MY DEAR SIR,

I have been for two or three days at Tunbridge Wells, and have been

agreeably surprised to-day on my arrival in London, to hear of the great

events which are taking place in France in consequence of the great

victory obtained by the Duke of Wellington and his brave army over

Bonaparte. With the deposition of Bonaparte I hope there may be no other

obstacles to peace, and that we may at length be rewarded for the blood

and treasure which we have expended with a long period of

tranquil[l]ity, which I have no doubt will also prove a long period of

prosperity. I think with Mr. Whitbread[106] that great credit is due to

ministers for the energy which they have displayed in the prosecution of

this contest. Having determined on war, their preparations have been on

such a scale as to give from the commencement the best hopes of success,

and we appear at last to have adopted the wise policy of making one

grand effort in preference to a series of puny efforts, each just

sufficient to keep the contest alive without making the least advance to

its ultimate object.

The effect on the price of Omnium has been no more than what might have

been expected. I am sorry that you have not profited by the rise. As for

myself, I have all my stock, by which I mean I have all my money[,]

invested in Stock; and this is as great an advantage as ever I expect or

wish to make by a rise. I have been a considerable gainer by the

loan[107]; in the first place by replacing the stock which I had sold

before the contract with the minister [_sic_] at a much lower price,

secondly by a moderate gain on such part of the loan as I ventured to

take over and above my stock. This portion I sold at a premium of from 3

to 5 per cent., and I have every reason to be well contented. Perhaps no

loan was ever more generally profitable to the Stock Exchange.

Now for a little of our old subject. It appears to me that there are two

causes which may cause a rise of prices, one the depreciation of money,

the other the difficulty of producing. The latter can in no case be

advantageous to a society. It is always a sign of prosperity but never

the cause of it. Depreciation of money may be beneficial, because it

generally favours that class who are disposed to accumulate, but I

should say that it augmented riches by diminishing happiness, that it

was advantageous only by occasioning a great pressure on the labouring

classes and on those who lived on fixed incomes. You and I concur in

this opinion, for you say you are convinced that there are unobserved

advantages attending the high price of corn and labour 'when not arising

solely from difficulty of production,' [by] which I think you imply that

no such advantages attend high prices if attended with difficulty of

production.

This opinion is, however, a little at variance with that which you have

long been supporting, for you have said that the high price of corn and

labour in this country at this time was an advantage, although it is

universally allowed that that high price is mainly owing to difficulty

of production. The farmers and shopkeepers may suffer very general

distress from a sudden and general fall of prices; but I hold that this

would be no criterion by which to judge of the general or permanent

prosperity of a country.

The accounts in which I am at present engaged will I fear keep me in

London till the very latter end of July. I shall very much regret if you

quit Bath without my seeing you. I quite depended on having a visit from

you at Gatcomb this year, and I yet hope that it may be accomplished. I

shall certainly leave London the very earliest day possible.

The price of labour in America appears to me enormously high as compared

with the price of wheat; but we should not fail to remember how very low

the exchangeable value of wheat is there, and how much of it must be

given for the manufactured necessaries and comforts of life....

Ever truly yours,

DAVID RICARDO.

Letters of David Ricardo to Thomas Robert Malthus, 1810-1823 · 第 81 / 225 题