VI

A case in which a personal wrong rather than a personal right was

offensively asserted, was that of a lady, young and too fair to be so

unfair, in a crowded train coming from the Doncaster Races to York. She

had kept a whole first-class compartment to herself, putting her maid

into the second-class adjoining, and heaping the vacant seats with her

hand-baggage, which had also overflowed into the corridor. At the time

the train started she was comforting herself in her luxurious solitude

with a cup of tea, and she stood up, as if to keep other people out.

But, after waiting, seven of us, in the corridor, until she should offer

to admit us, we all swarmed in upon her, and made ourselves indignantly

at home. When it came to that she offered no protest, but gathered up

her belongings, and barricaded herself with them. Among the rest there

was a typewriting-machine, but what manner of young lady she was, or

whether of the journalistic or the theatrical tribe, has never revealed

itself to this day. We could not believe that she was very high-born,

not nearly so high, for instance, as the old lady who helped dispossess

her, and who, when we ventured the hope that it would not rain on the

morrow, which was to be St. Leger Day, almost lost the kindness for us

inspired by some small service, because we had the bad taste to suggest

such a possibility for so sacred a day.

I never saw people standing in a train, except that once which I have

already noted, when in a very crowded car in Wales, two women, decent

elderly persons, got in and were suffered to remain on foot by the young

men who had comfortable places; no one dreamed, apparently, of offering

to give up his seat. But, on the other hand, a superior civilization

is shown in what I may call the manual forbearance of the trolley and

railway folk, who are so apt to nudge and punch you at home here, when

they wish your attention. The like happened to me only once in England,

and that was at Liverpool, where the tram conductor, who laid hands

on me instead of speaking, had perhaps been corrupted by the unseen

American influences of a port at which we arrive so abundantly and

indiscriminately. I did not resent the touch, though it is what every

one is expected to do, if aggrieved, and every one else does it in

England. Within his rights, every one is safe; though there may be some

who have no rights. If there were, I did not see them, and I suppose

that, as an alien, I might have refused to stand up and uncover when the

band began playing _God Save the King_, as it did at the end of every

musical occasion; I might have urged that, being no subject of the King,

I did not feel bound to join in the general prayer. But that would have

been churlish, and, where every one had been so civil to me, I did not

see why I should not be civil to the King, in a small matter. In the

aggregate indeed, it is not a small matter, and I suppose that the

stranger always finds the patriotism of a country molestive. Patriotism

is, at any rate, very disagreeable, with the sole exception of our own,

which we are constantly wishing to share with other people, especially

with English people. We spare them none of it, even in their own

country, and yet many of us object to theirs; I feel that I am myself

being rather offensive about it, now, at this distance from them. Upon

the whole, not caring very actively for us, one way or the other, they

take it amiably; they try to get our point of view, and, as if it were a

thorn, self-sacrificially press their bosoms against it, in the present

or recent _entente cordiale_. None of their idiosyncrasies is more

notable than their patience, their kindness with our divergence from

them; but I am not sure that, having borne with us when we are by, they

do not take it out of us when we are away.

We are the poetry of a few, who, we like to think, have studied the

most deeply into the causes of our being, or its excuses. But you cannot

always be enjoying poetry, and I could well imagine that our lovers must

sometimes prefer to shut the page. The common gentleness comes from the

common indifference, and from something else that I will not directly

touch upon. What is certain is that, with all manner of strangers,

the English seem very gentle, when they meet in chance encounter. The

average level of good manners is high. My experience was not the widest,

and I am always owning it was not deep; but, such as it was, it brought

me to the distasteful conviction that in England I did not see the

mannerless uncouthness which I often see in America, not so often from

high to low, or from old to young, but the reverse. There may be much

more than we infer, at the moment, from the modulated voices, which

sweetens casual intercourse, but there are certain terms of respect,

almost unknown to us, which more obviously do that effect. It is a pity

that democracy, being the fine thing it essentially is, should behave

so rudely. Must we come to family government, in order to be filial or

fraternal in our bearing with one another? Why should we be so blunt, so

sharp, so ironical, so brutal in our kindness?

Seven English Cities · 第 72 / 86 题