A little like wine enters bottles

It was necessary to descend three floors to reach the first.

The entry door, which was on the side of the house that

faced the road, opened nearly into the roof, like a

mansard. I dined there once with L. G. It was a strange

dinner, with its dishes based on economical recipes

invented by Balzac. At my express request, the famous

onion purée, endowed with so many healthy and

symbolic qualities and which almost killed Lassailly, did

not appear. But the wines were marvelous! Each bottle

had a story, and Balzac told it with an eloquence, a verve,

a conviction without equal. The wine of Bordeaux had

gone around the world three times; the Châteauneuf-du-Pape

traced back to legendary times; the rum came from

a barrel rolled for more than a century by the sea, which

had to be opened with blows from an axe, because the

crust that had been formed around it by shellfish, coral

and seaweed was thick. My palate, surprised, irritated by

the acidic flavors, protested in vain against these

illustrious origins. Balzac maintained the solemnity of a

soothsayer, and despite the proverb, I kept my eyes fixed

on him, but I did not make him laugh!

For dessert, we had pears of a ripeness, a size, a

tenderness and a quality that would do honor to a royal

table. Balzac devoured five or six of them with the juice

running down his chin; he believed that this fruit was

good for him, and he ate them in such a quantity as much

for health as for sweetness. Already he felt the first

effects of the illness that would take him. Death, with its

skeletal fingers, was touching this robust body to know

where to attack it, and finding no weakness there, killed it

through excess and hypertrophy. The cheeks of Balzac

were already lined and marked with those red spots that

simulate health to inattentive eyes; but for the observer,

the yellow tones of hepatitis surrounded the tired eyelids

with their golden halo; the expression, brightened by this

warm sepia hue, appeared even more vivacious and

shining and lessened anxieties.

At that time, Balzac was very preoccupied with the occult

sciences, palmistry, and card reading; he had been told of

an oracle even more astonishing than Mademoiselle

Lenormand, and he persuaded me, as well as Madame E.

de Girardin and Méry, to go and consult her with him.

The prophetess lived in Auteuil, I no longer know in

which street; that matters little to my story, because the

address that was given was false. We came upon an

honorable middle class family on holiday: the husband,

the wife, and an old mother in whom Balzac, sure of his

facts, persisted in finding a mystical air. The good

woman, not flattered to have been taken for a sorceress,

became angry; the husband took us for tricksters or

crooks; the young woman laughed loudly, and the servant

hastened prudently to lock up the silver. We had no

choice but to withdraw after our blunder; but Balzac

maintained that we were in the right place, and having

climbed back into the carriage, muttered insults at the old

lady: "Demon, harpy, magician, vampire, worm, monster,

lemur, ghoul, snake charmer, creature," and all of the

bizarre terms that a familiarity with the litanies of

Rabelais could suggest to him. I said: "If she is a

sorceress, she hides her game well." "Of cards," added

Madame de Girardin with a quickness of mind that never

failed her. We tried some further explorations, always

fruitlessly, and Delphine asserted that Balzac had

imagined this resource of Quinola in order to be driven by

carriage to Auteuil, where he had business, and to

procure some pleasant traveling companions. It is

necessary to believe, however, that Balzac alone found

that Madame Fontaine that we were all seeking together,

because, in Les Comédiens Sans le Savoir, he depicted her

between her hen Bilouche and her toad Astaroth with a

fantastic and frightening truthfulness, if those two words

can go together. Did he consult her seriously? Did he go

to see her as a simple observer? Many passages in La

Comédie Humaine seem to suggest that Balzac had a kind

of faith in the occult sciences, about which the official

sciences have still not said their last word.

Around this time, Balzac began to show a taste for old

furniture, chests, vases; the least piece of worm-eaten

wood that he bought on the Rue de Lappe always had an

illustrious provenance, and he created detailed

genealogies for his lesser knickknacks. He hid them here

and there, always because of those fantastical creditors

that I was starting to doubt. I even amused myself by

spreading the rumor that Balzac was a millionaire, that he

was buying old stockings from dealers in caterpillars to

hide onces, quadruples, génovines, crusades, colonnates,

double louis, in the manner of Père Grandet; I said

everywhere that he had three cisterns, like Aboul-Casem,

filled to the brim with garnets, dinars and rials. "Théo will

get my throat cut with his jokes!" said Balzac, annoyed

and charmed.

That which gave some veracity to my jokes was the new

house in which Balzac lived, on the Rue Fortunée, in the

Beaujon quarter, less populated then than it is today. He

occupied a mysterious little house there that would have

suited the fantasies of an ostentatious financier. From

outside, one saw over the wall a sort of cupola formed by

the arched ceiling of a sitting room and fresh paint on the

closed shutters.

When one entered this small house, which was not easy,

because the master of this dwelling hid himself with

extreme care, one discovered a thousand details of luxury

and comfort that contradicted the poverty that he

affected. He received me however one day, and I could

see a dining room adorned with old oak, with a table, a

fireplace, some buffets, some sideboards and some chairs

of sculpted wood, that would have made Berruguète,

Cornejo Duque and Verbruggen envious; a salon of

golden yellow damask, with doors, cornices, plinths and

window frames of ebony; a library arranged in armoires

inlayed with shell and brass in the style of Boule, and

whose door, hidden by the shelves, once closed, could

not be found; a bathroom in yellow Breccia, with bas-reliefs

of stucco; a domed sitting room, whose old

paintings had been restored by Edmond Hédouin; a

gallery lit from above, that I recognized later in the

collection of Le Cousin Pons. There were on the shelves all

sorts of curiosities, porcelain from Dresden and Sèvres,

horns of crackled celadon, and on the stairway, which

was covered with a rug, some great vases from China and

a magnificent lantern suspended by a cable of red silk.

"So have you emptied one of the caches of Aboul-Casem?"

I said to Balzac, laughing, confronted with these

splendors. "You can see well that I was right to suggest

that you are a millionaire."

"I am poorer than ever," he responded while taking on a

humble and pious air. "None of this is mine. I have

furnished the house for a friend that I await. I am only

the caretaker and porter of the building."

I quote here his exact words. This response, he made it in

passing to many people who were as shocked as me. The

mystery was soon explained by the marriage of Balzac to

the woman whom he had loved for a long time.

There is a Turkish proverb that says: "When the house is

finished, death enters." It is for this reason that the

sultans always have a palace in the course of construction

that they are very careful not to complete. Life seems to

want nothing to be complete – except misfortune.

Nothing is as dreaded as a wish fulfilled.

The notorious debts were finally paid, the dream union

completed, the nest made for happiness padded and

covered with down; as if they had foreseen his

approaching end, those who envied Balzac started to

praise him: Les Parents Pauvres, Le Cousin Pons, where the

genius of the author shines in all its radiance, united all

opinions. It was too beautiful; nothing more remained

for him but to die.

His illness made rapid progress, but nobody believed that

there would be a fatal outcome, so much we all trusted in

the athletic constitution of Balzac. I thought firmly that

he would bury us all.

I was going to take a trip to Italy. And before leaving I

wanted to say goodbye to my illustrious friend. He had

left in a carriage to collect from customs some exotic

curiosity. I drew away reassured, and at the moment that

I returned to my carriage, I was given a note from

Madame de Balzac, which explained to me obligingly and

with polite regrets why I had not found her husband at

home. At the bottom of the letter, Balzac had scrawled

these words.

"I can neither read, nor write.

"De Balzac."

I have preserved like a relic that ominous line, probably

the last that was written by the author of La Comédie

Humaine; it was, and I did not understand it right away,

the final cry, "My God, why have you forsaken me!" of

the thinker and of the worker. The idea that Balzac could

die did not even occur to me.

A few days after that, I was eating ice cream at the Café

Florian, on the Piazza Saint Marco; in my hand I found

the Journal des Débats, one of the few French papers that

was available in Venice, and I saw in it the announcement

of the death of Balzac. I almost fell from my chair onto

the stones of the Piazza at this sudden news, and my pain

was quickly mixed with an impulse of indignation and

outrage that was not very Christian, because all souls

have an equal value before God. I had just visited the

insane asylum on the island of San-Servolo, and I saw

there decrepit idiots, doddering octogenarians, human

worms who are not even guided by animal instinct, and I

asked myself why this luminous brain was extinguished

like a flame on which one blows, while tenacious life

persisted in these murky heads that were dimly traversed

by fickle rays.

Nine years have already passed since that fatal date.

Posterity has commenced for Balzac; every day he seems

greater. When he was in the company of his

contemporaries, he was poorly appreciated, he was seen

only in fragments under sometimes unfavorable

circumstances: now the edifice that he built rises as one

draws further away, like the cathedral of a city that

conceals the neighboring houses, and which on the

horizon appears immense above the flattened roofs. The

monument is not completed, but, such as it is, it terrifies

by its enormity, and surprised generations will ask

themselves who is the giant who alone has raised these

formidable blocks and built so high this Babel that made

all of society sing.

Although he is dead, Balzac still has detractors; on his

memory are thrown the banal reproach of immorality,

the last insult of powerless and jealous mediocrity, or

even of total stupidity. The author of La Comédie Humaine

not only is not immoral, but he is actually a strict

moralist. Monarchical and catholic, he defends authority,

exalts religion, preaches duty, reprimands passion, and

does not accept happiness except in marriage and the

family.

"Man," he says, "is neither good, nor bad; he is born with

instincts and aptitudes; society, far from corrupting him,

as Rousseau maintained, improves him, makes him

better; but self-interest develops also his evil tendencies.

Christianity, and particularly Catholicism, being, as I said

in Le Médecin de Campagne, a complete system for the

repression of the depraved tendencies of man, is the

most important component of social order."

And with the ingenuity that suits a great man, anticipating

the reproach of immorality that will be addressed to him

by shoddy spirits, he numbers the irreproachably virtuous

characters who are found in La Comédie Humaine: Pierrette

Lorrain, Ursule Mirouët, Constance Birotteau, la

Fosseuse, Eugénie Grandet, Marguerite Claës, Pauline de

Villenoix, Madame Jules, Madame de la Chanterie, Eve

Chardon, Mademoiselle d'Esgrignon, Madame Firmiani,

Agathe Rouget, Renée de Maucombe, without counting

among the men, Joseph Le Bas, Genestas, Benassis, the

cleric Bonnet, Dr. Minoret, Pillerault, David Séchard, the

two Birotteaus, the cleric Chaperon, the judge Popinot,

Bourgeat, the Sauviats, the Tascherons, etc.

Rogues are not missing, it is true, in La Comédie Humaine.

But is Paris populated only with angels?

Honoré de Balzac(#53398) · 第 8 / 9 题