NOTES.

NOTE 1. The hasty organization of the command is marked by one feature

not often regarded, and that is the readiness with which men of various

regiments enlisted in the enterprise. Washington, in his official report

of the casualties, thus specifies the loss:--

Colonel of Regiment. Killed. Wounded. Missing.

Frye, 10 38 4

Little, 7 23 -

Brewer, 12 22 -

Gridley, - 4 -

Stark, 15 45 -

Woodbridge, - 5 -

Scammon, - 2 -

Bridge, 17 25 -

Whitcomb, 5 8 2

Ward, 1 6 -

Gerrishe, 3 5 -

Reed, 3 29 1

Prescott, 43 46 -

Doolittle, 6 9 -

Gardner, - 7 -

Patterson, - 1 1

Nixon, 3 - -

NOTE 2. The record, brief as it is, shows that hot controversies as to

the question of precedence in command are beneath the merits of the

struggle, because all worked just where the swift transitions of the

crisis best commanded presence and influence.

NOTE 3. As both the Morton and Moulton families had property near the

British landing-place, it is immaterial whether hill or point bear the

name of one or the other. Hence the author of this sketch, in a memorial

examination of this battle, elsewhere, deemed it but just to recognize

both, without attempt to harmonize differences upon an immaterial

matter.

NOTE 4. The occupation of Lechmere Point, Cobble Hill, Ploughed Hill,

and Prospect Hill, as shown upon the map of Boston and vicinity,

rendered the British occupation of Bunker Hill a barren victory,

silenced the activity of a thousand men, vindicated the wisdom of the

American occupation, however transient, rescued Boston, and projected

the spirit of the battle of Bunker Hill into all the issues which

culminated at Yorktown, October 19, 1781.

* * * * *

The Bay State Monthly — Volume 1, No. 5, May, 1884 · 第 35 / 42 题