The mutual obligations of the popes and the Carlovingian family form

the important link of ancient and modern, of civil and ecclesiastical,

history. In the conquest of Italy, the champions of the Roman church

obtained a favorable occasion, a specious title, the wishes of the

people, the prayers and intrigues of the clergy. But the most essential

gifts of the popes to the Carlovingian race were the dignities of king

of France, and of patrician of Rome. I. Under the sacerdotal monarchy of

St. Peter, the nations began to resume the practice of seeking, on the

banks of the Tyber, their kings, their laws, and the oracles of their

fate. The Franks were perplexed between the name and substance of their

government. All the powers of royalty were exercised by Pepin, mayor

of the palace; and nothing, except the regal title, was wanting to

his ambition. His enemies were crushed by his valor; his friends

were multiplied by his liberality; his father had been the savior of

Christendom; and the claims of personal merit were repeated and ennobled

in a descent of four generations. The name and image of royalty was

still preserved in the last descendant of Clovis, the feeble Childeric;

but his obsolete right could only be used as an instrument of sedition:

the nation was desirous of restoring the simplicity of the constitution;

and Pepin, a subject and a prince, was ambitious to ascertain his own

rank and the fortune of his family. The mayor and the nobles were bound,

by an oath of fidelity, to the royal phantom: the blood of Clovis was

pure and sacred in their eyes; and their common ambassadors addressed

the Roman pontiff, to dispel their scruples, or to absolve their

promise. The interest of Pope Zachary, the successor of the two

Gregories, prompted him to decide, and to decide in their favor: he

pronounced that the nation might lawfully unite in the same person

the title and authority of king; and that the unfortunate Childeric, a

victim of the public safety, should be degraded, shaved, and confined

in a monastery for the remainder of his days. An answer so agreeable to

their wishes was accepted by the Franks as the opinion of a casuist, the

sentence of a judge, or the oracle of a prophet: the Merovingian race

disappeared from the earth; and Pepin was exalted on a buckler by the

suffrage of a free people, accustomed to obey his laws and to march

under his standard. His coronation was twice performed, with the

sanction of the popes, by their most faithful servant St. Boniface, the

apostle of Germany, and by the grateful hands of Stephen the Third,

who, in the monastery of St. Denys placed the diadem on the head of his

benefactor. The royal unction of the kings of Israel was dexterously

applied: the successor of St. Peter assumed the character of a divine

ambassador: a German chieftain was transformed into the Lord's

anointed; and this Jewish rite has been diffused and maintained by the

superstition and vanity of modern Europe. The Franks were absolved from

their ancient oath; but a dire anathema was thundered against them

and their posterity, if they should dare to renew the same freedom of

choice, or to elect a king, except in the holy and meritorious race of

the Carlovingian princes. Without apprehending the future danger, these

princes gloried in their present security: the secretary of Charlemagne

affirms, that the French sceptre was transferred by the authority of the

popes; and in their boldest enterprises, they insist, with confidence,

on this signal and successful act of temporal jurisdiction.

II. In the change of manners and language the patricians of Rome were

far removed from the senate of Romulus, on the palace of Constantine,

from the free nobles of the republic, or the fictitious parents of

the emperor. After the recovery of Italy and Africa by the arms of

Justinian, the importance and danger of those remote provinces required

the presence of a supreme magistrate; he was indifferently styled the

exarch or the patrician; and these governors of Ravenna, who fill their

place in the chronology of princes, extended their jurisdiction over the

Roman city. Since the revolt of Italy and the loss of the Exarchate, the

distress of the Romans had exacted some sacrifice of their independence.

Yet, even in this act, they exercised the right of disposing of

themselves; and the decrees of the senate and people successively

invested Charles Martel and his posterity with the honors of patrician

of Rome. The leaders of a powerful nation would have disdained a servile

title and subordinate office; but the reign of the Greek emperors

was suspended; and, in the vacancy of the empire, they derived a

more glorious commission from the pope and the republic. The Roman

ambassadors presented these patricians with the keys of the shrine of

St. Peter, as a pledge and symbol of sovereignty; with a holy banner

which it was their right and duty to unfurl in the defence of the church

and city. In the time of Charles Martel and of Pepin, the interposition

of the Lombard kingdom covered the freedom, while it threatened the

safety, of Rome; and the _patriciate_ represented only the title, the

service, the alliance, of these distant protectors. The power and policy

of Charlemagne annihilated an enemy, and imposed a master. In his first

visit to the capital, he was received with all the honors which had

formerly been paid to the exarch, the representative of the emperor; and

these honors obtained some new decorations from the joy and gratitude of

Pope Adrian the First. No sooner was he informed of the sudden approach

of the monarch, than he despatched the magistrates and nobles of Rome

to meet him, with the banner, about thirty miles from the city. At the

distance of one mile, the Flaminian way was lined with the _schools_, or

national communities, of Greeks, Lombards, Saxons, &c.: the Roman youth

were under arms; and the children of a more tender age, with palms

and olive branches in their hands, chanted the praises of their great

deliverer. At the aspect of the holy crosses, and ensigns of the saints,

he dismounted from his horse, led the procession of his nobles to the

Vatican, and, as he ascended the stairs, devoutly kissed each step of

the threshold of the apostles. In the portico, Adrian expected him at

the head of his clergy: they embraced, as friends and equals; but in

their march to the altar, the king or patrician assumed the right

hand of the pope. Nor was the Frank content with these vain and empty

demonstrations of respect. In the twenty-six years that elapsed between

the conquest of Lombardy and his Imperial coronation, Rome, which had

been delivered by the sword, was subject, as his own, to the sceptre of

Charlemagne. The people swore allegiance to his person and family:

in his name money was coined, and justice was administered; and the

election of the popes was examined and confirmed by his authority.

Except an original and self-inherent claim of sovereignty, there was not

any prerogative remaining, which the title of emperor could add to the

patrician of Rome.

The gratitude of the Carlovingians was adequate to these obligations,

and their names are consecrated, as the saviors and benefactors of the

Roman church. Her ancient patrimony of farms and houses was transformed

by their bounty into the temporal dominion of cities and provinces; and

the donation of the Exarchate was the first-fruits of the conquests of

Pepin. Astolphus with a sigh relinquished his prey; the keys and

the hostages of the principal cities were delivered to the French

ambassador; and, in his master's name, he presented them before the tomb

of St. Peter. The ample measure of the Exarchate might comprise all the

provinces of Italy which had obeyed the emperor and his vicegerent;

but its strict and proper limits were included in the territories

of Ravenna, Bologna, and Ferrara: its inseparable dependency was the

Pentapolis, which stretched along the Adriatic from Rimini to Ancona,

and advanced into the midland-country as far as the ridges of the

Apennine. In this transaction, the ambition and avarice of the popes

have been severely condemned. Perhaps the humility of a Christian priest

should have rejected an earthly kingdom, which it was not easy for him

to govern without renouncing the virtues of his profession. Perhaps

a faithful subject, or even a generous enemy, would have been less

impatient to divide the spoils of the Barbarian; and if the emperor

had intrusted Stephen to solicit in his name the restitution of the

Exarchate, I will not absolve the pope from the reproach of treachery

and falsehood. But in the rigid interpretation of the laws, every one

may accept, without injury, whatever his benefactor can bestow without

injustice. The Greek emperor had abdicated, or forfeited, his right to

the Exarchate; and the sword of Astolphus was broken by the stronger

sword of the Carlovingian. It was not in the cause of the Iconoclast

that Pepin has exposed his person and army in a double expedition beyond

the Alps: he possessed, and might lawfully alienate, his conquests:

and to the importunities of the Greeks he piously replied that no human

consideration should tempt him to resume the gift which he had conferred

on the Roman Pontiff for the remission of his sins, and the salvation

of his soul. The splendid donation was granted in supreme and absolute

dominion, and the world beheld for the first time a Christian bishop

invested with the prerogatives of a temporal prince; the choice of

magistrates, the exercise of justice, the imposition of taxes, and

the wealth of the palace of Ravenna. In the dissolution of the Lombard

kingdom, the inhabitants of the duchy of Spoleto sought a refuge

from the storm, shaved their heads after the Roman fashion, declared

themselves the servants and subjects of St. Peter, and completed, by

this voluntary surrender, the present circle of the ecclesiastical

state. That mysterious circle was enlarged to an indefinite extent,

by the verbal or written donation of Charlemagne, who, in the first

transports of his victory, despoiled himself and the Greek emperor of

the cities and islands which had formerly been annexed to the Exarchate.

But, in the cooler moments of absence and reflection, he viewed, with

an eye of jealousy and envy, the recent greatness of his ecclesiastical

ally. The execution of his own and his father's promises was

respectfully eluded: the king of the Franks and Lombards asserted the

inalienable rights of the empire; and, in his life and death, Ravenna,

as well as Rome, was numbered in the list of his metropolitan cities.

The sovereignty of the Exarchate melted away in the hands of the popes;

they found in the archbishops of Ravenna a dangerous and domestic

rival: the nobles and people disdained the yoke of a priest; and in the

disorders of the times, they could only retain the memory of an ancient

claim, which, in a more prosperous age, they have revived and realized.

Fraud is the resource of weakness and cunning; and the strong, though

ignorant, Barbarian was often entangled in the net of sacerdotal

policy. The Vatican and Lateran were an arsenal and manufacture,

which, according to the occasion, have produced or concealed a various

collection of false or genuine, of corrupt or suspicious, acts, as they

tended to promote the interest of the Roman church. Before the end

of the eighth century, some apostolic scribe, perhaps the notorious

Isidore, composed the decretals, and the donation of Constantine, the

two magic pillars of the spiritual and temporal monarchy of the popes.

This memorable donation was introduced to the world by an epistle of

Adrian the First, who exhorts Charlemagne to imitate the liberality, and

revive the name, of the great Constantine. According to the legend, the

first of the Christian emperors was healed of the leprosy, and purified

in the waters of baptism, by St. Silvester, the Roman bishop; and never

was physician more gloriously recompensed. His royal proselyte withdrew

from the seat and patrimony of St. Peter; declared his resolution of

founding a new capital in the East; and resigned to the popes the free

and perpetual sovereignty of Rome, Italy, and the provinces of the West.

This fiction was productive of the most beneficial effects. The Greek

princes were convicted of the guilt of usurpation; and the revolt

of Gregory was the claim of his lawful inheritance. The popes were

delivered from their debt of gratitude; and the nominal gifts of the

Carlovingians were no more than the just and irrevocable restitution of

a scanty portion of the ecclesiastical state. The sovereignty of Rome no

longer depended on the choice of a fickle people; and the successors of

St. Peter and Constantine were invested with the purple and prerogatives

of the CÊsars. So deep was the ignorance and credulity of the times,

that the most absurd of fables was received, with equal reverence, in

Greece and in France, and is still enrolled among the decrees of the

canon law. The emperors, and the Romans, were incapable of discerning

a forgery, that subverted their rights and freedom; and the only

opposition proceeded from a Sabine monastery, which, in the beginning of

the twelfth century, disputed the truth and validity of the donation of

Constantine. In the revival of letters and liberty, this fictitious deed

was transpierced by the pen of Laurentius Valla, the pen of an eloquent

critic and a Roman patriot. His contemporaries of the fifteenth century

were astonished at his sacrilegious boldness; yet such is the silent and

irresistible progress of reason, that, before the end of the next age,

the fable was rejected by the contempt of historians and poets, and the

tacit or modest censure of the advocates of the Roman church. The popes

themselves have indulged a smile at the credulity of the vulgar; but a

false and obsolete title still sanctifies their reign; and, by the same

fortune which has attended the decretals and the Sibylline oracles, the

edifice has subsisted after the foundations have been undermined.

While the popes established in Italy their freedom and dominion, the

images, the first cause of their revolt, were restored in the Eastern

empire. Under the reign of Constantine the Fifth, the union of civil and

ecclesiastical power had overthrown the tree, without extirpating the

root, of superstition. The idols (for such they were now held) were

secretly cherished by the order and the sex most prone to devotion; and

the fond alliance of the monks and females obtained a final victory over

the reason and authority of man. Leo the Fourth maintained with less

rigor the religion of his father and grandfather; but his wife, the fair

and ambitious Irene, had imbibed the zeal of the Athenians, the heirs of

the Idolatry, rather than the philosophy, of their ancestors. During

the life of her husband, these sentiments were inflamed by danger and

dissimulation, and she could only labor to protect and promote some

favorite monks whom she drew from their caverns, and seated on the

metropolitan thrones of the East. But as soon as she reigned in her own

name and that of her son, Irene more seriously undertook the ruin of the

Iconoclasts; and the first step of her future persecution was a general

edict for liberty of conscience. In the restoration of the monks,

a thousand images were exposed to the public veneration; a thousand

legends were inverted of their sufferings and miracles. By the

opportunities of death or removal, the episcopal seats were judiciously

filled the most eager competitors for earthly or celestial favor

anticipated and flattered the judgment of their sovereign; and the

promotion of her secretary Tarasius gave Irene the patriarch of

Constantinople, and the command of the Oriental church. But the decrees

of a general council could only be repealed by a similar assembly: the

Iconoclasts whom she convened were bold in possession, and averse to

debate; and the feeble voice of the bishops was reechoed by the more

formidable clamor of the soldiers and people of Constantinople. The

delay and intrigues of a year, the separation of the disaffected troops,

and the choice of Nice for a second orthodox synod, removed these

obstacles; and the episcopal conscience was again, after the Greek

fashion, in the hands of the prince. No more than eighteen days were

allowed for the consummation of this important work: the Iconoclasts

appeared, not as judges, but as criminals or penitents: the scene was

decorated by the legates of Pope Adrian and the Eastern patriarchs,

the decrees were framed by the president Taracius, and ratified by the

acclamations and subscriptions of three hundred and fifty bishops.

They unanimously pronounced, that the worship of images is agreeable

to Scripture and reason, to the fathers and councils of the church: but

they hesitate whether that worship be relative or direct; whether the

Godhead, and the figure of Christ, be entitled to the same mode of

adoration. Of this second Nicene council the acts are still extant; a

curious monument of superstition and ignorance, of falsehood and folly.

I shall only notice the judgment of the bishops on the comparative merit

of image-worship and morality. A monk had concluded a truce with the

dÊmon of fornication, on condition of interrupting his daily prayers to

a picture that hung in his cell. His scruples prompted him to consult

the abbot. "Rather than abstain from adoring Christ and his Mother in

their holy images, it would be better for you," replied the casuist, "to

enter every brothel, and visit every prostitute, in the city." For the

honor of orthodoxy, at least the orthodoxy of the Roman church, it is

somewhat unfortunate, that the two princes who convened the two councils

of Nice are both stained with the blood of their sons. The second of

these assemblies was approved and rigorously executed by the despotism

of Irene, and she refused her adversaries the toleration which at first

she had granted to her friends. During the five succeeding reigns, a

period of thirty-eight years, the contest was maintained, with unabated

rage and various success, between the worshippers and the breakers of

the images; but I am not inclined to pursue with minute diligence the

repetition of the same events. Nicephorus allowed a general liberty of

speech and practice; and the only virtue of his reign is accused by the

monks as the cause of his temporal and eternal perdition. Superstition

and weakness formed the character of Michael the First, but the saints

and images were incapable of supporting their votary on the throne. In

the purple, Leo the Fifth asserted the name and religion of an Armenian;

and the idols, with their seditious adherents, were condemned to a

second exile. Their applause would have sanctified the murder of an

impious tyrant, but his assassin and successor, the second Michael,

was tainted from his birth with the Phrygian heresies: he attempted to

mediate between the contending parties; and the intractable spirit

of the Catholics insensibly cast him into the opposite scale. His

moderation was guarded by timidity; but his son Theophilus, alike

ignorant of fear and pity, was the last and most cruel of the

Iconoclasts. The enthusiasm of the times ran strongly against them; and

the emperors who stemmed the torrent were exasperated and punished by

the public hatred. After the death of Theophilus, the final victory of

the images was achieved by a second female, his widow Theodora, whom he

left the guardian of the empire. Her measures were bold and decisive.

The fiction of a tardy repentance absolved the fame and the soul of her

deceased husband; the sentence of the Iconoclast patriarch was commuted

from the loss of his eyes to a whipping of two hundred lashes: the

bishops trembled, the monks shouted, and the festival of orthodoxy

preserves the annual memory of the triumph of the images. A single

question yet remained, whether they are endowed with any proper and

inherent sanctity; it was agitated by the Greeks of the eleventh

century; and as this opinion has the strongest recommendation of

absurdity, I am surprised that it was not more explicitly decided in the

affirmative. In the West, Pope Adrian the First accepted and announced

the decrees of the Nicene assembly, which is now revered by the

Catholics as the seventh in rank of the general councils. Rome and Italy

were docile to the voice of their father; but the greatest part of

the Latin Christians were far behind in the race of superstition. The

churches of France, Germany, England, and Spain, steered a middle course

between the adoration and the destruction of images, which they admitted

into their temples, not as objects of worship, but as lively and

useful memorials of faith and history. An angry book of controversy was

composed and published in the name of Charlemagne: under his authority

a synod of three hundred bishops was assembled at Frankfort: they blamed

the fury of the Iconoclasts, but they pronounced a more severe censure

against the superstition of the Greeks, and the decrees of their

pretended council, which was long despised by the Barbarians of the

West. Among them the worship of images advanced with a silent and

insensible progress; but a large atonement is made for their hesitation

and delay, by the gross idolatry of the ages which precede the

reformation, and of the countries, both in Europe and America, which are

still immersed in the gloom of superstition.

Chapter XLIX: Conquest Of Italy By The Franks.--Part IV.

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 5(#894) · 第 2 / 44 段