III

During those limited days of the week before Doncaster, I was constantly

coming back to the Minster, which is not the germ of political York, or

hardly religious York; the brave city was a Romano-British capital and

a Romano-British episcopal see centuries before the first wooden temple

was built on the site of the present edifice in 627. I should like to

make believe that we found traces of that simple church in the crypt of

the Minster when we went the next morning and were herded through it by

the tenderest of vergers. Most of our flock were Americans, and we put

our guide to such question in matters of imagination and information

as the patience of a less amiable shepherd would not have borne. Many a

tale, true or o’ertrue, our verger had, which he told with unction; when

he ascended with us to the body of the church, and said that the stained

glass of the gigantic windows suffered from the depredations of the

mistaken birds which pecked holes in the joints of their panes, I felt

that I had full measure from him, pressed down and running over. I do

not remember why he said the birds should have done this, but it seems

probable that they took the mellow colors of the glass for those of ripe

fruits.

For myself, I could not get enough of those windows, in another sort

of famine which ought at this time to have been sated. I was forever

wondering at their grandeur outside and their glory inside. I was glad

to lose my way about the town, for if I kept walking I was sure, sooner

or later, to bring up at the Minster; but the last evening of our stay

I made a purposed pilgrimage to it for a final emotion. It was the

clearest evening we had in York, and at half-past six the sun was

setting in a transparent sky, which somehow it did not flush with any of

those glaring reds which the vulgarer sorts of sunsets are fond of, but

bathed the air in a delicate suffusion of daffodil light, just tinged

with violet. This was the best medium to see the past of the Minster in,

and I can see it there now, if I did not then. I followed, or I follow,

its veracious history back to the beginning of the seventh century,

whence you can look back further still to the earliest Christian temples

where the Romans worshipped with the Britons, whom they had enslaved

and converted. But it was not till 627 that the little wooden chapel was

built on the site of the Minster, to house the rite of the Northumbrian

King Eadwine’s baptism. He felt so happy in his new faith that he

replaced the wooden structure with stone. In the next century it was

burned, but rebuilt by another pious prince, and probably repaired by

yet another after the Danes took the city a hundred years later. It

was then in a good state to be destroyed by that devout William the

Conqueror, who came to take the Saxon world in its sins of guttling

and guzzling. The first Norman archbishop reconstructed or restored

the church, and then it began to rise and to spread in glory--nave,

transepts, and choir, and pillars and towers, Norman and Early English,

and Perpendicular and Decorated--till it found itself at last what the

American tourist sees it to-day. It suffered from two great fires in

the nineteenth century, the first set by a lunatic who had the fancy of

seeing it burn, but who had only the satisfaction of destroying part of

the roof.

It was never richly painted, but the color wanting in the walls and

fretted vault was more than compensated by the mellowed splendors of

the matchless windows. It was, indeed, fit to be the home of much more

secular history than can be associated with it; but not till the end

of the thirteenth century had the Minster a patron of its own, when St.

William was canonized, and exercised his office, whatever it was, for

two brief centuries. Then the Cromwell of Henry VIII. took possession

of it in behalf of the crown, and the saint’s charge was practically

abolished. He was even deprived of his head, for the relic was encased

in gold and jewels, and was therefore worth the king’s having, who was

most a friend of the reformed religion when it paid best. The later

Cromwell, who beat a later king hard by at Marston Moor, must have

somehow desecrated the Minster, though there is no record of any such

fact. A more authentic monument of the religious difficulties of the

times is the pastoral staff, bearing the arms of Catharine of Braganza,

the poor little wife of Charles II., which was snatched from a Roman

Catholic bishop when, to the high offence of Protestant piety, he was

heading a procession in York in 1688. The verger showing us through the

Minster was a good Protestant, but he held it bad taste in a predecessor

of his, who when leading about a Catholic party of sight-seers took the

captive staff from its place and shook it in their faces, saying, “Don’t

you wish you had it?”

Seven English Cities · 第 31 / 86 题