XXIII: VERHAEREN

Verhaeren was one of those men who feel all their life long “l’envie”

(to use his own admirably expressive phrase), “l’envie de tailler en

drapeaux l’étoffe de la vie.” The stuff of life can be put to worse

uses. To cut it into flags is, on the whole, more admirable than to cut

it, shall we say, into cerecloths, or money-bags, or Parisian

underclothing. A flag is a brave, a cheerful and a noble object. These

are qualities for which we are prepared to forgive the flag its

over-emphasis, its lack of subtlety, its touch of childishness. One can

think of a number of writers who have marched through literary history

like an army with banners. There was Victor Hugo, for example—one of

Verhaeren’s admired masters. There was Balzac, to whose views of life

Verhaeren’s was, in some points, curiously akin. Among the minor makers

of oriflammes there is our own Mr. Chesterton, with his heroic air of

being for ever on the point of setting out on a crusade, glorious with

bunting and mounted on a rocking-horse.

The flag-maker is a man of energy and strong vitality. He likes to

imagine that all that surrounds him is as large, as full of sap and as

vigorous as he feels himself to be. He pictures the world as a place

where the colours are strong and brightly contrasted, where a vigorous

chiaroscuro leaves no doubt as to the true nature of light and darkness,

and where all life pulsates, quivering and taut, like a banner in the

wind. From the first we find in Verhaeren all the characteristics of the

tailor of banners. In his earliest book of verse, _Les Flamands_, we see

him already delighting in such lines as

Leurs deux poings monstrueux pataugeaient dans la pâte.

Already too we find him making copious use—or was it abuse?—as Victor

Hugo had done before him, of words like “vaste,” “énorme,” “infini,”

“infiniment,” “infinité,” “univers.” Thus, in “L’Ame de la Ville,” he

talks of an “énorme” viaduct, an “immense” train, a “monstrueux” sun,

even of the “énorme” atmosphere. For Verhaeren all roads lead to the

infinite, wherever and whatever that may be.

Les grand’routes tracent des croix

A l’infini, à travers bois;

Les grand’routes tracent des croix lointaines

A l’infini, à travers plaines.

Infinity is one of those notions which are not to be lightly played

with. The makers of flags like it because it can be contrasted so

effectively with the microscopic finitude of man. Writers like Hugo and

Verhaeren talk so often and so easily about infinity that the idea

ceases in their poetry to have any meaning at all.

I have said that, in certain respects, Verhaeren, in his view of life,

is not unlike Balzac. This resemblance is most marked in some of the

poems of his middle period, especially those in which he deals with

aspects of contemporary life. _Les Villes tentaculaires_ contains poems

which are wholly Balzacian in conception. Take, for example, Verhaeren’s

rhapsody on the Stock Exchange:

Une fureur réenflammée

Au mirage du moindre espoir

Monte soudain de l’entonnoir

De bruit et de fumée,

Où l’on se bat, à coups de vols, en bas.

Langues sèches, regards aigus, gestes inverses,

Et cervelles, qu’en tourbillons les millions traversent,

Echangent là leur peur et leur terreur ...

Aux fins de mois, quand les débâcles se décident

La mort les paraphe de suicides,

Mais au jour même aux heures blêmes,

Les volontés dans la fièvre revivent,

L’acharnement sournois

Reprend comme autrefois.

One cannot read these lines without thinking of Balzac’s feverish

money-makers, of the Baron de Nucingen, Du Tillet, the Kellers and all

the lesser misers and usurers, and all their victims. With their

worked-up and rather melodramatic excitement, they breathe the very

spirit of Balzac’s prodigious film-scenario version of life.

Verhaeren’s flag-making instinct led him to take special delight in all

that is more than ordinarily large and strenuous. He extols and

magnifies the gross violence of the Flemish peasantry, their almost

infinite capacity for taking food and drink, their industry, their

animalism. In true Rooseveltian style, he admired energy for its own

sake. All his romping rhythms were dictated to him by the need to

express this passion for the strenuous. His curious assonances and

alliterations—

On the Margin: Notes and Essays · 第 35 / 44 题