P. 322. In the same letter, Junius says: "How far people may

{581}

NOTES AND QUERIES:

A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES,

GENEALOGISTS, ETC.

"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.

* * * * *

No. 243.]

SATURDAY, JUNE 24. 1854

[Price Fourpence. Stamped Edition 5d.

* * * * *

CONTENTS.

NOTES:-- Page

Memoirs of Grammont, by W. H. Lammin, &c. 583

Bohn's Reprint of Woodfall's "Junius," by H. Martin 584

MINOR NOTES:--Mutilating Books--The Plymouth Calendar--

Divinity Professorships 585

QUERIES:--

Sepulchral Monuments 586

Roger Ascham and his Letters, by J. E. B. Mayor 588

MINOR QUERIES:--Symbolism in Raphael's Pictures--

"Obtains"--Army Lists for Seventeenth and Eighteenth

Centuries--Anonymous Poet--John Bale--A short Sermon 589

MINOR QUERIES WITH ANSWERS:--Quakers' Calendar--"Rodondo,

or the State Jugglers"--Rathlin Island--Parochial

Registers--"Trevelyan," &c.--Grammar School of

St. Mary de Crypt, Gloucester 589

REPLIES:--

Cranmer's Martyrdom, by John P. Stilwell, &c. 590

Coleridge's Unpublished Manuscripts, by

C. Mansfield Ingleby 591

Life 591

Inscriptions on Bells, by Peter Orlando Hutchinson,

Cuthbert Bede, Rev. H. T. Ellacombe, &c. 592

De Beauvoir Pedigree, by Edgar MacCulloch 596

Right of Refuge in the Church Porch, by

Goddard Johnson, &c. 597

Ferdinand Charles III., Duke of Parma, by

J. Reynell Wreford, &c. 598

PHOTOGRAPHIC CORRESPONDENCE:--Mr. Townsend's Wax-paper

Process--Photographic Litigation 598

REPLIES TO MINOR QUERIES:--Vandyking--Monteith--A. M. and

M. A.--Greek denounced by the Monks--Caldecott's

Translation of the New Testament--Blue Bells of

Scotland--"De male quæsitis gaudet non tertius

hæres"--Mawkin--"Putting a spoke in his wheel"--Dog

Latin--Swedish Words current in England--Mob--"Days

of my Youth"--Encore--Richard Plantagenet, Earl of

Cambridge--Right of redeeming Property--Latin Inscription

on Lindsey Court-house--Myrtle Bee--Mousehunt--Longfellow's

"Hyperion"--Benjamin Rush--Quakers executed in North

America 599

MISCELLANEOUS:--

Notices to Correspondents 603

* * * * *

Multæ terricolis linguæ, coelestibus una.

SAMUEL BAGSTER AND SONS'

[Illustration]

GENERAL CATALOGUE is sent Free by Post. It contains Lists of Quarto Family

Bibles; Ancient English Translations; Manuscript-notes Bibles; Polyglot

Bibles in every variety of Size and Combination of Language;

Parallel-passages Bibles; Greek Critical and other Testaments; Polyglot

Books of Common Prayer; Psalms in English, Hebrew, and many other

Languages, in great variety; Aids to the Study of the Old Testament and of

the New Testament; and Miscellaneous Biblical and other Works. By Post

Free.

London: SAMUEL BAGSTER & SONS, 15. Paternoster Row.

[Greek: Pollai men thnêtois Glôttai, mia d'Athanatoisin]

* * * * *

Now ready, No. VII. (for May), price 2s. 6d., published Quarterly.

RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW (New Series); consisting of Criticisms upon, Analyses

of, and Extracts from, Curious, Useful, Valuable, and Scarce Old Books.

Vol. I., 8vo., pp. 436, cloth 10s. 6d., is also ready.

JOHN RUSSELL SMITH, 36. Soho Square, London.

THE ORIGINAL QUADRILLES, composed for the PIANO FORTE by MRS. AMBROSE

MERTON.

London: Published for the Proprietors, and may be had of C. LONSDALE, 26.

Old Bond Street; and by Order of all Music Sellers.

PRICE THREE SHILLINGS.

* * * * *

"It is conducted with ability, industry, and learning."--_Nottingham

Mercury._

Now ready, price 1s. 6d., the Half-yearly Volume (January to June, 1854),

of the

BRITISH CONTROVERSIALIST AND MAGAZINE OF SELF-CULTURE. Containing

interesting Debates on Episcopacy, Presbyterianism,

Congregationalism--Communications from a Spiritual World--Napoleon

Buonaparte--Justice to Scotland--Slavery.

A series of Articles on European Philosophy, and "Self-Culture."

Essays on Poetry--Modern Poets--Building Societies: their Constitution and

Advantages--Language--Phonetics, &c. Information in answer to numerous

questions, on the plan of "NOTES AND QUERIES." Also a Monthly List of New

Books, Literary Intelligence, Notices of Books, &c.

The BRITISH CONTROVERSIALIST is also published on the first of every month,

in Parts, price Threepence each, containing Forty Pages of superior

Letterpress, with a Wrapper devoted to Notices to Correspondents.

London: HOULSTON & STONEMAN.

* * * * *

AMERICAN BOOKS.--LOW, SON, & CO., as the Importers and Publishers of

American Books in this Country, have recently issued a detailed Catalogue

of their Stock in Theology, History, Travels, Biography, Practical Science,

Fiction, &c., a Copy of which will be forwarded upon application.

By arrangements with the American Publishers, all Works of known or

anticipated interest will in future be published by LOW, SON, & CO.,

simultaneously with their appearance in America. Works not in stock

obtained within six weeks of order. Lists of Importations forwarded

regularly when desired.

Literary Institutions, the Clergy, Merchants and Shippers, and the Trade,

supplied on advantageous terms.

Small enclosures taken for weekly case to the United States at a moderate

charge.

* * * * *

TO BOOK-BUYERS.--Just published, Gratis, Part XIV. of a CATALOGUE OF

SECOND-HAND BOOKS, in the various Classes of English Literature (including

numerous choice Illustrated Works), in excellent condition, and at very low

prices, by W. J. CRAWFORD (Successor to the late J. DOWDING), 82. Newgate

Street, London.

* * * * *

TO BOOK-COLLECTORS.--Now Ready, Gratis and Post-Free, T. MILLARD'S XXXVIth

Catalogue of Second-hand Books, containing Illustrated London News,

complete, 23 vols., hf. calf, 15l., another, cloth, 12l.; Encyclopædia

Britannica, sixth edition, calf, fine copy, 10gs., seventh edition, cloth,

14l.; Penny Cyclopædia, with Supplement, new hf. calf., 7l. 10s.; Dr. Adam

Clarke's Bible, new, 2l. 10s.; D'Oyly and Mant's Bible, 3l.; Nash's

Mansions, new, 8gs.; Magistrated Statutes, 1835 to 1852, 6gs.; Tegg's

London Cyclopædia, 4l. 10s.

70. NEWGATE STREET, LONDON.

*** Books Bought.

* * * * *

BOOKS.--The CATALOGUE for JUNE is now ready, containing Rare, Curious, and

Valuable Books at reduced prices for ready money. Gratis and Post Free.

JOHN PETHERAM, 94. High Holborn.

* * * * *

OLD AND SECOND-HAND BOOKS.--A CATALOGUE of Second-hand Books, Free by Post

on receipt of Address. A CATALOGUE of Mathematical and Scientific Books, in

various Languages, Free on receipt of Two Postage Stamps. Address

W. B. KELLY, Bookseller, Dublin.

* * * * *

LITERARY CURIOSITIES.--Fac-Similes of extremely Curious and Interesting

Newspapers, published during the Times of King Charles and Oliver Cromwell,

sent (Post Free) on Receipt of 12 Stamps.

J. H. FENNELL, 1. Warwick Court, Holborn, London.

* * * * *

{582}

MURRAY'S BRITISH CLASSICS.--The Third Volume of GIBBON'S ROMAN EMPIRE,

edited by DR. WM. SMITH will be published with the Magazines on June 30th.

JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.

* * * * *

THE QUARTERLY REVIEW. No. CLXXXIX. ADVERTISEMENTS for the forthcoming

Number must be forwarded to the Publisher by the 1st, and BILLS for

Insertion by the 3rd JULY.

JOHN MURRAY, Albemarle Street.

* * * * *

ALFORD'S GREEK TESTAMENT WITH ENGLISH NOTES.

Now ready, in 8vo., Vol. I., Second Edition (containing the Four Gospels)

of

THE GREEK TESTAMENT: with a critically revised Text: a Digest of various

Readings: Marginal References to Verbal and Idiomatic Usage: Prolegomena;

and a copious Critical an Exegetical Commentary. For the Use of Theological

Students and Ministers. By HENRY ALFORD, B.D., Minister of Quebec Chapel,

London, and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.

RIVINGTONS, Waterloo Place, London; and DEIGHTON, Cambridge.

Of whom may be had,

The SECOND VOLUME.

(The Third and Concluding Volume is in preparation.)

* * * * *

FAMILY MUSIC.--STEPHEN GLOVER'S NEW QUADRILLES: The Turkish Army. the

Turkish Navy. Le Perroquet, Osborne, the Great Globe, the Gipsies', the

Welsh, Mamma's, Papa's, Eugenie, the Nice Young Maidens', and the Nice

Young Bachelors'. Piano solos, 3s. each; duets, 4s. each.

London: ROBERT COCKS & CO., New Burlington Street.

* * * * *

FAMILY MUSIC.--ROBERT COCKS & CO.'S HANDBOOK OF GLEES. Madrigals, Catches,

Canons, Part Songs, &c., with an Accompaniment for the Piano or Harmonium.

Edited by JOSEPH WARREN. 80 Numbers. price 2d. each. Nos. 1. to 50. may be

had in one vol., cloth boards, 8s.

London: ROBERT COCKS & CO., New Burlington Street; and of all

music-sellers.

* * * * *

LONGFELLOW, THE POET.--There is a sweet song by this admired writer just

now much inquired after. It is called "EXCELSIOR." This really sublime

effusion of the poet is charmingly wedded to music by MISS M. LINDSAY. It

is particularly a song for the refined evening circle, and is adorned with

a capital illustration. It is among the recent publications of the MESSRS.

ROBERT COCKS & CO., Her Majesty's Music Publishers, of New Burlington

Street.--See _The Observer_, May 28, 1854.

* * * * *

INDISPENSABLE TO CORRECT WRITERS AND SPEAKERS.

Just ready, price 3s. 6d., square 12mo., cloth,

A NEW DICTIONARY OF SYNONYMS, arranged in alphabetical Order. By D. L.

MACKENZIE.

This is an entirely new Dictionary of English Synonyms. Considerable pains

have been taken to render it what, on comparison with others, it will be

found to be--the MOST COMPLETE in the LANGUAGE.

Published by G. WILLIS, Great Piazza, Covent Garden.

* * * * *

Just published, in One Volume 12mo., sewed, 222 pp., price 1s. 6d.

THE GOVERNING CLASSES OF GREAT BRITAIN. Political Portraits, by EDWARD M.

WHITTY.

"In this volume we have some exceedingly smart sketches of various

public men."--_Church and State Gazette._

"These portraits of what the author terms the 'Governing Classes of

Great Britain,' are republished from 'The Leader' newspaper, and form a

little Thesaurus of information of a peculiar and interesting

character."--_Leeds Times._

"These lively sketches of living political characters are, many of

them, admirably written, always satirical in spirit, and occasionally

far-seeing in their ken. There are points which Thackeray could hardly

have done better."--_Era._

"The readers of the 'Leader' need only be informed that the series of

papers, 'The Governing Classes of Great Britain,' which were

contributed by a Non-Elector, have been collected into an eighteenpenny

volume, in handsome legible type; the Non-Elector declaring himself to

be Mr. Edward Whitty, a name which has only the aspirate _de

trop_."--_Leader._

TRÜBNER & CO., 12. Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

This Day is published in 8vo., 10s. 6d., the First Volume (embracing the

Topography and Botany) of a

NATURAL HISTORY OF THE EASTERN BORDERS. By G. JOHNSTON, M.D., Author of "A

History of British Zoophytes," &c.

JOHN VAN VOORST, 1. Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

Just published, 2 vols. post 8vo., 18s.

A VOLUNTEER'S INDIAN SCRAMBLE. By LIEUT. HUGO JAMES, Bengal Army.

"There is variety in the volumes: rough adventure in the earlier

Journeys through Scinde and the Punjab; camp life at the Siege of

Mooltan; interviews with half independent princes." &c.--_Spectator._

"A perusal will certainly delight and instruct the reader."--_Morning

Advertiser._

JUST RECEIVED FROM INDIA.

In 8vo., cloth, price 5s.; by post 5s. 6d.

HINTS ON EXAMINATIONS IN THE VERNACULAR LANGUAGES OF WESTERN INDIA. By A.

ST. JOHN RICHARDSON, Bombay Civil Service.

W. THACKER & CO., 87. Newgate Street.

* * * * *

Just published, in crown 8vo., price 9s. 6d. cloth,

THE LAST OF THE OLD SQUIRES: A Sketch. By CEDRIC OLDACRE. ESQ., of

Sax-Normanbury, sometime of Christ Church, Oxon.

London: LONGMAN. BROWN, GREEN, & LONGMANS.

* * * * *

EDWARD OFFOR, Lithographic Draughtsman and Missal Painter, 28. Leadenhall

Street, City, and Grove Street. Hackney, having received permission to make

fac-similes from the Bibles and Autographs, and copy the illuminated

Manuscripts in the British Museum, is ready to fulfil any orders entrusted

to him. He has also free access to his Father's well-known valuable

Collection of Bibles and Manuscripts, from which he has made many

fac-similes.

Autograph and other Letters accurately fac-similed on Stone or Paper.

Architectural Drawings; all kinds of Plans; Old Woodcuts; Missals, and

various kinds of Illuminated Writing; as also Designs in any style made or

copied, Plain or in Colours, on Stone, Wood, Zinc, Paper, &c., on the

shortest notice.

E. O. has received the appointment of Heraldic Draughtsman to the "Star

Clubs" of London, an undertakes all kinds of Heraldry on Vellum or Stone.

Valuable Books or Drawings will be preserved with the greatest care, and

security given if required.

* * * * *

URGENT QUESTIONS. BY THE REV. JOHN CUMMING, D.D.

On the 1st JULY will be published,

WHAT THINK YE OF CHRIST? The First of a Series of Personal, Practical, and

Pointed Questions, adapted for Universal Circulation.

The Series will be continued MONTHLY neatly printed, with a Wrapper, in

imperial 32mo., price TWOPENCE.

These QUESTIONS are Personal, Practical, and Pointed. They are designed to

suggest trains of inquiry in which every human being has a deep interest,

and to indicate answers full of Peace.

Each Question, with its Solution, will be published monthly, and at so low

a price, that Christian heads of houses and establishments may be induced

to circulate or distribute them. They may awaken inquiries, which will be

satisfied with nothing short of an answer from the only Source of light,

life, and truth.

The SECOND will be published on the 1st of AUGUST,

WHAT MUST I DO TO BE SAVED?

London: JOHN F. SHAW, 27. Southampton Row, and Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

WORKS BY DR. CUMMING.

THE GREAT SACRIFICE; or, The Gospel according to Leviticus. Fcp. 8vo., 2s.

6d. cloth.

*** This forms the First Companion Volume to the "Sabbath Morning

Readings."

Fourth Thousand. Uniform with "Voices of the Night."

BENEDICTIONS; or, the Blessed Life. Fcp. 8vo., 7s. cloth.

VOICES OF THE NIGHT. Twelfth Thousand. Fcp. 8vo., 7s. cloth.

VOICES OF THE DAY. Ninth Thousand. Fcp. 8vo., 7s. cloth.

VOICES OF THE DEAD. Sixth Thousand. Fcp. 8vo., 7s. cloth.

CHRIST RECEIVING SINNERS. Sixteenth Thousand. Fcp. 8vo., 2s. 6d. cloth;

also in 18mo., price 1s. cloth.

GOD in HISTORY. Eighth Enlarged Edition. Fcp. 8vo., 2s. 6d. cloth.

SABBATH MORNING READINGS ON THE OLD TESTAMENT.

THE BOOK OF GENESIS. Seventh Thousand. 5s. cloth.

THE BOOK OF EXODUS. Fifth Thousand. 5s. cloth.

THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS.

London: JOHN F. SHAW, 27. Southampton Row, and Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

Just published, fcp. 8vo. 3s. 6d. cloth.

TALES OF IRELAND AND THE IRISH. By J. G. MACWALTER. Author of the "Scarlet

Mystery," "History of the Irish Church."

London: JOHN F. SHAW. 27. Southampton Row, and Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

TURKEY.--SHAW'S FAMILY LIBRARY.

Price 1s. boards.

THE SULTAN OF TURKEY, ABDUL MEDJID KHAN. A Brief Memoir of his Life and

Times, with Notices of the Country, its Army, Navy, and present Prospects.

By the REV. HENRY CHRISTMAS, M.A.

Fcp. 8vo., 2s. 6d. cloth.

RUSSIA AND TURKEY. Lives of the Emperor of Russia, Nicholas I. and the

Sultan of Turkey, Abdul Medjid Khan. By the REV. HENRY CHRISTMAS, M.A.

London: JOHN F. SHAW, 27. Southampton Row, and Paternoster Row.

* * * * *

{583}

_LONDON, SATURDAY, JUNE 24, 1854._

* * * * *

Notes.

MEMOIRS OF GRAMMONT.

(Vol. viii., pp. 461. 549.; Vol. ix., pp. 3. 204. 356.)

"Des gens qui écrivent pour le Comte de Grammont peuvent compter sur

quelque indulgence."--Vide Introduction to the Memoirs.

Grammont's first visit to England may have been in Nov. 1655, when

Bordeaux, the French ambassador, concluded a treaty with Cromwell, whereby

France agreed totally to abandon the interests of Charles II.; and

Cromwell, on his part, declared war against Spain, by which we gained

Jamaica. Another opportunity occurred in 1657, when Cromwell's son-in-law,

Lord Fauconberg, was sent to compliment Louis XIV. and Cardinal Mazarin,

who were near Dunkirk. The ambassador presented some horses to the King and

his brother, and also to the Cardinal. They made the ambassador handsome

presents, and the King sent the Duke de Crequi as his ambassador

extraordinary to the Protector, accompanied by several persons of

distinction.

Grammont was at the siege of Montmedi, which surrendered on the 6th August,

1657.

He accompanied his brother, the Marshal, to Madrid in 1660, to demand the

hand of the Infanta for his sovereign. On the Kings entry into Paris the

same year with his Queen, Madame de Maintenon writes:

"The Chevalier de Grammont, Rouville, Bellefont, and some other

courtiers, followed the household of Cardinal Mazarin, which surprised

everybody: it was said it was out of flattery. The Chevalier was

dressed in a flame-coloured suit, and was very brilliant."

In 1662 he was disgraced on account of Madlle de la Motte Houdancourt,

aggravated also, it is said, by his having watched the King getting over

the tiles into the apartments of the maids of honour, and spread the report

about.

The writer of the notes to the _Memoirs_ supposes that the Count's

circumstances were not very flourishing on his arrival in England, and that

he endeavoured to support himself by his literary acquirements. A scarce

little work in Latin and French on King Charles's coronation was attributed

to him, the initials to which were P. D. C., which it was said might stand

for Philibert de Cramont. There seems no reason for this supposition: his

finances were no worse in England than they had been in France; and there

is no doubt he made his appearance at the Court of England under the

greatest advantages. His family were specially protected by the Duke and

Duchess of Orleans, the favourite sister of King Charles; and the Count was

personally known to the King and to the Duke of York; and from a letter of

Comminges', dated 20th Dec. 1662, it may be almost inferred that the Duke

sent his own yacht to fetch the Count to London. Bussi-Rabutin writes of

the Count, that he wrote almost worse than any one, and therefore not very

likely to recruit his finances by authorship.

The exact date of Grammont's marriage has yet to be fixed: probably a

search at Doctors' Commons for the licence, or in the Whitehall Registers,

if such exist, would determine the day. The first child, a boy, was born on

the 28th August, O. S., 7th September, 1664, but did not live long. This

would indicate that the marriage took place in December, 1663. From

Comminges' letters, dated in that month, it must have been on a day

subsequent to the 24th December. Their youngest child, who was afterwards

an abbess, was born on the 27th December, 1667.

It has been stated that Grammont was the hero of Molière's _Mariage

forcée_, which was performed before the Court at Versailles in 1664.

Comminges' letter of May 19-24, 1664, may allude to the Count's conduct to

Miss Hamilton. He was twenty years older than the lady.

Under date of October 24-November 3, 1664, Comminges announces the

departure from London of the Count and Countess de Grammont.

The Count was present with the King at the conquest of Franche Comte in

1660, and in particular at the siege of Dôle in February, 1668. The Count

and Countess were subsequently in England, as King Charles himself writes

to the Duchess of Orleans on the 24th October, 1669, that the Count and

Countess, with their family, were returning to France by way of Dieppe.

In 1668, according to St. Evremond, the Count was successful in procuring

the recall of his nephew, the Count de Guiche.

Evelyn mentions in his _Diary_ dining on the 10th May, 1671, at Sir Thomas

Clifford's, "where dined Monsieur de Grammont and several French noblemen."

Madame de Sévigné names the Count in her letter of 5th January, 1672.

He was present at the siege of Maestricht, which surrendered to the King in

person on the 29th June, 1673.

Madame de Sévigné names the Count again in her letter of the 31st July,

1675.

The Duchess of Orleans (the second) relates the great favour in which the

Count was with the King.

He was present at the sieges of Cambray and Namur in April, 1677, and

February, 1678.

We obtain many glimpses of the Count and Countess in subsequent years in

the pages of Madame de Sévigné, Dangeau, and others, which may be consulted

in preference to filling your columns with extracts. {584}

In 1688, Grammont was sent by the Duke of Orleans to congratulate James II.

on the birth of his son; in the _Ellis Correspondence_, under the date of

10th July, 1688, it appears there was to have been an exhibition of

fire-works, but it was postponed, and the following intimation of the cause

was hinted at by a person behind the scenes:

"The young Prince is ill, but it is a secret; I think he will not hold.

The foreign ministers, Zulestein and Grammont, stay to see the issue."

Grammont died on the 30th January, 1707, aged eighty-six years; his

Countess survived him only until the 3rd June, 1708, when she expired, aged

sixty-seven years. They only left one child, namely, Claude Charlotte,

married on the 6th April, 1694, to Henry Howard, Earl of Stafford; Marie

Elizabeth de Grammont, born the 27th December, 1667, Abbess of Sainte

Marine de Poussey, in Lorraine, having died in 1706, previous to her

parents.

Maurepas says that Grammont's eldest daughter was maid of honour to the

second Duchess of Orleans, who suspected her of intriguing with her son,

afterwards the celebrated Regent. The Duchess, he adds, married her to Lord

Stafford.

Another writer says, that although Grammont's daughters were not handsome,

yet they caused as much observation at Court as those who were.

W. H. LAMMIN.

Fulham.

Count Hamilton is little to be trusted to in his chronology, from a

mischievous custom that he has of, whenever he has to record a marriage or

love affair between two parties considerably different in age, adding to

that difference extravagantly, to make the thing more ridiculous. Sir John

Denham is a well-known instance of this; but another, which is not noticed

by the editor of Bohn's edition, nor any other that I have seen, is his

making out Col. John Russell, a younger brother of the first Duke of

Bedford, to have been seventy years of age in 1664, although his eldest

brother was born in 1612, and the colonel could have been little older

than, if as old as, De Grammont himself.

J. S. WARDEN.

* * * * *

BOHN'S REPRINT OF WOODFALL'S "JUNIUS."

When a publisher issues a series of such works as are comprised in _Bohn's

Standard Library_, and thereby brings expensive publications within the

reach of the multitude, he is entitled to the gratitude and the active

support of the reading portion of the public; but, if he wish to be ranked

amongst the respectable booksellers, he ought to see to the accuracy of his

reprints. Bohn's edition of Woodfall's _Junius_, in two volumes, purports

to contain "the entire work, as originally published." This it does not.

Some of the notes are omitted; and the text is, in many instances,

incorrect. I have examined the first volume only; and I shall state some of

the errors which I have found, on comparing it with Woodfall's edition,

three volumes 8vo., 1814. The pages noted are those of Bohn's first volume.

P. 87. In his Dedication, Junius says: "If an honest, and, I may truly

affirm, a laborious zeal." Bohn turns it into nonsense, by printing it: "If

an honest _man_, and I may truly," &c.

P. 105. In Letter I., Junius speaks of "distributing the _offices_ of

state, by rotation." Bohn has it "_officers_."

P. 113. In Letter II., Sir W. Draper says that "all Junius's _assertions_

are false and scandalous." Bohn prints it "_exertions_."

P. 206. In Letter XXII., Junius says, "it may be advisable to _gut_ the

resolution." Bohn has it "to _put_."

P. 240. In Letter XXX., Junius says: "And, if possible, to perplex _us

with_ the multitude of their offences." Bohn omits the words "_us with_."

P. 319. In Letter XLII., Junius speaks of the "future _projects_" of the

ministry. Bohn prints it "future _prospects_."

P. 322. In the same letter, Junius says: "How far people may be animated

_to resistance_, under the present administration." Bohn omits "_to

resistance_."

P. 382. In Letter LIII., Horne says: "And in case of refusal, _threaten_ to

write them down." Bohn omits "_threaten_."

P. 428. In Letter LXI., Philo-Junius says, "his view is to change a court

of _common law into a court of_ equity." Bohn omits the words "_common law

into a court of_."

P. 437. In Letter LXIII., Junius writes, "love _and kindness_ to Lord

Chatham." Bohn omits "_and kindness_."

P. 439. In Letter LXIV., Junius speaks of "a multitude of _prerogative

writs_." Bohn has it "a multitude of _prerogatives_."

P. 446. In Letter LXVIII., Junius says to Lord Mansfield: "If, on your

part, you should have no plain, substantial _defence_." Bohn substitutes

"_evidence_" for "_defence_."

These are the most important errors, but not all that I have found in the

text. I now turn to the reprint of Dr. Mason Good's Preliminary Essay. The

editor says: "The omission of a quotation or two, of no present interest,

and the correction of a few inaccuracies of language, are the only

alterations that have been made in the Preliminary Essay." We shall see how

far this is true. Such alterations as "arrogance" for "insolence," p. 2.;

"classic purity" for "classical chastity," p. 3.; "severe" for "atrocious,"

p. 15., I shall not particularise farther; but merely observe that, so far

from being merely "corrections {585} of inaccuracies of language," they are

frequently changes of meaning.

At pp. 4. and 5., extracts from speeches by Burke and North are introduced

into the text. In Woodfall, they are given in a note, so as not to

interrupt the writer's argument.

Occasionally, a sentence is partly rewritten. I take one specimen. Dr. Good

says that, "But for the Letters of Junius, the Commons of England might

still ... have been exposed to the absurd and obnoxious harassment of

parliamentary arrests, upon a violation of privileges undefined and

incapable of being appealed against--defrauded of their estates upon an

arbitrary and interested claim of the crown." In Bohn, p. 5., the words are

altered to "have been exposed to arbitrary violations of individual

liberty, under undefined pretexts of parliamentary privileges, against

which there _were_ (?) no appeal--defrauded of their estates upon

capricious and interested claims of the crown."

Dr. Good, to show that Burke could not be Junius, cites several passages

from his works; and then proves, by quotations from Junius, that the

opinions of the one were opposed to those of the other. In Bohn's edition

all these quotations, which occupy twelve octavo pages in Woodfall, are

omitted as unnecessary, although the writer's argument is partly founded

upon them; and yet the editor has retained (evidently through

carelessness), at p. 66., Dr. Good's subsequent reference to these very

quotations, where, being about to give some extracts from General Lee's

letters, he says: "They may be compared with those of Junius, _that follow

the preceding extracts from Mr. Burke_." This reference is retained, but

the extracts spoken of are omitted.

Some of Woodfall's notes are wholly left out; but I will not lengthen these

remarks by specially pointing them out. The new notes of Bohn's editor

offer much matter for animadversion, but I confine myself to one point. In

a note to Sir W. Draper's first letter (p. 116.), we are told that Sir

William "married a Miss De Lancy, who died in 1778, _leaving him a

daughter_." In another note relating to Sir William (p. 227.), it is stated

that "he married a daughter of the second son of the Duke of St. Alban's.

Her ladyship died in 1778, _leaving him no issue_." How are we to reconcile

these statements?

H. MARTIN.

Halifax.

[The work professes to be edited by Mr. Wade. Mr. Wade therefore, and

not Mr. Bohn, is responsible for the errors pointed out by our

correspondent.--ED.]

* * * * *

Minor Notes.

_Mutilating Books._--Swift, in a letter to Stella, Jan. 16, 1711, says, "I

went to Bateman's the bookseller, and laid out eight-and-forty shillings

for books. I bought three little volumes of Lucian in French, for our

Stella." This Bateman would never allow any one to look into a book in his

shop; and when asked the reason, he would say, "I suppose you may be a

physician, or an author, and want some recipe or quotation; and if you buy

it I will engage it to be perfect before you leave me, but not after; as I

have suffered by leaves being torn out, and the books returned, to my very

great loss and prejudice.

ABHBA.

_The Plymouth Calendar._--To your collection of verses (Vol. vii. _passim_)

illustrative of local circumstances, incidents, &c., allow me to add the

following:

"The West wind always brings wet weather,

The East wind wet and cold together;

The South wind surely brings us rain,

The North wind blows it back again.

If the Sun in red should set,

The next day surely will be wet;

If the Sun should set in grey,

The next will be a rainy day."

BALLIOLENSIS.

_Divinity Professorships._--In the last number of _The Journal of Sacred

Literature_ (April, 1854), there is a well-deserved eulogium on the

biblical labours of Dr. Kitto; who, though in the enjoyment of the title of

D.D. (conferred on him some years ago by a Continental University), is

nevertheless a layman, and not, as is very commonly imagined, in orders.

The article, however, to which I refer, contains a curious mistake.

Michaelis is cited (p. 122.) as an instance of a layman being able, on the

Continent, to hold a professorship relating to theology and biblical

science, in contrast to what is assumed to be the invariable system at the

English Universities. It is true, indeed, that for the most part such

professorships are here held by clergymen; but from several of them laymen

are not excluded by any law. At Cambridge, the Norrisian Professor of

Divinity, for example, may be a layman.

With respect to the degree of D.D., it is observed by the Writer of the

article, p. 127.:

"In Germany this degree is given to laymen, but in England it is

exclusively appropriated to the clergy. This led to the very general

impression among strangers, that Dr. Kitto is a clergyman."

ABHBA.

[We have frequently seen the celebrated Nonjuror Henry Dodwell noticed

as in orders, perhaps from his portrait exhibiting him in gown and

bands as Camden Professor of History at Oxford. Miss Strickland, too,

in her _Lives of the Queens of England_, vol. vii. p. 202., and vol.

viii. p. 352., edit. 1853, speaks of that worthy layman, Robert Nelson,

both as a _Doctor_ and a clergyman!--ED.]

{586}

* * * * *

Queries.

SEPULCHRAL MONUMENTS.

(_Concluded from_ p. 539.)

A divine, reasoning philosophically with a lady on the possibility of the

appearance of ghosts, was much perplexed by her simple inquiry as to where

the clothes came from. If then the mediæval effigies are alive, how can the

costume be reconciled with their position? Where do their clothes come

from? The theory advanced in the two preceding Numbers seems to offer a

ready solution. Another corroborative fact remains to be stated, that when

a kneeling attitude superseded the recumbent, the brasses were placed upon

the wall, testifying, in some degree at least, that the horizontal figures

were not traditionally regarded as living portraits. In anticipation of

objections, it can only be said that "they have no speculation in their

eyes;" that out of the thousands in existence, a few exceptions will only

prove the rule; and that their incongruities were conventional.

It is now my purpose to offer a few more reasons for releasing the

sculptors of the present day from a rigid adherence to the uplifted hands

and the straight head. That there is grace, dignity, and pious serenity

occasionally perceptible in these interesting relics of bygone days, which

so appropriately furnish our magnificent cathedrals, and embellish numbers

of our parochial churches, is freely admitted; but that they are formal,

conventional, monotonous, and consequently unfitted for modern imitation,

cannot reasonably be denied by a person with pretensions to taste. From the

study of anatomy, the improvement in painting, the invention of engraving,

our acquaintance with the matchless works of Greece, and other causes, this

branch of art has made considerable advance. Why, then, should a sculptor

be now "cabin'd, cribb'd, confined, bound in," by such inflexible

conditions? If some variation is discoverable in the ancient types, why

should he not have the advantage of selection, and avail himself of that

attitude best adapted to the situation of the tomb and the character of the

deceased? Not to multiply examples of deviation--the Queen of Henry IV., in

Canterbury Cathedral, has one arm reposing at her side, and the other upon

her breast. The arms of Edward III., in Westminster Abbey, are both

stretched at his side. An abbot of Peterborough, in that cathedral, holds a

book and a pastoral staff. The hands of Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick,

in his beautiful chapel, are raised, but separate. Several have the arms

crossed, expressive of humility and resignation. Others (lay as well as

clerical) press a holy book to their bosom; and some place the right hand

upon the heart, denoting the warmth of their love and faith. In his

description of Italian monuments, Mr. Ruskin remarks, that "though in

general, in tombs of this kind, the face of the statue is slightly turned

towards the spectator, in one case it is turned away" (_Stones of Venice_,

vol. iii. p. 14.); and instances are not unfrequent of similar inclinations

of the head at home. Why then should this poor choice be denied? Why should

he be fettered by austere taskmasters to this stereotyped treatment, to the

proverbial stiffness of "our grandsires cut in alabaster." Indignation has

been excited in many quarters against that retrograde movement termed

"pre-Raphaelism," yet what in fact is this severe, angular, antiquated

style, but identically the same thing in stone? What but pre-Angeloism?

Upon the supposition that the effigies have departed this life, or even

that the spirit is only about to take its flight, anatomical and

physiological difficulties present themselves, for strong action would be

required to hold the hands in this attitude of prayer. The drapery, too,

hanging in straight folds, has been always apparently designed from upright

figures, circumstances evincing how little the rules of propriety were then

regarded. Their profusion occasions a familiarity which demands a change,

for the range is here as confined as that of the sign-painter, who could

only depict lions, and was therefore precluded from varying his signs,

except by an alteration in the colour. Such is the yearning of taste for

diversity, that in the equestrian procession on the frieze of the

Parthenon, out of about ninety horses, not two are in the same attitude;

yet to whatever extent our churches may be thronged with these sepulchral

tombs, all must be, as it were, cast in the same mould, till by repetition

their beauty

"Fades in the eye and palls upon the sense."

It is evidently imitating the works of antiquity under a disadvantage,

inasmuch as modern costume is far inferior in picturesque effect to the

episcopal vestments, the romantic armour, and numerous elegant habiliments

of an earlier day. Every lesser embellishment and minuteness of detail are

regarded by an artist who has more enlarged views of his profession as

foreign to the main design; yet the robes, millinery, jewellery, and

accoutrements usually held a place with the carvers of that time of equal

importance with the face, and engaged as large a share of their attention.

The comparative easiness of execution forms another argument. Having

received the simple commission for a monument (specifications are

needless), the workmen (as may be imagined) fixes the armour of the defunct

knight upon his table, places a mask moulded from nature on the

helmet-pillow, fits on a pair of hands with which, like an {587} assortment

of gloves, his studio is provided, diligently applies his compasses to

insure exact equality by means of a receipt, perchance imparts some

devotional expression, and the work is ready to be transferred to stone.

Mr. Petit, in the preface (page x.) to his _Architectural Studies_, after

due praise, asserts--

"That no sculptor anxious to advance his own reputation and art will

ever set up a mediæval statue as his model. He may acknowledge its

merits, and learn much from a careful examination of it, but still he

will not look up to its designer as his master and guide."

Again, the efforts of genius are cramped by such uncompromising terms. The

feet must unavoidably be directed towards the east; still, whatever the

situation of the tomb may chance to be, from whatever point it may be

viewed, or whether the light may fall on this side or on that, no way of

escape is open, and no ingenuity can be employed to grapple with the

uncontrollable obstruction. Portrait painters can choose the position most

favourable to the features, but the monumental sculptor of the nineteenth

century may only exhibit what is generally shunned, the direct profile; the

contour of the face, and the wide expanse of brow, which might probably

give the most lively indications of intellectual power, amiability of

disposition, and devout tranquillity of soul, must be sacrificed to this

unbending law "which altereth not." Sculptors, we are told, should overcome

difficulties; but here they are required to "strive with impossibilities,

yea, get the better of them." Whether painted windows, or some other

ornament, or a tomb alone in harmony with the architecture (the form and

features of the individual being elsewhere preserved), may constitute a

more desirable memorial, is a separate question, but as statues are only

admissible in a recumbent posture, some little latitude must be allowed.

Like our reformers in higher things, it behoves us to discard what is

objectionable in art, while we cherish that which is to be admired. Instead

of treading in the footsteps of those lofty spirits, we should endeavour to

follow the same road. Fully appreciating their excellences, let us avoid

the distorted drawing of their brilliant glass, their irregularities in

architectural design, the irreverence of their carving, and the

conventionalism of their monumental sculpture.

C. T.

I agree with C. T. in thinking that the usual recumbent figure on mediæval

tombs was intended to represent a dead body, and more particularly to

represent the body as it had lain in state, or had been borne to the grave;

and I will add one or two additional reasons for this opinion. In the

description in Speed, of the intended monument of Henry VIII., taken from a

MS. given to Speed by that industrious herald master, Charles Lancaster,

the following direction occurs:--

"Item, upon the same basement shall be made two tombes of blacke touch,

that is to say, on either side one, and upon the said tombes of blacke

touch shall be made the image of the King and Queen, on both sides, not

as death [dead], but as persons sleeping, because to shewe that famous

princes leaving behind them great fame never doe die, and shall be in

royall apparels after the antique manner."--Speed's _Hist. of Great

Brit._, p. 1037. ed. 1632.

The distinction here taken between a dead and a sleeping figure, and the

reason assigned for the latter, show, I think, that at that time a

recumbent figure generally was supposed to represent death. In a monument

of Sir Roger Aston, at Cranford, Middlesex, in Lysons' _Environs of

London_, the knight and his two wives are represented praying, and by the

side of the knight _lies_ the infant son who had died in his lifetime. In

the monument of Pope Innocent VIII. (Pistolesi, _Il Vaticano_, vol. i.

plate 63.), the Pope is in one part represented in a living action, and in

another as lying on his tomb, and from the contrast which would thus be

afforded between life and death, the latter representation seems to

indicate death.

The hands raised in prayer are accounted for by C. T. Open eyes, I think,

may be intended to express, by their direction towards heaven, the hope in

which the deceased died. This is suggested by the description of the

funeral car of Henry V.

"Preparations were made to convey the body of Henry from Rouen to

England. It was placed within a car, on which reclined his figure made

of boiled leather, elegantly painted. A rich crown of gold was on its

head. The right hand held a sceptre, and the left a golden ball. _The

face seemed to contemplate the heavens._"--Turner's _Hist. of Eng._,

vol. ii. p. 465.

I must, however, add that on referring to Monstrelet, I doubt whether

Turner does not go too far in this last particular. Monstrelet merely says,

"le visage vers le ciel." (Monst. _Chron._ vol. i. 325. ed. 1595.) Speed

adds an additional circumstance: "The body (of this figure) was clothed

with a purple roabe furred with ermine." From the mutilated state of the

tomb it is impossible to say how far the recumbent effigy resembled this

boiled figure, but it is evidently just such a representation of the king

as might have been laid on his tomb, and so far it tends to support the

opinion that the effigy on a tomb represents the deceased as he had lain in

state, or was borne to and placed in his tomb, an opinion fully borne out

by the agreement which, in some cases, has been found to exist between the

effigy on a tomb and the body discovered within it, or between the effigy

and the description of the body as it had lain in state. See the tombs of

King {588} John, Robert Lord Hungerford, and Henry II., in Stothard's

_Monumental Effigies of Great Britain_, and the Introduction to that work.

I think it is not irrelevant to remark that at a very early period a

recumbent figure was sometimes placed on a tomb as in a state of death. The

recumbent Etruscan figures generally represent a state of repose or of

sensual enjoyment; but there is one given by Micali (_Monumenti inediti a

Illustrazione degli Antichi Popoli Italiani_, Tav. 48. p. 303.), which is,

undoubtedly, that of a dead person. In his description of it, Micali says,

"On the first view of it one would say it was a sepulchral monument of the

Middle Ages, so greatly does it resemble one." Mrs. Gray, too (_Tour to the

Sepulchres of Etruria_, p. 264.), mentions a sepulchral urn, "very large,

with a woman robed, and with a dog upon it, exactly like an English

monument of the Middle Ages." If it were not for the dog, I should suppose

this to be the one given by Micali. Though it may be too much to suppose

that this form of representation may have been not uncommon, and may have

passed into early Christian monuments, the instance in Micali at least

shows that the idea of representing a dead body on a tomb is a very ancient

one. It may be added, perhaps, that it is an obvious one.

Though the reasons for thinking that the ordinary mediæval figure

represents death may not be conclusive, still that opinion is, I think,

entitled to be looked upon as the more probable one, until some

satisfactory reason is given why a _living_ person should be represented

outstretched, and lying on his back--a position, as it seems to me, more

inconsistent with life than the open eyes and hands joined in prayer are

with death. For too much weight is not to be attached to slight

inconsistencies. These would probably be disregarded for the sake of

expressing some favourite idea or sentiment. Thus, in the proposed monument

of Henry VIII., though the king and queen are directed to be represented as

living, their souls are to be represented in the hand of "the Father."

In modern tombs the mediæval idea has been entirely departed from, and the

recumbent position sometimes expresses neither death, nor even sleep, but

simple repose, or contemplation, resignation, hope, &c. If it is proper or

desirable to express these or other sentiments in a recumbent figure, it

seems unreasonable to exclude them for the sake of a rigid adherence to a

form, of which the import is either obscure, or, if rightly conjectured,

has, by the change of customs, become idle and unmeaning.

F. S. B. E.

* * * * *

ROGER ASCHAM AND HIS LETTERS.

To the epistles of Roger Ascham, given in Elstob's edition, have since been

added several to Raven and others[1], two to Cecil[2], and several to Mrs.

Astley, Bp. Gardiner, Sir Thos. Smith, Mr. Callibut, Sir W. Pawlett, Queen

Elizabeth, the Earl of Leicester, and Mr. C. H.[owe].[3] Some of your

correspondents will, doubtless, be able farther to enlarge this list of

printed letters.

In a MS. volume, once belonging to Bp. Moore, now in the University

Library, Cambridge, is a volume of transcripts[4], containing, amongst

other documents, letters from Ascham to Petre[5] and to Cecil; one (p. 44.)

"written by R. A., for a gent to a gentlewoman, in waie of marriage," and

one to the B. of W.[inchester], which, though without a signature, is

certainly Ascham's. In another MS. volume, in the same collection (Ee. v.

23.), are copies of Ascham's letter to his wife on the death of their

child[6], and of a letter to Mr. Richard Goodrich. Lastly, Ascham's College

(St. John's) possesses his original letter to Cardinal Pole, written on the

fly-leaf of a copy of Osorius _De nobilitate civili_[7]; and also the

original MS. of the translation of Oecumenius, accompanied by a Latin

letter to Seton.[8]

These unpublished letters will shortly be printed for the Cambridge

Antiquarian Society. Early information respecting any other MS. works of

Ascham, or collations of his published letters with the originals, will be

thankfully acknowledged.

J. E. B. MAYOR.

St. John's College, Cambridge.

P. S.--I may add that we have at St. John's a {589} copy of Ascham's

Letters (ed. Elstob), with many dates and corrections in Baker's hand.

There may be something new in Kennett's biographical notice of Ascham

(Lansdowne MSS. 981. art. 41.)

[Footnote 1: In _The English Works of Roger Ascham_, London, 1815, 8vo.:

this edition is reprinted from Bennet's, with additions. Bennet took these

letters from Baker's extracts (in his MSS. xiii. 275-295., now in the

Harleian Collection), "from originals in Mr. Strype's hands." One letter is

more fully given by Mr. Tytler, _England under Edward VI. and Mary_, vol.

ii. p. 124.]

[Footnote 2: In Sir H. Ellis's _Letters of Eminent Literary Men_, Camden

Soc. Nos. 4 and 5. Correcter copies than had before appeared from the

Lansdowne MSS.]

[Footnote 3: Most incorrectly printed in Whitaker's _History of

Richmondshire_, vol. i. p. 270. seq. The letters themselves are highly

important and curious.]

[Footnote 4: Dd. ix. 14. Some of the letters are transcribed by Baker, MSS.

xxxii. p. 520. seq.]

[Footnote 5: This letter has many sentences in common with that to

Gardiner, of the date Jan. 18 [1554], printed by Whitaker (p. 271. seq.)]

[Footnote 6: Whitaker, who prints this (p. 289. seq.) says that it had been

printed before. Where?]

[Footnote 7: This, I believe, unpublished letter is referred to by Osorius,

in a letter to Ascham (_Aschami Epistolæ_, p. 397.: Oxon. 1703).]

[Footnote 8: Both of these have been printed, the letter in _Aschami

Epistolæ_, lib. i. ep. 4. p. 68. seq. Compare on the commentary, ibid. pp.

70. and 209.]

* * * * *

Minor Queries.

_Symbolism in Raphael's Pictures._--In some of the most beautiful pictures

of "The Virgin and Child" of Raphael, and other old masters, our Lord is

represented with His right foot placed upon the right foot of the blessed

Virgin. What is the symbolism of this position? In the Church of Rome, the

God-parent at Holy Confirmation is, if I remember right, directed by a

rubric to place his or her right foot upon the right foot of the person

confirmed. Is this ceremony at all connected with the symbolism I have

noticed?

WM. FRASER, B.C.L.

"_Obtains._"--Every one must have observed the frequent recurrence of this

word, more especially those whose study is the law: "This practice on that

principle _obtains_." How did the word acquire the meaning given to it in

such a sentence?

Y. S. M.

Notes and Queries, Number 243, June 24, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 1 / 5 段