CHAPTER XVII

SOUTHAMPTON

When I left Porchester I went on into Fareham to sleep, and next

morning set out by train, for it was raining, to go to Clausentum.

Before I left the railway, however, the weather began to clear, and

presently the sun broke through the clouds, so that when I came into

Clausentum the whole world was again full of joy.

Clausentum, which even to-day, is not without charm was as I understand

it, the mother of Southampton, a Roman, perhaps even a Celtic

foundation, for its name Clausentum is certainly of Celtic origin. Of

its high antiquity there can at least be no doubt, for there we may

still see parts of the Roman walls near nine feet thick and innumerable

Roman remains have been found within them.

The situation of Clausentum, too, was rather Celtic than Roman. It

stands upon a tongue of land thrust out into the Itchen from the left

bank, between Northam and St Denys on the right bank; the river washed

its walls upon three sides, north, south and west, but upon the

landward side to the east it was protected by two lines of defence, an

outer and an inner, the one nearly three hundred yards from the other.

At first this arrangement might seem rather Celtic than Roman, and in

fact, it may well be that the Romans occupied here earthworks far older

than anything built by them in Britain, and yet it seems perhaps more

probable that they are responsible for all we have here, un-Roman

though it seems, and that the true explanation is that the outer

defences, while their work, are the older of the two; that with the

decline of their administration in the fourth century, with the

building of the Stane Street and the general walling of the Roman towns

this older and larger defence was abandoned, and the place, whatever it

may have been, reduced to a mere fort to hold which upon the landward

side the inner defence was there built.

Of the fate of Clausentum in the Dark Age we know nothing; if it was a

mere fort with no life of its own it may or may not have been

abandoned; but it would seem certain that with the renewal of

civilisation in southern England, by the return of Christianity, a town

was established upon the right bank of the estuary opposite Clausentum.

This town was the first Southampton, and there Athelstane is said to

have established mints. This town, however, does not seem to have

occupied the same site as the Southampton we know, but rather to have

been gathered about St Mary's church to the north-east as Leland was

told when he visited Southampton in 1546. The place was probably burnt

by the Danes, and it is to one of them, to Canute, that we owe the

foundation of the town we know. If Canute was the founder of

Southampton, however, it was the Normans who really and finally

established it, the greatness of the place as a port really dating from

the Conquest. The Normans seem to have settled there early in

considerable numbers, and their energy and enterprise began the

development which continued throughout the Middle Age and the

Renaissance. In the seventeenth century, however, Southampton rapidly

declined, and this continued till in the time of our grandfathers it

was arrested and Southampton rose again, to become the chief port of

southern England. So extraordinary indeed has been her modern

development that it has completely engulfed the great town of the

Middle Age, which, for all that, still forms the nucleus as it were of

the modern city, though no one, I suppose would suspect it at first

sight.

Of the greatness of Southampton in the Middle Age, however, there can

be no doubt. It was the best exit out of that England into Normandy,

the natural port of the capital Winchester, and its whole record is

full of glory. It was in a very real sense the gate of England. Hither

came the great ships from the South and the East, from the ports of

Normandy and Anjou, from Bayonne and Venice, with wine and Eastern

silks, leather from Cordova, swords and daggers from Toledo, spices

from India, and coloured sugars from Egypt. Here the merchants

disembarked to trade in the capital or to attend the great fair of St

Giles; hither came the pilgrims, thousands upon thousands, to follow

the old road from Winchester to the Shrine of St Thomas at

Canterbury; while out of Southampton streamed the chivalry of the

Crusades; hence "cheerly to sea" sailed the fleets of Coeur de Lion for

Palestine, of Edward III. for France, the army that won at Crecy, the

army that won at Agincourt. All the glory of mediaeval England

Southampton has seen pass by.

That the abandonment of Guienne and Aquitaine by the English was a

severe blow to Southampton is certain, but still it had the Venice

trade, the "Flanders Galleys" laden with the spoil of the East, the

wines of the Levant, the "fashions of proud Italy"; and the real

decline of Southampton dates from the moment when Venice too was

wounded even to death by the discovery of the Cape route to the East

and the rise of Portugal.

As it happens we have at the time of her greatest prosperity a

description of the town from the hand of Leland. "There be," he writes,

"in the fair and right strong wall of New Hampton, eight gates. Over

Barr Gate by north is the _Domus Civica_, and under it the town prison.

There is a great suburb without it, and a great double dyke, well

watered on each hand without it. The East Gate is strong, not so large

as Barr Gate, and in its suburb stands St Mary's Church, to the South

Gate joins a Castelet well ordinanced to beat that quarter of the

haven. There is another mean gate a little more south called God's

house gate, of an hospital founded by two merchants joined to it; and

not far beyond it is the Water Gate, without which is a quay. There are

two more gates. The glory of the Castle is in the dungeon, that is both

fair and large and strong, both by work and the site of it. There be

five parish churches in the town. Holy Rood Church standeth in the

chief street, which is one of the fairest streets that is in any town

in England, and it is well builded for timber building. There be many

fair merchants' houses, and in the south-east part was a college of

Grey Friars. Here was also an hospital called God's House, founded by

two merchants, appropriated since to Queen's College, Oxford."

Of all this what remains? Happily more than might seem possible

considering the enormous modern development of the place. The town of

Southampton stood looking south-west upon a tongue of land thrust out

south into the water with the estuary of the Itchen upon the east, and

Southampton Water upon the west, upon the south were the vast mud-flats

swept by every tide which the great modern docks now occupy. The town

was, as we have seen, enclosed by walls, perhaps by Canute, certainly

by the Normans, and these seem to have been enlarged by King John, and

rebuilt and repaired after the French raid of 1338. They formed a rude

quadrilateral, roughly seven hundred yards from north to south, and

three hundred from east to west, were from twenty-five to thirty feet

high and of varying thickness. Something of them still remains,

especially upon the west of the town over the quays. Here we have two

great portions of the old wall which is practically continuous from the

site of the Bugle Tower upon the south, to the site of the Bigglesgate

about half-way up this western side. This portion includes two of the

old gates, the West Gate and the Blue Anchor Postern. Beyond the site

of the Bigglesgate the old wall has been destroyed as far as the

Castle, but from there it still stands all the way to the Arundel Tower

at the north-west corner of the town. So much for the western front.

Upon the north the wall is broken down at the western end, the Bargate,

which still stands, being isolated, but beyond two portions remain

complete as far as the Polymond Tower at the north-east angle. Upon the

east of the town there is very little standing until we come to the

southern corner, where God's House Tower and the South-East Gate

remain. Upon the south almost nothing is left.

Southampton in its mediaeval greatness had eight gates, of which, as we

see, four remain: two upon the west, the West Gate and the Blue Anchor

Postern; one upon the north, the Bargate; upon the east, or rather at

the south-eastern angle of the walls, God's House or South-East Gate;

upon the south none at all.

The West Gate is a plain but beautiful work of the fourteenth century,

a great square tower over a pointed arch, under which is the entry. The

tower within consists of three stages, the last being embattled and

now roofed, while the first is reached by a picturesque outside

stairway of stone, which served both it and the ramparts. Close by,

against the wall, is a timber building upon a stone basement, called

the guard-room, dating from the fifteenth century.

The best portions of the old wall run northward from the West Gate over

the western shore road. This is Norman work added to in the fourteenth

century. Here is the Blue Anchor Postern, or as it is more properly

called, simply the Postern, little more than a round archway within the

great arcading and the wall itself. Just to the south of this gate is

the twelfth-century building known as King John's Palace. We follow the

grand old wall till it ends upon the site of the Bigglesgate, where we

turn eastward a little into the town and come to the Castle, of which,

unhappily, almost nothing remains. It consisted of a great Keep in the

midst of an enclosure, entered by two gates, the Castle Gate upon the

north-east where now is Castle Lane, and the Postern over the site of

which we have entered the Castle Green. The decay of this fortress

dates, at least, from the sixteenth century, and apparently before the

Civil War it had been pulled down.

The walls still enclose the Bailey of the Castle upon the west. There,

in some sort, still stands the Castle Water Gate, a mere fragment,

within which is a great vaulted chamber some fifty feet long and

twenty-five feet high, with only one small window. From this

fragmentary gate the wall sweeps away to the salient, for the most

part Norman; but beyond the salient its character changes, two towers

appear--the Catchcold Tower of the late fourteenth and early fifteenth

century, and the fine Arundel Tower, now only a curtain of fourteenth-

century work in the Decorated style.

It is in these western walls of the town that we shall get our best

idea of what mediaeval Southampton was, and if we add to our impression

by an examination of the two remaining gates, one upon the north and

the other at the south-east angle, we may perhaps understand how

formidable it must have appeared standing up out of the sea armed at

all points.

Mediaeval Southampton had eight gates, of these, as I have said, but

four remain, the most notable of which is undoubtedly the Bargate, upon

the north. This is a fine work of various periods in two stages, the

lower consisting of a vaulted passage-way of fine proportions, a work

of the fourteenth century and the upper of a great hall, the Guildhall

now used as a court room. The original gate, of course, was Norman, and

this seems to have endured until about 1330 two towers were built on

either side, without the gate, and a new south front added. In the

first years of the fifteenth century a new north front was contrived,

and this remains more or less as we see it. Of old the gate was reached

by a drawbridge across a wide moat.

Beyond the Bargate we come to the Polymond Tower or the Tower of St

Denys, beautiful with creepers. This would seem to be in some way

connected with the Priory of St Denys which held all the churches in

the town, as we shall see. As for its other name of Polymond, it would

seem to get it from that John Polymond, who, in the fourteenth century,

from which time the tower, as we see it, dates, was nine times mayor of

Southampton.

As for the God's House Gateway, to reach it we must cross the town. It

is a plain but charming work of two periods, the gate proper being of

the thirteenth century, while the tower with the two-storied building

attached to it is of the fourteenth. From the beginning of the

eighteenth century until 1855 it was used as the town gaol.

The old town of Southampton, a town within a town, is a fascinating

study, the interest of its gates and old walls is inexhaustible, but

apart from these it has little architectural beauty to boast of. For

all that it is amusing to linger there, if only to solve the problems

that time has contrived for us. Among these not the least is that of

the first site of the town. Not one of the churches in Southampton is

of any great beauty or interest, but it is astonishing to find that the

mother church is not in the town at all, but at least half a mile

outside it upon the north. Leland, as I have already said, was told,

when he was in Southampton in 1546, that the first town did not occupy

the site of that we see but was further to the north, where St Mary's

stands. The fact that St Mary's is the mother church would seen to

confirm this. Moreover, there is no mention in the Domesday Survey of

any church at all within the borough of "Hantune," and though we may

think that the church of St John then existed, St John's was never the

mother church; this was St Mary's which possessed all the tithes of the

town. In the time of Henry II. we find the King granting to the Priory

of St Denys, founded in 1124 by Henry I., a Priory of Austin Canons,

his "chapels" of St Michael, the Holy Rood, St Laurence and All Saints,

that is all the churches save St John's already granted to the Abbey of

St Mary of Lire, in Southampton. But that these chapels had some

relation to the mother church of St Mary might seem certain. Indeed the

rector of St Mary's was continually in controversy with the canons as

to his rights, and eventually, in the thirteenth century, he won the

day. In any case the mother church of Southampton was St Mary's,

outside the walls of the town. That a Saxon church stood upon this site

is certain, and this was possibly represented in Leland's time by the

chapel of St Nicholas, "a poor and small thing," which then stood to

the East of "the great church of Our Lady," which he saw and which

probably dated from the time of Henry I. This church was, alas,

destroyed by the town only a few years later because its spire was said

to guide the French cruisers into Southampton Water, and the stones

were used to mend the roads. It may be that the chancel escaped, or it

may be that a new and much smaller church was erected in 1579. This,

whichever it was, was much neglected till in 1711 a nave was built on

to it. Then in 1723 the chancel was destroyed, and a new one built. In

1833 this was rebuilt, and then in 1878 a new church was built, in

place of the old which was pulled down, by Street. Thus in St Mary's

church, the mother church of Southampton to-day, we have only a

lifeless modern building.

Much the same fate has befallen the churches within the walls of

Southampton. The oldest, that of St John, was pulled down in the

seventeenth century, that of Holy Rood, in the High Street, was rebuilt

about fifty years ago, so was St Laurence, while All Saints was

destroyed in the eighteenth century. The only ancient church remaining

is that of St Michael, which, though not destroyed, was ruined in 1826.

It remains, however, in part, a Norman building, with an interesting

font of the twelfth century, a lectern of the fifteenth century, and a

fine tomb with the effigy of a priest in mass vestments.

The same fate which has so brutally overtaken the churches of

Southampton has, with perhaps more excuse, fallen upon the old

religious houses. The Priory of St Denys, founded by Henry I., upon

which all these churches within the walls were in a sense dependent,

has been totally destroyed, a piece of ruined wall alone remaining,

the present church of St Denys dating from 1868.

Nor does much remain of the Hospital of St Julian or God's House,

founded for the poor in the town, by Gervase le Riche, in 1197. It was

one of the most important hospitals in the diocese of Winchester, and

in 1343 the King, its protector, gave it to Queen's College, Oxford,

just founded by Queen Philippa. As the possession of this college it

survived the suppression, and was still carrying on its good work in

1560. About 1567, however, certain Walloons, refugees from the Low

Countries, settled in Southampton, and these were granted the use of St

Julian's Chapel by Queen's College.

The house should have remained to us, but that in 1861, by as black an

act of vandalism as was ever perpetrated, this seat of learning swept

away all the old domestic buildings of the hospital, which dated from

its foundation, and in their place erected what we might expect, at the

same time "restoring" the chapel of St Julian, of course, out of all

recognition. May St Julian forget Queen's College, Oxford, for ever and

ever.

[Illustration: THE TUDOR HOUSE, OPPOSITE ST MICHAEL'S CHURCH, SOUTHAMPTON]

Not far from this hospital for the poor the Grey Friars built their

house in 1237, or rather the burgesses of Southampton built it for

them, including a cloister of stone, but nothing remains at all of this

house.

For the most part, too, the great houses that of old filled

Southampton, and helped to glorify it, are gone. "The chiefest house,"

writes Leland, "is the house that Huttoft, late customer of

Southampton, builded on the west side of the town. The house that

Master Lightster, chief baron of the King's exchequer, dwelleth in, is

very fair; the house that Master Mylles, the recorder, dwelleth in, is

fair, and so be the houses of Niccotine and Guidote, Italians." Of

these, what remains? Nothing. The only noble dwelling is that called

Tudor House, in St Michael's Square, a fine half-timbered building,

and of this nothing is known.

No, the only thing to be enjoyed in Southampton to-day is the old wall

with its gateways, that upon the west still valiantly outfaces the

modern world and recalls for us all that noble great past out of which

we are come. And yet I suppose Southampton is fulfilling its purpose

to-day more wonderfully than ever before. It was once the port of

England for those dominions oversea we held in France. They are gone,

but others we have since acquired, though less fair by far, remain. It

is to these Southampton looks to-day, south and east, as of old over

how many thousand miles of blue water.

England of My Heart : Spring · 第 17 / 21 章