was the

spiritual instruction indicated in the form of the ceremony. The union

among the bishops which appeared in the title of the book was in

appearance only, or rather it was assumed by the will of the king, and

in obedience to his orders. When the doctrines had been determined by

the bench, he even thought it necessary to admonish the composers to

observe their own lesson.

[Sidenote: The king's exhortation to the bishops.]

[Sidenote: He will have all preachers agree;]

"Experience," he wrote to them, "has taught us that it is much better

for no laws to be made, than when many be well made none to be kept; and

even so it is much better nothing should be written concerning religion,

than when many things be well written nothing of them be taught and

observed.... Our commandment is, therefore, that you agree in your

preaching, and that vain praise of crafty wits and worldly estimation be

laid aside, and true religion sought for. You serve God in your calling,

and not your own glory or vile profit. We will no correcting of things,

no glosses that take away the text; being much desirous,

notwithstanding, that if in any place you have not written so plainly as

you might have done, in your sermons to the people you utter all that is

in God's Word. We will have no more thwarting--no more contentions

whereby the people are much more set against one another than any taketh

profit by such undiscreet doctrines. We had much sooner to pray you than

command you, and if the first will serve we will leave out the second.

Howbeit, we will in any case that all preachers agree; for if any shall

dissent, let him that will defend the worser part assure himself that he

shall run into our displeasure."[297]

[Sidenote: And he will find that they cannot agree.]

"The wind bloweth where it listeth, and we hear the sound thereof, but

we cannot tell whence it cometh nor whither it goeth, so is every one

that is born of the Spirit." Henry would have the bishops agree; as

easily could he bind the winds, and bid them blow at his pleasure. Under

conditions, and within limits which he did not imagine, some measure of

the agreement which he desired would be at last accomplished when the

time and season would permit. Meanwhile, though his task was an

impossible one, it was better to try and fail than to sit by and let the

dissensions rage. Nor was Henry a man to submit patiently to failure. He

would try and try again; when milder methods were unsuccessful he would

try with bills of six articles, and pains and penalties. He was

wrestling against destiny; yet then, now, and ever, it was and remains

true, that in this great matter of religion, in which to be right is the

first condition of being right in anything--not variety of opinion, but

unity--not the equal licence of the wise and the foolish to choose their

belief, but an ordered harmony, where wisdom prescribes a law to

ignorance, is the rule which reasonable men should most desire for

themselves and for mankind.

But if Henry erred, his errors might find excuse in the multitude of

business which was crowded upon him. Insurrection and controversy,

foreign leagues, and Papal censures did not exhaust the number of his

difficulties. All evil things in nature seemed to have combined to

thwart him.

[Sidenote: Neglected state of the English navy.]

[Sidenote: The Iceland fleet.]

[Sidenote: Piracy in the Channel.]

[Sidenote: English fishing vessels plundered by the French and the

Flemings.]

[Sidenote: Unprotected state of the harbours.]

[Sidenote: Battle between the French and the Spaniards in Falmouth

harbour.]

In the first few years after he became king, he had paid particular

attention to the navy. He had himself some skill as a naval engineer,

and had conducted experiments in the construction of hulls and rigging,

and in ship artillery. Other matters had subsequently called off his

attention, and especially since the commencement of the Reformation

every moment had brought with it its own urgent claims, and the

dockyards had fallen into decay. The finances had been straitened by the

Irish wars, and from motives of economy the ships which the government

possessed had fallen many of them out of commission, and were rotting in

harbour. A few small vessels were kept on the coast of Ireland; but in

the year 1536 there was scarcely in all the Channel a single royal

cruiser carrying the English flag. Materials to man a fleet existed

amply in the fishermen who went year after year in vast numbers to

Iceland and to Ireland,[298]--hardy sailors, who, taught by necessity,

went always armed, and had learnt to fight as well as to work; but, from

a neglect not the less injurious because intelligible, the English

authority in their own waters had sunk to a shadow. Pirates swarmed

along the coasts--entering fearlessly into the harbours, and lying there

in careless security. The war breaking out between Charles and Francis,

the French and Flemish ships of war captured prizes or fought battles in

the mouths of English rivers, or under the windows of English towns; and

through preying upon each other as enemies in the ordinary sense, both

occasionally made prey of heretic English as enemies of the Church.

While the courts of Brussels and Paris were making professions of

goodwill, the cruisers of both governments openly seized English traders

and plundered English fishing vessels, and Henry had for many months

been compelled by the insurrection to submit to these aggressions, and

to trust his subjects along the coasts to such inadequate defences as

they could themselves provide. A French galliass and galleon came into

Dartmouth harbour and attempted to cut out two merchantmen which were

lying there: the mayor attacked them in boats and beat them off:[299]

but the harbours in general were poorly defended, and strange scenes

occasionally took place in their waters. John Arundel, of Trerice,

reports the following story to Cromwell: "There came into Falmouth haven

a fleet of Spaniards, and the day after came four ships of Dieppe,

men-of-war, and the Spaniards shot into the Frenchmen, and the Frenchmen

shot into the Spaniards, and during three hours great guns shot between

them, and the Frenchmen were glad to come higher up the haven; and the

morrow after St. Paul's day the Spaniards came up to assault the

Frenchmen, and the Frenchmen came up almost to the town of Truro, and

went aground there. I went to the admiral of the Spaniards and commanded

him to keep the king's peace, and not to follow further; but the

Spaniard would not, but said 'I will have them, or I will die for it.'

And then the Spaniards put their ordnance in their boats, and shot the

French admiral forty or sixty shots during a long hour, the gentlemen of

the city, Mr. Killigrew and Mr. Trefusis, and others, taking pleasure at

it. Then I went to the Spaniards and told them to leave their shooting,

or I would raise the country upon them. And so the Spaniards left. My

Lord, I and all the country will desire the King's Grace that we may

have blockhouses made upon our haven."[300]

Pirates were enemies to which the people were accustomed, and they could

in some measure cope with them; but commissioned vessels of war had now

condescended to pirates' practices. Sandwich boatmen were pillaged by a

Flemish cruiser in the Downs in the autumn of 1536.[301] A smack

belonging to Deal was twice boarded and robbed by a Flemish officer of

high rank, the admiral of the Sluys.[302]

[Sidenote: Barges pillaged at Dover.]

[Sidenote: Redress cannot be obtained.]

The king had for several years been engaged in making a harbour of

refuge at Dover. The workmen saw English traders off the coast, and even

the very vessels which brought the iron and timber for the

harbour-piers, plundered by French and Flemings under their eyes;[303]

and the London merchants declared, that, although the country was

nominally at peace, their ships could not venture out of port unless the

government would undertake their convoy.[304] The remonstrances which

were made, of course in loud terms, at Paris and Brussels, were received

with verbal apologies, and the queen regent gave orders that her

cruisers should cease their outrages; but either their commanders

believed that their conduct would be secretly winked at, or they could

not be convinced that heretics were not lawful game; or perhaps the

zealous subjects of the Catholic powers desired to precipitate the

sluggish action of their governments. At any rate, the same insolences

continued, and no redress could be obtained.

[Sidenote: A small fleet is fitted out at Portsmouth.]

[Sidenote: A French ship is sunk in Mounts Bay.]

[Sidenote: Action in the Downs.]

[Sidenote: The admiral of the Sluys is taken by Sir John Dudley.]

[Sidenote: The English are again lords of the narrow seas.]

Henry could not afford to declare war. The exchequer was ill-furnished.

The rebellion had consumed the subsidy, and the abbey lands had as yet

returned little profit either by their rentals or by sale. The country,

however, had not yet sunk so low as to be unable to defend its own

coasts and its own traders. Sufficient money was found for the immediate

purpose, and a small but admirably equipped fleet was fitted out

silently at Portsmouth. Sir Thomas Seymour, the queen's brother, Sir

George Carew, Sir John Dudley, and Christopher Coo, a rough English

sailor, were appointed to the command; and, when the ships were ready,

they swept out into the Channel. Secrecy had been observed as far as

possible, in hope of taking the offenders by surprise. The greater

number of them had, unhappily, been warned, and had escaped to their own

harbours; but Coo shortly brought two pirate prizes into Rye. The people

of Penzance, one August afternoon, heard the thunder of distant cannon.

Carew and Seymour, searching the western coast, had come on the traces

of four French ships of war, which had been plundering. They came up

with them in Mounts Bay, and, closing against heavy odds, they fought

them there till night. At daybreak, one of the four lay on the water, a

sinking wreck. The others had crawled away in the darkness, and came no

more into English waters.[305] Dudley had been even more fortunate. "As

he was lying between the Needles and the Cowe," there came a letter to

him from the Mayor of Rye, "that the Flemings had boarded a

merchant-ship belonging to that port, and had taken goods out of her

valued at three hundred pounds." "That hearing," he said, in his

despatch to Henry, "I, with another of your Grace's ships, made all the

diligence that was possible towards the said coast of Rye; and, as it

chanced, the wind served us so well that we were next morning before day

against the Combe, and there we heard news that the said Flemings were

departed the day before. Then we prepared towards the Downs, for the

wind served for that place, and there we found lying the admiral of the

Sluys, with one ship in his company besides himself, being both as well

trimmed for the war as I have lightly seen. And when I had perfect

knowledge that it was the admiral of the Sluys, of whom I had heard,

both at Rye and at Portsmouth, divers robberies and ill-demeanours by

him committed against your Highness's subjects, then I commanded my

master to bring my ship to an anchor, as nigh to the said admiral as he

could, to the intent to have had some communication with him; who

incontinent put himself and all his men to defence, and neither would

come to communication nor would send none of his men aboard of me. And

when I saw what a great brag they set upon it--for they made their

drumsalt to strike alarum, and every man settled them to fight--I caused

my master gunner to loose a piece of ordnance, and not touched him by a

good space; but he sent one to my ship, and mocked not with me, for he

brake down a part of the decks of my ship, and hurt one of my gunners

very sore. That done, I trifled no more with him, but caused my master

to lay her aboard; and so, within a little fight, she was yielded."

Dudley's second ship had been engaged with the other Fleming; but the

latter, as soon as the admiral was taken, slipped her cable and

attempted to escape. The Englishman stood after her. Both ships vanished

up Channel, scudding before a gale of wind; but whether the Dutchman was

brought back a prize, or whether the pursuer followed too far, and found

himself, as Dudley feared, caught on a lee shore off the Holland flats,

the Records are silent.[306] Pirates, however, and over-zealous

privateers, in these and other encounters, were taught their lesson; and

it did not, for some time, require to be repeated: "Your subjects,"

Dudley and Seymour told the king in a joint letter, "shall not only pass

and repass without danger of taking, but your Majesty shall be known to

be lord of these seas."[307] They kept their word. In this one summer

the Channel was cleared, and the nucleus was formed of the fleet which,

eight years after, held in check and baffled the most powerful armament

which had left the French shores against England since the Norman

William crossed to Hastings.

[Sidenote: Fortifications of the coast.]

[Sidenote: Commissions issued for a survey.]

[Sidenote: List of fortresses built in the years 1537, 1538, and 1539.]

But Henry did not rest upon his success. The impulse had been given, and

the work of national defence went forward. The animus of foreign powers

was evidently as bad as possible, Subjects shared the feelings of their

rulers. The Pope might succeed, and most likely would succeed at last,

in reconciling France and Spain; and experience proved that England lay

formidably open to attack. It was no longer safe to trust wholly to the

extemporized militia. The introduction of artillery was converting war

into a science; and the recent proofs of the unprotected condition of

the harbours should not be allowed to pass without leaving their lesson.

Commissions were issued for a survey of the whole eastern and southern

coasts. The most efficient gentlemen residing in the counties which

touched the sea were requested to send up reports of the points where

invading armies could be most easily landed, with such plans as occurred

to them for the best means of throwing up defences.[308] The plans were

submitted to engineers in London; and in two years every exposed spot

upon the coast was guarded by an earthwork, or a fort or blockhouse.

Batteries were erected to protect the harbours at St. Michael's Mount,

Falmouth, Fowey, Plymouth, Dartmouth, Torbay, Portland, Calshot, Cowes,

and Portsmouth.[309] Castles (some of them remain to the present day)

were built at Dover, Deal, Sandwich, and along both shores of the

Thames. The walls and embankments at Guisnes and Calais were repaired

and enlarged; and Hull, Scarborough, Newcastle, and Berwick-upon-Tweed

were made impregnable against ordinary attack. Each of these places was

defended by adequate and trained garrisons;[310] and the musters were

kept in training within twenty miles of the coast, and were held in

readiness to assemble on any point at any moment.

[Sidenote: Derangement of the revenue owing to the change in the

character of war.]

Money was the chief difficulty. The change in the character of war

created unforeseen expenses of many kinds. The cost of regular military

and naval establishments, a new feature in the national system, was

thrown suddenly on the crown; and the revenue was unequal to so large a

demand upon it. A fresh political arrangement was displacing the old;

and the finances were necessarily long disordered before the country

understood its condition, and had devised methods to meet its

necessities.

[Sidenote: The abbey lands are disposed of,]

[Sidenote: And employment is found for the poor on public works.]

At this conjuncture the abbey lands were a fortunate resource. They were

disposed of rapidly--of course on easy terms to the purchasers. The

insurrection as we saw had taught the necessity of filling the place of

the monks with resident owners, who would maintain hospitality

liberally, and on a scale to contrast favourably with the careless waste

of their predecessors. Obligations to this effect were made a condition

of the sales, and lowered naturally the market value of the properties.

Considerable sums, however, were realized, adequate for immediate

objects, though falling short of the ultimate cost of the defences of

the country. At the same time the government works found labour for the

able-bodied beggars, those sturdy vagrants whose living had been

gathered hitherto at the doors of the religious houses, varied only with

intervals of the stocks and the cart's-tail.

Thus the spoils of the Church furnished the arms by which the Pope and

the Pope's friends could be held at bay; and by degrees in the healthier

portion of the nation an English enthusiasm took the place of a

superstitious panic. Loyalty towards England went along with the

Reformation, when the Reformation was menaced by foreign enemies; and

the wide disaffection which in 1536 had threatened a revolution, became

concentrated in a vindictive minority, to whom the Papacy was dearer

than their country, and whose persevering conspiracies taught England at

no distant time to acquiesce with its whole heart in the wisdom which

chained them down by penal laws as traitors and enemies to the

commonwealth.[311]

[Sidenote: Increasing ill-health of the king.]

[Sidenote: September. Approach of the queen's confinement.]

[Sidenote: October 12. Edward Prince of Wales is born.]

[Sidenote: General expressions of delight.]

[Sidenote: Latimer's letter to Cromwell.]

Meanwhile, the event to which the king, the whole of England and the

Continent, friends and enemies, were looking so anxiously, was

approaching near. The king's health was growing visibly weaker; his

corpulency was increasing, through disease and weakness of system; an

inveterate ulcer had settled in his leg; and the chances of his death in

consequence of it were already calculated.[312] The whole fortune of

the future seemed to depend on the issue of the queen's pregnancy. Yet,

notwithstanding his infirmities, Henry was in high spirits. At the end

of the summer he was with a hunting party at Guildford, and was

described as being especially affable and good-humoured.[313] In

September he was at Hampton Court, where the confinement was expected at

the close of the month, or at the beginning of October. Strange

inquiries had been made by Pole, or by Pole's secretary,[314] on the

probable sex of the child. On the 12th of October the question was

decided by the birth of a prince, so long and passionately hoped for.

Only a most minute intimacy with the condition of the country can make

intelligible the feelings with which the news was received. The crown

had an undoubted heir. The succession was sure. The king, who was

supposed to be under a curse which refused him male posterity, was

relieved from the bane. Providence had borne witness for him, and had

rewarded his policy. No revolution need be looked for on his death. The

Catholics could not hope for their "jolly stirring." The anti-Papal

leaders need not dread the stake for their wages. The insurrection was

crushed. A prince was born. England was saved. These were the terms

which many a heart repeated to itself. The Marchioness of Dorset wrote

to Henry that she had received the most joyful news that came to England

these many years; for the which she and all his Grace's subjects gave

thanks to Almighty God, for that He had remembered his Grace and all his

subjects with a prince, to the comfort, universal weal, and quietness of

the realm.[315] Latimer, in a letter to Cromwell, was still more

emphatic. "There is no less rejoicing," he said, "for the birth of our

prince, whom we hungered for so long, than there was, I trow, _inter

vicinos_, at the birth of John the Baptist. God give us grace to yield

due thanks to our Lord God, the God of England. For verily He hath

shewed Himself the God of England; or rather an English God, if we will

consider and ponder his proceedings with us. He hath overcome our

illness with his exceeding goodness, so that we are now more compelled

to serve Him and promote his Word, if the Devil of all devils be not in

us. We have now the stop of various trusts and the stay of vain

expectations. Let us all pray for his preservation."[316]

In Latimer's words, the joy and the especial causes of it are alike

transparent; but a disaster followed so closely as to show that the

mysterious fatality which pursued the king in his domestic relations had

not ceased to overshadow him, and to furnish food for fresh

superstition and fresh intrigue. The birth took place on the 12th of

October. The queen continued to do well up to the 22d or 23d,[317] when

it seems that, through the carelessness of her attendants, she was

allowed to indulge in some improper food, for which she had expressed a

wish. She caught a cold at the same time;[318] and although on the

evening of the 23d she appeared still so well that the king intended to

leave Hampton Court on the following day, she became in the night

alarmingly worse, and was in evident danger. In the morning the symptoms

had somewhat improved, and there were hopes that the attack would pass

off; but the unfortunate appearances soon returned; in a few more hours

she was dead.[319]

[Sidenote: The queen dies on the 24th of October.]

A worse calamity could scarcely have befallen the king (unless the loss

of the child had been added to that of the mother) than the death of

Jane Seymour. Although she makes no figure in history, though she took

no part in state questions, and we know little either of her sympathies

or opinions, her name is mentioned by both Protestant and Catholic with

unreserved respect. She married the king under circumstances peculiarly

agitating, without preparation, without attachment, either on her part

or on his, but under the pressure of a sudden and tragical necessity.

Her uprightness of character and sweetness of disposition had earned her

husband's esteem, and with his esteem an affection deeper than he had

perhaps anticipated. At her side, at his own death, he desired that his

body might be laid.

[Sidenote: The king shuts himself up in the palace at Westminster.]

When he knew that she was gone, he held a single interview with the

council, and then retired to the palace at Westminster, where "he

mourned and kept himself close a great while."[320]

[Sidenote: Wild rumours afloat of the causes of the death.]

In the country the rejoicings were turned to sorrow.[321] Owing to the

preternatural excitement of the public imagination, groundless rumours

instantly gained currency. It was said that, when the queen was in

labour, a lady had told the king that either the child must die or the

mother; that the king had answered, Save the child, and therefore "the

child was cut out of his mother's womb."[322] Catherine's male children

had all died in infancy. This child, it was soon believed, was dead

also. Some said that the child, some that the king, some that both were

dead. The Cæsarian birth passed for an established fact; while a

prophecy was discovered, which said that "He should be killed that never

was born, and nature's hand or man's had brought it to pass, or soon

would bring it to pass."[323]

[Sidenote: November. Anxiety felt for the child's life.]

[Sidenote: Regulations of the royal nursery.]

These were the mere bubbles of credulity, blown by the general wind; but

the interests which now depended upon the infant prince's life caused to

grave persons grave anxiety. He was but one--a single life,--between the

king's death and chaos, and the king was again a widower. The greater

the importance of the child's preservation to one party, the greater the

temptation to the other to destroy it; and the precautions with which

the royal nursery was surrounded, betray most real alarm that an attempt

might be ventured to make away with him.

Instructions to the grand chamberlain were drawn, by some one in high

authority, with more than the solemnity of an act of parliament.

[Sidenote: Inasmuch as all good things have their opposing evil,]

[Sidenote: The Prince it is likely lacks not adversaries.]

"Like as there is nothing in this world so noble, just, and perfect, but

that there is something contrary, that evermore envieth it, and

procureth the destruction of the same, insomuch as God Himself hath the

Devil repugnant to Him, Christ hath his Antichrist and persecutor, and

from the highest to the lowest after such proportion, so the Prince's

Grace, for all his nobility and innocency (albeit he never offended any

one), yet by all likelihood he lacketh not envy nor adversaries against

his Grace, who, either for ambition of their own promotion, or otherwise

to fulfil their malicious perverse mind, would, perchance, if they saw

opportunity, which God forbid, procure to his Grace displeasure. And

although his Majesty doubteth not, but like as God for the comfort of

this whole realm hath given the said prince, so of his providence He

will preserve and defend him; yet, nevertheless, heed and caution ought

to be taken, to avoid the evil enterprises which might be devised

against his Grace, or danger of his person."

[Sidenote: No person therefore to approach the cradle except the regular

attendants. All food to be assayed.]

[Sidenote: All clothes to be perfumed.]

[Sidenote: No member of the household to approach London during the

unhealthy season.]

In pursuance of such caution, it was commanded that no person, of what

rank soever, except the regular attendants in the nursery, should

approach the cradle, without an order under the king's hand. The food

supplied for the child's use was to be largely "assayed." His clothes

were to be washed by his own servants, and no other hand might touch

them. The material was to be submitted to all tests of poison. The

chamberlain or vice-chamberlain must be present morning and evening,

when the prince was washed and dressed; and nothing, of any kind, bought

for the use of the nursery, might be introduced till it had been aired

and perfumed. No person--not even the domestics of the palace--might

have access to the prince's rooms, except those who were specially

appointed to them; nor might any member of the household approach London

during the unhealthy season, for fear of their catching and conveying

infection. Finally, during the infancy, the officers in the

establishment were obliged to dispense with the attendance of pages or

boys of any kind, for fear of inconvenience from their

thoughtlessness.[324]

Regulations so suspicious and minute, betray more than the exaggeration

of ordinary anxiety. Fears were evidently entertained of something worse

than natural infection; and we can hope only, for the credit of the

Catholics, who expected to profit by the prince's death, that they were

clear of the intentions which were certainly attributed to them.

[Sidenote: Sir Edward Seymour, Sir William Fitzwilliam, Sir John

Russell, and Sir William Paulet are raised to the peerage.]

Other steps were also taken, in which precaution was mixed with

compliment. Should the king die within a few years, the natural

protectors of the prince in his minority would be his mother's family.

Sir Edward Seymour, her brother, was now created Earl of Hertford, to

give him the necessary rank; and for additional security, peerages were

bestowed upon three others of the council whose loyalty could be

depended upon. Sir William Fitzwilliam, now lord high admiral, was

created Earl of Southampton; Sir William Paulet became Lord St. John;

and Sir John Russell as Lord Russell, commenced a line of nobles whose

services to England wind like a silver cord through later history.

[Sidenote: The Privy Council requests the King to undertake a fourth

marriage]

But inasmuch as, if the danger to the prince was real, the chief cause

of it lay in his being an only child, as the temptation to a crime would

cease when, by other sons or daughters, of unquestioned legitimacy, the

success of the attempt would produce no change, and as all other

interests depending now on a single life would be additionally secured,

so on the very day of the queen's death, as on the day which followed

it, the Privy Council represented to the king the necessity of his

undertaking a fresh marriage while the state of his health left a hope

that he might be again a father. Henry, suffering deeply from his loss,

desired at first to evade a duty in which he had little interest at any

time, and which his present sorrow rendered merely distressing. He had

consented, under an absolute necessity, on the discovery of the

complicated treasons of Anne. The obligation was now less considerable,

and he hoped to be spared.

[Sidenote: The king reluctantly consents.]

The council, however, continued to urge what his own judgment united to

recommend. He saw that it must be so; and he resigned himself. "Although

his Highness is not disposed to marry again," wrote Cromwell, in the

despatch which communicated to the ambassador in France the death of

Queen Jane, "yet his tender zeal to his subjects hath already overcome

his Grace's said disposition, and framed his mind both to be indifferent

to the thing, and to the election of any person, from any part, that

with deliberation shall be thought meet for him."[325]

Persons who are acquainted with the true history of Henry's later

marriages, while not surprised at their unfortunate consequences, yet

smile at the interpretation which popular tradition has assigned to his

conduct. Popular tradition is a less safe guide through difficult

passages in history than the word of statesmen who were actors upon the

stage, and were concerned personally in the conduct of the events which

they describe.