I BIRDS AND POETS

"In summer, when the shawes be shene,

And leaves be large and long,

It is full merry in fair forest

To hear the fowles' song.

The wood-wele sang, and wolde not cease,

Sitting upon the spray;

So loud, it wakened Robin Hood

In the greenwood where he lay."

It might almost be said that the birds are all birds of the poets and

of no one else, because it is only the poetical temperament that

fully responds to them. So true is this, that all the great

ornithologists--original namers and biographers of the birds--have been

poets in deed if not in word. Audubon is a notable case in point, who,

if he had not the tongue or the pen of the poet, certainly had the

eye and ear and heart--"the fluid and attaching character"--and the

singleness of purpose, the enthusiasm, the unworldliness, the love, that

characterize the true and divine race of bards.

So had Wilson, though perhaps not in as large a measure; yet he took

fire as only a poet can. While making a journey on foot to Philadelphia,

shortly after landing in this country, he caught sight of the red-headed

woodpecker flitting among the trees,--a bird that shows like a

tricolored scarf among the foliage,--and it so kindled his enthusiasm

that his life was devoted to the pursuit of the birds from that day. It

was a lucky hit. Wilson had already set up as a poet in Scotland, and

was still fermenting when the bird met his eye and suggested to his soul

a new outlet for its enthusiasm.

The very idea of a bird is a symbol and a suggestion to the poet. A

bird seems to be at the top of the scale, so vehement and intense is

his life,--large-brained, large-lunged, hot, ecstatic, his frame charged

with buoyancy and his heart with song. The beautiful vagabonds, endowed

with every grace, masters of all climes, and knowing no bounds,--how

many human aspirations are realized in their free, holiday lives, and

how many suggestions to the poet in their flight and song!

Indeed, is not the bird the original type and teacher of the poet, and

do we not demand of the human lark or thrush that he "shake out his

carols" in the same free and spontaneous manner as his winged

prototype? Kingsley has shown how surely the old minnesingers and early

ballad-writers have learned of the birds, taking their key-note from the

blackbird, or the wood-lark, or the throstle, and giving utterance to a

melody as simple and unstudied. Such things as the following were surely

caught from the fields or the woods:--

"She sat down below a thorn,

Fine flowers in the valley,

And there has she her sweet babe borne,

And the green leaves they grow rarely."

Or the best lyric pieces, how like they are to certain

bird-songs!--clear, ringing, ecstatic, and suggesting that challenge

and triumph which the outpouring of the male bird contains. (Is not

the genuine singing, lyrical quality essentially masculine?) Keats and

Shelley, perhaps more notably than any other English poets, have the

bird organization and the piercing wild-bird cry. This, of course,

is not saying that they are the greatest poets, but that they have

preeminently the sharp semi-tones of the sparrows and the larks.

But when the general reader thinks of the birds of the poets, he

very naturally calls to mind the renowned birds, the lark and the

nightingale, Old World melodists, embalmed in Old World poetry, but

occasionally appearing on these shores, transported in the verse of some

callow singer.

The very oldest poets, the towering antique bards, seem to make little

mention of the song-birds. They loved better the soaring, swooping birds

of prey, the eagle, the ominous birds, the vultures, the storks and

cranes, or the clamorous sea-birds and the screaming hawks. These

suited better the rugged, warlike character of the times and the simple,

powerful souls of the singers themselves. Homer must have heard the

twittering of the swallows, the cry of the plover, the voice of the

turtle, and the warble of the nightingale; but they were not adequate

symbols to express what he felt or to adorn his theme. Aeschylus saw in

the eagle "the dog of Jove," and his verse cuts like a sword with such a

conception.

It is not because the old bards were less as poets, but that they were

more as men. To strong, susceptible characters, the music of nature is

not confined to sweet sounds. The defiant scream of the hawk circling

aloft, the wild whinny of the loon, the whooping of the crane, the

booming of the bittern, the vulpine bark of the eagle, the loud

trumpeting of the migratory geese sounding down out of the midnight sky;

or by the seashore, the coast of New Jersey or Long Island, the wild

crooning of the flocks of gulls, repeated, continued by the hour,

swirling sharp and shrill, rising and falling like the wind in a storm,

as they circle above the beach or dip to the dash of the waves,--are

much more welcome in certain moods than any and all mere bird-melodies,

in keeping as they are with the shaggy and untamed features of ocean

and woods, and suggesting something like the Richard Wagner music in the

ornithological orchestra.

"Nor these alone whose notes

Nice-fingered art must emulate in vain,

But cawing rooks, and kites that swim sublime

In still repeated circles, screaming loud,

The jay, the pie, and even the boding owl,

That hails the rising moon, have charms for me,"

says Cowper. "I never hear," says Burns in one of his letters, "the

loud, solitary whistle of the curlew in a summer noon, or the wild

mixing cadence of a troop of gray plovers in an autumnal morning,

without feeling an elevation of soul like the enthusiasm of devotion or

poetry."

Even the Greek minor poets, the swarm of them that are represented in

the Greek Anthology, rarely make affectionate mention of the birds,

except perhaps Sappho, whom Ben Jonson makes speak of the nightingale

as--

"The dear glad angel of the spring."

The cicada, the locust, and the grasshopper are often referred to, but

rarely by name any of the common birds. That Greek grasshopper must

have been a wonderful creature. He was a sacred object in Greece, and

is spoken of by the poets as a charming songster. What we would say of

birds the Greek said of this favorite insect. When Socrates and Phaedrus

came to the fountain shaded by the plane-tree, where they had their

famous discourse, Socrates said: "Observe the freshness of the spot, how

charming and very delightful it is, and how summer-like and shrill

it sounds from the choir of grasshoppers." One of the poets in the

Anthology finds a grasshopper struggling in a spider's web, which he

releases with the words:--

"Go safe and free with your sweet voice of song."

Birds and Poets : with Other Papers · 第 8 / 50 题