250 Strand, London, Sept. 4, 1843.

* * * * *

WOOD PAVEMENT.--STEAD v. WILLIAMS AND OTHERS.

(Abridged from the Liverpool Albion.)

This was an action for an infringement of a patent for the paving of

roads, streets, &c. with timber or wooden blocks. Mr Martin and Mr

Webster were for the plaintiff; Mr Warren and Mr Hoggins for the

defendants; Mr John Duncan, of 72 Lombard street, was the solicitor for

the plaintiff.

The plaintiff is Mr David Stead, formerly a merchant of the City of

London; the defendants are, nominally, Mr Lewis Williams, and several

others, who are the surveyors of streets and paving at Manchester; but

the action was really against the Metropolitan Wood Paving Company.

About the year 1836 or 1837 Mr Nystrom, a Russian merchant, with whom Mr

Stead had had transactions in business came to England, having whilst in

Russia devoted his attention to the mode of pavement in that country,

which was done in a great measure by wood. He communicated with Mr

Stead, who paid a great deal of attention to the matter, and materially

improved the scheme; and it was the intention of Mr Nystrom and Mr

Stead, in 1835 or 1837, to take out a patent, but Mr Nystrom found it

necessary to return to Russia, and thus frustrated that intention.

On the 19th of May, 1838, the plaintiff, however, took out a patent, and

this was the one to which attention was directed. Four months were

allowed for inrolment, but as six months was the usual period, the

plaintiff imagined that that would be the period allowed to him, and

inadvertently allowed the four months to elapse before he discovered his

mistake.

On the 21st of June, 1841, however, an Act of Parliament was passed,

confirming the patent to Mr Stead, as though it had been regularly filed

within the prescribed period. A second patent was afterwards obtained,

but that related more particularly to the form of blocks. The first

patent, which had been infringed, was for an invention consisting of a

mode of paving with blocks of similar sizes and dimensions, of either a

sexagonal, triangular, or square form, so as to make a level road or

surface.

The defendants pleaded, amongst other things, that the patent was not an

original invention; that it was not useful; and that it was in use prior

to the granting of the patent.

The Jury retired to consult at a quarter past four, and returned at

twenty minutes to six o'clock with a verdict for the plaintiff.

* * * * *

PARSONS'S ALEPPO OFFICE WRITING INK.--This very superior Ink, being made

with pure Aleppo Galls, is equally adapted for Quills and Steel Pens,

and combines the requisite qualities of Incorrodibility and Permanency

of Colour with an easy flow from the Pen. It is therefore strongly

recommended to Merchants, Bankers, Solicitors, Accountants, and others.

*** Warranted not to be affected either by time or climate.

Sold in Quart, Pint, Half-pint, and Sixpenny Bottles, by John Parsons,

Manufacturer of Printing and Writing Inks, 35 Orange street, Gravel

lane, Southwark; and 9 Ave Maria lane, London.

* * * * *

The Economist, Volume 1, No. 3 · 第 119 / 123 题