PREFACE

When I consented to prepare this volume for a series, which should

deal with the notables of American history with some familiarity and

disregard of historic gravity, I did not anticipate the seriousness of

the task. But investigation of the subject showed me that while Captain

John Smith would lend himself easily enough to the purely facetious

treatment, there were historic problems worthy of a different handling,

and that if the life of Smith was to be written, an effort should be

made to state the truth, and to disentangle the career of the adventurer

from the fables and misrepresentations that have clustered about it.

The extant biographies of Smith, and the portions of the history of

Virginia that relate to him, all follow his own narrative, and accept

his estimate of himself, and are little more than paraphrases of his

story as told by himself. But within the last twenty years some new

contemporary evidence has come to light, and special scholars have

expended much critical research upon different portions of his career.

The result of this modern investigation has been to discredit much of

the romance gathered about Smith and Pocahontas, and a good deal to

reduce his heroic proportions. A vague report of--these scholarly

studies has gone abroad, but no effort has been made to tell the real

story of Smith as a connected whole in the light of the new researches.

This volume is an effort to put in popular form the truth about Smith's

adventures, and to estimate his exploits and character. For this purpose

I have depended almost entirely upon original contemporary material,

illumined as it now is by the labors of special editors. I believe that

I have read everything that is attributed to his pen, and have compared

his own accounts with other contemporary narratives, and I think I have

omitted the perusal of little that could throw any light upon his

life or character. For the early part of his career--before he came to

Virginia--there is absolutely no authority except Smith himself; but

when he emerges from romance into history, he can be followed and

checked by contemporary evidence. If he was always and uniformly

untrustworthy it would be less perplexing to follow him, but his

liability to tell the truth when vanity or prejudice does not interfere

is annoying to the careful student.

As far as possible I have endeavored to let the actors in these pages

tell their own story, and I have quoted freely from Capt. Smith himself,

because it is as a writer that he is to be judged no less than as an

actor. His development of the Pocahontas legend has been carefully

traced, and all the known facts about that Indian--or Indese, as some

of the old chroniclers call the female North Americans--have been

consecutively set forth in separate chapters. The book is not a history

of early Virginia, nor of the times of Smith, but merely a study of his

life and writings. If my estimate of the character of Smith is not that

which his biographers have entertained, and differs from his own candid

opinion, I can only plead that contemporary evidence and a collation of

his own stories show that he was mistaken. I am not aware that there has

been before any systematic effort to collate his different accounts

of his exploits. If he had ever undertaken the task, he might have

disturbed that serene opinion of himself which marks him as a man who

realized his own ideals.

The works used in this study are, first, the writings of Smith, which

are as follows:

“A True Relation,” etc., London, 1608.

“A Map of Virginia, Description and Appendix,” Oxford, 1612.

“A Description of New England,” etc., London, 1616.

“New England's Trials,” etc., London, 1620. Second edition, enlarged,

1622.

“The Generall Historie,” etc., London, 1624. Reissued, with date of

title-page altered, in 1626, 1627, and twice in 1632.

“An Accidence: or, The Pathway to Experience,” etc., London, 1626.

“A Sea Grammar,” etc., London, 1627. Also editions in 1653 and 1699.

“The True Travels,” etc., London, 1630.

“Advertisements for the Unexperienced Planters of New England,” etc.,

London, 1631.

Other authorities are:

“The Historie of Travaile into Virginia,” etc., by William Strachey,

Secretary of the colony 1609 to 1612. First printed for the Hakluyt

Society, London, 1849.

“Newport's Relatyon,” 1607. Am. Ant. Soc., Vol. 4.

“Wingfield's Discourse,” etc., 1607. Am. Ant. Soc., Vol. 4.

“Purchas his Pilgrimage,” London, 1613.

“Purchas his Pilgrimes,” London, 1625-6.

“Ralph Hamor's True Discourse,” etc., London, 1615.

“Relation of Virginia,” by Henry Spelman, 1609. First printed by J. F.

Hunnewell, London, 1872.

“History of the Virginia Company in London,” by Edward D. Neill, Albany,

1869.

“William Stith's History of Virginia,” 1753, has been consulted for the

charters and letters-patent. The Pocahontas discussion has been followed

in many magazine papers. I am greatly indebted to the scholarly labors

of Charles Deane, LL.D., the accomplished editor of the “True Relation,”

and other Virginia monographs. I wish also to acknowledge the courtesy

of the librarians of the Astor, the Lenox, the New York Historical,

Yale, and Cornell libraries, and of Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull, the

custodian of the Brinley collection, and the kindness of Mr. S. L. M.

Barlow of New York, who is ever ready to give students access to his

rich “Americana.”

Captain John Smith(#3130) · 第 4 / 26 题