MICHAEL BRUCE.

We refer our readers to Dr Mackelvie's well-known and very able Life of

poor Bruce, for his full story, and for the evidence on which his claim

to the 'Cuckoo' is rested. Apart from external evidence, we think that

poem more characteristic of Bruce's genius than of Logan's, and have

therefore ranked it under Bruce's name.

Bruce was born on the 27th of March 1746, at Kinnesswood, parish of

Portmoak, county of Kinross. His father was a weaver, and Michael was

the fifth of a family of eight children.

Poor as his parents were, they were intelligent, religious, and most

conscientious in the discharge of their duties to their children. In the

summer months Michael was sent out to herd cattle; and one loves to

imagine the young poet wrapt in his plaid, under a whin-bush, while the

storm was blowing,--or gazing at the rainbow from the summit of a

fence,--or admiring at Lochleven and its old ruined castle,--or weaving

around the form of some little maiden, herding in a neighbouring field

--some 'Jeanie Morrison'--one of those webs of romantic early love which

are beautiful and evanescent as the gossamer, but how exquisitely

relished while they last! Say not, with one of his biographers, that his

'education was retarded by this employment;' he was receiving in these

solitary fields a kind of education which no school and no college could

furnish; nay, who knows but, as he saw the cuckoo winging her way from

one deep woodland recess to another, or heard her dull, divine monotone

coming from the heart of the forest, the germ of that exquisite strain,

'least in the kingdom' of the heaven of poetry in size, but immortal in

its smallness, was sown in his mind? In winter he went to school, and

profited there so much, that at fifteen (not a very early period, after

all, for a Scotch student beginning his curriculum--in our day twelve

was not an uncommon age) he was judged fit for going to college. And

just in time a windfall came across the path of our poet, the mention of

which may make many of our readers smile. This was a legacy which was

left his father by a relative, amounting to 200 merks, or £11, 2s.6d.

With this munificent sum in his pocket, Bruce was sent to study at

Edinburgh College. Here he became distinguished by his attainments, and

particularly his taste and poetic powers; and here, too, he became

acquainted with John Logan, afterwards his biographer. After spending

three sessions at college, supported by his parents and other friends,

he returned to the country, and taught a school at Gairney Bridge (a

place famous for the first meeting of the first presbytery of the

Seceders) for £11 of salary. Thence he removed to Foresthill, near

Alloa, where a damp school-room, poverty, and hard labour in teaching,

united to injure his health and depress his spirits. At Foresthill he

wrote his poem 'Lochleven,' which discovers no small descriptive power.

Consumption began now to make its appearance, and he returned to the

cottage of his parents, where he wrote his 'Elegy on Spring,' in which

he refers with dignified pathos to his approaching dissolution. On the

5th of July 1767, this remarkable youth died, aged twenty-one years and

three months. His Bible was found on his pillow, marked at the words,

Jer. xxii. 10, 'Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep

sore for him that goeth away: for he shall return no more, nor see his

native country.'

Lord Craig wrote some time afterwards an affecting paper in the _Mirror_,

recording the fate, and commending the genius of Bruce. John Logan, in

1770, published his poems. In the year 1807, the kind-hearted Principal

Baird published an edition of the poems for the behoof of Bruce's mother,

then an aged widow. And in 1837, Dr William Mackelvie, Balgedie, Kinross-

shire, published what may be considered the standard Life of this poet,

along with a complete edition of his Works.

It is impossible from so small a segment of a circle as Bruce's life

describes, to infer with any certainty the whole. So far as we can judge

from the fragments left, his power was rather in the beautiful, than in

the sublime or in the strong. The lines on Spring, from the words 'Now

spring returns' to the close, form a continuous stream of pensive

loveliness. How sweetly he sings in the shadow of death! Nor let us too

severely blame his allusion to the old Pagan mythology, in the words--

'I hear the helpless wail, the shriek of woe,

I see the muddy wave, the dreary shore;'

remembering that he was still a mere student, and not recovered from

that fine intoxication in which classical literature drenches a young

imaginative soul, and that at last we find him 'resting in the hopes of

an eternal day.' 'Lochleven' is the spent echo of the 'Seasons,' although,

as we said before, its descriptions possess considerable merit. His 'Last

Day' is more ambitious than successful. If we grant the 'Cuckoo' to be

his, as we are inclined decidedly to do, it is a sure title to fame,

being one of the sweetest little poems in any language. Shakspeare would

have been proud of the verse--

'Sweet bird! thy bower is ever green,

Thy sky is ever clear;

Thou hast no sorrow in thy song,

No winter in thy year.'

Bruce has not, however, it has always appeared to us, caught so well as

Wordsworth the differentia of the cuckoo,--its invisible, shadowy,

shifting, supernatural character--heard, but seldom seen--its note so

limited and almost unearthly:--

'O Cuckoo, shall I call thee bird,

Or but a _wandering voice_?'

How fine this conception of a separated voice--'The viewless spirit of a

_lonely_ sound,' plaining in the woods as if seeking for some incarnation

it cannot find, and saddening the spring groves by a note so contradictory

to the genius of the season. In reference to the note of the cuckoo we

find the following remarks among the fragments from the commonplace-book

of Dr Thomas Brown, printed by Dr Welsh:--'The name of the cuckoo has

generally been considered as a very pure instance of imitative harmony.

But in giving that name, we have most unjustly defrauded the poor bird of

a portion of its very small variety of sound. The second syllable is not

a mere echo of the first; it is the sound reversed, like the reading of

a sotadic line; and to preserve the strictness of the imitation we should

give it the name of Ook-koo.' _This_ is the prose of the cuckoo after its

poetry.

Specimens with Memoirs of the Less-known British Poets, Volume 3 · 第 82 / 184 题