ABSTRACTS OF RECENT PUBLIC UTILITY DECISIONS.

_In re West Shore & Seashore R. R. Co._--Application to discontinue

maintaining an agent at Forest Grove, as revenues do not warrant expense

of the agency; the place to be put under the supervision of the agent at

Minetola, who would keep the station open, lighted, etc. The Board permitted

the discontinuance, adding that "if future conditions change to the

extent of warranting the re-establishment of an agent, the matter will

be given further consideration." Report dated Nov. 4, 1921. Mr.

George A. Bourgeois for the Company. Mr. Joseph Little and Mr.

Charles H. Lincoln for Protestants.

Another application was made at the same time by the same Company for

the discontinuance of the agent at Buena. The Board said: "While the

reasonableness of the Company's desire to reduce operating expenses is

recognized, the discontinuance of the agent would undoubtedly result in

inconveniencing shippers and receivers of freight and express to an

extent that would not be justified considering the volume of business.

The necessity for the presence of an agent or clerk for a portion of the

day is manifest, and arrangement should be made to have a

representativeat the station from 8 A. M. until 1.30 P. M. daily,

excepting Sundays: also that the station be kept open during the hours

it is at present open for the convenience of passengers. If the Company

will arrange to have a representative at the station for the transaction

of necessary business from 8 A. M. until 1.30 P. M., and keep the

station open covering hours now in effect, the Board will approve such

an arrangement in lieu of agency now effective." Report dated Nov. 4,

1921. Mr. George A. Bourgeois for the Company. Mr. Charles Wray for

Protestants.

_In re Pennsylvania R. R._--Application to discontinue an agent at

Allaire. Permit granted. Report dated Nov. 4, 1921. Mr. W. Holt

Apgar for Petitioner.

_In re City of Newark._--Application for a change in the colorific

standard of gas. The Board was about to investigate the rates charged

for gas by the Public Service Gas Co., when the City of Newark gave

notice of a demand for an increase in the standard. "There was thus,"

said the Board, "injected into the proceeding a question which had to be

decided before the Board's investigation into the rates could proceed,

it being impossible to fix a price for gas until the Board should fix

the standard for gas under Newark's petition. The rule fixing the

standard for gas being applicable to all gas companies in the State,

general notice of hearing was given, and the gas companies were

represented." Testimony was begun in August last, and the general

purport appears in the Report. The Board said: "It does not appear that

the gas supplied by the Public Service Gas Company compares favorably

with that furnished by other companies, which, confronted by the rule

[IX of the standard adopted by the former Utility Board] alone, have

applied it in accordance with its apparent literal significance. The

rule, however, should be free from any misunderstanding as to its

meaning. As the Public Service Gas Company supplies the greater part of

the gas consumed in the State, and to now require it to change its

interpretation of the rule might result in undesirable complications in

the rate proceeding being conducted by the Board without corresponding

advantage to its customers, it is deemed inadvisable to insist upon such

change. In order, however, that there may not be a continued apparent

conflict between the rule as worded and the practice of the Company, the

Board will change the wording of the rule so that there will be no doubt

if gas is supplied with a minimum daily average of 525 B. t. u. it will

be in compliance therewith." Report dated Nov. 4, 1921. Messrs. E. W.

Wakelee, E. A. Armstrong and G. H. Blake for Public Service Gas Company.

Mr. Jerome T. Congleton and Mr. J. G. Wolber for the City of Newark. Mr.

George L. Record for City of Jersey City. Mr. Benjamin Natal for City of

Camden. Mr. William A. Kavanagh for City of Hoboken. Mr. Joseph T. Hague

for City of Elizabeth. Mr. A. O. Miller for City of Passaic. Mr. William

P. Hurley for Town of Nutley. Mr. Welcome W. Bender for Chamber of

Commerce of Elizabeth. Mr. F. R. Cutcheon for Consolidated Gas Company.

Mr. S. J. Franklin for Cumberland County Gas Company. Mr. H. S. Schutt

for Atlantic City Gas Company. Mr. William Wherry, Jr. for New Jersey

Gas Association. Dr. W. G. Hanrahan for Rent Payers' Association of

Essex County and Federation Improvement Associations. Mr. James W.

Howard on his own behalf.

_In re Blackwood Water Co._--Application for increase in rates. The

Board required, first, that changes must be made in the system so as to

provide for continuous operation of the filter plant, additional power to

operate the pumping machinery, etc., six different improvements in all.

Doing this the Company could make certain increases in rates beginning

Jan. 1, 1922. Report dated Nov. 9, 1921. Mr. Lewis Starr for Petitioner.

Mr. Samuel P. Hagerman for Township of Gloucester.

The New Jersey Law Journal, Volume XLV, No. 2, February, 1922 · 第 5 / 23 题