LETTER 210. TO MR. MOORE.

"January 19. 1815.

"Egad! I don't think he is 'down;' and my prophecy--like most

auguries, sacred and profane--is not annulled, but inverted.

"To your question about the 'dog'[64]--Umph!--my 'mother,' I won't

say any thing against--that is, about her: but how long a

'mistress' or friend may recollect paramours or competitors (lust

and thirst being the two great and only bonds between the amatory

or the amicable) I can't say,--or, rather, you know, as well as I

could tell you. But as for canine recollections, as far as I could

judge by a cur of mine own, (always bating Boatswain, the dearest

and, alas! the maddest of dogs,) I had one (half a _wolf_ by the

she side) that doted on me at ten years old, and very nearly ate me

at twenty. When I thought he was going to enact Argus, he bit away

the backside of my breeches, and never would consent to any kind of

recognition, in despite of all kinds of bones which I offered him.

So, let Southey blush and Homer too, as far as I can decide upon

quadruped memories.

"I humbly take it, the mother knows the son that pays her

jointure--a mistress her mate, till he * * and refuses salary--a

friend his fellow, till he loses cash and character--and a dog his

master, till he changes him.

"So, you want to know about milady and me? But let me not, as

Roderick Random says, 'profane the chaste mysteries of

Hymen'[65]--damn the word, I had nearly spelt it with a small _h_.

I like Bell as well as you do (or did, you villain!) Bessy--and

that is (or was) saying a great deal.

"Address your next to Seaham, Stockton-on-Tees, where we are going

on Saturday (a bore, by the way,) to see father-in-law, Sir Jacob,

and my lady's lady-mother. Write--and write more at length--both to

the public and yours ever most affectionately,

"B."

[Footnote 64: I had just been reading Mr. Southey's fine poem of

"Roderick;" and with reference to an incident in it, had put the

following question to Lord Byron:--"I should like to know from you, who

are one of the philocynic sect, whether it is probable, that any dog

(out of a melodrame) could recognise a master, whom neither his own

mother or mistress was able to find out. I don't care about Ulysses's

dog, &c.--all I want is to know from _you_ (who are renowned as 'friend

of the dog, companion of the bear') whether such a thing is probable."]

[Footnote 65: The letter H. is blotted in the MS.]

* * * * *

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 3 With His Letters and Journals · 第 93 / 165 题