CHAPTER X

THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS

It is not often on one's way, even in England of my heart, that one

can come upon a place, a lonely hill-side or a city, and say: this is

a spot upon which the history of the world was decided; yet I was able

on that showery morning, as I went up out of Hastings towards Battle

and saw all the level of Pevensey full of rain, to recall two such

places in which I had stood already upon my pilgrimage. For I had

lingered a whole morning upon the battlefield where the Romans first

met and overthrew our forefathers and thus brought Britain within the

Empire; while at Canterbury I had been in the very place where, after

an incredible disaster, England was persuaded back again out of

barbarism into the splendour of the Faith and of civilisation. These

places are more than English, they are European sanctuaries, two of

the greater sites of the history of Europe. Perhaps as much cannot

rightly be said for the hill where the town of Battle stands, the

landing-place at Pevensey and the port of Hastings.

And yet I don't know. What a different England it would have been if

William of Normandy had failed or had never landed here at all. And if

such an England could have endured how changed would have been the

whole destiny of Europe. I am not sure after all that we ought not to

be as uplifted by the memory of Hastings as we are or should be by the

memory of Caesar's advent. At any rate since Hastings was fought and

won in the eleventh century any national prejudices that belong wholly

to the modern world are quite as much out of place with regard to it as

they are with regard to Caesar or St Augustine. And if we must be

indignant and remember old injuries that as often as not were sheer

blessings, scarcely in disguise, let us reserve our hatred, scorn and

contempt for those damned pagan and pirate hordes that first from

Schleswig-Holstein and later from Denmark descended upon our Christian

country, and for a time overwhelmed us with their brutish barbarism.

As for me I am for the Duke of Normandy; without him England were not

the England of my heart.

Now the great and beautiful road up out of Hastings, seven miles into

Battle, is not only one of the loveliest in Britain, every yard of it

is full of Duke William's army, and thence we may see how in its

wonderful simplicity all that mighty business which was decided that

October morning on the hill-top that for so long Battle Abbey guarded

as a holy place, was accomplished. For looking southward over the

often steep escarpment, always between three and five hundred feet

over the sea plain, we may see Pevensey Castle, the landing, Hastings,

the port, and at last come to Battle, the scene of the fight that gave

England to the Norman for our enormous good and glory and honour.

I say that the struggle for the English crown between Duke William of

Normandy and Harold, King of England, was in no sense of the word a

national struggle; on the contrary, it was a personal question fought

and decided by the Duke of Normandy and his men, and Harold and his

men. Indeed the society of that time was altogether innocent of any

impulse which could be called national. That society, all of one piece

as it was, both in England and in Gaul, was wholly Feudal, though

somewhat less precisely so here than in Normandy. Men's allegiance

was not given to any such vague unity as England, but to a feudal

lord, in whose quarrel they were bound to fight, in whose victory they

shared, and in whose defeat they suffered. The quarrel between King

Harold and Duke William was in no sense of the word a national

quarrel but a personal dispute in which the feudal adherents of both

parties were necessarily involved, the gage being the crown and spoil

of England. This is at once obvious when we remember that the ground

of William's claim to the throne was a promise received from King

Edward personally, unconfirmed by council or witan, but endorsed for

his own part by Harold when shipwreck had placed him in Duke William's

power. Such were the true elements of the dispute.

It is true that the society of that time was, as I have said, all of

one piece both in England and in Gaul, but it is certain that in

England that society was less precisely organised, less conscious of

itself, less logical in its structure, in a word less real and more

barbarous than that of the Normans. The victory of Duke William meant

that the sluggish English system would be replaced or at any rate

reinvigorated by an energy and an intelligence foreign to it, without

which it might seem certain that civilisation here would have fallen

into utter decay or have perished altogether. The service of Duke

William then, while not so great as that of Caesar and certainly far

less than that of St Augustine, was of the same kind; he rescued

England from barbarism and brought us back into the full light of

Europe. The campaign in which that great service was achieved divides

itself into two parts, the first of which comes to an end with the

decisive action at Hastings which gave Duke William the crown; the

second consists of three great fighting marches, the result of which

was the conquest of England. I am only here concerned with the first

part of that campaign, and more especially with the great engagement

which was fought out upon the hill-top which the ruins of Battle Abbey

still mark. Let us consider this.

Harold, the second son of Earl Godwin, was crowned King of England at

Westminster upon the feast of the Epiphany in the year 1066. When Duke

William heard of it he was both angry and amazed, and at once began to

call up his feudatories to lend him aid to enforce his claim to the

Crown of England against King Harold. This was not an easy thing to

do, nor could it be done at all quickly. It was necessary to gather a

great host.

Those lords who owed him allegiance had as often as not to be

persuaded or bribed to fulfil their obligation; and they with their

followers and dependents were not enough; it was necessary to engage

as many as possible of those chiefs who did not own him as lord; these

had to be bought by promises of gain and honour. Also a considerable

fleet had to be built. All this took time, and Harold was therefore

perfectly aware of what Duke William intended, and gathered his forces,

both of ships and men, to meet him in the south of England. All through

the spring and summer he waited, in vain. Meantime, soon after Easter,

a strange portent appeared in the heavens "the comet star which some

men call the hairy star," and no man could say what it might mean. It

was not this, however, which delayed William; he was not ready. It is

possible that had he been able to advance during the summer the whole

history of England might have been different. As it was, when autumn

was at hand with the Birthday of the Blessed Virgin, Harold's men were

out of provisions and weary of waiting; they were allowed to disperse,

Harold himself went to London and the fleet beat up into the Thames,

not without damage and loss, against the wind, which, had he but known

it, now alone delayed the Duke.

But that wind which kept William in port brought another enemy of

Harold's to England with some three hundred galleys, Hardrada of

Norway, who came to support the claims of Tostig, now his man, King

Harold's exiled brother, to Northumbria; for the Northumbrians had

rebelled against him, and Harold had acquiesced in their choice of

Morkere for lord. Neither Morkere nor his brother Edwin, with their

local forces, was able to meet Hardrada with success. They attempted

to enter York but at Fulford on the 20th September they were routed,

and Hardrada held the great northern capital.

Meanwhile Harold had not been idle. Gathering his scattered forces he

marched north with amazing speed, covering the two hundred miles

between London and Tadcaster in nine days, to meet this new foe; but

this almost marvellous performance left the south undefended. He

entered York on September 25th, and on the same day, seven miles from

the city at Stamford Bridge, he engaged the enemy and broke them

utterly. Three days later William landed at Pevensey.

What could Harold do? He did all that a man could do. William had

landed at Pevensey upon Thursday, September 28th. It is probable that

Harold heard of it on the following Monday, October 2nd. Immediately

he set out for London, which by hard riding he reached, though

probably with but a few men, on Friday, October 6th, an amazing

achievement, only made possible by the great Roman road between York

and London. Upon the following Tuesday and Wednesday he was joined by

his victorious forces from the north, who had thus repeated their

unequalled feat and marched south again as they had north some two

hundred miles in nine days. Upon Wednesday, October 11th, Harold

marched out of London at the head of this force, and by the evening of

October 13th--a day curiously enough to be kept later as the feast of

St Edward the Confessor--this heroic force had marched in forty-eight

hours some sixty miles across country, and was in position upon that

famous hill some two hours from the coast, overlooking the landing-

place of William at Pevensey and the port he had seized at Hastings.

That great march has, I think, never been equalled by any British army

before or since.

It might seem strange that William, who had landed at Pevensey upon

the 28th of September, had not advanced at all from the sea-coast when

Harold and his men appeared upon that hill after their great march

from York upon October 13th. But in fact William, Norman as he was,

had a very clear idea of what he intended to do. He left little to

chance. He landed his men at Pevensey, seized upon Hastings and

beached his ships; then for a whole fortnight he awaited the hot and

weary return of Harold. Harold appeared upon the evening of October

13th. Upon the following day, a Saturday, the battle William had

expected was fought, Harold was slain and his heroic force destroyed.

The story of that day is well known. Harold's forces were drawn up upon

the ridge where the ruins of Battle Abbey now stand. William, upon the

thirteenth, had marched out of Hastings and had occupied the hill to

the east called Telham, where to-day stands Telham Court. In those days

probably no village or habitation of any sort occupied either of these

heights; one of the chroniclers calls the battlefield the place of

"the Hoar Apple Tree."

It is said that the night of October 13th was passed by Harold and his

men in feasting and in jollity, while the Normans confessed their sins

and received absolution. However that may be, in the full daylight,

about nine o'clock of Saturday, October 14th, the battle was joined.

This tremendous affair which was to have such enormous consequences

was opened by the minstrel Taellefer, who had besought leave of Duke

William to strike the first blow. Between the two armies he rode

singing the Song of Roland, and high into the air he flung his lance

and caught it three times e'er he hurled it at last into the amazed

English, to fall at last, slain by a hundred javelins as he rode back

into the Norman front.

Thus was begun the most famous battle ever fought in England. It

endured without advantage either way for some six hours till the

Norman horse, flung back from the charge, fell into the Malfosse in

utter confusion, and the day seemed lost to the Normans. But Odo,

Bishop of Bayeux, retrieved it and from that time, about three

o'clock, the Normans began to have the advantage. The battle seems to

have been decided at last by two clever devices attributed to William

himself. He determined to break Harold's line, and since he had not

been able to do this by repeated charges, he determined to try a

stratagem. Therefore he ordered his men to feign flight, and thus to

draw the English after them in pursuit. This was successfully done, and

when the English followed they were easily surrounded and slain.

William's other device is said to have been that of shooting high into

the air so that the arrows might turn and fall as from the sky upon

the foe. This stratagem is said to have been the cause of Harold's

death; for it was an arrow falling from on high and piercing him

through the right eye that killed him or so grievously wounded him

that he was left for dead, to be finally killed by Eustace of Boulogne

and three other knights.

With Harold down there can have been little hope of victory left to

his men, and indeed before night William had planted the Pope's banner

where Harold's had floated and held the battlefield. There he supped

among the dead, and having spent Sunday, October 15th, in burying the

fallen, he set out not for London, but for Dover, for his simple and

precise plan was to secure all the entries into England from the

continent before securing the capital. When he had done this he

marched up into England by the Watling Street, burned Southwark,

crossed the Thames at Wallingford, received there the submission of

the Archbishop of Canterbury, and at Berkhampstead the submission of

London and the offer of the Crown which he received at Westminster at

Mass upon Christmas Day; twelve days less than a year after Harold

had been crowned in the same place.

One comes to Battle to-day along that great and beautiful road, high

up over the sea plain, which still seems full with memories of the

Norman advance from Hastings, thinking of all that great business. If

one comes up on Tuesday, upon payment of sixpence, one is admitted

to the gardens of the house in which lie the ruins of the

abbey William founded in thankfulness to God for his victory, the high

altar of which was set upon the very spot where Harold fell: "Hic

Harold Rex interfectus est."

It was while William was encamped upon Telham Hill, expecting the

battle of the morrow, that he vowed an abbey to God if He gave him the

victory. He was heard by a monk of Marmoutier, a certain William,

called the Smith, who, when Duke William had received the crown at

Westminster, reminded him of his promise. The King acknowledged his

obligation and bade William of Marmoutier to see to its fulfilment. The

monk thereupon returned to Marmoutier, and choosing four others,

brought them to England; but finding the actual battlefield unsuited

for a monastery, since there was no water there, he designed to build

lower down towards the west. Now when the King heard of it he was angry

and bade them build upon the field itself, nor would he hear them

patiently when they asserted there was no water there, for, said he:

"If God spare me I will so fully provide this place that wine shall be

more abundant there than water is in any abbey in the land." Then said

they that there was no stone. But he answered that he would bring them

stone from Caen. This, however, was not done, for a quarry was found

close by. Also the King richly endowed the house, giving it all the

land within a radius of a league, and there the abbot was to be

absolute lord free of bishop and royal officer, [Footnote: The unique

privileges of the abbot of Battle included the right to "kill and take

one or two beasts with dogs" in any of the King's forests.] and very

many manors beside. Yet ten years elapsed before the Abbey of Battle

was sufficiently completed to receive an abbot. In 1076, however,

Robert Blancard, one of the four monks chosen by William of Marmoutier,

was appointed, but he died e'er he came to Battle. Then one Gausbert

was sent from Marmoutier, and he came with four of his brethren and

was consecrated "Abbot of St Martin's of the place of Battle." Beside

the extraordinary gifts and privileges which the Conqueror

had bestowed upon the Abbey in his lifetime, upon his death he

bequeathed to it his royal embroidered cloak, a splendid collection of

relics and a portable altar containing relics, possibly the very one

upon which Harold had sworn in his captivity in Normandy to support

his claim to England. William is said to have intended the monastery

to be filled with sixty monks. We do not know whether this number ever

really served there. In 1393, but that was after the Black Death,

there appear to have been some twenty-seven, and in 1404 but thirty.

In 1535, on the eve of the Suppression, Battle Abbey was visited by

the infamous Layton who reported to Thomas Cromwell that "all but two

or three of the monks were guilty of unnatural crimes and were

traitors," adding that the abbot was an arrant churl and that "this

black sort of develish monks I am sorry to know are past amendment."

Little more than two years later the abbot surrendered the abbey and

received a pension of one hundred pounds. The furniture and so forth

of the house was then very poor. "So beggary a house I never see, nor

so filthy stuff," Layton writes to Wriothesley. "I will not 20s. for

all the hangings in this house...." In August 1538 the place was

granted to Sir Anthony Browne, who is said to have removed the cloak

of the Conqueror and the famous Battle Abbey Roll to Cowdray. This

rascal razed the church and cloisters to the ground, and made the

abbot's lodging his dwelling. It is said that one night as he was

feasting a monk appeared before him and solemnly cursed him,

prophesying that his family should perish by fire. To the fulfilment of

this curse Cowdray bears witness even to this day.

[Illustration: BATTLE ABBEY]

What spoliation, time and neglect have left of the Abbey is beautiful,

especially the great fourteenth century gateway which faces the Market

Green. Nothing save the foundations is left of the great church. From

the terrace, doubtless, we look across the battlefield, but all is so

changed, the bleak hill-top has become a superb garden, that it is

impossible to realise still less to reconstruct the battle, and indeed

since we can only visit the place amid a crowd of tourists, our present

discomfort makes any remembrance of the fight or of the great and

solemn abbey which for so long turned that battlefield into a sanctuary

impossible.

Nor indeed are we more fortunate in the parish church which was

originally built by Abbot Ralph in the twelfth century. It has been so

tampered with and restored that little remains that is unspoilt. There,

and I think most fittingly, lies that Sir Anthony Browne who got Battle

Abbey from the King who had stolen it.

Now when I had seen all this I went on my way, and because I was

unhappy on account of all that theft and destruction, and because where

once there had been altar and monks to serve it, now there was none,

and because what had once been common to us all was now become the

pleasure of one man, I went up out of Battle into the hills by the

great road through the woods and so on and up by Dallington and

Heathfield and so down and down and down all a summer day across the

Weald till at evening I came to Lewes where I slept. I remember

nothing of that day but the wind and the hills and the great sun of

May which went ever before me into the west so that I soon forgot to

be sorry and rejoiced as I went.

England of My Heart : Spring · 第 10 / 21 章