PART VI

_THE THUMB-RING._

The Turk pulled his bow-string with a ring of ivory, or of other hard

material, fitted on his right thumb. (Fig 9, p. 113.) Its manipulation

is shown on p. 114.

It might be supposed that the strain of the bow-string on the ivory

ring would cause the edges of the latter to injure the flesh and sinews

of the thumb; this is not, however, the case in the least.

I find I can bend a strong bow much easier and draw it a great deal

farther with the Turkish thumb-ring than I can with the ordinary

European finger-grip.

The release to the bow-string which is bestowed by the small and smooth

point [in Turkish “lip”] of the thumb-ring, is as quick and clean as

the snap of a gunlock when a trigger is pulled, and very different in

feeling and effect from the comparatively slow and dragging action

that occurs when the release takes place in the modern way from the

leather-covered tips of three fingers.

[Page 113]

The range of a flight arrow when shot from a bow by means of a

thumb-ring is always much beyond that of an arrow shot with the three

fingers in the usual manner.

With the thumb-ring the feathers of an arrow can be placed close to

its nock, as the usual space of about 1½ in. need not be left on the

shaft at the butt-end lest the fingers holding the bow-string should

crush the feathers of the arrow--a precaution that is necessary in all

European archery.

There is no doubt that the closer to the nock the feathers of an arrow

can be fixed, the farther and steadier it will travel.

The handle of an English bow, or of any other bow that is loosed with

the fingers, is placed below its centre so that the arrow can be fitted

to the middle of the bow-string, a point which is just above the hand

of the archer as he grasps the bow.

A bow held below its centre can never be pulled really true, the limb

below the handle being shorter than the one above it.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.--THE TURKISH THUMB-RING. (Scale, half full size.)]

In a Turkish bow the handle is in its exact centre of length, and the

projecting point, or lip, of the thumb-ring engages the bow-string

close to its centre.

For these reasons the bow is equally strained, each of its limbs doing

its proper share of work in driving the arrow, an advantage that is

very noticeable in flight-shooting, and would probably also be at the

target. In the method of loosing used in modern times the bow-string

lies across the three middle fingers, its outline, where the arrow is

nocked on the string, taking the form of two angles connected by a

straight line 2½ to 3 in. in length.

With the thumb-ring the bow-string is drawn back to one sharp angle

close to the apex of which the nock of the arrow is fitted, so that

every part of the string is utilised in driving the arrow. (Fig. 12, p.

114.)

The ease with which a strong bow can be drawn with the thumb-ring,

and the entire absence of any unpleasant strain on the thumb, is

remarkable. This proves how effective the Oriental style of loosing a

bow-string was, compared with the one now practised by European archers.

The ring was usually of ivory, its edges being round and smooth where

they came in contact with the skin of the thumb.

A covering of soft leather was sometimes glued all over the sloping

outer surface of the projecting lip of the ring.

[Page 114]

The leather assisted the archer to hold the ring firmly with his

forefinger, so that it could not slip under the strain of pulling back

the bow-string. The projecting lip of the ring bestowed the leverage

which enabled the archer to draw the bow-string of a powerful bow.

Thumb-rings of silver or of agate were often permanently worn by

Turkish archers of position, both for ornament and for use.

These rings were finely polished and frequently inlaid with gold.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.]

[Illustration: FIG. 11.]

[Illustration: FIG. 12.

THE TURKISH THUMB-RING AND ITS MANIPULATION.]

Fig. 10. The position of the hand when the arrow is first fitted to the

bow-string, the latter being hitched behind the lip of the thumb-ring.

The nock of the arrow should be close against the lip of the ring, and

hence within about an eighth of an inch of the angle formed in the

bow-string when it is fully drawn, as shown in fig. 12.

Fig. 11. View of the thumb, with the ring, A, in position preparatory

to closing the forefinger and thumb.

[B. Section of the bow-string as hitched behind the projecting lip of

the ring.

C. The base of the forefinger, or the part of it which presses

tightly over the sloping surface of the lip of the ring, in front

of the bow-string, when the bow is being bent.]

[Page 115]

Fig. 12. The base of the forefinger pressed against the ring, the hand

closed, and the bow-string and arrow being drawn back by the thumb-ring.

It should be noted that no part of the hand is utilised in holding the

ring and in drawing the bow-string, except the thumb and the base of

the forefinger.

When the pressure of the forefinger is taken off the ring (by

separating this finger and the thumb) the bow-string instantly pulls

the lip of the ring slightly forward, and at the same moment slips off

it with a sharp ‘click.’

The archers of other Oriental nations besides the Turks employed

thumb-rings of various shapes and dimensions to suit the construction

of their bows, bow-strings and arrows. All thumb-rings were, however,

more or less similar, and were all used in the manner I have described.

It is, indeed, impossible to shoot an arrow by means of a thumb-ring

except as I have shown, and as a very short practical trial will prove.

If the ring is applied in any other way it either flies off the

hand when the bow-string is released; the thumb is injured; or the

bow-string escapes from its hold when only partially drawn.

* * * * *

In one of the Turkish manuals on Archery translated by Baron Purgstall,

many illustrations are given of the construction of the Turkish

composite bow, but, unfortunately, minor details are omitted, though

doubtless they were common knowledge when the Ottoman author wrote.

Without these details the correct formation of the bow cannot be

ascertained. The chief omissions are (1) the composition of the very

strong and elastic glue with which the parts of the bow were so

securely joined, (2) the treatment of the flexible sinew which formed

the back of the bow--whether, for instance, it was glued on in short

shredded lengths or was attached in one solid strip.

All we know is that the sinew was taken from the _Ligamentum Colli_ of

an ox or stag, a very powerful and elastic tendon which contracts or

expands as the animal raises or lowers its head to feed or drink.

When the sinew which comprises the back, or outside when it is strung,

of a Turkish bow--however old it be--is dissolved in hot water, it

disintegrates into hundreds of short pieces of from 2 to 3 in. long

and about ⅛ in. in diameter, each as ductile as indiarubber and almost

unbreakable by hand.

The component parts of a Turkish bow, consisting of a thin strip of

horn, one of wood and another of sinew (fig. 3, p. 106), are so pliable

when separated that they can almost be coiled round the fingers, though

if the same pieces are glued together they form a bow of unrivalled

strength and elasticity.

[Page 116]

[Illustration:

TARTAR, UNSTRUNG.

CHINESE, UNSTRUNG.

CHINESE, STRUNG.

Scale: One inch = one foot.

FIG. 13.]

FIGS. 13, 14. THE COMPARATIVE DIMENSIONS OF THE REFLEX COMPOSITE BOWS

OF VARIOUS NATIONS.--The structure of all these bows is similar in that

they are composed of sinew, wood and horn, _i.e._ sinew on the back of

the bow, naturally curved horn on its inner face, and a thin core of

wood between the horn and sinew.

[Page 117]

[Illustration:

PERSIAN, UNSTRUNG.

PERSIAN, STRUNG.

INDIAN, UNSTRUNG.

INDIAN, STRUNG.

TURKISH, UNSTRUNG.

TURKISH, STRUNG.

Scale: One inch = one foot.

FIG. 14.]

[Page 118]

Though the range of the Turkish bow--whether with a flighting or with

a war arrow--far exceeds that of the other bows depicted, yet the

Persian and Indian weapons are capable of shooting to a long distance,

certainly much farther than any European longbow.

The great Chinese or Tartar bow requires a very long arrow, which from

its length is, of necessity, a heavy one with a thick shaft. It cannot

be propelled, as a result, farther than from 250 to 260 yards. One

distinctive feature of Chinese, Tartar, Persian or Indian bows is the

formation of their bow-strings. These are invariably from ¼ to 5/16 in.

in thickness, and are always closely wrapped round, from end to end,

with soft cord or coloured silk of about the substance of worsted.

The Turkish bow-string is ⅛ in. thick, and is merely served round with

fine silk for 3 in. at its centre of length, with three or four shorter

lashings at intermediate points.

THE LENGTHS OF THE ARROWS FORMERLY USED IN WARFARE WITH THE BOWS GIVEN

IN FIGS. 13 AND 14.

Chinese or Tartar bow 3 ft.

Persian 2 ft. 8 in.

Indian 2 ft. 6 in.

Turkish[47] 2 ft. 4½ in.

[47] The long Turkish war arrow was drawn to the head as in

an ordinary bow. The grooved horn was only used with the

short and light flight-arrow.

[Page 119]

A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times · 第 6 / 7 章