CHAPTER IX

THE LAST ACT OF THE TRAGEDY OF THE TOMB, AND THE DAY OF JUDGMENT

As soon as Michael Angelo arrived in Rome, in 1535, he set to work to

complete his contract for the Tomb of Julius, and marbles that had waited

in silence for his liberating hand began to resound with the clink of the

iron. The two Slaves in the Louvre appear to have been worked upon once

again at this date, if we may judge by their likeness to the work in the

Dawn and the Day. After the death of Clement the new Pope, Paul III.,

Farnese, sent for him and requested him to enter his service, as Condivi

tells us.(147) Paul III., in a brief dated September 1, 1535,(148)

appointed Michael Angelo chief architect, sculptor, and painter at the

Vatican; he became a member of the Pope's household, with a pension of

1200 golden crowns, raised on the revenue from a ferry across the river

Po, at Piacenza. This was so unremunerative, however, that it was

exchanged for a post on the Chancery at Rimini. And now the doors of the

Sistine Chapel once more close upon the master, not to be opened again

until the Christmas of 1541.

[Image #43]

THE DAY OF JUDGMENT

(_From a print in the British Museum_)

Michael Angelo had to destroy three frescoes by Perugino and two lunettes

of his own upon the altar wall of the Sistine Chapel for his new scheme.

He is said to have had the wall rebuilt of well-baked bricks, so possibly

the old frescoes had suffered from damp and dirt. Vasari says Fra

Sebastiano del Piombo prepared the wall for Michael Angelo, and secretly

had it grounded for oil painting, no doubt hoping himself to be employed

in the work, as oil was his special medium. Michael Angelo was very wroth

with his old friend for this, and declared that oil painting was an art

only fit for women and crazy fellows. We hear of no further intercourse

between Michael Angelo and the jovial frate. Vasari attributes their

coolness to this incident.

Hieronimo Staccoli wrote a letter in July 1537,(149) to the Duke of

Camerino, son and heir to the Duke of Urbino, about a salt-cellar designed

for him by Michael Angelo. This prince was afterwards a good friend to the

master, and his letter of September 7, 1539, informs us of the position of

affairs with regard to the Tomb of Julius during the progress of the large

painting in the Sistine:--

"DEAREST MESSER MICHAEL ANGELO,--It always has been, and now is,

more than ever our infinite desire, as you will naturally imagine,

to see the Tomb to the sainted memory of Pope Julius, my uncle,

brought to a good conclusion by you, and we know well that it

belongs to our duty to have good care of it, and see it ultimately

finished, being held to it as you so well know by that sainted

spirit: nevertheless, having heard by letters from our ambassador

at Rome the great desire of our Lord, we must comfort ourselves

with all patience whilst this said work is passed over by you. As

long as His Holiness holds you busy in finishing the picture in

the said chapel of Sisto; not being able or willing, but by our

duty and our natural inclination in this as in all things to

otherwise than comply with his wishes, we are contented to agree

with a good grace, on reflection and by the reverence we bear to

His Holiness. You may, therefore, fairly go on with the painting

until the work is finished; but with a firm hope and belief that

when it is done you will give yourself up entirely to finishing

the said Tomb, redoubling your diligence and care to make up for

the loss of time, as His Holiness has also promised you shall,

kindly offering himself to urge you to do it; and to this end we

have written you this letter. So long a time has passed since this

said Tomb was begun that we cannot persuade ourselves but that you

are equally desirous with us to see it finished; and esteeming you

an honourable man, as we certainly believe you are--you cannot be

otherwise with your singular virtue--we judge it superfluous to

give you any admonition except that you keep yourself in good

health, in order that you may honour those sainted bones that

living honoured you and the other gifted men of that age, by all

that we have so often heard. We beg you will make use of us if

there is any other matter in which we can do you pleasure, for we

shall do it with that good will which your most rare gifts

deserve. And keep well."

[Image #44]

THE JUDGE. FROM "THE DAY OF JUDGMENT"

SISTINE CHAPEL, ROME

(_By permission of the Fratelli, Alinari, Florence_)

Shortly before the fresco was finished, Vasari informs us that Michael

Angelo had a bad fall from the scaffolding, and injured his leg. He

returned home, shut himself up in his house, and would not allow any

doctor to come near him or even enter the house. A certain Florentine

physician and lover of the arts, Baccio Rontini, contrived to creep in by

a back door, and roamed about until he found the master. He then insisted

upon remaining with him, looking after him until he had effected a

complete cure.

The Last Judgment was shown to the public upon Christmas Day, 1541. In

this picture of the Day of Wrath, Michael Angelo has concentrated all his

energies to represent the terror of the wrath of God. It is Jehovah with

His thunders that rises before the frightened mass of human souls. The

Holy Mother crouches beside Him, turning her face away so as not to see

the wrath to come. Even the saints look with dread towards the great

Judge, fearing lest they too should be condemned. Martyrs brandish the

emblems of their martyrdom before His eyes to plead for them, and, as some

have said, claim vengeance for their pains. Michael Angelo would have us

realise that no human soul is innocent beside the Holiness of Heaven. The

gentle happiness of the redeemed, as represented by the blessed Frate

Angelico is absent from the scene--it could not appear without destroying

the unities of the tragedy. Peace will follow as the blessed walk in the

Elysian fields after they have passed, with a fearful joy, from the

judgment seat. Michael Angelo has followed the traditional composition of

the subject in all its lines and details, adapting it with the least

change possible to the space at his command, and to the superior knowledge

of the drawing of the human form that he possessed. It is most interesting

to compare this rendering with the same subject in the Campo Santo at

Pisa. Every part of the composition is repeated, the action of the Judge,

the Madonna beside Him on His right, Apostles on either side, the

resurrection of the dead, the descent into hell, the angels blowing the

trumpets in the centre of the lower part, the angels bearing the cross and

other implements of the Passion in the upper corners. This crowded mass of

figures is divided into nine several parts, all the figures and groups

having room enough to move, and to spare. The more this work is studied in

detail the more beautiful the forms appear, and the more daring and

skilful the foreshortenings are found to be. Every figure is beautiful,

and every one of them noble. The picture is full of symbolism in the

details, and may be studied every day, and new thoughts and new meanings

found in it. Souls that help each other in their upward struggle. Beads of

prayers with which one good righteous man draws souls to heaven. The wife

who lifts up her despairing husband; his expression of awe and doubt as he

rises upward. Souls long separated by death rush together in close

embrace; father and son, husband and wife. Dante is there thirsting for

deepest mysteries, his face positively thrust between St. Peter and St.

Paul. Souls driven down to hell, beautiful and noble as are those destined

for heaven; even their despair is dignified as if they assented to their

doom as just. Old Charon, in his boat, "with eyes of brass, who beats the

delaying souls with uplifted oar," is taken directly from Dante:--

Caron demonio con occhi di bragia

Loro accenando, tutte le raccoglie,

Batte col remo qualunque si adagia.

[Image #45]

SPIRITS OF THE BLESSED, PART OF "THE DAY OF JUDGMENT"

SISTINE CHAPEL, ROME

(_By permission of the Fratelli Alinari, Florence_)

Those portions of the fresco in the semicircular spaces at the top, angels

bearing implements of the Passion, appear to have been painted the last.

They approximate in style to the works afterwards done in the Pauline

Chapel, and are not so absolutely true in drawing as the rest of the work.

Here, for the first time, is a sense of fatigue in the workmanship. They

appear to have been treated as two separate compositions filling their

lunettes. Michael Angelo has used the favourite device of Raphael to give

movement, direction, and force of line, two figures pointing almost side

by side in almost exactly parallel actions. Nothing gives so much sense of

rush, as may be seen in many of the compositions in the Loggia. One

instance here is the angel bearing the Crown of Thorns and the figure near

him. Another is just below, two figures near the right arm of the Judge.

One of the finest and most superb groups ever designed by Michael Angelo

is the group of angels blowing the trumpets of doom in the forefront of

the fresco. Their energy and power, compared with the placid angels of

Pisa and Orvieto, exhibit the different aims of the artist most

effectively. It must be noticed how carefully Michael Angelo has arranged

his composition, so that the baldacchino used behind the High Altar upon

great occasions shall not injure his composition. The group of angel

trumpeters, the Charon and the devils in a cave, are all hidden and cut

off exactly by the curtains, and the composition generally is positively

improved by their absence. Michael Angelo, no doubt, thought the fresco

would be most seen on such occasions, and designed his work accordingly.

The space hidden, however, he did not neglect, but placed in it some of

his finest work.

The prophet above this end of the chapel is Jonah, whose history is a

symbol of the resurrection of the dead. His presence there makes us

suppose that Michael Angelo always contemplated the possibility of his

having to paint the Last Judgment upon this wall, although he himself

painted the lunettes now covered by the larger composition. The colour of

this fresco is very much darkened by dust and by smoke from the altar

candles; and, as it is more within reach than the vault, it has been

retouched. It should be a source of comfort to those who get tired with

looking upward at pictures in high places, if they will but remember that

their beloved paintings have often been protected from the restorer by

their high position. There is an interesting early copy of this fresco in

the Corsini Gallery in Florence, which, though rather crude, gives us a

good idea of the light tone of the painting in its early state.

This work was received by artists with enthusiasm, reflected in the pages

of Vasari. They came from all parts to study it; in fact, most of the

drawings attributed to Michael Angelo in collections are their studies

from it, and not his studies for it, as they are called. As a general

rule, whenever there are two or more figures drawn in a group, all equally

finished and accurately in the same position as the figures in the fresco,

the drawing may be assumed to be a copy.

Two sections of the public, even then, were unable to receive Michael

Angelo's message of the beauty and purity of the human figure. Not only

scandalous persons, like Aretino, objected to them, but pious people, who

could not and cannot yet be brought to believe in the splendour and

holiness of the Creator's work. Vasari tells us that when Michael Angelo

had almost finished the work Pope Paul came to see it, and Messer Biagio

da Cesena, Master of the Ceremonies, a very particular person, was with

him in the chapel, and was asked what he thought of it. Messer Biagio da

Cesena replied that he considered it highly improper to paint so many

shameless, naked figures in such an honourable building, and that it was

not a fit work for the Pope's chapel, but more suitable to a bagno or an

inn. Michael Angelo nettled by this resolved to revenge himself at once.

As soon as they left the chapel he set to work and drew Messer Biagio's

portrait, from memory, in hell as Minos, with a great serpent twisted

round his legs, surrounded by a crowd of devils. Messer Biagio complained

to the Pope, who asked him where he was placed? "In hell," was the reply.

"Then I can do nothing to help you," said the Pope; "had the painter sent

you to purgatory I would have used my best efforts to get you released,

but I exercise no influence in hell, _ubi nulla est redemptio_." Some

years afterwards Paul IV. objected to the naked figures, and employed

Daniele da Volterra to patch draperies on to some of them, with Michael

Angelo's consent, whereby Daniele obtained the nickname of Il Braghettone,

or the breeches-maker. Daniele did his work with a good deal of

discretion, hiding as little of the original fresco as possible: the

additions are unfortunately offensive in colour. The early engravings show

the picture in its original state, and show that the additions are not so

many or so important as might be supposed, as most of the larger masses of

draperies are seen to be Michael Angelo's own work. When the Pope obtained

Michael Angelo's consent to this alteration, the artist replied to his

messenger: "Tell his Holiness this is a small matter, and can easily be

set right. Let him look to setting the world in order: to reform a picture

costs no great trouble." Pius V. also employed Girolamo da Fano to make

some further alterations. These retouches _a secco_ have destroyed to a

great extent the atmospheric quality and the relation of the planes in

Michael Angelo's suave true-fresco method, which, as may be seen in the

vault, gives the grey half-tints of the flesh-tones in a way only equalled

by Andrea del Sarto in fresco and Rembrandt in oil painting.

As soon as Michael Angelo had finished the Last Judgment, Paul III. set

him to work again to fresco the walls of the chapel of the Holy Sacrament,

just completed by Antonio da San Gallo, and now known as the Cappella

Paolina. Michael Angelo had hoped to complete the Tomb of Julius at once,

with his own hand, but the Pope's determination necessitated further

negotiations with the Duke of Urbino. The Duke wrote to Michael Angelo

upon March 6, 1542, saying that he would be quite satisfied if the three

statues by his hand, including the Moses, were assigned to the Tomb, the

execution of the rest being left to competent workmen under him.(150)

There is also a petition from Michael Angelo to Paul III.(151) stating

that his Holiness the Pope's commission for Michael Angelo to work and

paint in his new chapel prevents him finishing the Tomb as agreed with the

illustrious signor Duke of Urbino. "Already Raffaello da Monte Lupo, the

Florentine, considered one of the best masters of the time, was well

forward with the standing group of the Madonna with the Child in her arms,

and a Prophet and a Sibyl seated, for four hundred scudi. The rest of the

decoration, excepting the part in front, was in the hands of Master

Giovanni de' Marchesi and Francesco da Urbino, chisellers and carvers in

stone, for seven hundred scudi. But there still remained to be supplied

the three figures to be carved by Michael Angelo's own hand, that is to

say, a Moses and two captives. But as the two said captives were designed

for the work when it was to have been on a much larger scale, they would

not fit in the reduced design, nor could they in any way be made to look

well there. Accordingly the said Messer Michael Angelo, not to lose his

honour, had blocked out two new statues to go on either side of the Moses,

representing the Active and Contemplative Life, which are well advanced,

so that they may be easily finished by another master. Michael Angelo

desires and supplicates his Holiness our Lord the Pope Paul the Third, in

order that he may work in his chapel, which needs all his energies and his

entire care, and he being aged, and desiring to serve the Pope with all

his power, to free him from his obligation to the signor Duke of Urbino

with regard to the said Tomb, cancelling and annulling every obligation.

Especially, to allow him to hand over the two statues that remain to be

done to the said Raffaello da Montelupo, or to some one pleasing to his

Excellency, for a good price, which it is thought would be 200 scudi. The

Moses will be finished entirely by Michael Angelo, and arrangements will

be made by Michael Angelo to pay the money due for these workers ... and

so he will be free in all things and able to serve and satisfy his

Holiness." Finally, he deposits a sum of 1200 crowns, and guarantees that

the work shall be efficiently executed in all its details. The final

contract in agreement with this petition was signed upon August 20,

1542.(152)

The mighty design of Michael Angelo's early years of enthusiasm dwindled

down to the Moses, but what a height above other men's biggest designs is

this single figure! The Cardinal was right who said the statue of Moses

alone was a sufficient memorial of Julius. In a letter to Salvestro da

Montauto, of February 3, 1545(153), Michael Angelo says that the Duke of

Urbino ratified the deed, and the five statues were given to Raffaello da

Montelupo to be carved. "Of these five statues my Lord the Pope having at

my earnest prayer and for my satisfaction conceded to me a little time, I

finished two of them with my own hand, that is to say, the Contemplative

Life and the Active Life for the same sum that the said Raffaello was to

have had." From the works themselves we may be sure that there is a good

deal of Raffaello da Montelupo about these figures all the same.

Notwithstanding all this evidence of the desire of Michael Angelo to carry

out his contract, we have a letter(154) from Annibale Caro to Antonio

Gallo as late as 1553 entreating him to plead with the Duke of Urbino for

Michael Angelo. "I assure you that the extreme distress caused him by

being in disgrace with his Excellency is sufficient to bring his grey hair

with sorrow to the grave before his time."

In the finished work there are statues not yet accounted for, that is to

say, the recumbent portrait of the Pope which was executed by Maso del

Bosco, the coat of arms of the Della Rovere by Battista Benti of Pietra

Santa, and the terminal figures by Giacomo del Duca. The greatest drawback

to the effect of the whole is the change in the architectural treatment

and decorations. The lower part belongs to the period when the work was

begun in 1505, and the upper, with no transition but a joint in the stone,

to the heavier and coarser style of the period when it was finished, 1545.

The jointing and the masonry generally are not of a satisfactory

character,(155) and Michael Angelo's assistants cannot be congratulated

upon the way they did their share of the work. With the exception of the

figures of Active and Contemplative Life, the work of the assistants would

be better away.

The two bound captives which were too big for the altered monument are now

the glory of the Italian sculpture galleries of the Louvre. They were

presented by Michael Angelo to Roberto degli Strozzi, because, when the

sculptor was ill in 1544, Luigi del Riccio, his friend, nursed him and

looked after him in the Strozzi Palace. They were taken to France and

offered to the King of France, who gave them to the Connetable de

Montmorenci; they were placed by him in Ecouen. They were bought for the

French nation by M. Lenoir when the Republic put them up for sale in 1793.

Four unfinished colossal figures, which still appear to be wrenching

themselves from their prison of stone, now lurk in the corners of a

repulsive grotto in the Boboli Gardens. They are supposed to have been

also for the Tomb of Julius. Heath Wilson suggests that they may have been

intended for the facade of San Lorenzo. The difficulty as to scale that

caused a doubt as to their being intended for the Tomb does not really

disprove it; for Michael Angelo was never very particular as to the

comparative size of the figures in his monuments, and the many alterations

of his schemes for the Tomb make it possible for them to have been worked

in somehow. It is very probable that when he was at Florence, and after

some of the more threatening letters of the executors, he set savagely to

work upon some blocks ready to his hand, with the idea of having them

conveyed to Rome afterwards. They belong to about the time of the siege of

Florence, and are more suggestive of his method of work, and of his

thoughts in the presence of the stone, than any other of his statues. If

they were removed from their ugly surroundings and placed, say, in the

Tribuna of David in the Belle Arti at Florence instead of the plaster

casts that represent the master in his own city, they, with the other

fragments, such as the Saint Matthew, the Apollo, the Victory, and the

other works in the Bargello, would make a gallery of his art even worthy

of Michael Angelo. Failing such a possibility, they might, at least, be

placed under the Loggia dei Lanzi, away from the repulsive grotesque of

stucco and stalactite that grins at them in the grotto. If something must

be left as a companion to the ugly thing, plaster casts would be quite

good enough.

The Victory, of the Bargello, was said by Vasari to have been designed for

the Tomb, but it may just as well have been intended for an angel

overcoming a demon, part of the ruined scheme for the facade of San

Lorenzo. The lower figure is still left in the rough, and is supposed to

be like the artist. The head of the upper figure is so dull that it cannot

have been carved by the sculptor who finished the torso so exquisitely. It

may have been left a mere block, like the head of one of the captives of

the Boboli. The man who carved the head, and also worked on other portions

of the group, turned the neck round too much. If we imagine the head less

turned and looking down towards the crouching figure, conquered by the

young genius of beauty and victory, we shall see the grace in the pose of

the torso to greater advantage. We imagine a somewhat similar story for

the figure in the Bargello, called the Adonis. The boar cannot be by

Michael Angelo's hand, and, indeed, very little of the figure suggests his

grasp of plastic possibilities; the figure cannot have been much more than

blocked out by him, and was finished after his death by some artist of the

type of Vincenzio Danti.

Michael Angelo Buonarroti With Translations Of The Life Of The Master By His Scholar, Ascanio Condivi, And Three Dialogues From The Portugese By Francisco d'Ollanda · 第 9 / 12 章