A MAN EATS A LIVE COCK ETC.

On Tuesday last a fellow at Sadler’s Wells, near Islington, after

he had dined heartily on a buttock of beef, for the lucre of five

guineas, eat a live cock, feathers, guts and all, with only a plate

of oil and vinegar to wash it down, and afterwards preferred to lay

five guineas more, that he could do the same again in two hours time.

The banality, the stupidity of it all startled him. It held him all

that day, and soon the idea filled Steele’s mind that a decent and

dignified journalism was possible. He was idealist enough to believe,

and optimist enough to hope that a decent paper might become a potent

agency of enlightenment and that intelligent citizens everywhere would

be only too glad to look to it for light and leading. It might contain

foreign news, dramatic reports and the literary gossip of Will’s and

the Grecian, the two coffee houses where the wits foregathered. So,

full of the idea, he wrote to Addison of his plan. No sooner did

Addison, then in Ireland, learn of it than he was all eagerness to

join in. His unexpected decision almost swept Steele off his feet. “I

fared,” he said, “like a distressed prince who calls in a powerful

neighbor to his aid. I was undone by my auxiliary. When I had once

called him in, I could not subsist without dependence on him.” And in

another place he wrote: “This paper was advanced indeed. It was raised

to a greater thing than I intended it.”

Shortly after the paper was started, the circulation was a little short

of three thousand, but in a short time, nine or ten thousand copies

of each issue were sold, and, as Addison said each issue was read by

twenty people. Of the essays, in all, two hundred and seventy-four were

written by Addison and two hundred and thirty-six by Richard Steele.

The plan involved the creation of a fictitious character, one known

as the _Spectator_, a gentleman who had been a studious youth, and,

after some travel on classic ground, took up the study of men and

manners. He was a kind of sublime _Pickwick_. And, like that later

glorious creation of Dickens, he was a good listener. Fixing his

residence in London, he goes hither and yon, to coffee houses, to

theaters, to churches and to notable gatherings, and, in the pages of

the _Spectator_, records his impressions and his thoughts. As Dickens

gave _Samuel Pickwick_ his lesser lights, his _Tupper_, and _Winkle_

and _Snodgrass_, so the _Spectator_ has a few friends: a templar, a

clergyman, a soldier and a merchant, but the high lights are thrown

upon Sir Roger de Coverly, the old country baronet, and Will Honeycomb,

an old town rake, and through the eyes of these, as through a focussing

glass, was shown the life of the day. Soon, readers everywhere became

eager to know the doings of the famous club which Sir Roger visited,

the sessions of which were recorded by the _Spectator_.

The first outline of Sir Roger was made by Steele in No. 2, of the

_Spectator_, March 2, 1711, and thereafter Addison used the character,

indeed almost seems to have identified himself with it. “We were born

for one another,” he wrote.

“The first of our society is a gentleman of Worcestershire of an

ancient descent, a baron, his name, Sir Roger de Coverly. His

grandfather was inventor of the famous dance which is called after

him. All who know that satire, are very well acquainted with the

parts and merits of Sir Roger. He was a gentleman that is very

singular in his behavior, but his singularities proceed from a good

sense, and are contradictions to the manners of the world, only as

he thinks the world is in the wrong. However, this humor creates him

no enemies, for he does nothing with sourness or obstinacy, and his

being unconfined to modes and forms makes him but the readier and the

more capable to please and oblige all who know him. When he is in

town he lives in Soho Square. It is said he keeps himself a bachelor

by reason he was crossed in love by a perverse beautiful widow of the

next county to him. Before his disappointment, Sir Roger was what you

call a fine gentleman, had often supped with my Lord Rochester and

Sir George Etheridge, fought a duel on his first coming to town, and

kicked Bully Dawson in the coffee house for calling him youngster;

but being ill-used by the said widow, he was very serious for a year

and a half; and, though, his temper being naturally jovial, he at

last got over it, he grew careless of himself, and never dressed

afterwards. He continues to wear a coat and a doublet of the same cut

that were in fashion at the time of his repulse, which, in his merry

humors he tells us twelve times since he first wore it. He is now

in his 56th year, cheerful, gay and hearty; keeps a good house both

in town and country; a great lover of mankind; but there is such a

skilful cast in his behavior, that he is rather beloved than esteemed.

“His tenants grow rich, his servants look satisfied, all the young

women profess to love him, and the young men are glad of his company.

When he comes into a house he calls the servants by their names, and

talks all the way upstairs to a visit. I must not omit that Sir Roger

is Justice to the Quorum, that he fills the chair at quarter sessions

with great ability, and three months ago gained universal applause by

explaining a passage in the Gane Act.”

* * * * *

Thus, and with that fictitious character as a nucleus, began the

greatest literary partnership in the history of literature. Thus,

also, Addison found himself. Until he wrote in the _Spectator_, he

had, or seems to have had, no knowledge of his powers. He did not know

himself. Perhaps Steele knew Addison though; knew of the vast hidden

mine of wealth and thus deliberately tapped the inexhaustible vein.

True, Addison had written before the advent of the _Spectator_, for

at college he had been distinguished in a small way, and, later, he

had written his poem, the _Campaign_ (1704). That in itself was an

excellent model of a becoming and classical style, easily and correctly

written, but, alone, it had not the excellence to ensure its author

immortality. As it turns out, as we see it from this distance, it was

the _Spectator_ that made him, as it gave him an audience to hearten

him. And through the character of Sir Roger, he set out to make

morality fashionable, and, later, by means of the essay made it his

task to reconcile virtue with elegance and to make pleasure subservient

to reason. As a by-product there came a mighty literary influence that

passed down the ages. For it was upon Addison that Benjamin Franklin

founded his style. That prince of living essayists, Michael Monahan,

has been strongly affected by the same hand. His influence has touched

such widely diverse characters as Oliver Goldsmith, Charles Lamb,

Washington Irving, Oliver Wendell Holmes, W. H. Hudson, Ford Maddox

Hueffer, Cunningham Grahame, Hilaire Belloc, H. M. Tomlinson, William

Marion Reedy. More still. The very existence of these Haldeman-Julius

booklets is, in a measure, due to the ideals promulgated by Addison,

or, at any rate, at bottom the same notion that moved Steele’s friend

moved the editor of this series. In proof, I quote from _Spectator_ No.

10, March 12, 1710:

“It was said of Socrates that he brought Philosophy down from heaven

to inhabit among men; and I shall be ambitious to have it said of

me, that I have brought Philosophy out of closets and libraries,

schools and colleges, to dwell in clubs and assemblies, at tea tables

and coffee houses. I would, therefore, in a very particular manner,

recommend these, my speculations, to well regulated families, and

set apart an hour in every morning for tea, and bread and butter;

and would earnestly advise them for their good to order this paper

to be punctually served up, and to be looked upon as a part of the

tea-equipage.”

If I were asked to choose from all that Addison had written in the

pages of the _Spectator_, to take a single essay which might be

adduced as evidence that posterity would assign to him the reputation

he coveted, I would at once name his Vision of Mirza. To my notion it

is the most intensely beautiful thing he wrote. I transcribe it, well

remembering the thrill with which I first read it when a mere boy. It

seemed to me then the most fantastically beautiful thing ever written.

Joseph Addison and his time · 第 9 / 37 题