HIS IDIOSYNCRASIES, AND SOME OF YOURS

All games of cards, even the simplest--those that require but little

thought or mental analysis--afford an excellent field for the study

of human nature.

Players frequently permit little mannerisms and idiosyncrasies to

intrude, and, if not corrected at the start, the habit is likely to

grow.

For the most part such offenses are, of themselves, but trivial

breaches, as it were, of the etiquette of the card-table; but at

times they are intensely irritating and the cause of some displeasure

that finds relief in word or action, both of which may quite

seriously disrupt bridge harmony.

When a rubber of bridge is in contemplation and after the

preliminaries you sit down to play, it is just possible that “your

partner” may have his ideas about the game. If you have omitted to

ascertain in advance what they are, it will help neither of you in

the least if you immediately begin to differ as to leads, discards

and signals. Your game will strongly resemble a tug-of-war--both at

opposite ends of the rope, instead of at one end pulling conjointly.

It is an invariable custom that the player who cuts the lowest card

has the choice of seats and the cards. If “your partner” objects to

moving do not advise that he would better change. Very likely his

reasons why he should not are quite as urgent as any that you can

advance to the contrary, and why interject at the start anything that

shall tend to create a slight element of discord.

If you ask “your partner” for advice rest assured of criticism during

the remainder of play, whether it be for a rubber or for an evening.

It is one thing to consult, quite another to request. The moment that

you show subserviency you admit superiority, and there are those who

play bridge, and some with little experience or knowledge, who as

critics, in their own estimation, are _par excellence_. Better agree

with “your partner” at the start on the common principles that are

essential to be observed, and then play with an eloquent silence that

will command respect and admiration at the table.

If you pass the make with a weak hand and your partner declares

“No-Trumps,” look as cheerful as possible, and make up your mind to

do the best that you can with the cards that have been given to you.

If you begin by abusing your partner for the make, you practically

say that your hand is weak and that the situation is hopeless. That

is most valuable information for your adversaries.

Some times “your partner,” sitting behind the dummy hand, has a queer

way of waking up just as you are leading a thirteenth card from his

hand, and asking you whether you have a card of the suit led, thus

distracting your thoughts from the selection of a proper discard.

The partner behind the silent hand, to hasten the play, has no right

to touch or suggest the use of a single card from those which lie

exposed before him, yet often players find the impulse to push out a

card from dummy almost irresistible.

Haste and waste are antitypes in bridge as they are in everything.

Playing the hand as if you are in a hurry to catch a train may lend

a spectacular appearance to your disposition of the cards, but many

a rubber is lost by not stopping to give the situation the careful

thought that it demands.

The occupant of the “high chair” usually has a monopoly of giving

advice. That kindly and courteous soul who can see it all--and who

may know it all, or imagine he does, which amounts to the same thing

in this particular case--and who sees no hand played without voicing

personal ideas as to the methods used, is a well-meaning adjunct to

the game, even if occasionally distressing.

When a player spreads out all the cards of an abandoned spade hand,

scrutinizes each with an air of anxious concern, and conjectures

as to what might have happened had some other declaration been

attempted, it tries everybody at the table. What is done with a hand

cannot be undone. All time at bridge should be devoted earnestly to

what confronts a player, not to what is of the past.

A penalty of some kind should be exacted from the player who makes a

practice of insisting that the dealer has led from the wrong hand.

It is very disconcerting and frequently disturbs the one criticized

to such an extent as to interrupt the train of thought for the

subsequent lead.

Post mortems have their interest and are unmistakably convincing as a

rule. Don’t venture upon them unless you are certain what the scalpel

is going to reveal, and above all things when the corpse is buried

don’t continue to talk of the harassing details with another hand

awaiting play.

Be careful how you criticize in all cases. It is not an invariable

rule that he who points out the first mistake had the best reason for

doing so. How about a blunder that may have been committed earlier by

the critic himself, and the possible embarrassment that may follow if

a complete analysis of all the cards played is insisted upon.

There are personalities in bridge that can be avoided in addition to

arguments with “your partner” or public criticism of his play. The

actual time saved in “claiming all the rest” will not shorten the

game by two minutes. Better play all the cards out and save yourself

the possible mortification of having it placed in evidence that you

had not read your hand, that of “your partner” and those of your

adversaries, as intelligibly as you had imagined.

Bridge knowledge is not acquired in a moment. Some persons are

naturally better players than others. Intuition is an aid to some,

the ability to forecast assists others, but both are powerless

without a thorough grasp of all the details that are accessory to the

game.

In connection with this subject it may not be out of place to observe

that while the object of the game is to take tricks, the same number

can be made in a great many different ways. That you did not happen

to lose on a hand is no palliation for the very bad play of which

you may have been guilty. Always bear in mind the fact that there

is a right way and a wrong way to play, and that the acquirement of

playing by the right method should be the purpose of all who devote

their time to the game.

Play bridge as if a genuine pleasure, whether winner or loser, and

eventually you will discover that it is far easier to win in that

spirit than it was with the critical idea predominating; and, if you

do lose, it is with the consciousness of good will toward your fellow

man, who happens, in this case, to be “your partner.”

Endeavor to be serene under all circumstances. Keep in mind that it

is a pastime for sound mental training. Never forget that a cool head

is a most valuable essential, and try just as far as possible to sink

all peccadilloes in play, avoid all whimsicalities and correct all

personal mannerisms.

Advanced Bridge; The Higher Principles of the Game Analysed and Explained · 第 160 / 256 题