I looked at him, holding my head in my hands.

“I couldn’t swear that I understand that,” I said slowly. “And I

repeat, that it looks like lifting yourself by your own bootstraps.”

The homely simile did not dismay him. He pointed a finger at me as he

spoke:

“You’ve seen a chip of wood bobbing on the ripples of a pond. Now you

think the chip is moving; now the water. Yet neither is moving; the

only motion is of an abstract thing called a wave.

“You’ve seen those ‘illusion’ diagrams, for instance this one of a

group of cubes. (Diagram is on opposite page.) Make up your mind that

you are looking down upon their upper surfaces, and indeed they seem

below you. Now change your mind, and imagine that you are down below,

looking up. Behold, you see their lower surfaces; you are indeed below

them. You have ‘gone somewhere,’ yet there has been no translation of

anything. You have merely changed coordinates.”

[Illustration: _Make up your mind that you are looking down upon the

upper surfaces of the cubes, and indeed they seem below you. Now change

your mind, and imagine that you are looking up. Behold, you see their

lower surfaces._]

“Which do you think will drive me insane more quickly--if you _show_ me

what you mean, or if you keep on talking without showing me?”

“I’ll try to show you. There are some types of mind, you know,

that cannot grasp the idea of relativity. It isn’t the mathematics

involved that matters; it’s just the inability of some types of mental

organization to grasp the fact that the mind of the observer endows his

environment with certain properties which have no absolute existence.

Thus, when you walk through the garden at night the moon floats from

one tree top to another. Is your mind good enough to invert this: make

the moon stand still and let the trees move backwards. Can you do that?

If so, you can ‘go somewhere’ into another dimension.”

* * * * *

Woleshensky rose and walked to the window. His office was an

appropriate setting for such a modern discussion as was ours; situated

in a new, ultramodern building on the University campus, the varnish

glossy, the walls clean, the books neatly arranged behind clean glass,

the desk in most orderly array; the office was just as precise and

modern and wonderful as the mind of its occupant.

“When do you want to go?” he asked.

“Now!”

“Then, I have two more things to explain to you. The fourth dimension

is just as much _here_ as anywhere else. Right here around you and me

things exist and go forward in the fourth dimension; but we do not see

them and are not conscious of them, because we are confined to our own

three. Secondly: if we name the four coordinates as Einstein does, _x_,

_y_, _z_, and _t_, then we exist in _x_, _y_, and _z_, and move freely

about in them; but are powerless to move in _t_. Why? Because _t_ is

the time dimension; and the time dimension is a difficult one for

biological structures that depend on irreversible chemical reactions

for their existence. But, biochemical reactions can take place along

any one of the other dimensions as well as along _t_.

“Therefore, let us transform coordinates. Rotate the property of

chemical irreversibility from _t_ to _z_. Since we are organically able

to exist (or at least to perceive) in only three dimensions at once,

our new time dimension will be _z_. We shall be unconscious of _z_ and

cannot travel in it. Our activities and consciousness will take place

along _x_, _y_, and _t_.

“According to fiction writers, to switch into the _t_ dimension, some

sort of an apparatus with an electrical field ought to be necessary.

It is not. You need nothing more to rotate into the _t_ dimension than

you do to stop the moon and make the trees move as you ride down the

road; or than you do to turn the cubes upside down. It is a matter of

_relativity_.”

The Gostak and the Doshes · 第 4 / 8 题