CHAPTER XVII.

_THE GAIN OF A LOVE OF GODLINESS, AND THE UNGODLINESS OF A LOVE OF

GAIN._

"Wranglings of men corrupted in mind and bereft of the truth,

supposing that godliness is a way of gain. But godliness with

contentment is great gain: for we brought nothing into the world,

for neither can we carry anything out....

"Charge them that are rich in this present world, that they be not

high minded, nor have their hope set on the uncertainty of riches,

but on God, Who gives us richly all things to enjoy; that they do

good, that they be rich in good works, that they be ready to

distribute, willing to communicate; laying up in store for

themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may

lay hold on the life which is life indeed."--1 TIM. vi. 5-7, 17-19.

It is evident that the subject of avarice is much in the Apostle's mind

during the writing of the last portion of this Epistle. He comes upon it

here in connexion with the teachers of false doctrine, and speaks

strongly on the subject. Then he writes what appears to be a solemn

conclusion to the letter (vv. 11-16). And then, as if he was oppressed

by the danger of large possessions as promoting an avaricious spirit, he

charges Timothy to warn the wealthy against the folly and wickedness of

selfish hoarding. He, as it were, re-opens his letter in order to add

this charge, and then writes a second conclusion. He cannot feel happy

until he has driven home this lesson about the right way of making gain,

and the right way of laying up treasure. It is such a common heresy, and

such a fatal one, to believe that gold is wealth, and that wealth is

the chief good.

"Wranglings of men corrupted in mind and bereft of the truth." That is

how St. Paul describes the "dissidence of dissent," as it was known to

him by grievous experience. There were men who had once been in

possession of a sound mind, whereby to recognize and grasp the truth;

and they had grasped the truth, and for a time retained it. But they had

"given heed to seducing spirits," and had allowed themselves to be

robbed of both these treasures,--not only the truth, but the mental

power of appreciating the truth. And what had they in the place of what

they had lost? Incessant contentions among themselves. Having lost the

truth, they had no longer any centre of agreement. Error is manifold and

its paths are labyrinthine. When two minds desert the truth, there is no

reason why they should remain in harmony any more; and each has a right

to believe that his own substitute for the truth is the only one worth

considering. As proof that their soundness of mind is gone, and that

they are far away from the truth, St. Paul states the fact that they

"suppose that godliness is a way of gain."

It is well known that the scholars whose labours during the sixteenth

and seventeenth centuries produced at last the Authorized Version, were

not masters of the force of the Greek article. Its uses had not yet been

analysed in the thorough way in which they have been analysed in the

present century. Perhaps the text before us is the most remarkable among

the numerous errors which are the result of this imperfect knowledge. It

seems so strange that those who perpetrated it were not puzzled by their

own mistake, and that their perplexity did not put them right. What kind

of people could they have been who "supposed that gain was godliness"?

Did such an idea ever before enter into the head of any person? And if

it did, could he have retained it? People have devoted their whole souls

to gain, and have worshipped it as if it were Divine. But no man ever

yet believed, or acted as if he believed, that gain was godliness. To

make money-getting a substitute for religion, in allowing it to become

the one absorbing occupation of mind and body, is one thing: to believe

it to be religion is quite another.

But what St. Paul says of the opinions of these perverted men is exactly

the converse of this: not that they supposed "gain to be godliness," but

that they supposed "godliness to be a means of gain." They considered

godliness, or rather the "form of godliness" which was all that they

really possessed, to be a profitable investment. Christianity to them

was a "profession" in the mercantile sense, and a profession that paid:

and they embarked upon it, just as they would upon any other speculation

which offered equally good hopes of being remunerative.

The Apostle takes up this perverted and mean view of religion, and shows

that in a higher sense it is perfectly true. Just as Caiaphas, while

meaning to express a base and cold-blooded policy of expediency, had

given utterance to a profound truth about Christ, so these false

teachers had got hold of principles which could be formulated so as to

express a profound truth about Christ's religion. There is a very real

sense in which godliness (genuine godliness and not the mere externals

of it) is even in this world a fruitful source of gain. Honesty, so long

as it be not practised merely as a policy, is the best policy.

"Righteousness exalteth a nation": it invariably pays in the long run.

And so "Godliness with contentment is great gain." They _suppose_ that

godliness is a good investment:--in quite a different sense from that

which they have in their minds, it really _is_ so. And the reason of

this is manifest.

It has already been shown that "godliness is profitable for all things."

It makes a man a better master, a better servant, a better citizen, and

both in mind and body a healthier and therefore a stronger man. Above

all it makes him a happier man; for it gives him that which is the

foundation of all happiness in this life, and the foretaste of happiness

in the world to come,--a good conscience. A possession of such value as

this cannot be otherwise than great gain: especially if it be united, as

it probably will be united, with _contentment_. It is in the nature of

the godly man to be content with what God has given him. But godliness

and contentment are not identical; and therefore, in order to make his

meaning quite clear, the Apostle says not merely "godliness," but

"godliness with contentment." Either of these qualities far exceeds in

value the profitable investment which the false teachers saw in the

profession of godliness. They found that it _paid_; that it had a

tendency to advance their worldly interests. But after all even mere

worldly wealth does not consist in the abundance of the things which a

man possesses. That man is well off, who has as much as he wants; and

that man is rich, who has more than he wants. Wealth cannot be measured

by any absolute standard. We cannot name an income to rise above which

is riches, and to fall below which is poverty. Nor is it enough to take

into account the unavoidable calls which are made upon the man's purse,

in order to know whether he is well off or not: we must also know

something of his _desires_. When all legitimate claims have been

discharged, is he satisfied with what remains for his own use? Is he

_contented_? If he is, then he is indeed well-to-do. If he is not, then

the chief element of wealth is still lacking to him.

The Apostle goes on to enforce the truth of the statement that even in

this world godliness with contentment is a most valuable possession, far

superior to a large income; and to urge that, even from the point of

view of earthly prosperity and happiness, those people make a fatal

mistake who devote themselves to the accumulation of wealth, without

placing any check upon their growing and tormenting desires, and without

knowing how to make a good use of the wealth which they are

accumulating. With a view to enforce all this he repeats two well-known

and indisputable propositions: "We brought nothing into the world" and

"We can carry nothing out." As to the words which connect these two

propositions in the original Greek, there seems to be some primitive

error which we cannot now correct with any certainty. We are not sure

whether one proposition is given as a reason for accepting the other,

and, if so, which is premise and which is conclusion. But this is of no

moment. Each statement singly has been abundantly proved by the

experience of mankind, and no one would be likely to dispute either. One

of the earliest books in human literature has them as its opening moral.

"Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return

thither," are Job's words in the day of his utter ruin; and they have

been assented to by millions of hearts ever since.

"We brought nothing into the world." What right then have we to be

discontented with what has since been given to us? "We can take nothing

out." What folly, therefore, to spend all our time in amassing wealth,

which at the time of our departure we shall be obliged to leave behind

us! _There_ is the case against avarice in a nutshell. Never contented.

Never knowing what it is to rest and be thankful. Always nervously

anxious about the preservation of what has been gained, and laboriously

toiling in order to augment it. What a contrast to the godly man, who

has found true independence in a trustful dependence upon the God Whom

he serves! Godliness with contentment is indeed great gain.

There is perhaps no more striking example of the incorrigible perversity

of human nature than the fact that, in spite of all experience to the

contrary, generation after generation continues to look upon mere wealth

as the thing best worth striving after. Century after century we find

men telling us, often with much emphasis and bitterness, that great

possessions are an imposture, that they promise happiness and never give

it. And yet those very men continue to devote their whole energies to

the retention and increase of their possessions: or, if they do not,

they hardly ever succeed in convincing others that happiness is not to

be found in such things. If they could succeed, there would be far more

contented, and therefore far more happy people in the world than can be

found at present. It is chiefly the desire for greater temporal

advantages than we have at present that makes us discontented. We should

be a long way on the road to contentment, if we could thoroughly

convince ourselves that what are commonly called temporal

advantages--such as large possessions, rank, power, honours, and the

like--are on the whole _not_ advantages; that they more often detract

from this world's joys than augment them, while they are always a

serious danger, and sometimes a grievous impediment, in reference to the

joys of the world to come.

What man of wealth and position does not feel day by day the worries and

anxieties and obligations, which his riches and rank impose upon him.

Does he not often wish that he could retire to some cottage and there

live quietly on a few hundreds a year, and sometimes even seriously

think of doing it? But at other times he fancies that his unrest and

disquiet is owing to his not having enough. If he could only have some

thousands a year added to his present income, then he would cease to be

anxious about the future; he could afford to lose some and still have

sufficient. If he could only attain to a higher position in society,

then he would feel secure from detraction or serious downfall; he would

be able to treat with unconcerned neglect the criticisms which are now

such a source of annoyance to him. And in most cases this latter view

prevails. What determines his conduct is not the well-grounded suspicion

that he already has more than is good for him; that it is his abundance

which is destroying his peace of mind; but the baseless conviction that

an increase of the gifts of this world will win for him the happiness

that he has failed to secure. The experience of the past rarely destroys

this fallacy. He knows that his enjoyment of life has not increased with

his fortune. Perhaps he can see clearly that he was a happier man when

he possessed much less. But, nevertheless, he still cherishes the belief

that with a few things more he would be contented, and for those few

things more he continues to slave. There is no man in this world that

has not found out over and over again that success, even the most

complete success, in the attainment of any worldly desire, however

innocent or laudable, does not bring the permanent satisfaction which

was anticipated. Sooner or later the feeling of satiety, and therefore

of disappointment, must set in. And of all the countless thousands who

have had this experience, how few there are that have been able to draw

the right conclusion, and to act upon it!

And when we take into account the difficulties and dangers which a large

increase in the things of this world places in the way of our advance

towards moral and spiritual perfection, we have a still stronger case

against the fallacy that increase of wealth brings an increase in

well-being. The care of the things which we possess takes up thought and

time, which could be far more happily employed on nobler objects; and it

leads us gradually into the practical conviction that these nobler

objects, which have so continually to be neglected in order to make room

for other cares, are really of less importance. It is impossible to go

on ignoring the claims which intellectual and spiritual exercises have

upon our attention without becoming less alive to those claims. We

become, not contented, but self-sufficient in the worst sense. We

acquiesce in the low and narrow aims which a devotion to worldly

advancement has imposed upon us. We habitually act as if there were no

other life but this one; and consequently we cease to take much interest

in the other life beyond the grave; while even as regards the things of

this world our interests become confined to those objects which can

gratify our absorbing desire for financial prosperity.

Nor does the mischief done to our best moral and spiritual interests

end here; especially if we are what the world calls successful. The man

who steadily devotes himself to the advancement of his worldly position,

and who succeeds in a very marked way in raising himself, is likely to

acquire in the process a kind of brutal self-confidence, very

detrimental to his character. He started with nothing, and he now has a

fortune. He was once a shop-boy, and he is now a country gentleman. And

he has done it all by his own shrewdness, energy, and perseverance. The

result is that he makes no account of Providence, and very little of the

far greater merits of less conspicuously successful men. A contempt for

men and things that would have given him a higher view of this life, and

some idea of a better life, is the penalty which he pays for his

disastrous prosperity.

But his case is one of the most hopeless, whose desire for worldly

advantages has settled down into a mere love of money. The worldly man,

whose leading ambition is to rise to a more prominent place in society,

to outshine his neighbours in the appointments of his house and in the

splendour of his entertainments, to be of importance on all public

occasions, and the like, is morally in a far less desperate condition

than the miser. There is no vice more deadening to every noble and

tender feeling than avarice. It is capable of extinguishing all mercy,

all pity, all natural affection. It can make the claims of the suffering

and sorrowful, even when they are combined with those of an old friend,

or a wife, or a child, fall on deaf ears. It can banish from the heart

not only all love, but all shame and self-respect. What does the miser

care for the execrations of outraged society, so long as he can keep his

gold? There is no heartless or mean act, and very often no deed of

fraud or violence, from which he will shrink in order to augment or

preserve his hoards. Assuredly the Apostle is right when he calls the

love of money a "root of all kinds of evil." There is no iniquity to

which it does not form one of the nearest roads. Every criminal who

wants an accomplice can have the avaricious man as his helper, if he

only bids high enough.

And note that, unlike almost every other vice, it never loses its hold:

its deadly grip is never for an instant relaxed. The selfish man can at

a crisis become self-sacrificing, at any rate for a time. The sensualist

has his moments when his nobler nature gets the better of his passions,

and he spares those whom he thought to make his victims. The drunkard

can sometimes be lured by affection or innocent enjoyments to forego the

gratification of his craving. And there are times when even pride, that

watchful and subtle foe, sleeps at its post and suffers humble thoughts

to enter. But the demon avarice never slumbers, and is never off its

guard. When it has once taken full possession of a man's heart, neither

love, nor pity, nor shame, can ever surprise it into an act of

generosity. We all of us have our impulses; and, however little we may

act upon them, we are conscious that some of our impulses are generous.

Some of the worst of us could lay claim to as much as that. But the

miser's nature is poisoned at its very source. Even his impulses are

tainted. Sights and sounds which make other hardened sinners at least

wish to help, if only to relieve their own distress at such pitiful

things, make him instinctively tighten his purse-strings. Gold is his

god; and there is no god who exacts from his worshippers such undivided

and unceasing devotion. Family, friends, country, comfort, health, and

honour must all be sacrificed at its shrine. Certainly the lust for

gold is one of those "foolish and hurtful lusts, such as drown men in

destruction and perdition."

In wealthy Ephesus, with its abundant commerce, the desire to be rich

was a common passion; and St. Paul feared--perhaps he knew--that in the

Church in Ephesus the mischief was present and increasing. Hence this

earnest reiteration of strong warnings against it. Hence the reopening

of the letter in order to tell Timothy to charge the rich not to be

self-confident and arrogant, not to trust in the wealth which may fail

them, but in the God Who cannot do so; and to remind them that the only

way to make riches secure is to give them to God and to His work. The

wealthy heathen in Ephesus were accustomed to deposit their treasures

with "the great goddess Diana," whose temple was both a sanctuary and a

bank. Let Christian merchants deposit theirs with God by being "rich in

good works;" so that, when He called them to Himself, they might receive

their own with usury, and "lay hold on the life which is life indeed."

_THE EPISTLE TO TITUS._

The Expositor's Bible: The Pastoral Epistles · 第 17 / 37 章