PICTURES

OLD GENERAL LAND OFFICE BUILDING iii

PRESENT GENERAL LAND OFFICE BUILDING v

I.

HISTORY OF TEXAS LAND

When Christopher Columbus stepped ashore in the West Indies in October,

1492, he drew the curtain to an immense area of land, some fertile and

some desert—land of all types and for all purposes.

So vast was this discovery that land-conscious European powers who

sponsored New World exploration were soon giving away large areas with a

surprising disregard for their value. However, when rival powers

disputed their claims to specific territories in the New World, they

were quick to argue. The effect was that nations which matured in the

Western Hemisphere grew up with a high regard for land.

From this it may be inferred that the history of any nation or state has

been and continues to be largely a history of land. The political,

social, and economic superstructure of a people is traceable to the land

they control. Especially is this true of western nations and of Texas.

In what is now Southwestern United States there were several settlements

of Mexicans and Indians on both sides of the Rio Grande as early as

1750. These people held no title to their land. They had assembled for

reasons of economics and security.

Agents of the King of Spain finally arrived in the New World in 1767,

surveyed the river lands, and issued titles. With the exception of

Laredo, there was little colonization until 1815, when the Spanish

governor began to feel the French encroachment on the east. Before then,

Spain’s main effort had been directed toward the erection of missions,

which required constant support and defense, rather than toward

establishing civil settlements that could defend and support themselves.

Thus, the vast area of the Southwest was sparsely populated and lay as a

wilderness to American settlers who had pushed to its borders from the

United States. A grant to colonize was made to Moses Austin in January,

1821, to settle 300 families in Texas; this was the first deviation from

the Spanish policy of maintaining a predominately native population.

Later in 1821, the Spanish yoke was thrown off by Mexico, and the

Mexicans continued the policy of granting land to Americans. A liberal

colonization policy brought an immediate and widespread response. By

1835 it is estimated that there were over 30,000 people in the Texas

colonies—people who had come to Texas not as adventurers or speculators,

but to establish new homes. The fourteen-year period had wrought many

changes. Texas was no longer a complete wilderness. Many areas had been

cleared and turned into small agricultural districts where the people

were both industrious and self-reliant.

Because of the differences in the background and heritage of the

Anglo-Americans and the Mexicans, it was inevitable that conflicts would

develop. Differences in political views, religion, language, and mode of

living all served to kindle and feed the flames of the Texas Revolution.

At the very beginning of hostilities, Texans closed the colonial land

offices and assumed control of the land problems under one agency. This

was the foundation and beginning of the General Land Office, as it is

known today.

In separating from Mexico, Texans recognized the valid titles to land

which had been made by Spain and Mexico, but all vacant land within the

borders of the new republic became the property of Texas. These borders

were defined by the Congress of Texas in an Act of December 19, 1836,

and included all land within the present boundaries of the state (and

out to three marine leagues in the Gulf of Mexico), more than half of

the present State of New Mexico, and parts of Kansas, Colorado and

Wyoming. The first commissioners of the General Land Office, who were

given the momentous task of administering this huge domain, were John P.

Borden (who served from 1837 to 1841) and Thomas Wm. Ward (whose tenure

of office was 1841 to 1848). On December 29, 1845, the Republic became a

state.

Events leading to the annexation of Texas by the United States were

significant in the land history of the state. Relations between the

Republic of Texas and the United States during this time may be

separated into three periods, each of which lasted about three years.

During the first period, Texas sought annexation. Partly as a result of

the slavery controversy then raging in the United States and partly in

fear of war with Mexico, the United States refused annexation.

In the second period, Texas altered her attitude, withdrew her

application for annexation, and made plans to perpetuate her republic.

During this period, Texas was recognized by powers such as Great

Britain, France, Holland, and Belgium. Americans, laboring under the

influence of what they considered a Manifest Destiny, feared the

influence of foreign powers in Texas.

This led to the third phase, which was characterized by renewed U. S.

interest in Texas. On June 8, 1844, a treaty of annexation was defeated

in the United States Senate, largely by partisan politics. This treaty

stipulated that the United States would pay Texas debts up to ten

million dollars, but that Texas would have to surrender title to all

public lands.

Texas was fortunate that this treaty was not approved, because only a

small part of the land that she would have traded for ten million

dollars has since put more than 625 million dollars in the Permanent

School and University Funds. Later that year, President John Tyler of

the United States proposed that the treaty of annexation be adopted by a

joint resolution of Congress, and this maneuver succeeded, the treaty

receiving approval on February 28, 1845.

Provisions of the treaty as confirmed by the joint resolution allowed

Texas to retain her public domain and provided also that the new state

should keep her debts, which amounted to about 13 million dollars at

that time. All in all, it was a better arrangement than the earlier

treaty which had been defeated.

Congressional approval was greeted in Texas by considerable enthusiasm.

The initiative in annexation proceedings now lay with Texas. President

of the Republic Anson Jones called a convention to meet at Austin on

July 4, 1845, to decide whether or not Texas should accept the proposal.

The decision being in the affirmative, the State of Texas was admitted

into the Union on December 29, 1845, and the State government was

formally installed on February 19, 1846. Thomas Wm. Ward, who had been

Commissioner of the General Land Office under the Republic, assumed the

same position in the State government. His duties remained essentially

the same.

Shortly after Texas was annexed by the United States, war broke out

between Mexico and the Union over the newly-acquired territory. Mexico

had never relinquished her claim to Texas, and had repeatedly warned the

United States that annexation of what she considered a rebellious

province would mean war. From the beginning of hostilities, however, the

United States experienced a minimum of difficulty in subduing her

southern adversary. Less than two years after the war began, it came to

a conclusion with the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, signed February 2,

1848. Among other provisions, Mexico gave up her claim to Texas.

Hardly had the war come to an end than a dispute arose between the

United States and Texas over 78,892,800 acres of land claimed by Texas.

When Mexico concluded the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, she sold this and

other land to the United States for $15,000,000. Mexico had never

recognized Texas’ claim to the land in question, which included parts of

what is now New Mexico, Kansas, Colorado, and Wyoming.

However, when the United States began taking possession of this land,

anger in Texas mounted. The Legislature passed a resolution renewing

Texas’ claim to the disputed area.

A solution to the problem was worked out in the Compromise of 1850 by

which the United States was to pay Texas $10,000,000 for the area. On

February 28, 1855, Congress paid Texas an additional $5,496,477.77 for

this land. Therefore, Texas profited handsomely by some shrewd

bargaining on the part of its early leaders. Not only was Texas able to

pay its public debt, but the State reserved its present domain to itself

as well.

This public domain of land has been the basis of growth for the State’s

two big educational funds, the Permanent School Fund and the Permanent

University Fund, as the result of mineral exploration within Texas and

especially because of oil development on public land set aside for the

benefit of these funds.

As a result, the history of oil exploration and development within Texas

is directly related to the story of Texas land. For that reason, it is

briefly told here.

Tradition says that one John A. Veatch arrived in what is now East Texas

but which was then a province of Mexico. After meeting certain

requirements, he was authorized as an immigrant to select a league of

land. Veatch chose his property in two parts: one three miles south of

the present city of Beaumont and the other near Sour Lake in present

Hardin County. Seventy-five years later, two of Texas’ greatest oil

discoveries were made almost on top of his two tracts of land.

Ironically enough, Veatch is reported to have believed that oil existed

in those localities and, for that reason, consistently declined to sell.

The first oil well in Texas was probably drilled near Saratoga in Hardin

County in the early 1860’s, but the first oil discovered in

commercially-suitable quantities was produced in Nacogdoches County 20

years later. The first commercial use of oil appears to have been as a

tick remover.

First important oil production in Texas occurred in the Corsicana area

in 1895. The Corsicana field was of such importance that it attracted

numerous geologists and operators to Texas.

Before the Corsicana field came in, however, efforts had been made to

develop the Beaumont location as an oil-producing area. Nearly ten years

passed before the famous Lucas gusher came in producing a spectacular

4,000 barrels a day. Other wells were drilled in the same area, and the

Texas coast suddenly became a paradise for oil developers.

The next major development in Texas oil history came in that same

coastal region. At Sour Lake in Hardin County, a gusher came in in 1902,

and it is reported that some wells have produced 10,000 barrels a day in

this field. Drilling in this field had been going on since 1893. When

the 1902 gusher was drilled, the supply of oil suddenly exceeded the

demand, and oil was being sold for 15 cents a barrel. An average 1957

price was about $2.85 per barrel.

In 1903, the Batson field in Hardin County was discovered. The Permanent

School Fund experienced its first sensation from this field. A surveyor

discovered a scrap of unsurveyed school land near the oil field and

filed to purchase it at $10.00 per acre, thinking the General Land

Office unaware of its true value. To the contrary, the chief clerk of

the Land Office held out for $1,500.00 per acre. He received what he

asked for, and the School Fund profited by $23,025.00 from the sale.

One of the most productive oil fields in Texas was developed at Humble

in January, 1905. The well that brought in the field began producing at

8,500 barrels per day.

Matagorda County caused some excitement in 1908. Its best producer

yielded 7,200 barrels per day, but the field soon declined.

About 1910, exploration in Wichita County was active. Development moved

at a snail’s pace originally, but discoveries near Burkburnett in 1912

and 1917 resulted in renewed attempts, and a field that was regarded as

shallow suddenly became one of extensive resources. The field was even

extended into the channel of the Red River. In general, the land was in

the hands of small farmers, so this was the little man’s field.

Far to the south, the Goose Creek field in Harris County had been

attracting attention since 1907. By 1911, a well on the edge of San

Jacinto Bay was reported to be flowing several hundred barrels a day. In

1913, the Legislature enacted into law at the recommendation of

Commissioner of the General Land Office J. T. Robison a plan whereby San

Jacinto Bay, which was owned by the State, could be opened for

development on a royalty basis. The first permit for this purpose was

issued on August 18, 1913.

The first royalty, $33.97, was paid to the General Land Office in April,

1914. Six years later, royalties from this source had increased to

$600,000.

The Goose Creek field is still producing.

An interesting chapter in the history of Texas oil has to do with

natural gas. In 1913, a well was drilled on top of 50-foot-high chalk

cliffs on Nueces Bay near Corpus Christi. As the drill cut through the

cap rock and into the gas chamber at about 2000 feet, the well blew out,

a hole was torn in the ground, the derrick fell in, and the gas burned

with a roar that was audible for miles. Four hundred yards away another

well was drilled, and precautions were taken to avoid the previous

calamity. The precautions were without avail, however, and the

experience was repeated. An eyewitness described the scene:

Rushing gas came out with such tremendous force that a crater was torn

some two hundred feet in diameter and made the ground and housetops

snowlike with white sand for some six miles. The gas was dry. It

ignited. A flame some one hundred and fifty feet in diameter shot up

two hundred or more feet high and tossed up boulders as large as a

peck measure as one would a baseball. The light could be seen forty

miles and when I approached to within warming distance of the flame

the earth trembled like a mass of jelly.

In northeast Texas, some small production was discovered on Tar Island

in Caddo Lake in 1914. Caddo Lake is on the Marion-Harrison County line.

Three years later, oil discoveries began shifting to West Texas.

At Ranger in Eastland County on October 17, 1917, oil was discovered.

Uncontrolled, the producers allowed their wells to flow thousands of

barrels a day, and in many cases wells were practically exhausted within

six months. Though the Ranger field is still producing today, the great

period of activity lasted only about five years.

From Ranger, oil exploration drifted to the north in Stephens County.

The Stephens County field is reported to have produced up to 90,000

barrels a day at its zenith.

Other oil developments in West Texas in the first quarter of the

Twentieth Century came at Blue Ridge field in Fort Bend County in 1919,

in Potter County near Amarillo in 1919, and in Wilbarger County in 1920.

Near the coast in 1919, the West Columbia field in Brazoria County came

in. Reports say that a 29,600-barrel well was drilled in July, 1920.

Though small, the field was quite productive.

The Mexia field was discovered in 1920, and the Powell field near

Corsicana was reopened in 1924. As a result, Texas oil production shot

above 200,000,000 barrels in 1927. Early in the 1920’s, oil was

discovered in the Texas Panhandle. In 1925, Spindletop field near

Beaumont was redeveloped, and proved more productive than when first

discovered.

In the last half of the 1920’s, oil was discovered in Howard and Winkler

Counties in West Texas. Other discoveries included Raccoon Bend on the

coast, Van Zandt County in East Texas, and Bee County in 1929.

But the most prolific field of all was the East Texas field, which C. M.

(Dad) Joiner brought in in October, 1930. Haunted by two failures,

Joiner drilled a well in Rusk County where geologists said no oil

existed. The overwhelming success of the well resulted in the wildest

battle for leases in the history of the petroleum industry.

The discovery of the East Texas field, which soon covered a large area,

led to a decline in the price of oil. After much struggle—some verbal

and other physical—the field was put under martial law by Governor Ross

Sterling in August, 1931. The reason for the struggle—the desire of some

to reduce the amount of production and divide it among the producers—was

solved as the Texas Legislature gave the Railroad Commission authority

to ration production.

A number of major fields were discovered in the 1930’s, mostly in West

Texas and along the Gulf Coast.

The next sensational discovery, however, came in 1948 in Scurry and

adjoining counties. The discovery well in this field was brought in on

November 21, 1948. This led to further exploration and further

discoveries of oil in West Texas.

In 1953, the Neches Field in Anderson and Cherokee Counties was

discovered. It has been labeled a major field.

Another area of oil development in Texas has been the so-called

“tidelands”, the submerged lands under the Gulf of Mexico to the

three-league limit. Production in the tidelands began as early as 1940

but drilling exploration has never developed to the desired extent. One

reason has been the controversy between the United States and Texas over

the ownership of the tidelands. After some litigation, Congress passed a

law in 1953 placing ownership of the “tidelands” in the hands of Texas.

Until then, Texas had claimed land out to the outer edge of the

continental shelf, an average of about 85 miles.

In another area of petroleum development, the first oil discovery on

University of Texas land makes an interesting story. A stubborn

professor and a broken-down wagon played key roles.

In the early 1920’s, the governing body of The University of Texas

decided to sell the University’s vast land endowment in West Texas. The

late Dr. J. A. Udden, then director of the Bureau of Economic Geology

and a renowned scholar, protested the sale and insisted that the land

had possibilities for mineral development.

To prove his point, he located a site to drill an oil well and made

arrangements for the drilling. When the drilling rig was being

transported to the location, the wagon on which it was carried broke

down and was extensively damaged. It was decided to drill at the site of

the breakdown. On May 28, 1923, oil was discovered there.

The well was named Santa Rita and was the discovery well for the Big

Lake field in Reagan County.

Ironically enough, a well was drilled later at Dr. Udden’s original

location. It was a dry hole.

Santa Rita, though shallow, is still producing. Since its discovery,

wells have been drilled nearby at seven levels, and the Big Lake field

has yielded a total of 113,878,857 barrels to September, 1956. In terms

of dollars and cents, this amounts to $18,874,527.09.

From the meager beginning provided by the Santa Rita well, the Permanent

University Fund has grown today to more than 280 million dollars.

As a direct result of oil exploration and development in Texas, the

Permanent School Fund and Permanent University Fund have mushroomed.

Much oil exploration and development have been done on State-owned

lands. This has been the major source of income for these funds, which

now total more than 625 million dollars.

Even today these permanent funds are growing as a result of oil and

other mineral development on State-owned lands. As a result, the public

school systems and higher education in Texas will continue developing in

a manner befitting the Lone Star State.

Thus, the history of Texas land is still being written.

II.

DISPOSITION OF TEXAS LAND

The disposal of land within the present boundaries of Texas constitutes

an interesting segment of the State’s history.

The disposition of these lands actually began while they were still part

of Spain’s colonial empire. In the areas around Nacogdoches, San

Antonio, and the Rio Grande Valley, Spain gave away a few very large

tracts of land. When Mexico obtained her independence, she granted title

to other large areas in Texas. The means by which Mexico disposed of

these lands were three: sale, special grants, and empresario contracts.

The most famous of the last of these was the contract with Moses and

Stephen F. Austin. The total number of acres granted by Spain and Mexico

approximated 26,250,000.

When Texas earned her independence, she recognized the legitimacy of

titles to land granted by Spain and Mexico. In addition, Texas set about

disposing of more land.

In general, Texas parted with land in three ways. She gave some away,

traded other for services, and sold some.

Land given away was designed to encourage immigration, reward good

citizens and veterans of military service, encourage settlement and

improvement of land, help the growth of railroads and other internal

improvements, and foster development of educational systems.

Texas traded more than 3,000,000 acres of land for the construction of a

state capitol building.

There was but one reason to sell land, and that was important: to pay

debts of the State.

Grants of land were given numerous names, depending upon the purpose of

the grant. HEADRIGHTS were to encourage immigration and reward native

citizens. BOUNTIES and DONATIONS were given to men who had fought with

the Army of the Republic during the Texas Revolution. PRE-EMPTIONS (or

HOMESTEADS) were given in the late 1850’s to encourage families to

settle permanently on and to improve a plot of land. CONFEDERATE SCRIP

rewarded Texas veterans who had fought for the Confederacy. CONTRACTOR

SCRIP was given for construction of railroads and other internal

improvements. Two other classes of scrip were sold: TOBY SCRIP, named

for the man who sold it; and SALES SCRIP; these were designed to help

pay the public debt. Land granted without any particular designation was

that given to public schools, counties, The University of Texas, and

eleemosynary institutions to use in developing an educational system.

Here is a detailed study of circumstances surrounding the disposition of

all land given, traded, or sold by the Republic and State of Texas.

History of Texas Land · 第 4 / 30 题