II

"THE BURGHERS OF CALAIS" (1889)--RODIN AND VICTOR HUGO--THE STATUE OF

BALZAC (1898)

At the time the plaster model of "The Burghers of Calais" was first

offered to the judgment of the public, in 1889, nearly seven years had

gone by since Rodin had originally undertaken the group.

This is the period of my own childish memories of the master. He was a

frequent visitor at the home of my father, who lived in Sèvres, on the

outskirts of Paris.

Rodin, with his silent nature, apparently so full of calm and

meditation, delighted in the ardor, the patriotic enthusiasm, the

ferment of character, the brilliant conversation of that powerful,

original writer, my father; he loved his books, too, spirited and

passionate like himself, and possessing a vigor of expression that was

new to French letters.

Léon Cladel received his friends on Sundays. In winter they gathered in

the drawing-room, in summer on a terrace shaded by great chestnuts and

limes, where thousands of birds twittered and chattered so energetically

that at dusk they ended by drowning the voices of the visitors. Among

the latter were writers, painters, and sculptors, several of whom have

since become famous. Among them were Auguste Rodin and his colleague,

his dear comrade, Jules Dalou, creator of many fine works, notably the

monument to Eugène Delacroix which stands in the Luxembourg Gardens.

The sculptor of "The Burghers of Calais" was then barely fifty. He was

far from possessing the immense fame that is his to-day, but artists

already regarded him as a master. Of medium height, robust, with large

shoulders and heavy limbs, placid and deliberate in appearance, never

gesticulating, he himself resembled a block of stone; but above this

heavy base his countenance, with its broadly designed features and its

gray-blue eyes, expressed an extraordinarily keen intelligence and

finesse. Despite my youth I was struck by this physiognomy, so singular

and so penetrating, and also by the remarkable shyness that made the

sculptor blush whenever he was addressed. Since then innumerable

portraits have familiarized people with these features, which with age

have settled into an expression of authority and firm will; his strange

timidity has disappeared with time, with the consciousness of his

strength, with his having become accustomed to glory. Moreover, Rodin

has become a ready talker. Of old he listened intently, but always

held his peace; at most a few words, spoken in a soft, clear voice,

escaped from the waves of his long beard. He would at once relapse into

silence, while with a slow movement giving his beard an instinctive

caress with his large, square, irresistible hand, the true hand of a

builder. But when he raised his eyelids, almost always lowered, the

transparent eye, that limpid gray-blue eye, betrayed a perspicacity

that was almost malicious, almost cunning: one felt that he penetrated

through the forms of people to their very souls; and this he fixed so

skilfully in the clay of his busts that his models were not always

pleased with it. Many of Rodin's portraits have been refused by sitters

offended by their pitiless realism.

[Illustration: STATUE OF BASTIEN-LEPAGE.]

Sometimes my father kept Rodin and Jules Dalou to dinner. The two

sculptors were devoted to each other. They were comrades from of old who

had traveled together the hard road of beginners; since their student

days at the Petite Ecole they had many times reëncountered each other

in the same workshops, where they had received the same contemptuous

wages for their long days of labor. They felt a profound esteem for each

other's talent, different as these talents were, altogether opposed, in

fact, as were their natures; and it was a fine, a lovely thing to see

them bring forward each other's respective merits. Alas! I shall have

to tell later how an artistic rivalry came one day to destroy this noble

friendship.

The appearance of "The Burghers of Calais" aroused a flood of enthusiasm

in the world of art. I remember it well. At that time I was only a

young school-girl, and my father was unwilling to allow me to "miss

my classes" in order to accompany him to the opening of the Rodin

Exhibition. After all, the lessons I received that day, following them

quite absent-mindedly, were they worth the lesson I should have received

from the contemplation of that masterpiece, even if my age would have

prevented me from quite understanding it? Beauty is always the most

fertilizing teacher.

A rich art-lover, acting with the municipal authorities of Calais, had

ordered from Rodin the statue of Eustache de Saint-Pierre, the Calais

hero whose devotion had in the fourteenth century, during the Hundred

Years' War, saved the city when it was besieged by King Edward III of

England.

Rodin, true to his principles, sought as ever to approach his subject

from the quick of reality. He consulted history. He read the old

chronicles of France, above all those of Jean Froissart, who was

contemporaneous with the event and almost a witness of it. Froissart was

a man of the fourteenth century, a man of the age of the cathedrals,

and therefore himself a Gothic. His narrative has the force, the

savor, the naïveté, the simple and profound art of the masters of that

marvelous epoch. What a source of emotion for Rodin, a Gothic likewise

in his faith and his artistic rectitude! He caught fire at the recital

of the old master as at the voice of a brother-in-arms. He read, he

learned that Edward III would not consent to spare the city of Calais

from pillage and destruction unless six of her richest citizens would

come out to him dressed only in their shirts, barefoot, with ropes about

their necks, bringing him the keys of the city and their own heads to be

cut off. In response to this terrible message, Eustache de Saint-Pierre

and five of his fellow-citizens, taking counsel with the notables

of the place, at once rose to go to the king's camp. They set forth

immediately, escorted on their way by the hunger-stricken multitude,

weeping and groaning over their sacrifice and "adoring them with pity."

This was the vision which from that time on took possession of Rodin,

dominating him and never leaving him. But it was not an isolated person

detached from his environment that he saw: it was the six martyrs just

as they appeared in history, just as they were in life. In his thought

he followed this band of heroes marching to the sacrifice in the midst

of the weeping city. He could not bring himself to separate them either

from their whole number or from their tragic surroundings. Therefore,

in accordance with the genius of his theme, that is to say, with

historic truth, he would make all six of them, and he would insist that

they should be set up in the midst of the city, among the old houses,

where they would continue to live their sublime life in the heart of the

very town that they had saved.

For the price of one statue, therefore, Rodin set out to execute six.

He rented a vast atelier in the rue des Fourneaux, in the Vaugirard

Quarter. He worked unceasingly. To keep this enormous group in good

condition, to maintain the proper temperature, he moistened the clay

morning and evening, having as his _garçon d'atelier_ no one but his

devoted wife, who had become thoroughly experienced in these matters.

Despite all, accidents would happen: the clay would give way, an

arm, modeled with his habitual exactitude, would fall and have to be

laboriously repaired; but the fervent modeler never hesitated in his

work, and on the day when he exhibited "The Burghers of Calais" at the

house of Georges Petit the praise and the homage that sprang forth from

the soul of all true artists recompensed him magnificently, bringing

him the intoxicating caress of dawning glory. They spoke, in connection

with the "Burghers," of the image-makers of our cathedrals; they spoke

of the statues of Claus Sluters, of the famous statues of the "Well of

Moses" at Dijon. Really, in the Calais monument Rodin is more than ever

under the Gothic influence in subject, in thought, and in execution.

The equilibrium of the figures composing the group is the same as that

of the "Saint John the Baptist." The long shifts that cover the naked

bodies of his heroes recall those draperies in vertical folds dear to

the Middle Ages. The very modeling of the figures and of the faces

increases this effect of elongation caused by the fall of the fabric;

the modeling in large planes, the vigorous accents, the simple and

pathetic movements are certainly those of the sort that out-of-door

sculpture calls for. In twenty years Rodin had made innumerable visits

to the Gothic monuments. Here was the result of his tours of France. He

had made them in order to recapture the traditions of art from the hands

of our wonderful old stone-cutters, and his heart must have throbbed

with joy when he was told that in his own hands that tradition had

suffered no loss.

Naturally, the appearance of "The Burghers of Calais," even that,

could not fail to have its share of comic anecdote, that bitter and

painful humor that marks the adventures of genius in its struggle with

vulgarity. Let us not complain too much. The contrast between these

adventures and the proud way of life of a great man, the regularity

of his hours of toil--it is this that creates opposition, movement,

life. The elect soul feels a savage joy in these blows which shake it

like a tree tormented by brutal hands, a tree aware of the vigor of its

resistance and its ever-increasing tenacity.

The municipality of Calais, hearing that there were to be six statues

instead of the one that had been ordered, took umbrage, and deliberated

for two years. The heroic group waited, and, as it encumbered Rodin's

atelier, where other works were going forward, it was placed in a

stable. At last the worthy town authorities decided to assign it a

site. Naturally, the site in question was exactly opposed to the ideas

of the master--ideas that had been thought out and that were perfectly

logical, based on the laws of decorative art and still more determined

by that infallible criterion, taste. Rodin desired that his monument

should be in the center of the town; they placed it on the edge of

the sea. He counted on emphasizing the tall stature of his figures

by enshrining it in the narrow frame of the houses; they placed it

against a horizon without limits. He requested that the group should be

placed very low, almost on the ground, or else very high on an elevated

pedestal, like the "Colleoni" at Venice or the "Gattamelata" at Padua;

they placed it at a middle height, thus diminishing the effect of its

imposing proportions. The lesson had to come from foreign lands. The

city of Antwerp has erected, in front of its museum of fine arts,

two of the statues of the celebrated group, and England, which does

things splendidly when it is a question of embellishing its cities or

of rendering homage to the valor of its adversaries, has erected the

effigies of the six heroes of Calais on one of the most beautiful sites

in London, before the Palace of Westminster.

* * * * *

By this time the reader is sufficiently familiar with the technic of

Rodin for it to be unnecessary to analyze here in detail this well-known

work. What must not be forgotten is that the sculptor had first modeled

these six powerful bodies entirely in the nude. This is his invariable

method when he executes draped figures. One realizes this, even without

knowing it, before these arms, these hands, these legs, and these feet

constructed with that rigorous conscience which, with the true artist,

is at once a necessity and a delight; one divines the slope of the

torsos bent with grief or rigid in the pride of sacrifice.

"Yes, they are beautiful," the master said to me one day when I was

talking with him. "The shirt, the blouse are garments the folds of

which yield simple planes and effects that, rightly rendered, are those

of true sculpture. But there is something better still, and that is

sackcloth. If I had clothed my 'Burghers of Calais' in sackcloth, they

would certainly be more beautiful. I did not dare to. Some one else will

do this and will succeed. It is sufficient to express an idea and leave

it to its destiny."

We ought to love in Rodin this intellectual vigor that skirts the

borders of the impossible. In our age, consumed with indecision, it is a

priceless aid, a resting-place, a _point d'appui_ from which one starts

forth afresh, fortified, one's nerves recharged with vitality, to the

conquest of one's share of knowledge or of talent. This accounts in part

for the irresistible influence which for thirty years the illustrious

sculptor has exercised over the minds of artists. One feels that this

fount of strength condensed in his virile soul comes from something

deeper than his personality alone; it comes from the very depths of

the national reserves. The conviction, the energy of Rodin are those

of the workman who knows his trade, of the laborer impassioned by the

culture of his own soil. This endurance is the foundation of the French

temperament; the events happening now have proved it. When a country

possesses such individualities through the course of history, the roads

of the future open out before it brilliant with hope despite passing

shadows, and promise the highest surprises.

[Illustration: DANAIADE.]

Rodin: The Man and His Art, with Leaves from His Note-book · 第 69 / 74 题