METEORIC MEN AND PLANETARY MEN

There are meteoric men and there are planetary men. The men who now

and then flash across our intellectual heavens, drawing all eyes for

the moment, these I call meteoric men. What a contrast they present to

the planetary men, who are slow to attract our attention, but who

abide, and do not grow dim! Poets like Emerson, Whitman, and

Wordsworth were slow to gain recognition, but the radiance of their

names grows. I call such a poet as Swinburne meteoric, a poet of a

certain kind of brilliant power, but who reads him now? Stephen

Phillips with his "Marpessa" had a brief vogue, and then disappeared

in the darkness. When I was a young man, I remember, a Scottish poet,

Alexander Smith, published a "Life Drama," which dazzled the literary

world for a brief period, but it is forgotten now. What attention

Kidd's "Social Evolution" attracted a generation or more ago! But it

is now quite neglected. It was not sound. When he died a few years ago

there was barely an allusion to it in the public press. The same fate

befell that talented man, Buckle, with his "Civilization in England."

Delia Bacon held the ear of the public for a time with the

Bacon-Shakespeare theory. Pulpit men like Joseph Cook and Adirondack

Murray blazed out, and then were gone. Half a century ago or more an

Englishman by the name of M. F. Tupper published a book called

"Proverbial Philosophy" which had a brief season of popularity, and

then went out like a rush-light, or a blaze of tissue paper. Novels

like Miss Sprague's "Earnest Trifler," Du Maurier's "Trilby," and

Wallace's "Ben Hur" have had their little day, and been forgotten. In

the art world the Cubists' crazy work drew the attention of the public

long enough for it to be seen how spurious and absurd it was.

Brownell's war poems turned out to be little more than brief

fireworks. Joaquin Miller, where is he? Fifty years ago Gail Hamilton

was much in the public eye, and Grace Greenwood, and Fanny Fern; and

in Bohemian circles, there were Agnes Franz and Ada Clare, but they

are all quite forgotten now.

The meteoric men would not appreciate President Wilson's wise saying

that he would rather fail in a cause that in time is bound to succeed

than to succeed in a cause that in time is bound to fail. Such men

cannot wait for success. Meteoric men in politics, like Elaine and

Conkling, were brilliant men, but were politicians merely. What

fruitful or constructive ideas did they leave us? Could they forget

party in the good of the whole country? Are not the opponents of the

League of Nations of our own day in the same case--without, however,

shining with the same degree of brilliancy? To some of our

Presidents--Polk, Pierce, Buchanan--we owe little or nothing.

Roosevelt's career, though meteoric in its sudden brilliancy, will

shine with a steady light down the ages. He left lasting results. He

raised permanently the standard of morality in politics and business

in this country by the gospel of the square deal. Woodrow Wilson,

after the mists and clouds are all dispelled, will shine serenely on.

He is one of the few men of the ages.

The Last Harvest · 第 98 / 107 题