LETTER 227. TO MR. MOORE.

"13. Terrace, Piccadilly, October 28. 1815.

"You are, it seems, in England again, as I am to hear from every

body but yourself; and I suppose you punctilious, because I did

not answer your last Irish letter. When did you leave the 'swate

country?' Never mind, I forgive you;--a strong proof of--I know not

what--to give the lie to--

'He never pardons who hath done the wrong.'

"You have written to * *. You have also written to Perry, who

intimates hope of an Opera from you. Coleridge has promised a

Tragedy. Now, if you keep Perry's word, and Coleridge keeps his

own, Drury Lane will be set up; and, sooth to say, it is in

grievous want of such a lift. We began at speed, and are blown

already. When I say 'we,' I mean Kinnaird, who is the 'all in all

sufficient,' and can count, which none of the rest of the Committee

can.

"It is really very good fun, as far as the daily and nightly stir

of these strutters and fretters go; and, if the concern could be

brought to pay a shilling in the pound, would do much credit to the

management. Mr. ---- has an accepted tragedy * * * * *, whose first

scene is in his sleep (I don't mean the author's). It was forwarded

to us as a prodigious favourite of Kean's; but the said Kean, upon

interrogation, denies his eulogy, and protests against his part.

How it will end, I know not.

"I say so much about the theatre, because there is nothing else

alive in London at this season. All the world are out of it, except

us, who remain to lie in,--in December, or perhaps earlier. Lady B.

is very ponderous and prosperous, apparently, and I wish it well

over.

"There is a play before me from a personage who signs himself

'Hibernicus.' The hero is Malachi, the Irishman and king; and the

villain and usurper, Turgesius, the Dane. The conclusion is fine.

Turgesius is chained by the leg (_vide_ stage direction) to a

pillar on the stage; and King Malachi makes him a speech, not

unlike Lord Castlereagh's about the balance of power and the

lawfulness of legitimacy, which puts Turgesius into a frenzy--as

Castlereagh's would, if his audience was chained by the leg. He

draws a dagger and rushes at the orator; but, finding himself at

the end of his tether, he sticks it into his own carcass, and dies,

saying, he has fulfilled a prophecy.

"Now, this is _serious downright matter of fact_, and the gravest

part of a tragedy which is not intended for burlesque. I tell it

you for the honour of Ireland. The writer hopes it will be

represented:--but what is Hope? nothing but the paint on the face

of Existence; the least touch of Truth rubs it off, and then we see

what a hollow-cheeked harlot we have got hold of. I am not sure

that I have not said this last superfine reflection before. But

never mind;--it will do for the tragedy of Turgesius, to which I

can append it.

"Well, but how dost thou do? thou bard not of a thousand but three

thousand! I wish your friend, Sir John Piano-forte, had kept that

to himself, and not made it public at the trial of the song-seller

in Dublin. I tell you why: it is a liberal thing for Longman to do,

and honourable for you to obtain; but it will set all the 'hungry

and dinnerless, lank-jawed judges' upon the fortunate author. But

they be d----d!--the 'Jeffrey and the Moore together are confident

against the world in ink!' By the way, if poor C * * e--who is a

man of wonderful talent, and in distress[86], and about to publish

two vols. of Poesy and Biography, and who has been worse used by

the critics than ever we were--will you, if he comes out, promise

me to review him favourably in the E.R.? Praise him I think you

must, but you will also praise him _well_,--of all things the most

difficult. It will be the making of him.

"This must be a secret between you and me, as Jeffrey might not

like such a project;--nor, indeed, might C. himself like it. But I

do think he only wants a pioneer and a sparkle or two to explode

most gloriously. Ever yours most affectionately, B.

"P.S. This is a sad scribbler's letter; but the next shall be 'more

of this world.'"

[Footnote 86: It is but justice both to "him that gave and him that

took" to mention that the noble poet, at this time, with a delicacy

which enhanced the kindness, advanced to the eminent person here spoken

of, on the credit of some work he was about to produce, one hundred

pounds.]

* * * * *

As, after this letter, there occur but few allusions to his connection

with the Drury Lane Management, I shall here avail myself of the

opportunity to give some extracts from his "Detached Thoughts,"

containing recollections of his short acquaintance with the interior of

the theatre.

"When I belonged to the Drury Lane Committee, and was one of the

Sub-Committee of Management, the number of _plays_ upon the shelves

were about _five_ hundred. Conceiving that amongst these there must be

_some_ of merit, in person and by proxy I caused an investigation. I do

not think that of those which I saw there was one which could be

conscientiously tolerated. There never were such things as most of them!

Mathurin was very kindly recommended to me by Walter Scott, to whom I

had recourse, firstly, in the hope that he would do something for us

himself; and, secondly, in my despair, that he would point out to us any

young (or old) writer of promise. Mathurin sent his Bertram and a letter

_without_ his address, so that at first I could give him no answer. When

I at last hit upon his residence, I sent him a favourable answer and

something more substantial. His play succeeded; but I was at that time

absent from England.

"I tried Coleridge too; but he had nothing feasible in hand at the time.

Mr. Sotheby obligingly offered _all_ his tragedies, and I pledged

myself, and notwithstanding many squabbles with my Committed Brethren,

did get 'Ivan' accepted, read, and the parts distributed. But, lo! in

the very heart of the matter, upon some _tepid_ness on the part of Kean,

or warmth on that of the author, Sotheby withdrew his play. Sir J.B.

Burgess did also present four tragedies and a farce, and I moved

green-room and Sub-Committee, but they would not.

"Then the scenes I had to go through!--the authors, and the authoresses,

and the milliners, and the wild Irishmen,--the people from Brighton,

from Blackwall; from Chatham, from Cheltenham, from Dublin, from

Dundee,--who came in upon me! to all of whom it was proper to give a

civil answer, and a hearing, and a reading. Mrs. * * * *'s father, an

Irish dancing-master of sixty years, calling upon me to request to play

Archer, dressed in silk stockings on a frosty morning to show his legs

(which were certainly good and Irish for his age, and had been still

better,)--Miss Emma Somebody, with a play entitled 'The Bandit of

Bohemia,' or some such title or production,--Mr. O'Higgins, then

resident at Richmond, with an Irish tragedy, in which the unities could

not fail to be observed, for the protagonist was chained by the leg to a

pillar during the chief part of the performance. He was a wild man, of a

salvage appearance, and the difficulty of _not_ laughing at him was only

to be got over by reflecting upon the probable consequences of such

cachinnation.

"As I am really a civil and polite person, and _do_ hate giving pain

when it can be avoided, I sent them up to Douglas Kinnaird,--who is a

man of business, and sufficiently ready with a negative,--and left them

to settle with him; and as the beginning of next year I went abroad, I

have since been little aware of the progress of the theatres.

"Players are said to be an impracticable people. They are so; but I

managed to steer clear of any disputes with them, and excepting one

debate[87] with the elder Byrne about Miss Smith's _pas

de_--(something--I forget the technicals,)--I do not remember any

litigation of my own. I used to protect Miss Smith, because she was like

Lady Jane Harley in the face, and likenesses go a great way with me.

Indeed, in general, I left such things to my more bustling colleagues,

who used to reprove me seriously for not being able to take such things

in hand without buffooning with the histrions, or throwing things into

confusion by treating light matters with levity.

"Then the Committee!--then the Sub-Committee!--we were but few, but

never agreed. There was Peter Moore who contradicted Kinnaird, and

Kinnaird who contradicted every body: then our two managers, Rae and

Dibdin; and our secretary, Ward! and yet we were all very zealous and

in earnest to do good and so forth. * * * * furnished us with prologues

to our revived old English plays; but was not pleased with me for

complimenting him as 'the Upton' of our theatre (Mr. Upton is or was the

poet who writes the songs for Astley's), and almost gave up prologuing

in consequence.

"In the pantomime of 1815-16 there was a representation of the

masquerade of 1814 given by 'us youth' of Watier's Club to Wellington

and Co. Douglas Kinnaird and one or two others, with myself, put on

masks, and went on the stage with the [Greek: hoi polloi], to see the

effect of a theatre from the stage:--it is very grand. Douglas danced

among the figuranti too, and they were puzzled to find out who we were,

as being more than their number. It was odd enough that Douglas Kinnaird

and I should have been both at the _real_ masquerade, and afterwards in

the mimic one of the same, on the stage of Drury Lane theatre."

[Footnote 87: A correspondent of one of the monthly Miscellanies gives

the following account of this incident:--

"During Lord Byron's administration, a ballet was invented by the elder

Byrne, in which Miss Smith (since Mrs. Oscar Byrne) had a _pas seul_.

This the lady wished to remove to a later period in the ballet. The

ballet-master refused, and the lady swore she would not dance it at all.

The music incidental to the dance began to play, and the lady walked off

the stage. Both parties flounced into the green-room to lay the case

before Lord Byron, who happened to be the only person in that apartment.

The noble committee-man made an award in favour of Miss Smith, and both

complainants rushed angrily out of the room at the instant of my

entering it. 'If you had come a minute sooner,' said Lord Byron, 'you

would have heard a curious matter decided on by me: a question of

dancing!--by me,' added he, looking down at the lame limb, 'whom Nature

from my birth has prohibited from taking a single step.' His countenance

fell after he had uttered this, as if he had said too much; and for a

moment there was an embarrassing silence on both sides."]

* * * * *

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 3 With His Letters and Journals · 第 112 / 165 题