III

I have related the anecdote of the treasure buried by

Toussaint Louverture, not for the pleasure of telling a

strange story, but because it is connected with a

dominant idea of Balzac – money. Certainly, nobody was

less avaricious than the author of La Comédie Humaine, but

his genius made him foresee the immense role that this

metallic hero would play in art, more interesting for

modern society than the Grandissons, the Desgrieux, the

Oswalds, the Werthers, the Malek-Adhels, the Renés, the

Laras, the Waverleys, the Quentin Durwards, etc.

Until then the story had been confined to the portrayal of

a unique passion, love, but love in an ideal sphere and

outside of the necessities and miseries of life. The

personages of these entirely psychological recitals neither

ate, nor drank, nor lodged, nor had an account with their

tailor. They moved in an abstract environment like those

of a tragedy. If they wished to travel, they put, without

obtaining a passport, some handfuls of diamonds into the

bottom of their pocket, and paid with this currency the

postilions, who did not fail at each way station to have

exhausted their horses; some chateaus of indistinct

architecture received them at the end of their journeys,

and with their blood they wrote to their beloveds

interminable epistles dated from the tour of the North.

The heroines, no less immaterial, resembled an aquatint

of Angelica Kauffmann: a large straw hat, hair somewhat

straightened in the English style, a long robe of white

chiffon, held at the waist by an azure sash.

With his profound instinct for reality, Balzac understood

that the modern life he wanted to portray was dominated

by one grand fact, money, and, in La Peau de Chagrin, he

had the courage to present a lover not only anxious to

know if he had touched the heart of the one he loves, but

also if he will have enough money to pay for the carriage

in which he was bringing her home. This audacity is

perhaps one of the greatest that one might permit oneself

in literature, and it alone sufficed to immortalize Balzac.

The consternation was profound, and the purists were

indignant at this infraction of the laws of the genre; but

all the young people who, going out in the evening to the

home of some beautiful woman wearing white gloves ironed

with gum elastic, had traversed Paris as dancers, on the

tips of their shoes, fearing a spot of mud more than the

crack of a pistol, commiserated, having shared these fears,

like the anguishes of Valentin, who cared deeply about a

hat that he could not renew and preserve despite his minute

care. In moments of supreme misery, the discovery of a one

hundred sou piece slid under the papers of the drawer, due

to the discreet pity of Pauline, produced the effect of the

most romantic theatrical strokes or of the intervention of

a Peri in the Arabian tales. Who has not discovered during

days of distress, forgotten in pants or in a vest, a few

glorious coins appearing at just the right time and saving

you from the calamity that youth fears the most: to fail to

provide a beloved woman with a carriage, a bouquet, a small

bench, a show program, a tip to the usherette or some trifles

of this type?

Balzac excels in the portrayal of youth who are poor, as

they almost always are, entering into their first struggles

with life, prey to the temptation of pleasures and luxury,

and experiencing profound miseries due to their high

hopes. Valentin, Rastignac, Bianchon, d'Arthez, Lucien

de Rubempré, Lousteau, have all sunk their beautiful

teeth into the tough meat of the angry cow, fortifying

food for robust stomachs, indigestible for weak

stomachs; he does not lodge them, these beautiful young

ones without a sou, in conventional garrets decorated

with Persian rugs, with windows festooned with sweet

peas and looking out on gardens; he does not have them

eat "some simple dishes, prepared by the hand of nature,"

and does not dress them in luxurious garments, but in

those that are proper and practical; he puts them in the

boarding house of Mother Vauquer, or forces them to

crouch under the sharp angle of a roof, he presses them

into greasy tables at mean little restaurants, dressing them

in black clothing with gray seams, and he is not afraid to

send them to the pawn shop, if they still have, a rare

occurrence, their father's watch.

Oh Corinne, you who allows, upon Cape Misèna, your

snowy arm to dangle across your ivory lyre, while the son

of Albion, draped in a superb new coat, and shod in his

beloved perfectly polished boots, reflects on you and

listens to you in an elegant pose, Corinne, what would

you have said to such heroes? They have however one

small quality that was lacking in Oswald, they live, and of

a life so robust that it seems like one has encountered

them one thousand times; also Pauline, Delphine de

Nucingen, the princess of Cadignan, Madame de

Bargeton, Coralie, Esther, are madly infatuated with

them.

At the time that the first novels signed by Balzac

appeared, one did not have, to the same degree as today,

the preoccupation, or, better said, the fever for gold.

California had not been discovered; there existed perhaps

several leagues of railway whose future one hardly

suspected, and that one saw as a kind of conduit that led up

to the Russian mountains, but that had fallen into disuse;

the public ignored, so to speak, "business," and only

bankers gambled at the Bourse. This movement of

capital, this flow of gold, these calculations, these figures,

this importance given to money in works that one still

took as simple romantic fictions and not as serious

portraits of life, singularly shocked the subscribers to the

reading rooms, and critics added up the total sums spent

or staked by the author. The millions of father Grandet

led to arithmetic discussions, and serious people,

troubled by the enormity of the totals, doubted the

financial abilities of Balzac, very great abilities

nevertheless, and recognized later. Stendhal said with a

sort of disdainful smugness, "Before writing, I always

read three or four pages of the Civil Code to give me the

tone." Balzac, who understood money so well, also

discovered poems and dramas in the Code: Le Contrat de

Mariage, where he places in opposition, in the persons of

Matthias and of Solonnet, the ancient and the modern

notary, has all of the interest of the most eventful

comedy of the cloak and sword. The bankruptcy in

Grandeur et Décadence de César Birotteau makes you quiver

like the story of an empire's fall; the conflict of the

château and the cottage in Les Paysans offers just as much

adventure as the siege of Troy. Balzac knows how to give

life to the soil, to a house, to a heritage, to a capital, and

in fact to heroes and heroines whose adventures are

devoured with anxious avidity.

These new elements introduced into the novel were not

appreciated at first; the philosophical analyses, the

detailed character portraits, the minute descriptions that

seemed to have the future in view, were regarded as

unpleasantly lengthy, and quite often one skipped them

to move on to the story. Later, one recognized that the

goal of the author was not to weave intrigues that were

more or less well-plotted, but to portray society in its

entirety, from the summit to the base, with its characters

and its components, and that one will admire in it the

immense variety of these types. Is it not Alexandre

Dumas who said of Shakespeare: "Shakespeare, the man

who has created the most after God?"; the words might

be even more justly applied to Balzac; never, indeed, did

so many living creatures issue from one human brain.

At this time (1836), Balzac had conceived the plan for his

Comédie Humaine and possessed the full awareness of his

genius. He adroitly connected the works that had already

been published to his general concept and found them a

place in the categories that had been philosophically

outlined. Some novels of pure fantasy did not fit in very

well, despite the connections that were added afterwards;

but these are details that are lost in the immensity of the

ensemble, like ornaments in a differing style on a grand

edifice.

I have said that Balzac worked laboriously, and, being an

obstinate smelter, rejected ten or twelve times from the

crucible the metal that had not perfectly filled the mold;

like Bernard Palissy, he would have burned the furniture,

the flooring and up through the beams of his house

without regret to maintain the fire in his furnace; the

most challenging necessities would never make him

deliver a work on which he had not put the utmost

effort, and he gave admirable examples of literary

conscientiousness. His corrections, so numerous that

they were almost equivalent to different editions on the

same idea, were charged to his account by the editors

who were responsible for earnings, and his

compensation, often modest for the value of the work

and the pain it had cost him, were diminished in

proportion. The promised sums did not always arrive on

time, and to sustain what he laughingly called his floating debt,

Balzac displayed prodigious resources of mind and a

level of activity that would have completely absorbed the

life of an ordinary man. But, when seated before his table

in his friar's frock, in the midst of the nocturnal silence,

he found himself confronted with blank sheets

illuminated by the glow of seven candles, concentrated by

a green shade, in taking pen in hand he forgot

everything, and thus commenced a struggle more terrible

than the conflict of Jacob with the angel, that of form

and idea. In these nightly battles, from which in the

morning he would issue broken but victorious, when the

extinguished hearth chilled the atmosphere of his room

once again, his head steamed and his body exhaled a

visible fog like the body of a horse in wintertime.

Sometimes only a single phrase occupied an entire

evening; it was considered, reconsidered, twisted,

kneaded, pounded, stretched, shortened, written in one

hundred different ways, and, bizarrely, the necessary,

complete, form, would not present itself until after the

exhaustion of the approximate forms; without doubt the

metal often flowed from a fuller and thicker hose, but

there are very few pages in Balzac that stayed identical to

the first draft. His manner of proceeding was this: when

he had for a long time borne and lived a subject, with

writing that was rapid, jumbled, blotted, nearly

hieroglyphic, he would outline a sort of scenario in a few

pages, which he would send to the printer and which was

returned on placards, that is to say as isolated columns in

the middle of large sheets. He read these placards

carefully, which already gave to his embryo of work that

impersonal character that the manuscript does not have,

and he applied to this rough sketch the high critical

faculty that he possessed, acting as if he were another

person. He worked on something; approving or

disapproving, he kept or corrected, but mostly added.

Lines issuing from the beginning, the middle or the end

of phrases, were directed toward the margins, to the

right, to the left, to the top, to the bottom, leading to

some developments, to insertions, to interpolations, to

epithets, to adverbs. At the end of some hours of work,

one would have called his sheet a bouquet of fireworks

drawn by a child. From the primitive text shot forth

rockets of style which exploded on all sides. Then there

were simple crosses, crosses recrossed like a coat of arms,

stars, suns, Arab or Roman numerals, Greek or French

letters, every imaginable sign of reference to mix with the

scratchings. Some strips of paper, fastened with sealing

wafers, stuck on with pins, added to the insufficient

margins, striped with lines of fine characters to conserve

space, themselves full of crossings out, because the

correction that had barely been made had itself already

been corrected. The printed placard nearly disappeared in

what appeared to be a cabalistic book of spells, which the

typographers passed from hand to hand, each not

wanting to work for more than an hour on Balzac.

The following day, they sent back the placards with the

corrections made, and already expanded by half.

Balzac resumed work, always amplifying, adding a trait, a

detail, a description, an observation on manners, a

characteristic word, a phrase for effect, bringing the form

closer to the idea, always moving closer to his internal

outline, choosing like a painter among three or four

contours the definitive line. Often this terrible work

ended with that intensity of attention of which he alone

was capable, as he recognized that a thought had been

poorly expressed, that one incident predominated, that a

figure that he wished to be secondary for general effect

deviated from his plan, and with one stroke of the pen he

would courageously destroy the result of four or five

nights of labor. He was heroic in these circumstances.

Six, seven, and sometimes ten proofs were returned with

crossings out, rewritten, without satisfying the author's

desire for perfection. I have seen at Les Jardies, on the

shelves of a library composed of only his works, each

different proof of the same work bound in a separate

volume from the first sketch to the definitive book; the

comparison of Balzac's thought at these diverse stages

offers a very curious study and contains profitable literary

lessons. Near these volumes a sinister looking book,

bound in black morocco leather, with neither clasps nor

gilding, drew my attention: "Take it," Balzac said to me,

"it is an unpublished work which may have some value."

Its title was Comptes Mélancoliques; it contained lists of

debts, due dates of bills to be paid, notices of purveyors

and all that menacing paperwork that is legalized by a

stamp. This volume, with a kind of mocking contrast,

was placed beside the Contes Drolatiques, "of which it is

not a continuation," added the author of La Comédie

Humaine with a laugh.

Despite this laborious method of execution, Balzac

produced a great deal, thanks to his superhuman will

supplemented by the temperament of an athlete and the

seclusion of a monk. For two or three months in

succession, when he had some important work in

progress, he labored sixteen or eighteen hours out of

twenty-four; he granted to his animal being only six hours

of a heavy, feverish, convulsive sleep, encouraged by the

torpor of digestion after a hastily taken meal. He would

disappear so completely, his best friends would lose all

trace; but he would soon return from underground,

waving a major work above his head, laughing his hearty

laugh, applauding himself with a perfect innocence and

according himself the praise that he demanded from no

one else. No author was more unconcerned than him

regarding reviews and advertising upon the release of his

books; he allowed his reputation to grow by itself,

without putting his hand to it, and he never courted

journalists. Indeed other things consumed his time: he

delivered his copy, took his money and fled to distribute

it to his creditors who often waited in the journal's

courtyard, like, for example, the masons of Les Jardies.

Sometimes, in the morning, he would meet me

breathless, exhausted, giddy from the fresh air, like

Vulcan escaping from his forge, and he would fall upon a

couch; his long vigil had left him starving and he would

blend sardines with butter and make a sort of paste which

reminded him of the rillettes of Tours, and which he

would spread on bread. This was his favorite dish; he had

no sooner eaten than he fell asleep, begging me to

awaken him after one hour. Without regard for his

admonition, I would respect this well-earned sleep, and I

silenced all of the whispers in the house. When Balzac

awoke of his own accord, and he saw that the evening's

twilight was diffusing its gray tints across the sky, he

would leap up from his couch and heap me with abuse,

calling me traitor, thief, assassin: I made him lose ten

thousand francs, because awake he could have had the

idea for a novel that would have earned this sum (without

the reprints). I was the cause of the gravest catastrophes

and unimaginable disorders. I had made him miss

meetings with bankers, editors, duchesses; he would not

be able to repay his debts on time; this fatal sleep would

cost millions. But I was already used to these prodigious

betting systems that Balzac, starting from the lowest

figure, would push excessively to the most monstrous

sums, and I easily consoled myself by seeing the beautiful

colors characteristic in Tours reappear on his rested

cheeks.

Balzac lived then at Chaillot, rue des Batailles, a house

from which one found an admirable view of the course

of the Seine, the Champ de Mars, the École Militaire, the

dome of the Invalides, a large proportion of Paris and

further away the hills of Meudon. He had arranged there

an interior that was luxurious enough, because he knew

that in Paris nobody believed in an impoverished talent,

and that perception often leads to reality. It was during this

period that one hears of his tendencies toward elegance

and dandyism, the famous blue coat with solid gold

buttons, the walking stick with a turquoise head, the

appearances at the Bouffes and at the Opera, and the

more frequent visits into society where his sparkling flair

made him much sought after, visits that were useful for

more than one reason, for he met there more than one

model. It was not easy to penetrate into his home, which

was better guarded than the garden of the Hespérides.

Two or three passwords were required. Balzac, for fear

they might be divulged, changed them often. I remember

these ones: to the porter one said: "Prune season has

arrived," and he would let you cross the threshold; to the

servant who ran to the stairs at the sound of the bell, it

was necessary to whisper: "I bring lace from Belgium,"

and if you could assure the bedroom valet that "Madame

Bertrand was in good health," you were finally

introduced.

This childish behavior very much amused Balzac; it was

necessary to ward off unwanted people and those who

were even more disagreeable.

In La Fille aux Yeux d'Or is found a description of the

salon in the rue des Batailles. It is of the most scrupulous

fidelity, and one will not be displeased to see the lion's

den painted by himself. There is not a detail to add or to

subtract.

"Half of the sitting room described a delicately graceful

circular line, opposite of which the other half was

perfectly square, in the middle of which shined a fireplace

of white marble and gold. One entered through a side

door concealed by a rich tapestry and which faced a

window. The horseshoe-shaped section of the room was

decorated with a real Turkish divan, that is to say with a

mattress placed on the ground, but a mattress as large as

a bed, a divan fifty feet in circumference covered in white

cashmere, embellished with tufts of black and poppy-colored

silk, arranged in a diamond pattern; the back of

this immense bed was elevated several inches higher by

the numerous cushions that enriched it further by their

stylish compatibility. This sitting room was hung with a

red fabric on which was mounted a muslin from the

Indies that was fluted like a Corinthian column by piping

that alternated between hollow and round and stopped at

the top and bottom with a band of poppy-colored fabric,

on which were drawn some black arabesques. Under the

muslin, the poppy color became rose, an amorous color

that repeated in the window curtains, which were of

muslin from the Indies lined with rose-colored taffeta

and ornamented with poppy and black fringes. Six silver

arms each supporting two candles were attached to these

wall coverings at equal distances, to illuminate the divan.

The ceiling, from the center of which hung a lantern of

matte silver, sparkled with whiteness, and the molding

was gilded. The carpet resembled an Oriental shawl, it

presented the designs and recalled the poetry of Persia,

where the hands of slaves had created it. The furniture

was covered in white cashmere, set off by black and

poppy-colored accents. The clock, the candelabras, all

were of white marble and gold. The only table in the

room had a cashmere covering; elegant jardinières

contained roses of every type, and white or red flowers."

I can add that upon the table was placed a magnificent

writing desk in gold and malachite, the gift, without a

doubt, of some admiring stranger.

It was with a childlike satisfaction that Balzac showed me

this sitting room set in a square salon, and by necessity

leaving empty spaces at the angles of the circular half.

When I had admired the stylish splendors of this room

sufficiently, splendors whose luxury would seem less

today, Balzac opened a secret door and made me enter a

shadowy passage that led around the semicircle; at one of

the corners was placed a narrow iron bed, a kind of

working camp bed; in the other, there was a table "with

everything that is necessary to write," as M. Scribe said in

his stage directions: it was there that Balzac took refuge

to be free of all intrusions and all investigations.

Many thicknesses of fabric and paper padded the wall to

block all noise from both sides. To be sure that no

sounds could pass into the salon from outside, Balzac

asked me to return to the room and shout as loudly as I

could; one could still hear a little; it was necessary to add

a few sheets of gray paper to entirely block the sound.

These mysterious actions intrigued me immensely and I

demanded to know their motivation. Balzac gave me a

reason that Stendhal would have approved, but modern

prudery prevents my repeating. The fact is that he was

already developing in his mind the scene of Henry de

Marsay and Paquita, and he was anxious to know if the

cries of the victim in the salon could reach the ears of the

other inhabitants of the house.

He gave me a splendid dinner in the same sitting room,

for which he lit with his own hand all of the candles on

the silver arms, as well as the lantern and the candelabras.

The guests were the Marquis de B. and the painter L. B.:

although very sober and abstemious by habit, Balzac

from time to time did not fear to "indulge in a little good

cheer"; he ate with a jovial gourmandism that inspired the

appetite, and he drank in the manner of Pantagruel. Four

bottles of the white wine of Vouvray, one of the headiest

known, did not affect his powerful brain and gave only a

greater sparkle to his gaiety. What good stories he told us

at dessert! Rabelais, Beroalde de Verville, Eutrapel, le

Pogge, Straparole, the Queen of Navarre and all of the

doctors of the happy science would have recognized in

him a disciple and a master!

Characteristic feature! At this splendid feast provided by

Chevet there was no bread! But when one has excess

then what is the point of necessities?

After dinner, our Amphytrion led us to the Italians in a

superb presentation. The evening was already getting late,

but Balzac did not want to miss "the descent of the

staircase" spectacle, which, according to him, was

eminently instructive.

Weighed down by the good food and fine wines,

enveloped in the warm atmosphere of the room, I should

say that the three of us slept the sleep of the just and only

awakened to offer our final compliments.

Balzac was quite amused by this somnolent trio.

In the same apartment on the rue des Batailles, whose

salon I described using Balzac's own words, I recall

having seen a magnificent sketch of Louis Boulanger

after a bas-relief of Léda and the Swan attributed to

Michelangelo. It was the only picture that it contained,

because the author of La Comédie Humaine did not yet

have the taste for paintings and curiosities that he would

later develop, and his luxury then, as we have seen,

consisted more of sumptuousness than of art. His painter

was Girodet. Some of his first stories show the influence

of this admiration which led me to tease him with jibes

that he accepted with good grace.

Honoré de Balzac(#53398) · 第 5 / 9 题