AGRICULTURAL VARIETIES.

THE BEST HOME MARKET.--The _Norwich Mercury_ of last Saturday contains

no less than seventy advertisements relating to the sale of farming

stock; and a majority of these are cases in which the tenant of the farm

on which a sale is announced is described as one "quitting the

occupation," or "retiring from business." We should like to know how

many of those parties have managed to amass a fortune, or even to

acquire a moderate competency, under that protective system which, as

they have always been taught to believe, was devised for their especial

benefit. From the ominous newspaper paragraphs, announcing the

liberality of landlords to their tenants, which have lately become so

numerous, we rather suspect that most of those farmers who are retiring

from business do so to avoid greater evils. It is worthy of remark,

however, that, amidst all this agricultural depression, which has now

lasted some twelve months at least, the "home trade"--which the

advocates of the corn law always describe as entirely dependent on the

farmers obtaining high prices for their grain--is in a healthier state

than it has been for several years past. The _Standard_ lately stated,

on the authority of a Mr Spackman, that the United Kingdom contained

20,500,000 individuals dependent on agriculture, and only 6,500,000

individuals dependent on manufactures; and, as we have frequently seen

the same absurd statement brought forward at farmers' clubs as

"agricultural statistics," it is possible enough that many persons may

have been led to believe it. Those who do so, however, would find it

rather difficult to explain, under such a division of the population,

the fact, that during four or five years of high prices, which the Duke

of Buckingham designated "agricultural prosperity," the 20,500,000 souls

should have been unable to create a brisk demand for manufactures; while

a single year of cheap provisions has done so much to improve trade, and

relieve the pressure from the shoulders of the labouring classes. Who

that looks at these two facts can have the slightest doubt in his mind

as to what it is that makes the best home market?--_Manchester

Guardian._

CURIOUS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT.--The following novel and interesting

experiment has lately been successfully made by Mr A. Palmer, of Cheam,

Surrey:--In July, 1842, he put one grain of wheat in a common

garden-pot. In August the same was divided into four plants, which in

three weeks were again divided into twelve plants. In September these

twelve plants were divided into thirty-two, which in November were

divided into fifty plants, and then placed in open ground. In July,

1843, twelve of the plants failed, but the remaining thirty-eight were

healthy. On the 19th August they were cut down, and counted 1,972 stems,

with an average of fifty grains to a stem, giving an increase of 98,600.

Now, if this be a practicable measure of planting wheat, it follows that

most of the grain now used for seed may be saved, and will infinitely

more than cover the extra expense of sowing, as the wheat plants can be

raised by the labourer in his garden, his wife and children being

employed in dividing and transplanting them. One of the stems was rather

more than six feet long, and stout in proportion.

CULTIVATION OF WASTE LANDS.--EMPLOYMENT OF LABOURERS.--A paper was

recently laid before the Council of the Royal Agricultural Society of

England, by Lord Portman, which we think deserves a much greater degree

of attention than we believe it has yet received, in that it shows to

what a considerable extent waste lands may, without any very heavy

expenditure of money, be brought into profitable cultivation, and at the

same time, under a well-regulated system of spade husbandry, yield

abundant employment to agricultural labourers and their families. The

following is the substance of the document referred to:--His lordship,

who has large estates in Dorsetshire, found that a tract of land, called

Shepherd's Corner, about 200 acres in extent, was wholly unproductive,

yielding a nominal rent of 2s. 6d. per acre. About fifteen years ago his

lordship resolved to make an experiment with this land. He accordingly

gave directions to his steward that it should be laid out in six

divisions, representing so many small farms, in the cultivation of which

such of the labourers as could not obtain full work from the

neighbouring farmers were occasionally employed. For the three first

years there were no returns, the ground having been merely broken up

with the spade, and the surface soil exposed. In subsequent years this

land was sown chiefly with turnips, fed off by sheep, until it was found

in sufficient heart for the reception of grass and corn seeds, the

crops from which were at first scanty and indifferent, but sufficient,

however, to pay for cultivation. At the expiration of fifteen years the

expenditure upon the whole, inclusive of allowance for rent, at the

original rate of 2s. 6d. per acre, together with all charges on account

of tithes and taxes, amounted to a little more than 10,000_l._; the

returns by crops sold and sheep fed exceeding that sum by 88_l._,

independent of the crops now in the ground, which will come to the

landlord in September. This may appear to be an inadequate return for

the fifteen years' experiment; but, as Lord Portman justly observes, "as

a farmer he has lost nothing, whilst as landlord he is a considerable

gainer, the land being now fully equal to any of the neighbouring

farms." Two objects, both of great importance, have thus been obtained.

These 200 acres have been fertilized, which would otherwise have been of

no present or prospective value; and in the process of cultivation

employment has, during that long period, been provided for several

hundreds of labourers who, but for that resource, must, at some seasons

at least, have become a burden to the parish.

The Economist, Volume 1, No. 3 · 第 69 / 123 题