I. The Stewardship.

There can be no doubt that England stands in a position of a steward

before God. We are all stewards of the various talents and opportunities

which we possess. The minister is a steward of the mysteries of God, and

I stand here myself this very day as his steward, or servant, to declare

his word. The parent is a steward; and what a stewardship it is to be

entrusted with the training of immortal souls for the kingdom of the

Lord! The rich man is a steward; his property is not his own, but he is

entrusted with it in order that he may lay it out for man’s happiness and

God’s glory. On the same principle, nations are entrusted with their

various stewardships. The Jewish nation, for example, was the steward of

Scripture: “Unto them were committed the oracles of God;” and whatever be

the particular power or privilege of a nation, that power or privilege is

a talent, or stewardship, to be employed in the service of Him who gave

it.

Now, if ever there was a case in which this stewardship was conspicuous,

it is in England’s relationship to India. It was placed in our hands by

God himself. When our merchants first settled on the banks of the

Hooghly, there was no thought of territorial possession. In their first

acquisitions of property they were influenced merely by motives of

self-defence. They were compelled to occupy districts surrounding them,

in order to protect themselves from aggression. I fear that the same

cannot be said of our more recent annexations; but it was most

unquestionably the case when India was first placed in our hands. Our

first merchants had no thought of a kingdom, but the providence of God

gave it us.

Look, again, at the wonderful power with which that vast empire has been

held. Look at the two countries on the map—the one a little island on

the western ocean, and the other a vast territory 15,000 miles distant,

extending thousands of miles in every direction, and supporting a

population of not less than 160,000,000 souls. Remember, again, that

India contains many large, powerful, and warlike nations, and you will

see that there must have been a power far beyond the hand of man which

has enabled a little handful of Englishmen to hold under control so large

a proportion of the inhabited world. As the Lord gave the stewardship,

so the Lord has likewise preserved the power.

But look again at the religious condition of the two countries; one,

being the centre of Asiatic idolatry, with its vast population sunk in

idolatrous worship, and degraded by the most soul-abasing superstitions,

while the other has been the centre of Christian light, with a greater

amount of Christian truth, and greater opportunities for its spread than

any other nation in the world. Is there not enough in this to teach us

the character and purport of our stewardship? Idolatrous India is placed

under the government of professedly Christian England. This vast mass of

heathen darkness is brought into direct contact with the clearest light

to be found in Christendom, and is it too much to conclude that the

stewardship was a Christian stewardship, and that the great purpose for

which it was entrusted to our care was that the scriptural light of

England might be freely communicated, and shed its beams in the midst of

the deep darkness of Indian heathenism?

And is it not again most remarkable that this trust was given to

Protestant England? There were other nations which preceded us in India,

but to us was the stewardship given. It was entrusted to the care of no

Romish people, of Spain, or France, or Austria, for none of those nations

had the great qualification for the trust. Not holding the truth

themselves they were disqualified from the high commission. In England

there was the profession of Scriptural truth. In England the light of

the Reformation burnt steadier than in any other nation. In England

there was a larger circulation of the Scriptures than in any country in

the world, and therefore to England was the great trust given.

Can there then be any doubt as to the real character of England’s

stewardship? Can we suppose that such a trust was given simply in order

to enrich our merchants, or to find employment for our sons? Can we

believe that these 160,000,000 immortal heathens were placed under our

care in order that the wealth and luxury of the East might be transferred

to our little island? and that our merchant princes might return to erect

palaces, and spend their latter days in luxurious ease? Was it not

rather given in order that England’s light might shine in India’s

darkness; that heathen Asia might have Christianity presented to its

view, and that the millions of that vast empire might be brought under

the blessing of a Christian government, and favoured with that which is

the highest gift within the reach of man, the clear exhibition of

Christian truth? I believe it may be safely said, that throughout the

history of the world no nation was ever yet favoured with so noble an

opportunity, or intrusted with so high a stewardship. We have had both

light and power, and with this double qualification in our hands we have

had a vast empire for a whole century placed under our care. No wonder

then that God now says to us at the close of the hundred years, “Give an

account of thy stewardship.”

* * * * *

England's Stewardship The Substance of a Sermon Preached on the Fast-Day, in Trinity Church, Tunbridge Wells · 第 3 / 5 题