DEAR SIR,

I lose no time in answering your obliging letter and endeavouring as far

as lies in my power to remove the very few objections which prevent us

from being precisely of the same opinion on the subject of money and the

laws which regulate its value in the countries which have constant

commercial intercourse with each other. I have no view in this

discussion but that which you have avowed, the circulation of truth; if

therefore I should fail to convince you, and you should express your

opinions in print, it is immaterial to me whether you mention my name or

not. I trust you will do that which shall most fully tend to establish

the just principles of the science.

There does not appear to me to be any substantial difference between

bullion and any other commodity as far as regards the regulation of its

value and the laws which determine its exportation or importation. It is

true that bullion, besides being a commodity useful in the arts, has

been adopted universally as a measure of value and a medium of exchange;

but it has not on that account been taken out of the list of

commodities. A new use has been found for a particular article;

consequently there has been an increased demand for it and an augmented

supply. This new use has made every man a dealer in bullion; he buys it

to sell it again, and the general competition of all these dealers will

as surely, and as strictly, regulate its value in every country, as the

competition of the same or other dealers will regulate the value of all

other commodities. I have your sanction for calling every purchaser of

commodities a dealer in bullion; and, though in the language of

commercial men the sellers of money are in all cases called purchasers,

it is not on that account less true that they are sellers of one

commodity and purchasers of another. The nature of corn was not changed

by the discovery that a new use might be made of it by fermentation and

distillation; and, if we should hereafter discover that it might be used

for a hundred other purposes, contributing to the comforts and

enjoyments of mankind, the demand for it would increase, and its price

would in the first instance be considerably augmented; but this would be

the only change it would undergo; it would continue to be imported and

exported by the same rules as every other commodity. I have no doubt

that on this point we should not differ; it remains therefore for you to

show why the new uses, to which gold has been applied in consequence of

its being adopted as the money of the world, should exempt it from the

general law of competition, and why it should not certainly and

invariably (invariably only as that term is applied to other

commodities) seek the most advantageous market.

It is probable that the word 'redundancy' has not been happily chosen by

me to express the impression made on my mind of the cause of an

unfavourable balance of trade; but on looking over the article in the

Review[40] I find that you use it precisely in the sense in which I wish

to convey my meaning, for you admit that a relatively redundant

currency may be, and frequently is, a cause of an unfavourable balance

of trade; but you contend that it is not the only cause. Now I, so

understanding the word, contend that it is the invariable cause. This

relative redundancy may be produced as well by diminution of goods as by

an actual increase of money (or which is the same thing by an increased

economy in the use of it) in one country; or by an increased quantity of

goods or by a diminished amount of money in another. In either of these

cases a redundancy of money is produced as effectually as if the mines

had become more productive. I do not deny that temporary fluctuations do

occur in the value of the precious metals; on the contrary I maintain

that those fluctuations never cease; but I attribute them all to one

cause, namely a redundancy of the currency produced in one of the ways

above mentioned, and not to the demand for particular commodities. These

demands are in my opinion regulated by the relative state of the

currency; they are not causes but effects. You appear to me not

sufficiently to consider the circumstances [which] induce one country to

contract a debt to another. [In] all the cases you bring forward you

always suppose the [deb]t already contracted, forgetting that I

uniformly contend that it is the relative state of the currency which is

the motive to the contract itself. The corn, I say, will not be bought

unless money be relatively redundant; you answer me by supposing it

already bought and the question to be only concerning the payment. A

merchant will not contract a debt for corn to a foreign country unless

he is fully convinced that he shall obtain for that corn more money than

he contracts to pay for it, and, if the commerce of the two countries

were limited to these transactions, it would as satisfactorily prove to

me that money was redundant in one country as that corn was redundant in

the other. It would prove too that nothing but money was redundant. If

indeed sugar were exported by some other merchant, the debt for corn

would be paid without the exportation of money, and I should say that

sugar was the redundant commodity; and the exportation of sugar, the

more redundant commodity, by diminishing the aggregate amount of

commodities, would raise the value of money, so that in a short time

money would, if corn continued to be imported and sugar exported, no

longer be redundant even as compared with corn. Your observation is

just, concerning the extra expenses attending the exportation of bulky

commodities; but in all these discussions we must suppose these expenses

to make part of the price of the commodity; our comparison is made on

the prices at which the importer could afford to sell them, and those

prices necessarily include expenses of every sort. I do not think that

the knowledge of the computed exchange of Jamaica would throw any light

on the subject in dispute[41]. I will, however, endeavour to learn every

particular concerning it, and hope to be able on Saturday next to pay

you a visit in Hertfordshire, when we will further discuss these seeming

difficulties.

I am, dear Sir, with great respect,

Your obedient Servant,

DAVID RICARDO.

THROGMORTON STREET, _18th June, 1811_.

Letters of David Ricardo to Thomas Robert Malthus, 1810-1823 · 第 24 / 225 题