THE QUESTION OF LATIN

This subject of Latin that has been dinned into our ears for some time

past recalls to my mind a story--a story of my youth.

I was finishing my studies with a teacher, in a big central town, at

the Institution Robineau, celebrated through the entire province for the

special attention paid there to the study of Latin.

For the past ten years, the Robineau Institute beat the imperial lycee

of the town at every competitive examination, and all the colleges of

the subprefecture, and these constant successes were due, they said, to

an usher, a simple usher, M. Piquedent, or rather Pere Piquedent.

He was one of those middle-aged men quite gray, whose real age it is

impossible to tell, and whose history we can guess at first glance.

Having entered as an usher at twenty into the first institution that

presented itself so that he could proceed to take first his degree of

Master of Arts and afterward the degree of Doctor of Laws, he found

himself so enmeshed in this routine that he remained an usher all his

life. But his love for Latin did not leave him and harassed him like an

unhealthy passion. He continued to read the poets, the prose writers,

the historians, to interpret them and penetrate their meaning, to

comment on them with a perseverance bordering on madness.

One day, the idea came into his head to oblige all the students in his

class to answer him in Latin only; and he persisted in this resolution

until at last they were capable of sustaining an entire conversation

with him just as they would in their mother tongue. He listened to them,

as a leader of an orchestra listens to his musicians rehearsing, and

striking his desk every moment with his ruler, he exclaimed:

“Monsieur Lefrere, Monsieur Lefrere, you are committing a solecism! You

forget the rule.

“Monsieur Plantel, your way of expressing yourself is altogether French

and in no way Latin. You must understand the genius of a language. Look

here, listen to me.”

Now, it came to pass that the pupils of the Institution Robineau

carried off, at the end of the year, all the prizes for composition,

translation, and Latin conversation.

Next year, the principal, a little man, as cunning as an ape, whom he

resembled in his grinning and grotesque appearance, had had printed on

his programmes, on his advertisements, and painted on the door of his

institution:

“Latin Studies a Specialty. Five first prizes carried off in the five

classes of the lycee.

“Two honor prizes at the general examinations in competition with all

the lycees and colleges of France.”

For ten years the Institution Robineau triumphed in the same fashion.

Now my father, allured by these successes, sent me as a day pupil to

Robineau's--or, as we called it, Robinetto or Robinettino's--and made

me take special private lessons from Pere Piquedent at the rate of five

francs per hour, out of which the usher got two francs and the principal

three francs. I was then eighteen, and was in the philosophy class.

These private lessons were given in a little room looking out on the

street. It so happened that Pere Piquedent, instead of talking Latin to

me, as he did when teaching publicly in the institution, kept telling me

his troubles in French. Without relations, without friends, the poor man

conceived an attachment to me, and poured out his misery to me.

He had never for the last ten or fifteen years chatted confidentially

with any one.

“I am like an oak in a desert,” he said--“'sicut quercus in

solitudine'.”

The other ushers disgusted him. He knew nobody in the town, since he had

no time to devote to making acquaintances.

“Not even the nights, my friend, and that is the hardest thing on me.

The dream of my life is to have a room with my own furniture, my own

books, little things that belong to myself and which others may not

touch. And I have nothing of my own, nothing except my trousers and my

frock-coat, nothing, not even my mattress and my pillow! I have not four

walls to shut myself up in, except when I come to give a lesson in this

room. Do you see what this means--a man forced to spend his life without

ever having the right, without ever finding the time, to shut himself up

all alone, no matter where, to think, to reflect, to work, to dream?

Ah! my dear boy, a key, the key of a door which one can lock--this is

happiness, mark you, the only happiness!

“Here, all day long, teaching all those restless rogues, and during the

night the dormitory with the same restless rogues snoring. And I have

to sleep in the bed at the end of two rows of beds occupied by these

youngsters whom I must look after. I can never be alone, never! If I go

out I find the streets full of people, and, when I am tired of walking,

I go into some cafe crowded with smokers and billiard players. I tell

you what, it is the life of a galley slave.”

Original Short Stories — Volume 02 · 第 15 / 27 题