I. TOYS

Even when we are about buying for a child the pretty toy, one thing we

always say—“And yet children love their ugly old toys best.” It is not

true, however, that children love ugly toys; they like homely toys, toys

that can be clasped very close; and though homely does mean ugly, in the

American and the obsolete English languages (because we would hurt a

word rather than our ugly fellow-creatures’ feelings), yet what children

like in homeliness is precisely homeliness, something not too bright or

good. Ugliness is dreadful to a child, especially at first sight. He may

learn to love it in a dear parent or dear nurse, as the little boy

evidently loves the bottle-nosed man in Ghirlandajo’s delightful

picture, but ugliness in a stranger is, in the strict sense, frightful.

We are imposing our own sense of humour on children (as usual), and in

its most ignoble form, when we give them grotesque toys. And as for

guys, whereby we invert the natural veneration of images, the Fifth of

November is a date which—for the sake of Sylvia—we all dread.

🥀 When Sylvia was three, she wept and shuddered great part of a day, and

some part of a night, because a guy had suddenly faced her on the

pavement. Now she is four, she cons the difficult task of assuring

herself “They are boys, they are only little boys.” You may watch

through her delicate face the horrible misgiving, the resolute reply,

succeeding each other in that innocent, faltering breast. She says

little of her fear, but gently leads the talk that way; and, when she is

told that the boy-guys have each received a penny, her dear effort is to

establish a human relation with them in her thoughts. “Pennies for them

to buy nice sweets,” she says to herself. There is the thing in common

with her own beauty and tenderness and her little appetites: sweets,

then boys—not devils.

🥀 But if we wrong our children by the grotesque we do so more commonly

by the gift of the worthless toy, a thing that will not last. The doll

is perhaps as significant as the statue, the gargoyle, the coin; it is

generally worse than even the statue. The manufactured image of mankind

given to our little girls to play with is not only ill-designed, but so

fragile as to cause more weeping than joy. The doll of commerce is very

heartlessly made so that she often goes to pieces on the very day of

presentation. Her brief arm comes off first; it had been ineffectually

glued on. Piecemeal she comes apart. She does not preserve such poor

individuality as she had, long enough to get a name. She is never named,

never grows old, never gets the love of habit, never ratifies the

rapture of possession, never justifies the first kiss. A little time—at

the best it is not long—is all that we of larger than doll’s growth have

for that ratification and for that proof. Well, it is hardly moral that

the child and the doll should kiss but for an hour.

🥀 Why, the personality of an honest doll ought to outlast her head—nay,

several (resembling) heads. It was so with the dolls of an elder day and

a simpler country. When one head was unfortunately walked upon, the old

cook took the trunk and the pieces into the town, and matched the type

of beauty—he was very grave and intent, without condescension, over the

business. The face was renewed, but the name and the affection held on

with a persistence that was almost worthy of party politics.

🥀 There have been charming toys in literature, but none much dearer to

the reader of good will than the little horse which Esther Summerson

gave to Peepy after one of his misfortunes—Esther, contemned by the

readers who think to crush Dickens by one word, “Sentimentality” (albeit

this is an emotion that would be good for the majority, and the majority

includes those critics), and by another word, “Caricature” (caricature

being nevertheless a most admirable art). Dickens, of all the greater

masters of our national Letters, has the most perfect memory of

childhood. Not by his strangely over-praised “little Nell” is this

proved, nor by any but certain brief passages of Paul Dombey, but in his

much less famous children, and in the little fists of these are toys.

Childhood(#79680) · 第 6 / 17 题